The Church Fathers on this verse

Luke 20:18Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Whosoever shall fall upon that stone shall be bruised: and upon whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder.

Douay-Rheims

πας ο πεσων επ εκεινον τον λιθον συνθλασθησεται εφ ον δ αν πεση λικμησει αυτον

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

16 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 42 commentaries

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Now it was not accidentally but part of the purpose of the divine dispensation that Christ came after the prophets. For God does not pursue all things at once, but accommodates Himself to mankind through His great mercy; for if they despised His Son coming after His servants, much less would they have heard Him before. For they who listened not to the inferior commands, how would they have heard the greater?

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

After the prophets then had suffered all these things, the Son is delegated; for it follows, Then said the Lord of the vineyard, What shall I do? That the Lord of the vineyard speaks doubtingly, arises not from ignorance, for what is there that the Lord knows not? but He is said to hesitate, that the free will of man may be preserved.

Now He said this, not as ignorant that they would treat Him worse than they did the prophets, but because the Son ought to be reverenced by them. But if they should still be rebellious and slay Him, this would crown their iniquity. Lest therefore any should say that the Divine Presence has necessarily been the cause of their disobedience, He uses purposely this doubtful mode of speech.

Since we have already assumed the people, not Jerusalem, to be the vineyard, it may perhaps be more properly said that the people indeed slew Him without the vineyard; that is, our Lord suffered without the hands of the people, because in truth the people did not with their own hands inflict death upon Him, but delivered Him up to Pilate and the Gentiles. But some by the vineyard have understood the Scripture, which not believing they slew the Lord. And so without the vineyard, that is, without Scripture, our Lord is said to have suffered.

Now Matthew seems to relate the parable differently; that when our Saviour asked indeed, What will he do then to the husbandmen? the Jews answered, he will miserably destroy them. But there is no difference between the two circumstances. The Jews at first pronounced that opinion, then perceiving the point of the parable said, God forbid, as Luke here relates.

For the rulers of the people rejected Him, when they said, This man is not of God. (John 9:16.) But He was so useful and so precious, that He was placed as the head stone of the corner.

Or each one of the people is the vineyard, each likewise is the husbandman, for every one of us takes care of himself. Having committed then the vineyard to the husbandmen, he went away, that is, he left them to the guidance of their own judgment. Hence it follows, And went into a far country for a long time.

He says of the fruit of the vineyard, because not the whole fruit, but part only, He wished to receive. For what does God gain from us, but His own knowledge, which is also our profit.

He mentions two condemnations or destructions of them, one indeed of their souls, which they suffered being offended in Christ. And He touches this when He says, Whosoever shall fall upon that stone shall be shaken to pieces. But the other of their captivity and extermination, which the Stone that was despised by them brought upon them. And He points to this when He says, But upon whomsoever it shall fall, it shall grind him to powder, or winnow him. For so were the Jews winnowed through the whole world, as the straw from the threshing floor. And mark the order of things; for first comes the wickedness committed against Him, then follows the just vengeance of God.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

Or God took Himself away from the vineyard for the course of many years, for since the time that He was seen to descend in the likeness of fire upon Mount Sinai, He no longer vouchsafed to them His visible presence; though no change took place, in which He sent not His prophets and righteous men to give warning thereof; as it follows, And at the time of the vintage he sent a servant to the husbandmen, that they should give him of the fruit of the vineyard. (Exod. 19.)

The Lord of the vineyard also ponders what He should do, not that He is in need of ministers, but that having thoroughly tried every device of human aid, yet His people being in no wise healed, He may add something greater; as He goes on to say, I will send my beloved son: it may be they will reverence him when they see him.

The Jewish rulers were shut out then, because they resisted their Lord’s will, and made the vineyard barren which was entrusted to them. But the cultivation of the vineyard was given to the Priests of the New Testament, upon which the Scribes and Pharisees, as soon as they perceived the force of the parable, refuse to permit it, saying as follows, God forbid. They did not however escape any whit the more, because of their obstinacy and disobedience to the faith of Christ.

