The Church Fathers on this verse

Mark 11:13Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And when he had seen afar off a fig tree having leaves, he came, if perhaps he might find any thing on it. And when he was come to it, he found nothing but leaves. For it was not the time for figs.

Douay-Rheims

και ιδων συκην μακροθεν εχουσαν φυλλα ηλθεν ει αρα ευρησει τι εν αυτη και ελθων επ αυτην ουδεν ευρεν ει μη φυλλα ου γαρ ην καιρος συκων

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

12 Church Fathers comment on this verse

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

Let us also reflect on the parable of the fig tree, which presents us with a perplexing and harsh scenario. First, Jesus seeks out the fig tree early in the day; second, He asks for fruit despite it not being the season for figs, yet He reprimands the unyielding tree. In His actions and words, there is a distinctive awareness. Up to this moment, Jesus had performed miracles primarily for the sake of humanity, and His disciples had not witnessed Him doing harm to anyone. Now, in order to illustrate to His disciples His authority to judge and His ability to bring destruction upon those preparing to crucify Him, He demonstrated His power by withering a lifeless tree. The magnitude of this miracle is significant, as the tree, known for its lushness, was instantly stripped of vitality.

Read more (98 words)

His flesh, in this instance, felt hunger in the morning by divine design, seeking fruits from the fig tree to show His disciples that He possesses the ability to reprimand. Furthermore, this fig tree symbolizes the Jewish synagogue, adorned merely with leaves, representing the law, which offered only shade and no true sustenance. Yet, Jesus yearned for their salvation, declaring, ‘My food is to do the will of Him who sent Me’ (John 4:34), and this divine will is aimed at redeeming sinners. Since the synagogue bore no fruit, it faced condemnation and desolation, lacking prophets or teachers.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

Those who observed the miracles of Christ but failed to grasp their significance were astonished merely by the acts themselves. Others, who recognized their meaning, were also impressed by the wonders. We ought to be likewise engaged in the teachings of Christ. However, to claim that Christ performed miracles solely for their own sake is akin to asserting that when He sought fruit from a fig tree, one could argue it was not the season for figs, as noted by the Evangelist. Yet, despite His hunger, He expected to find fruit on the tree. Did Christ not possess the knowledge of the gardener? Would not the one who created the tree also be aware of what a mere cultivator knew?

Read more (119 words)

Thus, when He approached the tree in search of fruit, it signified to His disciples that He was yearning for something deeper and of greater significance. He found a tree that was lush in foliage but devoid of fruit, and He cursed it, causing it to wither. What transgression did the tree commit by not bearing fruit? Is the lack of fruit the tree's fault? Certainly, some may choose not to bear fruit of their own accord. The bareness of the tree reflects the responsibility of those whose yield relies on their willingness. The Jews, who possessed the words of the law but failed to enact them, resembled this tree, having the appearance of abundance yet lacking true fruitfulness.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

The fig tree has a characteristic that causes its fruit to take a long time to dry due to its high moisture content. This is why our Lord selected this tree to illustrate the essence of His power. The fig tree tends to become soft and lush earlier than other trees. Thus, our Lord instructed, “Take ye a likeness of the fig-tree: when its branches become soft and put forth leaves, then ye know that summer is near” (Matt. 24:32; Mark 13:28; Luke 21:30). Observe how He emphasizes its rich moisture and early budding as a significant sign.

Maximus the Confessor

7th centuryChurch Father

The phrase "As I was returning, I saw by the roadside a fig-tree, having leaves only" (Matthew 21:19) should be interpreted in this manner: it signifies the physical ministry of the law, which is confined to mere shadows and representations. This ministerial practice rests on an uncertain and temporary tradition, composed solely of ephemeral images and regulations.

