The Church Fathers on this verse

Mark 7:23Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

All these evil things come from within and defile a man.

Douay-Rheims

παντα ταυτα τα πονηρα εσωθεν εκπορευεται και κοινοι τον ανθρωπον

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

9 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 16 commentaries

John Chrysostom

5th centuryChurch Father

Again He subjoins, If any man have ears to hear, let him hear. For He had not clearly shewn them, what those things are which proceed out of a man, and defile a man; and on account of this saying, the Apostles thought that the foregoing discourse of the Lord implied some other deep thing; wherefore there follows: And when he was entered into the house from the people, his disciples asked him concerning the parable; they called it parable, because it was not clear.

The Jews regard and murmur about only the bodily purification of the law; our Lord wishes to bring in the contrary. Wherefore it is said, And when he had called all the people unto him, he said unto them, Hearken unto me every one, and understand; there is nothing from without a man, that entering into him can defile him, but the things which come out of a man, those are they which defile a man; that is, which make him unclean. The things of Christ have relation to the inner man, but those which are of the law are visible and external, to which, as being bodily, the cross of Christ was shortly to put an end.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

Then the Lord shews them what was hidden, saying, Do ye not perceive, that whatsoever thing from without entereth into the man, it cannot make him common?

The Lord begins by chiding them, wherefore there follows, Are ye so without understanding also?

But the intention of the Lord in saying this was to teach men, that the observing of meats, which the law commands, should not be taken in a carnal sense, and from this He began to unfold to them the intent of the law.

An evil eye, that is, hatred and flattery, for he who hates turns an evil and envious eye on him whom he hates, and a flatterer, looking askance at his neighbour’s goods, leads him into evil; blasphemies, that is, faults committed against God; pride, that is, contempt of God, when a man ascribes the good, which he does, not to God, but to his own virtue; foolishness, that is, an injury against one’s neighbour.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

For some things are joined to others in such a way as both to change and be changed, just as food, losing its former appearance, is both itself turned into our body, and we too are changed, and our strength is refreshed by it.b Further, a most subtle liquid, after the food has been prepared and digested in our veins, and other arteries, by some hidden channels, called from a Greek word, pores, passes through us, and goes into the draught.

Beda Venerabilis

8th centuryChurch Father

For that man is a faulty hearer who considers what is obscure to be a clear speech, or what is clear to be obscurely spoken.

For the Jews, boasting themselves to be the portion of God, call common those meats which all men use, as shellfish, hares, and animals of that sort. Not even however what is offered to idols is unclean, in as far as it is food and God’s creature; it is the invocation of devils which makes it unclean; and He adds the cause of it, saying, Because it entereth not into his heart. The principal seat of the soul according to Plato is the brain, but according to Christ, it is in the heart.

Thus then it is not meat that makes men unclean, but wickedness, which works in us the passions which come from within; wherefore it goes on: And he said, That which cometh out of a man, that defileth a man.

From this passage are condemned those men who suppose that thoughts are put into them by the devil, and do not arise from their own evil will. The devil may excite and help on evil thoughts, he cannot be their author.

Tichon of Zadonsk

18th centuryChurch Father

Feet will not commit wrongdoing unless the soul desires it. Hands will refrain from evil deeds if the will does not wish to act. The tongue will not utter malicious words unless the heart consents. The body will not engage in immoral acts if the heart is unwilling. What benefit is there in appearing righteous externally while being corrupt internally? What good is refraining from theft if one harbors thievery in the heart? What merit is there in keeping one's hands from murder while nurturing hatred within? The heart is where the murderer, the adulterer, and the thief reside. A vessel may look clean on the outside but be filled with decay and filth within.

Read more (511 words)

Similarly, a person may seem virtuous outwardly, yet be filled with pride, envy, and malice internally; who may speak kindly while harboring deceit and flattery in their heart; who refrains from stealing yet is stingy and refuses to help others. Thus, individuals who present themselves as righteous but are corrupt within resemble “painted tombs, which appear beautiful on the outside, but inside are full of dead bones and all uncleanness” (Matthew 23:27).