But holy Scripture compares to a corner the meeting together of the two nations, the Jew and the Gentile, into one faith. (1 Pet. 2:7. Eph. 2:20.) For the Saviour has compacted both peoples into one new man, reconciling them in one body to the Father. Of saving help then is that stone to the corner made by it, but to the Jews who resist this spiritual union, it bringeth destruction.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

Matthew has omitted for brevity’s sake what Luke has not, namely, that the parable was spoken not to the rulers only who asked concerning His authority, but also to the people.

Or else, in the multitude of which we are speaking there were those who craftily asked our Lord by what authority He acted; there were those also who not craftily, but faithfully, cried aloud, Blessed is he who cometh in the name of the Lord. And so there would be some who would say, He will miserably destroy those husbandmen, and let out his vineyard to others. Which are rightly said to have been the words of our Lord Himself, either on account of their truth, or because of the unity of the members with the head; while there would be others also who would say to those who made this answer, God forbid, inasmuch as they understood the parable was spoken against themselves. It follows, And he beheld them, and said, What is this then that is written, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner?

Basil the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

And this happens as it were to men who are condemned, having nothing to answer to the plain evidence of justice. But it is the property of Divine mercy not to inflict punishment in secret, but to foretell it with threatenings, that so it might recall men to repentance; and thus it follows here, He shall come and destroy those husbandmen.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

In confronting His opponents, Jesus positioned them as judges of their own fate, asking, "What will the owner of the vineyard do to those vine-growers?" (Matthew 21:40). Condemning their own actions, they replied, "He will bring those wretched men to a terrible end" (Matthew 21:41). He then illuminated the meaning of the parable, stating, "Have you not read in the Scriptures, 'The stone which the builders rejected has become the chief cornerstone'" (Matthew 21:42)? What is this stone? It is as unyielding as a diamond (Eze 3:9). To further illustrate that He was indeed this stone, He proclaimed, "Whoever falls on that stone will be broken to pieces, but on whomever it falls, it will shatter him" (Luke 20:18, Matthew 21:44).

Read more (44 words)

The religious leaders conspired against Him, rejecting His message. As it is stated, "Whomever it falls upon, it will crush," since He eradicated idolatry and similar iniquities. Just as the stone that struck the statue grew into a great mountain, filling the entire earth.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

Not that our Lord journeys from place to place, seeing that He is ever present in every place, but that He is more present to those who love Him, while He removes Himself from those who regard Him not. But He was absent for a long time, lest His coming to require His fruit might seem too early. For the more indulgent it is, it renders obstinacy the less excusable.

And it came to pass that He ordained many others, whom the Jews sent back to him disgraced and empty, for they could reap nothing from them; as it follows, And again he sent another servant.

Now many derive different meanings from the name vineyard, but Esaias clearly relates the vineyard of the Lord of Sabaoth to be the house of Israel. (Isa. 5.) This vineyard who else but God planted?

When then the only-begotten Son was sent to them, the unbelieving Jews, wishing to be rid of the Heir, put Him to death by crucifying Him, and rejected Him by denying Him. Christ is the Heir and the Testator likewise. The Heir, because He survives His own death; and of the testament which He Himself bequeathed, He reaps as it were the hereditary profits in our advances.

He rightly puts a question to them, that they may condemn themselves by their own words, as it follows, What then will the Lord of the vineyard do to them?

He says, the Lord of the vineyard will come, because in the Son is present also the Father’s majesty; or because in the last times He will be more graciously present by His Spirit in the hearts of men.

The vineyard is also our type. For the husbandman is the Almighty Father, the vine is Christ, but we are the branches. (John 15:5.) Rightly are the people of Christ called a vine, either because it carries on its front the sign of the cross, or because its fruits are gathered in the latter time of the year, or because to all men, as to the equal rows of vines, poor as well as rich, servants as well as masters, there is an equal allotment in the Church without distinction of persons. And as the vine is married to the trees, so is the body to the soul. Loving this vineyard, the husbandman is wont to dig it and prune it, lest it grow too luxuriant in the shade of its foliage, and check by unfruitful boastfulness of words the ripening of its natural character. Here must be the vintage of the whole world, for here is the vineyard of the whole world.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