Cyrill of Jerusalem

4th centuryChurch Father

When the First Parents transgressed, they hid themselves with fig leaves as recorded in Genesis 3:7. Consequently, Jesus also employed the fig tree as a final emblem. As He prepared for His Passion, He pronounced a curse on the fig tree—not all fig trees, but specifically the one that symbolically represented the fig tree of Paradise, declaring, “Let no man eat of the fruit of thee.” The sentence was pronounced, and since the First Parents had concealed themselves with fig leaves, Jesus approached at a time when the tree bore no fruit. Is it not well-known that during winter, a fig tree produces no fruit and is only adorned with leaves? Did Jesus lack knowledge of this?

Read more (48 words)

Yet, fully aware, He approached as though seeking fruit; His intention was not to discover any but to illustrate the curse upon the leaves.

Since they cloaked themselves with the fig tree's foliage, He came when there was no fruit to be found. The judgment must be fulfilled!

Gregory the Great

6th centuryChurch Father

It is clear that when the Lord refers to the fig tree, He symbolizes the output of the synagogue, which, despite displaying the foliage of the Law, lacked the fruit of righteous deeds. Surely, the Creator of all was aware that the fig tree bore no fruit and that it was not the season for harvesting - this was common knowledge to all.

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryCommentator

On the morning that He was making His way to Jerusalem alongside His disciples, He experienced hunger and sought to quell it with fruit from a fig tree that stood in the distance. The tree was lush with foliage, which at this time near Passover might suggest the presence of fruit. However, as the Lord approached, He discovered that the tree bore only the same leaves He had observed from afar, prompting Him to place a curse upon it, resulting in its immediate decay. This act would be perplexing were there not a deeper significance to it, for the curse symbolized something far more deserving of the Lord's judgment.

Read more (249 words)

To avoid any misunderstanding that this action stemmed merely from personal anger or impatience, the Lord reminded His disciples of His earlier instruction: when they seek anything from God, they must do so in faith and with full reconciliation with everyone they have wronged or who has wronged them. He further assured them that not only would they be capable of effects such as the withering of the fig tree, but even greater miracles.

So, what is the significance of this curse upon the seemingly innocent fig tree? Its true meaning is unveiled in the Lord's parable concerning the fig tree (Luke 13:6). The fig tree, adorned only with leaves, became a representation of the Jewish nation, whose devotion was confined to empty rituals that yielded nothing of true value. Consequently, this tree, failing to fulfill its intended purpose and bearing no fruit, ultimately withers away—just as the chosen nation, no longer fulfilling its divine purpose, faces the consequences of judgment. This judgment had been foretold, and now it comes to a pivotal moment. In essence, the outcome of the fig tree’s curse serves as a metaphor for God's judgment upon the people of Judah—an affirmation of His words manifested through actions rather than mere speech. At that moment, the full implications were not clarified, perhaps because they would have been too overwhelming for the disciples, yet these truths were destined to be revealed. The following events would clarify whether the leaders of the people warranted such a judgment.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryCommentator

The Lord’s entry into Jerusalem took place in the afternoon. After a brief visit to the temple, Jesus went to Bethany for the night. The following morning, as He was traveling back to Jerusalem, He felt hunger along the way. In the distance, He spotted a fig tree with an abundance of leaves, which suggested that it might bear fruit, since typically, a fig tree produces fruit before its leaves. Although it was not the season for harvesting figs, one would still expect to find some unripe fruit on the tree. However, when Jesus approached it, He discovered that there was no fruit at all, signaling that the tree was barren.

Read more (115 words)

In response, He cursed the tree, declaring, "Let there be no fruit henceforth from thee for ever." The act of cursing this unproductive tree carries a moral message: it symbolizes the Jewish nation. Just as the fig tree, adorned with leaves, gave the illusion of having fruit, the Jewish people, through their adherence to the law and the traditions of the elders, masked their lack of authentic faith and devotion. The curse placed upon the fig tree served as a prophecy concerning this people, warning them that without repentance and faith in Jesus Christ, they too would face rejection and condemnation. What Jesus had foretold earlier (Luke 13:6-9) was now manifested through this symbolic act.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

In the morning, they returned to Jerusalem, where the withering of the unfruitful fig tree was pronounced, connecting this event with the earlier parable regarding the fig tree. This time, the atmosphere of His entry was not grand; only the apostles accompanied Him. As they traveled, Jesus felt hunger and saw a fig tree in the distance that was full of leaves. He approached it, hoping to find fruit to satisfy His hunger. However, upon discovering there were no figs, He declared, "From now on, let no one eat fruit from you forever" (Mark 11:14). Immediately, the fig tree withered away (Matthew 21:19).

