The Church Fathers on this verse

Matthew 12:8Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

For the Son of man is Lord even of the sabbath.

Douay-Rheims

κυριος γαρ εστιν του σαββατου ο υιος του ανθρωπου

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

14 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 31 commentaries

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Why then did He lead them through the corn fields on the sabbath, seeing He knew all things, unless He desired to break the sabbath? This he desired indeed, but not absolutely, therefore He broke it not without cause, but furnished a sufficient reason; so that He both caused the Law to cease, and yet offended not against it. Thus in order to soften the Jews, He here introduces a natural necessity; this is what is said, And his disciples being an hungred, began to pluck the ears of corn, and to eat. Although in things which are manifestly sinful, there can be no excuse, he who kills another cannot plead rage, nor he who commits adultery, lust, or any other cause; yet here saying that the disciples were hungry, He delivers them from all accusation.

Here admire the disciples, who are so limited in their desires, that they have no care of the things of the body, but despise the support of the flesh; they are assailed by hunger, and yet they go not away from Christ; for had not they been hard pressed by hunger, they would not have done thus. What the Pharisees said to this is added, The Pharisees seeing it said unto Him, Behold, thy disciples do what is not lawful to do on the sabbath.

To clear His disciples, He brings forward the instance of David, whose glory as a Prophet was great among the Jews. Yet they could not here answer that this was lawful for him, because he was a Prophet; for it was not Prophets, but Priests only who might eat. And the greater was he who did this, the greater is the defence of the disciples; yet though David was a Prophet, they that were with him were not.

But some one will say, How is this instance applicable to the question in hand? For David did not transgress the sabbath. Herein is shewn the wisdom of Christ, that He brings forward an instance stronger than the sabbath. For it is by no means the same thing to violate the sabbath, and to touch that sacred table, which is lawful for none. And again, He adds yet another answer, saying, Or have ye not read in the Law, that on the sabbath days the Priests in the temple profane the sabbath, and are blameless?

But that you should not say to me, that to find an instance of another’s sin is not to excuse our own—indeed where the thing done and not the doer of it is accused, we excuse the thing done. But this is not enough, He said what is yet more, that they are blameless. But see how great things He brings in; first, the place, in the Temple; secondly, the time, on the sabbath; the setting aside the Law, in the word profane, not merely break; and that they are not only free from punishment but from blame; and are blameless. And this second instance is not like the first which He gave respecting David; for that was done but once, by David who was not a Priest, and was a case of necessity; but this second is done every sabbath, and by the Priests, and according to the Law.

Read more (73 words)

So that not only by indulgence, as the first case would establish, but by the strict law the disciples are to be held blameless. But are the disciples Priests? yea, they are yet greater than Priests, forasmuch as He was there who is the Lord of the Temple, who is the reality and not the type; and therefore it is added, But I say unto you, one greater than the Temple is here.

And because what He had said seemed hard to those that heard it, He again exhorts to mercy, introducing His discourse with emphasis, saying, But had ye known what that meaneth, I will have mercy and not sacrifice, ye would never have condemned the innocent.

Observe again how in leading the discourse towards an apology for them, He shews His disciples to be above the need of any apology, and to be indeed blameless, as He had said above of the Priests. And He adds yet another plea which clears them of blame, For the Son of Man is Lord also of the sabbath.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

Additionally, I, the Son of Man, hold dominion over the Sabbath, as well as over all creation; thus, as its Sovereign, I do not adhere to Sabbath restrictions. It is crucial to interpret this in a metaphorical context: the apostles worked as laborers; the harvest and the grains represent the faithful; the apostles gathered and consumed them, meaning that through their ministry, they brought salvation to people. They performed these actions on the Sabbath, a time designated for refraining from wicked deeds. Yet, the Pharisees were filled with anger. This scenario is mirrored within the church. Although the leaders frequently teach and provide guidance, the Pharisees and the envious often express their discontent.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

This which here follows is related both by Mark and Luke, without any question of discrepancy; indeed they do not say, At that time, so that Matthew has here perhaps preserved the order of time, they that of their recollection; unless we take the words in a wider sense, At that time, that is, the time in which these many and divers things were done, whence we may conceive that all these things happened after the death of John. For he is believed to have been beheaded a little after he sent his disciples to Christ. So that when he says at that time, he may mean only an indefinite time.

