John Chrysostom
Utilizing the same plea through which he sought forgiveness, this individual likewise requests salvation. However, his profound cruelty left him unmoved by these words, nor did he recognize that he himself was granted salvation through the same plea. Even were he to extend forgiveness, it would not have stemmed from a place of humanity but rather from a sense of duty and obligation. Indeed, had he acted before the reckoning with the master, after receiving such a favor, his response might have been one of genuine generosity. Yet, following so great a gift and the absolution of countless sins, he was already bound, as if by an inescapable obligation, to refrain from harboring resentment towards his fellow servant.
Read more (171 words)
Nevertheless, he failed to do so and did not acknowledge the vast disparity between the pardon he had received and the one he ought to have granted to his brother. Truly, the difference is evident not only in the monetary amounts owed but also in the status of the individuals involved and the very nature of their forgiveness. The debt there was ten thousand talents, while here it was a mere hundred denarii; one was indebted to the lord, while the other was in debt to his companion; one could offer a favor by receiving assistance, but the lord forgave him entirely, expecting nothing in return. What follows? It is stated that “his companion fell at his feet.” Notice how often the Evangelist emphasizes the term “his fellow-servant,” not without intent, so that we may understand there was no hierarchy between them. Yet the fellow debtor implores his creditor with the same humbling request that he himself had made to his master: “Bear with me, and I will repay you everything.”