In that chapter, He also included a portion of David's prophecy that was previously excluded, stating, "Wherefore I say unto you, that the kingdom of God shall be taken away from you, and given to a nation yielding the fruits thereof" (Matt. 21:43). He had already cited, "And he that falls on this stone shall be broken, and on whom it falls it shall crush him" (Matt. 21:44). Matthew's account is noted for its depth, while Luke's is recognized for its conciseness, which we have observed repeatedly. Nevertheless, all the Evangelists share a similar style, alternating between detailed and brief narratives. The context offered is explained in the mentioned chapter of Matthew's Gospel, so refer to that for clarification.

References: * “This is from the Lord, and is marvellous in our eyes” (Matt. 21:42; Ps. 117:23). * Matthew 21:44.

Eusebius of Caesarea

4th centuryChurch Father

But the parable which Esaias gives denounces the vineyard, whereas our Saviour’s parable is not directed against the vineyard, but the cultivators of it; of whom it is added, And he let it out to husbandmen, that is, to the elders of the people, and the chief priests, and the doctors, and all the nobles.

Christ is called a stone on account of His earthly body, cut out without hands, (Dan. 2:34.) as in the vision of Daniel, because of His birth of the Virgin. But the stone is neither of silver nor gold, because He is not any glorious King, but a man lowly and despised, wherefore the builders rejected Him.

The rulers of the Jewish people being now assembled together in the temple, Christ put forth a parable, foretelling by a figure the things they were about to do to Him, and the rejection that was in store for them.

Beda Venerabilis

8th centuryChurch Father

But it is rightly written fruit, not increase. For there was no increase in this vineyard. The first servant sent was Moses, who for forty years sought of the husbandmen the fruit of the law which he had given, but he was wroth against them, for they provoked his spirit. Hence it follows, But they beat him, and sent him away empty.

As if He said, How shall the prophecy be fulfilled, except that Christ, being rejected and slain by you, is to be preached to the Gentiles, who will believe on Him, that as the corner stone He may thus from both nations build up one temple to Himself?

The man then who plants the vineyard is the same who, according to another parable, hired labourers into his vineyard.

By the other servant is meant David, who was sent after the commandment of the law, that he by the music of his psalmody might stir up the husbandmen to the exercise of good works. But they on the contrary declared, What portion have we in David, neither have we inheritance in the son of Jesse. (1 Sam. 20:1.). Hence it follows, And they beat him also, and entreated him shamefully, and sent him away empty. (1 Kings 12:16.) But He does not stop here, for it follows, And again he sent a third: whereby we must understand the company of prophets who constantly visited the people with their testimony. But which of the Prophets did they not persecute; as it follows, And they wounded him also, and cast him out.

Read more (47 words)

Now these three successions of servants, our Lord elsewhere shews to comprehend under a figure all the teachers under the law, when He says, For all those things must be fulfilled which were written in the law of Moses, and the Prophets, and the Psalms, concerning me.

But our Lord most clearly proves that the Jewish rulers crucified the Son of God not from ignorance but for envy. For they knew it was He to whom it was said, I will give thee the heathen for thine inheritance. (Ps. 2:8.) And they cast him out of the vineyard, and slew him. (Heb. 13:12.) Because Jesus, that He might sanctify the people by His blood, suffered without the gate.

Or was He cast out of the vineyard and slain, because He was first driven out of the hearts of the unbelievers, and then fastened to the cross?

Or else, He who is a sinner, yet believes on Christ, falls indeed upon the stone and is shaken, for he is preserved by penitence unto salvation. But upon whomsoever it shall fall, that is, upon whom the stone itself has come down because he denied it, it shall grind him to powder, so that not even a broken piece of a vessel shall be left, in which may be drunk a little water. Or, He means by those who fall upon Him, such as only despise Him, and therefore do not yet utterly perish, but are shaken violently so that they cannot walk upright. But upon whom it falls, upon them shall He come in judgment with everlasting punishment, therefore shall it grind them to powder, that they may be as the dust which the wind scatters from the face of the earth. (Ps. 1:4.)