It should be observed, that one example is taken from royal persons, as David, the other from priestly, as those who profane the sabbath for the service of the Temple, so that much less can the charge concerning the rubbing the ears of corn attach to Him who is indeed King and Priest.

He did not forbid His disciples to pluck the ears of corn on the sabbath, that so He might convict both the Jews who then were, and the Manichæans who were to come, who will not pluck up a herb lest they should be committing a murder.

But no man passes into the body of Christ, until he has been stripped of his fleshly raiment; according to that of the Apostle, Put ye off the old man. (Eph. 4:22.)

The Jews rather charged the Lord’s disciples with the breach of the sabbath than with theft; because it was commanded the people of Israel in the Law (Deut. 23:25.), that they should not lay hold of any as a thief in their fields, unless he sought to carry ought away with him; but if any touched only what he needed to eat, him they suffered to depart with impunity free.

Jerome of Stridon

5th centuryChurch Father

As we read in another Evangelist, they had no opportunity of taking food because of the thronging of the multitude, and therefore they hungred as men. That they rub the ears of corn in their hands, and with them satisfy themselves, is a proof of an austere life, and of men who needed not prepared meats, but sought only simple food.

Observe, that the first Apostles of the Saviour broke the letter of the sabbath, contrary to the opinion of the Ebionitesa, who receive the other Apostles, but reject Paul as a transgressor of the Law. Then it proceeds to their excuse; But he said unto them, Have ye not read what David did, when he was an hungred? To refute the false accusation of the Pharisees, He calls to mind the ancient history, that David flying from Saul came to Nobba, and being entertained by Achimelech the Priest, asked for food; (1 Sam.

Read more (162 words)

21.) he having no common bread, gave him the consecrated loaves, which it was not lawful for any to eat, but the Priests only and Levites; esteeming it a better action to deliver men from the danger of famine than to offer sacrifice to God; for the preservation of man is a sacrifice acceptable to God. Thus then the Lord meets their objection, saying, If David be a holy man, and if you blame not the high-priest Achimelech, but consider their excuse for their transgression of the Law to be valid, and that was hunger; how do ye not approve in the Apostles the same plea which you approve in others? Though even here there is much difference. These rub ears of corn in their hands on the sabbath, those ate the Levitical bread, and over and above the solemn sabbath it was the season of new moon, during which when sought for at the banquet he fled from the royal palace.

Observe that neither David nor his servants received the loaves of shew-bread, before they had made answer that they were pure from women.

As though He had said, Ye bring complaints against my disciples, that on the sabbath they rub ears of corn in their hands, under stress of hunger, and ye yourselves profane the sabbath, slaying victims in the temple, killing bulls, burning holocausts on piles of wood; also, on the testimony of another Gospel (John 7:23.), ye circumcise infants on the sabbath; so that in keeping one law, ye break that concerning the sabbath.

Read more (61 words)

But the laws of God are never contrary one to another; wisely therefore, wherein His disciples might be accused of having transgressed them, He shews that therein they followed the examples of Achimelech and David; and this their pretended charge of breaking the sabbath He retorts truly, and not having the plea of necessity, upon those who had brought the accusation.

The word Hic is not a pronoun, but an adverb of place here, for that place is greater than the Temple which contains the Lord of the Temple.

What I will have mercy, and not sacrifice, signifies, we have explained above. The words, Ye mould never have condemned the innocent, are to be referred to the Apostles, and the meaning is, If ye allow the mercy of Achimelech, in that he refreshed David when in danger of famishing, why do ye condemn My disciples?

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

Once again, He makes His divine nature known. At times, He veils it before the eyes of those who are perpetually discontent, while at other moments, He makes it more manifest for those with sharper discernment. He asserts that He who took on human form is also the Sovereign of the Sabbath, as the Creator and Lawgiver. If I, the Sovereign, am present here and endure it, your condemnation of my disciples is in vain. In the Gospel according to Mark (Mark 2:27), Christ provides further justification: the Sabbath was established for the benefit of humanity, not humanity for the Sabbath. This signifies that the rest of the Sabbath is intended for human benefit, not the other way around; indeed, the Sabbath and all preceding days were designed for the flourishing of mankind.

