The Church Fathers on this verse

Mark 7:19Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Because it entereth not into his heart but goeth into his belly and goeth out into the privy, purging all meats?

Douay-Rheims

οτι ουκ εισπορευεται αυτου εις την καρδιαν αλλ εις την κοιλιαν και εις τον αφεδρωνα εκπορευεται καθαριζον παντα τα βρωματα

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

5 Church Fathers comment on this verse

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryCommentator

But what was the significance of the perplexing statement, "It shall not enter into the mouth"? Does it abolish the Mosaic laws regarding the classification of food, distinguishing between what is acceptable and what is not? If it does, how can we reconcile that with the reverence for the law, which led the Lord to dismiss the tradition of Korban? Conversely, if it does not annul these laws, how should we interpret it? The disciples struggled to find an answer and therefore sought the Lord’s clarification. Peter requested that the Lord shed light on this parable for them. The Lord, astonished at their lack of understanding, asserted that food itself, being an external substance, cannot cause inner moral defilement.

Read more (150 words)

However, this does not imply that all types of food are neutral for individuals. As long as divine commandments exist and are not revoked, consuming food that contradicts those laws will indeed defile an individual, stemming from a heart that disregards the law and seeks to gratify the flesh. The latter part of the parable communicates that the origin of moral impurity resides within the human heart, signifying that those desiring to remain pure before God must cleanse their hearts. The Lord did not address the laws governing clean and unclean foods, which were to be rendered obsolete with the dissolution of the Old Testament covenant, coinciding with the establishment of the New Covenant between God and humanity and the new spiritual law within the hearts of the new Israel. Nonetheless, He revealed to His disciples that these external laws are, even at present, significantly inferior to the internal principles.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryCommentator

After addressing the hypocrisy of the Pharisees, the Lord drew the crowd to Him and taught them about true impurity, which renders a person guilty before God. He emphasized a guiding principle: what enters the mouth does not make a person unclean, but what emerges from the mouth can lead to defilement. Following this instruction, as noted in Mark, He retreated to a house where His disciples informed Him—only Matthew notes this—that the Pharisees were troubled by His teachings. The disciples may have been concerned that Jesus' words, which were meant to uplift, were instead causing offense. They could also have been perplexed by His declaration regarding the non-defilement of food (v. 11. λόγον).

Read more (235 words)

The saying in verse 11 confused the Pharisees, who were accustomed to the notion of ceremonial washing before eating for the sake of spiritual cleanliness. They interpreted Christ's teachings as undermining the law regarding purification. Additionally, they might have felt insulted that Jesus addressed the people directly, challenging their authority with His message.

In response to the reports of the Pharisees' provocation, Jesus pointed out either the teachings of the Pharisees—which were human traditions rather than divine instruction, thus deserving of rejection—or the Pharisees themselves. They, as spiritual leaders, were not truly serving God’s purpose and were not the plants of the divine vineyard, failing to align with God’s command or will and thus losing His care. As a result, they were destined for destruction (ἐκριζόω cf. 13:29-30). Therefore, He instructed His followers to disregard them. This implied that one should not adhere to their teachings, lest they fall into the same pitfalls, and also to leave their concerns to themselves.

Eventually, Peter, speaking for the group, requested clarification on the Lord’s statement about what defiles through eating, which left them puzzled. Jesus clarified that when He referred to what enters the mouth, He was talking about food, and what comes from the mouth represented all corrupt thoughts, desires, and intentions that arise from the heart. Such thoughts expose the impurity of the human spirit, while food passes through the body without affecting the soul.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

Do you too fail to comprehend? questioned Christ. Do you not realize that nothing entering a person from the outside can render them impure? (Mark 7:18). It does not render them impure because it does not penetrate the heart but merely the stomach, and subsequently exits, thus purifying all food (Mk. 7:19). What emanates from the mouth—originating in the heart—this is what renders a person impure (Mt. 15:18); for from within the human heart arise evil intentions, adultery, sexual immorality, murder, theft, greed, wickedness, deceit, depravity, envy, slander, arrogance, and folly—all these evils emerge from within and render a person impure (Mk. 7:21-23). Yet, consuming food with unwashed hands does not defile a person (Matthew 15:20).