Our God, the Christian, “tests hearts and minds; He examines our hearts” and looks beyond outward appearances (Ps. 7:10; 1 Sam. 16:7). He focuses on the inner being, the heart, rather than the exterior, and judges accordingly. If you display humility on the outside, that is good; however, are you not prideful within? If you do not display anger outwardly, this is commendable, but does resentment against your neighbor not fester inside? You may not physically kill your brother, which is commendable, but do you not harbor hatred for him in your heart? “Everyone who hates his brother is a murderer” (1 John 3:15). Avoiding physical relations with a woman is commendable, but if you lust in your heart, you are an adulterer. “Anyone who looks at a woman with lust has already committed adultery with her in his heart” (Matt. 5:28). You may refrain from stealing what belongs to another, yet desire it in your inner being – that makes you a true thief. You may not take another’s possessions, but if you hoard your resources and refuse to assist the needy – that too makes you a true thief. Clinging to God’s gifts, which are meant for sharing and not solely for oneself, is an offense against others just as much as failing to share what you possess.

The human heart is a vessel tainted by impurity and the stench of sinful desires. Beloved Christians, let us strive to purify this vessel within us, so our outward actions may be pleasing to God. The extraordinary promise from God is that He intends to dwell in our hearts: “I will dwell in them, and walk among them; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people” (2 Cor. 6:16; Lev. 26:12). There is no greater or more precious treasure than having God reside within us. There is no higher honor for humanity than to serve as the temple of God! God inhabits a pure soul as His most cherished sanctuary. He prefers to dwell in a heart that is pure than in man-made structures, for in the soul resides the image of God. Let us cleanse our hearts, O Christians! Let the image of God shine through us, revealing the beauty of our souls, making us the temple of our God. “Therefore, beloved, having such promises, let us cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God” (2 Cor. 7:1). “Imitating the prophet Jonah, I cry, ‘My life, O Blessed One, be free from corruption, and save me, O Saviour of the world, calling, “Glory be to Thee.”’”

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryCommentator

What then is the significance of the cryptic statement, It shall not enter into the mouth? Does it invalidate the Mosaic laws that distinguish between clean and unclean foods, or does it not? If it does, how can this be harmonized with the Lord’s veneration for the law, which led Him to reject the tradition of Korban? Conversely, if it does not nullify these laws, what is its interpretation? The disciples were perplexed by this and turned to the Lord for clarification. Peter requested that the Lord elucidate this parable. The Lord, astonished by their lack of insight, declared that food, being an external element, does not create internal moral defilement. (This does not imply that all food is morally neutral.

Read more (134 words)

As long as divine commandments remain in effect, consuming food that contravenes these laws will corrupt an individual, as it stems from a heart that disregards the law and gratifies the flesh). The other part of the parable indicates that the origin of moral impurity resides within the heart of humanity, signifying that those who seek to remain pure before God must cleanse their hearts. The Lord did not address the regulations regarding clean and unclean foods, which would be rendered obsolete with the ending of the entire Old Testament framework upon the establishment of the New Covenant between God and humanity, and the introduction of spiritual laws within the hearts of the new Israel. Nonetheless, He imparted to His disciples that these external laws are, even now, considerably inferior to the internal ones.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryCommentator

After confronting the insincerity of the Pharisees, the Lord drew the crowd nearer, teaching them about what constitutes true uncleanness that defiles a person and implicates him before God. He emphasized a crucial principle: that what enters the mouth does not make a person unclean, but what emerges from the mouth can defile him. Following this teaching, the Lord, as recorded by Mark, entered a house, where His disciples approached Him with news—mentioned only by Matthew—that the Pharisees were offended by His message. It is possible that the Apostles were troubled by the fact that Christ's words, intended for their edification, had instead become a source of temptation for the Pharisees.

Read more (276 words)

Alternatively, they may have been influenced by Christ's assertion that nothing entering a person’s mouth can taint him. Thus, they reported the Pharisees' offense to Christ, perhaps hoping for clarification on His pronouncement. The provocative statement in verse 11 had led the Pharisees to feel threatened; they had become so accustomed to the notion that spiritual cleanliness required handwashing before meals that they interpreted Christ's words as undermining the law of purification. The Pharisees may have also been disheartened because, in verse 11, Christ spoke to the people, undermining their authority through His teaching. In response to the report of their offense, Christ referred to either the Pharisaic doctrine, which was human-made rather than divinely ordained and thus needed to be discarded, or to the Pharisees themselves as being misled. Despite their role as shepherds and teachers, they were not God’s chosen plants—those who act in accordance with divine will—and thus they fall outside of His special protection and are destined for ruin. Therefore, the guidance was clear: do not adhere to their teaching, or face the same downfall; alternatively, do not concern yourselves with them, leaving them to their own devices. Subsequently, Peter, representing the group, sought clarification from the Lord regarding His enigmatic remarks about the distinction between defilement through what is ingested versus what is expelled from the mouth. The Lord clarified that by what enters the mouth He was referring to food, while what comes forth from the mouth encompassed all harmful thoughts, desires, and intentions arising from the heart. Such expressions reveal the moral corruption of the human soul; in contrast, food merely passes through the body without affecting the spirit.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