Read more (75 words)

We should not find it surprising that one Gospel writer includes details that another might leave out. The Gospels were not penned concurrently with Christ’s teachings but rather after a considerable passage of time, which naturally leads to the possibility of some details being forgotten by the authors. It is important to consider this context when encountering such additions and omissions. At times, certain details may be intentionally left out for conciseness, or deemed non-essential.

Hilarius of Poitiers

4th centuryChurch Father

Figuratively; First consider that this discourse was held at that time, namely, when He had given thanks to the Father for giving salvation to the Gentiles. The field is the world, the sabbath is rest, the corn the ripening of them that believe for the harvest; thus His passing through the corn field on the sabbath, is the coming of the Lord into the world in the rest of the Law; the hunger of the disciples is their desire for the salvation of men.

The Pharisees, who thought that the key of the kingdom of heaven was in their hands, accused the disciples of doing what was not lawful to do; whereon the Lord reminded them of deeds in which, under the guise of facts, a prophecy was concealed; and that He might shew the power of all things, He further added, that it contained the form of that work which was to be, Had ye known what that meaneth, I will have mercy; for the work of our salvation is not in the sacrifice of the Law, but in mercy; and the Law having ceased, we are saved by the mercy of God.

Read more (49 words)

Which gift if they had understood they would not have condemned the innocent, that is His Apostles, whom in their jealousy they were to accuse of having transgressed the Law, where the old sacrifices having ceased, the new dispensation of mercy came through them to the aid of all.

Rabanus Maurus

9th centuryChurch Father

They pluck the ears of corn when they withdraw men from devotion to the world; they rub them in their hands when they tear away their hearts from the lusts of the flesh; they eat the grain when they transfer such as are amended into the body of the Church.

This they do on the sabbath, that is in the hope of eternal rest, to which they invite others. Also they walk through the corn fields with the Lord, who have delight in meditating on the Scriptures; they are hungry while they desire to find the bread of life, that is the love of God, in them; they pluck the ears of corn and rub them in their hands, while they examine the testimonies to discover what lies hid under the letter, and this on the sabbath, that is, while they are free from disquieting thoughts.

Remigius of Auxerre

9th centuryChurch Father

He calls Himself the Son of Man, and the meaning is, He whom ye suppose a mere man is God, the Lord of all creatures, and also of the sabbath, and He has therefore power to change the law after His pleasure, because He made it.

Abbot Panteleimon about the Trinity

19th centuryCommentator

He who surpasses the Church, the one who came to replace the shadows of the Old Testament with the reality of truth as the Creator of the Law, rightfully does not compel His disciples to adhere strictly to the written Law or to the customs of men; indeed, the SON OF MAN IS LORD of the Sabbath. Having the authority to interpret the Sabbath law—as no one is more qualified to do so than the Lawgiver Himself—He brings renewal to it. As St. Philaret of Moscow observes, do not assume that the Lord, who established the Sabbath, annulled it or permitted it to be disregarded. He declared that He did not come "to break the law... but to fulfill it" (Matthew 5:17).

Read more (332 words)

As the Lord of the Sabbath, He specifically demonstrated His authority by preserving the essence of the original command to dedicate the seventh day to God, while also sanctifying a new day for this purpose through His glorious Resurrection. The former Sabbath, which celebrated the creation of the world, has not been fully restored to joy following the corruption of creation due to sin, and rightfully yields its honor to the new day of Sunday, which commemorates the new creation, in which we are "created in Christ Jesus unto good works... regenerated" (by the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ) "by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead to the living hope" (Eph. 2:10; 1 Pet. 1:3). Observe how the Lord of the Sabbath did not abolish it, but rather elevated it further. If the ancient Lord’s day, the Sabbath, was sacred in honor of the first creation of the temporal, ought not the new Lord's day, Sunday, which celebrates the joy of the everlasting new creation, be regarded as even more holy and reverently esteemed? St. Chrysostom reflects that "great benefit" was conferred by the Sabbath; it cultivated meekness and love among people, guided them towards an understanding of God’s providence, and, as the prophet Ezekiel states, gradually led them away from evil. However, now a new era has emerged for humanity, when there is no longer a requirement to adhere to the letter of the Sabbath law with such severity. The Lord had previously restricted the Jews from various activities on the Sabbath to ensure their focus on the reading of the Law, but He did not impose similar prohibitions on Christians, who are instructed to gather in God’s temples on Sunday for prayer and the reading of the Divine Scriptures. For "it is unseemly for those who do not stretch their hands even to the least evil to sit idly by; it is unseemly for the perfect to live in the same way as the imperfect."