Or understanding it morally; to every one of the faithful is let out a vineyard to cultivate, in that the mystery of baptism is entrusted to him to work out. One servant is sent, a second and a third, when the Law, the Psalms, and the Prophets are read. But the servant who is sent is said to be treated despitefully or beaten, when the word heard is despised or blasphemed. The heir who is sent that man kills as far as he can, who by sin tramples under foot the Son of God. (Heb. 6:6.) The wicked husbandman being destroyed, the vineyard is given to another, when with the gift of grace, which the proud man spurned, the humble are enriched.

Philaret of Moscow (Drosdow)

19th centuryChurch Father

The living cornerstone of God’s spiritual and eternal temple serves as the foundation upon which ‘he who falls... will be broken’ (Matt. 21:44; Luke 20:18). The faithless Judaism, which stumbled and fell, was shattered so completely that it was dispersed throughout the universe for countless ages. What, then, initiated the judgment of this destruction? The first sin that Jesus Christ condemned among the Jews was their disregard for the temple of God, which He described as turning 'the house of the Father in heaven into a house of purchase' (John 2:16) and transforming the temple of prayer 'into a den of robbers' (Matthew 21:13; Mark 11:17; Luke 19:46).

Read more (116 words)

In the era of Christianity, as temples are established across the globe, it has become less practical to observe their condition or the attitudes of their worshipers. Yet, there is no need for this scrutiny. There is but one God for all true temples, and thus the fate of these places and their worshipers should be aligned. If it was significant to God to honor the temple that foreshadowed greater things, which housed the altar of dead sacrifices, how much more vital is it to pay homage to the temple that represents the dwelling place of the One who has come and revealed Himself, a sanctuary of truth and a source of living and life-giving ordinances.

Theophan the Recluse

19th centuryChurch Father

What do these words signify: Anyone who stumbles upon that stone will be shattered, and whoever it falls upon will be crushed. Those who stumble upon that stone are faithless, blasphemers, and skeptics. Just as the Lord has extended mercy to the blasphemer against the Son of Man, even if he reacts with anger, if he seeks repentance, he will be redeemed. This applies to all such individuals. However, the one upon whom the stone descends, deserving of the full anger of the Lord, is lost, with no hope remaining. This includes the hopeless, those who oppose God, the defiantly obstinate, and others of that nature.

Nikolaj Velimirovic

20th centuryChurch Father

The Lord forgave sinners seventy times seven times and more; but if sinners still remain sinners afterward, will the Lord save them against their will? He will not; for this is not the principle of the salvation of men. The principle is that man freely gives his consent to his salvation.

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryCommentator

To reinforce the concept of the chosen people’s rejection due to their persistent stubbornness, the Lord referenced the words of the prophet, the Psalmist, who had long ago predicted the astonishing reality that the very builders would dismiss the stone meant to serve as the cornerstone. He emphasized that other workers would be appointed for the vineyard of the Lord. Employing a metaphor from a psalm, He expressed the idea that those who stumble upon this rock will be shattered, and on it they will fall. This first shattering signifies repentance and the subsequent turning towards the kingdom of the Messiah, while the second shattering represents God's judgment, akin to what Daniel witnessed—the result of a stone striking the feet of the image (Dan. 2:45 cf. Is. 8:14-15).

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

In His continued admonition, Jesus inquired, “Have you not read in the Scriptures that the stone rejected by the builders will become the chief cornerstone, an act that will astonish all because it is the doing of God? Therefore, know that anyone who stumbles on this stone will be shattered, and it will crush anyone upon whom it falls. You have dismissed this stone, and it will land upon you: the kingdom of God will be taken from you and given to a people that produces its fruit." In referencing the stone cast aside by the builders and the Scriptures, Jesus alluded to Psalm 117 and the prophecy found in Isaiah (Isaiah 8:13-15).

