The Church Fathers on this verse

Luke 20:21Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And they asked him, saying: Master, we know that thou speakest and teachest rightly: and thou dost not respect any person, but teachest the way of God in truth.

Douay-Rheims

και επηρωτησαν αυτον λεγοντες διδασκαλε οιδαμεν οτι ορθως λεγεις και διδασκεις και ου λαμβανεις προσωπον αλλ επ αληθειας την οδον του θεου διδασκεις

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

7 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 8 commentaries

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

However, they did not even entertain these thoughts; how could they? They approached Him, trying to provoke Him, and concealed their treacherous intentions while speaking to Him with kind words, much like ravenous beasts disguised in sheep’s clothing. The prophet David likewise condemned such individuals, saying, ‘Their words are smoother than oil, and yet they are the points of spears.’ Additionally, he stated, ‘Their tongue pierces like the point of a spear; the words of their mouth are deceitful: he speaks peaceably to his neighbor, but in his heart is enmity.’

What are they inquiring? Rabbi! We recognize that You speak and teach truthfully, imparting the way of God without favoritism. Is it permissible for us to pay taxes to Caesar or not? (Luke 20:21). How detestable is their deceit! Even though the Almighty longs for Israel to be liberated from human oppression, they fell under the authority of their rulers because they violated God’s law, completely ignoring the commandment given to them and pursuing their own desires. Consequently, they were subjected to the authority of those in power, who enforced tributes, taxes, and the burden of unfamiliar servitude. The prophet Jeremiah, who mourned for Jerusalem, voiced this plight by saying, How lonely sits the populous city, the ruler of nations has become a tribute (Lamentations 1:1, LXX). Thus, the Evangelist indicates that they attempted to trap Him in the hands of the governing authorities (Luke 20:20), anticipating that He would unambiguously declare that it was unlawful to pay taxes to Caesar (Luke 20:22).

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

Matthew elaborated on this with greater clarity in chapter fifty-two, so it would be beneficial to seek a comparable understanding there.

Notes: * Matthew 22:16-17.

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryCommentator

In an effort to appoint Him as their arbiter in their contention, they questioned Him: since He is a proclaimer of truth and disregards outward appearances, would He now render a judgment...

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryCommentator

The high priests and Pharisees, humiliated before the crowd by the teachings of the Lord, sought to capture Jesus Christ and put Him on trial; however, they feared the very people who rallied behind Him, anticipating His role as the Messiah. Consequently, the adversaries of Christ attempted to entrap Him with His words in front of the populace, aiming to undermine their reverence for Him and create grounds to accuse Him as a wrongdoer (Luke 20:26).

Read more (121 words)

They approached Him with a cunning inquiry, “Is it lawful for us (God's chosen people) to give taxes to Cæsar or not?” The dilemma in this question lay in the fact that, should Jesus respond negatively, He would be seen as rebellious against Roman authority; yet, if He affirmed the tax, He would alienate the people who, influenced by the Pharisees, believed they could only serve the one true God and that allegiance to a foreign pagan regime was incompatible with their faith. Jesus' response articulated the principle that both civic duty and divine commandments are to be honored, underscoring the necessity to return to earthly power a portion of what one gains under its guardianship, while simultaneously upholding God’s statutes.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

During this gathering, the attendees deliberated on how to phrase a query to ensnare Jesus in His words. One suggestion that arose was to ask whether it was permissible to pay tribute to Caesar, and so the Herodians were summoned. They acknowledged the legitimacy of paying taxes to the Romans, making them more inclined to accuse Jesus if He voiced disapproval of such payments. At that time in Palestine, there existed two distinct types of currency: civil and sacred. The civil currency was the Roman coin, emblazoned with the likeness of the emperor (Caesar) along with its associated inscription; this coin was widely used among the Jews for commerce and tax payments to Caesar.

Read more (232 words)

Conversely, the Jewish shekel was regarded as sacred, used exclusively for the annual temple tax that each Jew was required to pay, regardless of their location. The people of Israel recognized their allegiance to God alone, thus feeling obligated to render taxes only to Him in support of His house, the temple in Jerusalem. They viewed any other form of taxation as unlawful, as it placed them under a sovereign other than God, effectively rendering them servants of a foreign king and slaves to Gentile authority. The question posed likely intrigued the crowd of admirers surrounding Jesus. Should He assert that paying taxes to Caesar was lawful, He would risk alienating those who resented their burden of taxation. Conversely, should He declare the tax unlawful and advise against payment, He would face immediate scrutiny and potential arrest by Pilate.