Read more (664 words)

Throughout His ministry, Jesus continually cultivated goodness, yet here we witness a severe verdict cast upon a lifeless fig tree for not producing fruit when it was not the season. Christ, in His omniscience, understood that fruit would not be found there; so why did He seek it? Generally, fruit trees blossom and bear fruit before they develop leaves. In Palestine, this is true for most fig trees; however, some varieties can retain leaves and late-ripening fruit until spring. Mark, the Evangelist, notes that the time for gathering figs had not arrived yet testifies that this fig tree was indeed covered in leaves. Thus, it was reasonable to assume that it might still possess last year's fruit, although no other fig trees around it had either leaves or fruit.

Ultimately, the appearance of this tree suggested the potential for fruit, providing an opportunity to extend the parable of the fig tree discussed previously with the apostles, and to carry out the judgment that had been postponed. In that parable (Luke 13:6-9), the unproductive fig tree found in the vineyard symbolized the Jewish people, from whom God, the owner of the vineyard, sought the fruit of faith in the promised Christ, along with repentance and good deeds. With the conclusion of His third year of ministry nearing, the fig tree of God had yet to bear fruit. Therefore, the vineyard owner, God, addressed Jesus, the vineyard caretaker, saying, "Cut it down: why does it occupy the earth?" (Luke 13:7), essentially indicating to abandon this obstinate people and allow other nations who would believe and act according to His will to take their place.

However, the compassionate Vinedresser requested a postponement of this decree, hoping that through exceptional efforts, this people might finally yield the fruit God expected: "Leave it for this year, but if it does not bear fruit, next year you will cut it down" (Luke 13:8-9). After Jesus performed numerous miracles, including raising Lazarus from the dead, and still found the fig tree barren, the moment to enact this verdict had arrived. Christ could not take joy from the throngs praising Him and exclaiming "hosanna," as He was fully aware that in just four days, the same crowd would vehemently shout, "Crucify Him, crucify Him!" (Luke 23:21). Indeed, it was time to uproot the unfruitful fig tree.

Thus, as if continuing the earlier parable, the Vinedresser approached the fig tree, which stood out distinctly among those around it. While the others were not only fruitless but also bare, this one was lush with leaves that concealed its lack of fruit. To declare its barrenness and execute the earlier decree, it was essential to examine it closely and demonstrate to the apostles its true condition, proving that it merely occupied space in vain. This was the purpose of Jesus' visit to the barren fig tree, searching for fruit, though He knew none existed; it was why He condemned it, despite knowing that a fig tree cannot be held accountable for not bearing figs. The condemnation did not fall upon the tree itself but upon the Jewish people, who were to be cast out of God's vineyard. The fig tree, as an inanimate object, served merely as a poignant illustration of the fruitlessness of the chosen nation.

This parable and the ultimate judgment pronounced upon the unfruitful fig tree can likewise be applied to us as sinners. If I present myself as devout, attending church, lighting candles before icons, and bowing in reverence; if I criticize the decline of faith and piety among others, lamenting their faults and insisting on the necessity of aiding my neighbors; if my speech is eloquent yet my heart is distant from the sincerity behind those words; if I fail to do good or offer assistance to those around me, am I not akin to a fig tree, adorned with abundant leaves but devoid of fruit? And what, then, is my fate? It mirrors that of the barren fig tree.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryCommentator

The following morning, He returned to Jerusalem to teach in the temple, and during His journey, an incident occurred that vividly revealed the insincerity and fruitlessness of the people once chosen by God, who had failed to live up to their calling. Eager to spread His message and not wishing to delay for those who had “from morning came to Him in the temple, to listen to Him,” the Savior departed from Bethany prior to breakfast. Feeling hungry, He sought out a fig tree that might provide sustenance (Matt. 21:17-19, Mk. 11:12-14). In the distance, He noticed a fig tree full of leaves that promised to meet His need; however, upon approaching, He found it entirely without fruit.