Read more (263 words)

There is no need to add to this elucidation of Jesus Christ’s teachings; everything is evident. Nonetheless, many interpret these words to mean that Christ dismissed fasting. This perspective is misleading. Fasting, whether through complete abstinence from food or by consuming only what is minimally necessary for survival, has long been acknowledged as a significant practice for overcoming bodily desires. Individuals striving for a life of reason rather than one led by their baser instincts have continually sought to rein in their desires and align them with their spiritual awareness. They understand that excessive food intake, particularly certain types such as meat and wine, can intensify desires and dull one’s conscience. Therefore, these individuals often turned to either total abstinence from food for periods of time, refrained from meat and wine, or maintained a very moderate diet. Christ Himself encouraged His followers to resist the flesh, and as an example, He fasted for forty days in the wilderness. Thus, it cannot be concluded from His statement, "Not that which goes into the mouth defiles a man," that He dismissed the importance and value of fasting. His focus was solely on what truly makes a person unworthy of the Kingdom of Heaven—not the food itself, but the spirit of self-restraint that arises from eating, along with evil thoughts and sinful actions. It is not the food taken unceremoniously, as highlighted by the Pharisees, that renders a person defiled; He clarified that eating with unwashed hands does not defile an individual, and with this assertion, removed any ambiguity regarding the true nature of this discourse.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryCommentator

The decision had finally been made. Until this point, Christ had held back His righteous indignation, eager to enlighten the scribes and Pharisees through loving instruction. However, it became evident that these dogmatic leaders were beyond hope. Thus, it was essential to take bold action. The followers of the scribes and Pharisees needed to see the true worth of the faith and morals they preached. The message of the gospel could not be embraced while the hearts of the people remained corrupted and shrouded in darkness by such teachers.

Read more (112 words)

Consequently, abandoning the scribes to their ineffective malice, Christ addressed the crowd around Him with a powerful declaration: ‘Hear and understand!’ He then instructed both the people and His disciples that within the kingdom of heaven, the purity of one’s heart holds greater significance than the ritualistic purity of one’s hands, ‘for out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witnesses, blasphemies.’ Indeed, all of these transgressions ‘defile a man; and eating with unwashed hands does not defile a man,’ a stipulation rooted only in the ordinary practice of ritualism without any inherent moral authority, contrary to the interpretations of the Pharisees, these “blind leaders of the blind.”

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryCommentator

"It does not enter into his heart": that which is consumed as nourishment does not pertain to a person's moral essence but instead influences only his physical state.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 20 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. ὅτι
    hoti
    that
    G3754 · ὅτι
  2. οὐκ
    ouk
    no
    G3756 · οὐ
  3. εἰσπορεύεται
    eisporeuetai
    I journey into
    G1531 · εἰσπορεύω
  4. αὐτοῦ
    autou
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  5. εἰς
    eis
    into
    G1519 · εἰς
  6. τὴν
    tēn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  7. καρδίαν
    kardian
    the heart
    G2588 · καρδία
  8. ἀλλ᾽
    all
    but
    G235 · ἀλλά
  9. εἰς
    eis
    into
    G1519 · εἰς
  10. τὴν
    tēn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  11. κοιλίαν
    koilian
    belly
    G2836 · κοιλία
  12. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  13. εἰς
    eis
    into
    G1519 · εἰς
  14. τὸν
    ton
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  15. ἀφεδρῶνα
    aphedrōna
    a drain
    G856 · ἀφεδρών
  16. ἐκπορεύεται
    ekporeuetai
    I journey out
    G1607 · ἐκπορεύω
  17. καθαρίζων
    katharizōn
    I make clean
    G2511 · καθαρίζω
  18. πάντα
    panta
    all
    G3956 · πᾶς
  19. τὰ
    ta
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  20. βρώματα
    brōmata
    food of any kind
    G1033 · βρῶμα