Read more (233 words)

Archbishop Innocent elaborates on these statements: “Psalm 117 is the majestic hymn through which David expresses his gratitude to God in the temple following the defeat of his adversaries. The Jewish nation is likened here to a structure, whose architects were Saul and the elders of the twelve tribes of Israel. The stone they rejected symbolizes David, whom God appointed as the chief cornerstone—making him king and victorious. Furthermore, David serves as an archetype for his illustrious descendant, the Messiah, with many aspects of his reign and personal fate mysteriously connected to Jesus Christ. It is reasonable to suggest that Jesus was alluding to the following passage from Isaiah’s prophecy (Isaiah 8:14-15): And He (the Lord of hosts) will be a sanctuary, a stumbling block, and a rock of offense to both houses of Israel... and many will stumble, fall, and be broken. In this context, Jesus identified Himself as the rock. Those who stumble over this rock include Jews who, swayed by His humiliated appearance, rejected His teachings. Such individuals could have easily repented, facing only the consequence of losing their privileges. However, among the unbelievers in Christ, there were those upon whom the stone would fall to crush them, for their sins stemmed not from frailty or ignorance, but from wickedness and defiance; they remained unrepentant and thus unworthy of forgiveness. A dreadful consequence was witnessed at the fall of Jerusalem.”

Paul Matwejewski

19th centuryCommentator

Then Jesus Christ, gazing intently at those around Him, recalled to them the words found in Psalm 117, verses 22 and 23, which depict their actions toward Him in a prophetic manner: "Have ye not read in any of the Scriptures, 'The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord's doing; it is marvelous in our eyes.'" The imagery conveyed by the Psalmist derives from the process of construction, where the most robust stone is essential for the junction of two walls. Christ emerged as the cornerstone of the holy Church, bringing together all people—Jews and Gentiles—through a shared faith.

Read more (280 words)

Therefore, the Lord proclaimed, "the Kingdom of God shall be taken from you and given to a people producing its fruits," specifically to a spiritual Israel composed of Abraham's offspring through faith, not merely the Jews by lineage. The Jews, through their steadfast unbelief, rejected this fundamental stone, incurring harm to themselves. For those who stumble upon that stone will be shattered, and whomever it falls upon will face destruction. Some were ensnared by the stone, feeling repelled by the lowly appearance of the God-Man; these individuals, denied of a gracious share in Christ's Kingdom, faced severe loss; others, persisting in disbelief not due to ignorance but through willful malice, were ultimately destined for ruin. The fall of the steadfast stone was starkly realized by the unbelieving Jews when they were subjugated by the Romans, and all who emulate their disbelief will confront similar judgment at the final assessment. The chief priests, scribes, and Pharisees knew that these parables directed by the Savior were aimed at them. The disgrace of their nation intensified their animosity toward the Lord Jesus, leading them to desire His capture, even as they feared the people who regarded Him as a prophet. Through the Lord's admonitions, they grasped what they needed to know: the Messiah they spurned acknowledged Himself as the cornerstone upon which the new Israel's joy would be established; He was aware of their hostile, murderous intentions; and the sufferings and death awaiting Him did not intimidate Him, as He was resolute in fulfilling all ordained for the salvation of humanity by God's guiding providence. Rather than introspecting and reconsidering their contentious issues, the adversaries of Christ harbored malice deep within their hearts.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 15 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Πᾶς
    pas
    all
    G3956 · πᾶς
  2. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  3. πεσὼν
    pesōn
    I fall
    G4098 · πίπτω
  4. ἐπ᾽
    ep
    on
    G1909 · ἐπί
  5. ἐκεῖνον
    ekeinon
    that
    G1565 · ἐκεῖνος
  6. τὸν
    ton
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  7. λίθον
    lithon
    a stone
    G3037 · λίθος
  8. συνθλασθήσεται
    synthlasthēsetai
    I break
    G4917 · συνθλάω
  9. ἐφ᾽
    eph
    on
    G1909 · ἐπί
  10. ὃν
    hon
    who
    G3739 · ὅς, ἥ
  11. δ᾽
    d
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  12. ἂν
    an
    an untranslatable word that makes a statement contingent
    G302 · ἄν
  13. πέσῃ
    pesē
    I fall
    G4098 · πίπτω
  14. λικμήσει
    likmēsei
    I crush to powder
    G3039 · λικμάω
  15. αὐτόν
    auton
    he
    G846 · αὐτός