"Do you not yet comprehend?" Christ asked. "Do you not realize that nothing which enters a person from the outside can make him unclean?" (Mark 7:18). It does not defile him because it does not reach his heart, but goes into his stomach and is eliminated, purifying all food (Mk. 7:19). The things that come out of the mouth, out of the heart, are what defile a person (Mt. 15:18); for from within the human heart arise evil thoughts, adultery, fornication, murder, theft, covetousness, malice, deceit, immorality, envy, blasphemy, pride, foolishness—this multitude of evils emerges from within and defiles a person (Mk. 7:21-23). Eating with unclean hands does not make him impure (Matthew 15:20). There is little to add to this elucidation of Jesus Christ’s remarks; the message is clear.

Read more (254 words)

Nonetheless, in light of these statements, many have come to believe that Christ dismissed the practice of fasting. This perspective cannot be accepted. Fasting, whether through total abstinence from food or consuming only minimal amounts necessary for survival, has long been acknowledged as a powerful tool for resisting the desires of the flesh. Those who aspire to a rational existence, rather than a base one, have consistently sought to temper their passions, aligning them with reason (spirit). They recognize that excessive food, particularly certain types like meat and wine, can inflame passions and dull the conscience. Consequently, such individuals have turned to complete abstinence from all food at times, or have chosen to forsake meat and wine, or to adhere to a very moderate diet overall. Christ Himself encouraged His followers to resist carnal desires, and He served as an example by fasting for forty days in the wilderness. Therefore, it cannot be concluded from His statement, "Not that which enters the mouth defiles a man," that He negated the value and necessity of fasting. He was addressing the fact that what defiles a person, rendering him unworthy of the Kingdom of Heaven, is not the food itself but rather the spirit of self-control that is compromised by indulgence, along with evil thoughts and wrongful actions—not the food and its consumption, nor the mere adherence to the external cleanliness valued by the Pharisees. "Eating with unwashed hands does not defile a man," He asserted, thus eliminating any misunderstanding regarding the essence of this dialogue.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryCommentator

The decision had been made. Until this point, Christ had held back His righteous wrath, intent on enlightening the scribes and Pharisees through His compassionate teaching. Yet, it became evident that these rigid leaders were beyond hope. Thus, decisive action became necessary. It was essential to clearly demonstrate to those who followed the scribes and Pharisees the true worth of the religion and ethics they professed. The gospel's truth could not take root while the hearts of the people were corrupted and shrouded in darkness by such instructors.

Read more (103 words)

Consequently, leaving the scribes to their ineffective malice, Christ addressed the surrounding crowd with a loud voice: ‘Hear and understand!’ He proceeded to instruct both the people and His disciples that within the kingdom of heaven, purity of heart surpasses ritual cleanliness, ‘for out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witnesses, blasphemies.’ Indeed, all these things ‘defile a man; and eating with unwashed hands does not defile a man.’ This regulation stems solely from a customary practice of ritualism and lacks any intrinsic moral significance, contrary to the interpretations of the Pharisees, those “blind leaders of the blind.”

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 10 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. πάντα
    panta
    all
    G3956 · πᾶς
  2. ταῦτα
    tauta
    this
    G3778 · οὗτος
  3. τὰ
    ta
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  4. πονηρὰ
    ponēra
    evil
    G4190 · πονηρός
  5. ἔσωθεν
    esōthen
    from within
    G2081 · ἔσωθεν
  6. ἐκπορεύεται
    ekporeuetai
    I journey out
    G1607 · ἐκπορεύω
  7. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  8. κοινοῖ
    koinoi
    I make unclean
    G2840 · κοινόω
  9. τὸν
    ton
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  10. ἄνθρωπον
    anthrōpon
    a man
    G444 · ἄνθρωπος