The Pharisees approached Jesus with insincerity, disguising themselves as His loyal followers, and began to flatter Him with their praise, saying, “Teacher, we know that You are righteous and that You teach the way of God with integrity, showing no favoritism and fearlessly proclaiming the truth. So tell us, what is Your stance: Is it lawful to pay taxes to Caesar, or is it not? Are we not thereby turning from God's people into servants of a foreign king? Enlighten us as to whether we ought to pay this tax or resist it.”

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryCommentator

Veiling their treachery with outward respect and civility, the Pharisees approached the Savior, seeking His insight to resolve their confusion. "Rabbi," they declared with insincere admiration, "we recognize that You are righteous and genuinely teach the path of God, indifferent to the opinions of others; for You do not judge by appearances." It was as if they were inviting Him to share His candid thoughts, suggesting a genuine need for His guidance on a significant moral dilemma, fully convinced that He alone held the answer to their quandary.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryCommentator

The inquiry regarding the tribute owed to Caesar is presented in Luke, mirroring its depiction in the Gospels of Matthew and Mark. Refer to Matthew 22:15-22 and Mark 12:13-17, accompanied by the observation of ‘Watching Him,’ indicating those who sought opportunities to bring about His downfall (Luke 19:47). The term ‘Evil men’ is utilized more explicitly in Matthew and Mark, referring to certain Pharisees and Herodians whose malice the Lord swiftly discerned and admonished. The phrase ‘Pretending to be pious’ suggests that they were acting as zealous legalists, attempting to create the illusion that they approached Him from a place of genuine religious concern rather than as agents of His adversaries with ulterior motives.

Read more (112 words)

The expression ‘Caught at the word’ corresponds to insights found in Matthew 21:15. Their intent to ‘Submit Him to the rulers’ indicates that the most effective method to undermine the Lord was to present accusations against Him in a political context, which the leaders ultimately did by bringing charges before Pilate. In framing their malicious inquiry, they aimed to elicit any statement that might incriminate Him regarding the king's authority, a desire apparent from their awe at His sagacious reply. However, this admiration soon turned into allegations, as they later claimed that He did not explicitly advocate for paying tribute to Caesar, thereby accusing Him of disrespecting the king’s authority (Luke 23:2).

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 23 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  2. ἐπηρώτησαν
    epērōtēsan
    I interrogate
    G1905 · ἐπερωτάω
  3. αὐτὸν
    auton
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  4. λέγοντες
    legontes
    I say
    G3004 · λέγω
  5. Διδάσκαλε
    didaskale
    a teacher
    G1320 · διδάσκαλος
  6. οἴδαμεν
    oidamen
    I know
    G1492 · εἴδω
  7. ὅτι
    hoti
    that
    G3754 · ὅτι
  8. ὀρθῶς
    orthōs
    rightly
    G3723 · ὀρθῶς
  9. λέγεις
    legeis
    I say
    G3004 · λέγω
  10. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  11. διδάσκεις
    didaskeis
    I teach
    G1321 · διδάσκω
  12. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  13. οὐ
    ou
    no
    G3756 · οὐ
  14. λαμβάνεις
    lambaneis
    I receive
    G2983 · λαμβάνω
  15. πρόσωπον
    prosōpon
    the face
    G4383 · πρόσωπον
  16. ἀλλ᾽
    all
    but
    G235 · ἀλλά
  17. ἐπ᾽
    ep
    on
    G1909 · ἐπί
  18. ἀληθείας
    alētheias
    truth
    G225 · ἀλήθεια
  19. τὴν
    tēn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  20. ὁδὸν
    hodon
    a way
    G3598 · ὁδός
  21. τοῦ
    tou
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  22. Θεοῦ
    theou
    God
    G2316 · θεός
  23. διδάσκεις
    didaskeis
    I teach
    G1321 · διδάσκω