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryCommentator

In the following two Sabbaths, the significance of the Sabbath and the sanctity of its rest, which had been inadequately understood during the recent disputes raised by the Pharisees, were explored in greater depth and clarified more definitively. First, this occurred when the Lord’s disciples were traveling from Jerusalem and, being hungry and lacking other provisions, plucked heads of grain from a field and rubbed them in their hands to eat. On another occasion, it involved the miraculous healing of a man with a withered hand in the synagogue, accomplished solely through the power of His word without any physical intervention. This last event took place in Galilee.

Read more (230 words)

In response to the Pharisees, who meticulously scrutinized His every action, the Lord provided examples of how holy individuals, in times of necessity, had transgressed certain laws. For instance, He cited how David, while fleeing from Saul, sought the showbread from Abiathar and shared it with his followers (1 Sam. 21:1). He highlighted how the Pharisees themselves contravened the Sabbath rest by rescuing animals trapped in pits, noting that even the priests in the temple could not adhere strictly to the commandment of rest due to their sacrificial duties, especially on ordinary days. The Lord emphasized that something greater than the temple is present here. Thus, the disciples, in following this greater principle, do not desecrate the temple, which is a temporary dwelling of the Almighty, nor His transient laws.

Moreover, the Lord reminded them of the divine words from the prophet: “I desire mercy, and not sacrifice”—that mercy towards the man with the withered hand takes precedence over simply maintaining passive rest. He underscored that the Sabbath is intended for humanity, not the other way around. The Sabbath, like any other time, serves the purpose of doing good rather than committing evil; neglecting a good deed that can benefit a neighbor is also a form of transgression. Finally, the Lord reiterated what He had stated in Jerusalem, declaring that the Son of Man is also Lord of the Sabbath.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

In this instance, they were confronted by the One who possesses the power to revoke the Old Testament Sabbath, the very Lord of the Sabbath.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryCommentator

The Christ whom they afflict is indeed greater than the temple, and as the Son of Man, He holds dominion over the Sabbath. Instead of fixating on trivial matters of equality, it would be more beneficial for them to recall the profound declaration of the prophet, which states that mercy surpasses sacrifice (Hos. 6:6), prioritizing compassion over lifeless rituals.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryCommentator

‘Lord of the Sabbath’ - He who surpasses the temple, transcending all laws associated with and in the temple, and is above the lawful regulations pertaining to the Sabbath, the Sovereign of the Sabbath itself. He possesses the authority to set aside the Old Testament Sabbath and can instruct His followers to move beyond the Old Testament shadow: ‘for the time has come for them to learn all things by means of the loftiest objects, and no longer should the law bind the hands of him who, freed from evil, strives after all good things.’

Paul Matwejewski

19th centuryCommentator

In conclusion, Jesus Christ stated that the Sabbath was created for the benefit of humanity, not humanity for the Sabbath. Its purpose is to assist individuals, guiding their hearts and minds, which may be weighed down by earthly concerns, towards God and righteousness. The Sabbath is not meant to restrain those who are diligently seeking goodness through the law. The one who surpasses the established religious order came to fulfill the forerunner of the Old Covenant, bringing forth the ultimate truth. Thus, as the Lord and the Son of Man, He possesses the authority to exempt His followers from the obligation of its observance.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 9 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. κύριος
    kyrios
    lord
    G2962 · κύριος
  2. γάρ
    gar
    for
    G1063 · γάρ
  3. ἐστιν
    estin
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί
  4. τοῦ
    tou
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  5. σαββάτου
    sabbatou
    the Sabbath
    G4521 · σάββατον
  6. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  7. Υἱὸς
    huios
    a son
    G5207 · υἱός
  8. τοῦ
    tou
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  9. ἀνθρώπου
    anthrōpou
    a man
    G444 · ἄνθρωπος