Read more (67 words)

This misleading appearance served as a poignant illustration of the spiritual emptiness and false pretenses of the Jewish people, particularly their leaders, whose expression of faith had devolved into mere external rituals devoid of true substance. To demonstrate to His disciples the consequences of such barrenness, He cursed the tree, proclaiming, “Let there be no fruit from thee henceforth for ever.” Instantly, the fig tree withered away.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryCommentator

The Evangelist’s comment about it not yet being time to gather figs seems intended to clarify why the Lord encountered no figs on the fig tree. However, the Lord was fully aware that the season for harvesting figs had not arrived, which raises the question of fairness regarding the cursing of the tree. Importantly, although the harvest might not be ready, it is possible for a fig tree to produce early figs, known as bokkoras, especially if it is already adorned with leaves. Typically, leaves appear later than the fruit, and some fig varieties bear fruit nearly year-round. Therefore, the Evangelist's observation about the timing of fig gathering serves not as an explanation for the absence of figs but rather as a context for the Lord’s actions.

Read more (40 words)

The essence is that while it was not the season for mature figs, the Lord, noticing the tree's foliage, might reasonably assume that there could be fruit present. Thus, He approached the tree to check for any signs of fruit.

Paul Matwejewski

19th centuryCommentator

The following day after the significant entry into Jerusalem, the Lord Jesus Christ returned to the city in the morning with the twelve disciples, much like the previous day, but without any grandeur. The mind of the God-Man inevitably reflected on the prior day's occurrence, where, amid the fleeting fervor of the crowds, the profound blindness of the Jewish religious leaders was starkly unveiled. These pretenders, who concealed their lack of genuine devotion behind a facade of outward righteousness and good deeds, constituted the most formidable adversaries of Jesus Christ, frequently facing sharp rebukes from the embodiment of truth.

Read more (787 words)

To illustrate their spiritual barrenness, as well as that of the Jewish nation at large, the Lord employed the vivid metaphor of a barren fig tree in His teachings. This fig tree, adorned with lush leaves yet devoid of fruit, failed to fulfill its intended purpose, serving as a fitting representation of the mere facade of the law devoid of the inner spirit of life. In the parable, the fig tree bore no fruit for three years and was condemned by the owner to be cut down to prevent it from taking up space unnecessarily. However, at the suggestion of the vinedresser, it was granted one more year to see if, under increased care, it would yield fruit (Luke 13:6-9). This exemplified the condition of the Jewish synagogue during the redemptive ministry of the Lord Jesus Christ. It was now apparent that this year of God's patience, extended for their discernment, had yielded no positive results and had only hardened their hearts. With the rejection of their Messiah and the birth of a new life through the grace covenant replacing the old law (Hebrews 10:1), they were losing their final traces of vitality and were nearing their demise. The significant act that the Lord was about to perform in front of His disciples was a continuation and conclusion of the earlier fig-tree parable.

