Surely the Lord recognized in him the potential to be an apostle; otherwise, He would not have permitted him to share such close fellowship with Him, nor treated him in the same manner as the other apostles. This does not rule out the possibility that Judas possessed both commendable and flawed traits, and the Lord saw the potential for good alongside the presence of evil within him. The internal struggle between these opposing forces had yet to reach a conclusion, and there was hope that virtue would triumph over vice.
What then was the predominant sinful inclination in Judas that led to his betrayal? When searching for historical clues to answer this, it is natural to first consider his love of money; the Evangelist John notes that Judas handled the moneybag containing the shared resources of the Lord's disciples, and he was untrustworthy in his duties, pilfering from it for his own benefit. This aligns with the testimony of the first three Evangelists, who attest that Judas conspired to betray his Master to the Sanhedrin for a predetermined sum. From this, one might conclude that avarice had consumed him to the point where he would commit such a heinous act to fulfill his greed. However, it is challenging to accept this conclusion. If Judas's selfishness was so overpowering, it seems improbable that the Lord would have welcomed him among His group. Given His profound understanding of every person's heart and His ability to utilize each disciple for their greatest potential, how could He have appointed him as the keeper of the treasury? Additionally, if Judas acted solely out of greed, it raises questions as to why he would settle for a relatively paltry sum of thirty pieces of silver. One could argue that the Sanhedrin, aiming to seize Jesus before Passover, would likely have offered a higher amount if Judas had requested it. Perhaps the Sanhedrin lacked the resources or confidence to offer a greater price, or they anticipated that Jesus would not seek to escape capture, relying instead on His divine authority.
Regardless, it is clear that the small amount could not have been the sole incentive for Judas's actions. Whether the sum was insignificant or substantial, it must be assumed that a man who had shared such intimacy with his Master, who had at least recognized Him as the Messiah for a period, experienced a significant shift in his relationship with Him. This suggests that the lust for wealth was not the primary driving force behind the betrayal. Did Judas truly foresee the consequences of his actions? His tragic end and the despair he displayed upon witnessing Jesus condemned indicate that he did not anticipate such a fate. One may assume that he intended to accelerate the situation: by placing Jesus in a precarious position, he hoped to compel Him to assert His role as Messiah-King at once or to manifest His divine power to overcome all obstacles. When the circumstances diverged sharply from his expectations, Judas became overwhelmed with despair upon seeing the One to whom he had once been devoted condemned. Such actions cannot be seen as anything other than criminal. The ends do not justify immoral means, nor should the workings of God be treated lightly in this way.
What should we make of this conjecture? If Judas harbored such misguided intentions, even if they were unlawful, it seems unlikely that the Lord would permit him to be led astray to the point of oblivion. Furthermore, allowing for this interpretation, it is inconceivable that, knowing Judas's intentions to leave the supper, the Lord would have spoken to him in a manner that appeared to endorse his actions. It is reasonable to conclude that Judas approached the Lord, similar to the other apostles, with earthly aspirations and carnal hopes. However, his disillusionment with these hopes soon set in, leaving him indifferent to the cause he had once fervently embraced. A year before the Lord’s crucifixion, during a well-known discussion in the synagogue at Capernaum, when many had turned away from Jesus, the Lord mentioned that there was a devil among them, referring to Judas. Of course, Peter was similarly reprimanded: “Get thee behind me, Satan; you are not mindful of the things of God, but the things of men” (Matthew 16:23). Yet, Peter's heart was easily swayed toward repentance. In contrast, Judas’s heart was hardened. Detached from the fellowship of Jesus and bound only by material interests, Judas had long ceased to be a true disciple, merely awaiting the opportunity to abandon Him. The Lord tolerated Judas's presence, intending to influence his soul and possibly foreseeing the fate intertwined with his actions (Jesus knew from the beginning who would betray Him, John 6:64).
Now we must consider the final events of the Lord’s ministry. As the raising of Lazarus drew public attention, the Sanhedrin’s plot to eliminate Jesus solidified. They were still deliberating on how to carry out their plan, wanting to tailor their approach to the circumstances. At that point, it was uncertain whether Jesus would come to Jerusalem. However, contrary to the Sanhedrin’s expectations, Jesus not only entered Jerusalem publicly amidst threats to His life but did so with unprecedented majesty. The ruling Pharisees began to regret allowing the situation to escalate: “Look, the Pharisees said amongst themselves, all your meetings are in vain, and all the people are following Him. What shall we do now?” (John 12:19). They began devising a clever scheme to seize Jesus and eliminate Him (Matthew 26:4); it is unclear whether this involved the efforts of a concealed traitor, of which there were many at the time, or if they had already formulated a strategy to apprehend Him surreptitiously and subject Him to a disgraceful death under the guise of legality. However, it was already determined that this would not occur during the feast, but either before or after it, with the latter being preferred by all. It was then that Judas Iscariot, one of the Lord's disciples, offered his aid to them (Matthew 26:14-16; Luke 22:3-6). They settled on a price with him, and he agreed to betray his Teacher and Lord.