The people of the biblical East were deeply engaged with symbolic actions that conveyed various abstract ideas vividly. Ancient prophets frequently utilized such actions to engrain their messages in the minds and hearts of those around them (2 Samuel 11:30; Jeremiah 19:10; 27:2). Christ the Saviour adopted this expressive approach to convey His message. Yielding to physical need, as Blessed Theophylact puts it, “in a special way,” He felt hunger. As He walked, a solitary fig tree came into view. Although the time for harvesting figs had not yet arrived, the vibrant leaves of the tree, which typically appear after the fruit, led to hopes of finding either autumn figs, known to linger on the tree throughout winter, or early spring figs of particularly good quality (Jeremiah 24:2). These figs had long been a staple for the people of Palestine (1 Samuel 30:12); thus, the Lord directed His path toward the roadside tree, not to satisfy His hunger, but, as noted by St. John Chrysostom, “for the sake of the disciples, to impart a significant moral lesson.” The Omniscient One was aware beforehand of what to expect from the fig tree. It was not the harvesting season, yet the tree was entirely fruitless: no remnants from winter, no signs of new figs for summer, just an abundance of leaves covering the branches. The Lord approached this majestic-looking tree that proved useless and deceptive in its lack of fruit—drawing a parallel in His mind to the synagogue of the Jews together with its leaders: chief priests, scribes, and Pharisees, who were blind and leading the blind (Matthew 15:14). Reflecting the words of a church hymn, this was an unfruitful and withered assembly cloaked in the leaves of the mere written law, devoid of the fruit of genuine deeds, much like the barren fig tree. The hypocrisy that the Lord had often condemned so powerfully was now presented before Him and His disciples in a tangible form. As a caution to the hypocrites and a lesson for His disciples, He pronounced His decisive judgment over the fig tree, declaring, “Let there be no fruit from you forever, and let no man bear fruit from you forever.” The disciples heard the Master's decree and witnessed its immediate effect: the fig tree withered right away. This miracle served to instruct the Lord’s closest followers, demonstrating that the Saviour is also a just judge who punishes all pretense and deceit, reinforcing their faith in light of the forthcoming events. “He always benefited and punished no one,” states St. John Chrysostom, “it was necessary for Him to show the experience of His justice and vengeance, so that both the disciples and the Jews might understand that while He could, like the fig tree, dry up His crucifiers, He willingly allowed Himself to be led to crucifixion.” When the disciples saw that the fig tree had withered, they were astonished and asked, “How could the fig tree wither away?” The Lord turned this miracle into a lesson for their moral growth, saying, “Amen, I say to you, if you have faith and do not doubt, not only will you do what has been done to the fig tree, but you will also say to this mountain, ‘Move from here to there,’ and it will move, and nothing will be impossible for you, if you ask in prayer, believing, you will receive.”

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 29 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  2. ἰδὼν
    idōn
    I know
    G1492 · εἴδω
  3. συκῆν
    sykēn
    a fig-tree
    G4808 · συκῆ
  4. ἀπὸ
    apo
    from
    G575 · ἀπό
  5. μακρόθεν
    makrothen
    from a distance
    G3113 · μακρόθεν
  6. ἔχουσαν
    echousan
    I have
    G2192 · ἔχω
  7. φύλλα
    phylla
    a leaf
    G5444 · φύλλον
  8. ἦλθεν
    ēlthen
    I come
    G2064 · ἔρχομαι
  9. εἰ
    ei
    if
    G1487 · εἰ
  10. ἄρα
    ara
    then
    G686 · ἄρα
  11. τι
    ti
    any one
    G5100 · τις
  12. εὑρήσει
    heurēsei
    I find
    G2147 · εὑρίσκω
  13. ἐν
    en
    in
    G1722 · ἐν
  14. αὐτῇ
    autē
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  15. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  16. ἐλθὼν
    elthōn
    I come
    G2064 · ἔρχομαι
  17. ἐπ᾽
    ep
    on
    G1909 · ἐπί
  18. αὐτὴν
    autēn
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  19. οὐδὲν
    ouden
    no one
    G3762 · οὐδείς
  20. εὗρεν
    heuren
    I find
    G2147 · εὑρίσκω
  21. εἰ
    ei
    if
    G1487 · εἰ
  22. μὴ
    mē
    not
    G3361 · μή
  23. φύλλα
    phylla
    a leaf
    G5444 · φύλλον
  24. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  25. γὰρ
    gar
    for
    G1063 · γάρ
  26. καιρὸς
    kairos
    fitting season
    G2540 · καιρός
  27. οὐκ
    ouk
    no
    G3756 · οὐ
  28. ἦν
    ēn
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί
  29. σύκων
    sykōn
    a fig
    G4810 · σῦκον