John Chrysostom
Since the Redeemer willingly embraced suffering, He references a prophecy where He is distinctly identified as the Lord. This is not done casually or without purpose, but rather for a compelling reason. When they failed to provide a proper response to His initial inquiry—merely identifying Him as a human—they mistakenly reduced Him to a mere man. In response to their erroneous view, He cites the words of David to affirm His divine nature. They saw Him as simply human and referred to Him as the Son of David. However, the Redeemer, seeking to rectify their misunderstanding, quotes the prophet who proclaims His lordship and the truth of being the Son of God, asserting that He deserves the same honor as the Father.
Read more (549 words)
Yet, He does not stop there; to instill a sense of reverence in them, He includes the phrase, "Till I make Thy enemies Thy footstool," hoping that this would draw them closer to Him. To prevent them from dismissing David's words as mere hyperbole or a human estimation, He poses the question, “How doth David call Him Lord by the spirit?” Here, He modestly highlights the prophet’s view of Him. Initially, He asks, “What think ye of Him? Whose son is He?” to provoke a response from them. When they reply that He is David’s son, He refrains from merely stating what David says. Instead, He poses the question, “How then does David call Him Lord?” to challenge their understanding. Likewise, the apostles respectfully address the patriarch David, recognizing his significant status as one who has died and been buried (Acts 2:29). The Saviour also presents His own nature through questioning and reasoning, asking, "How does David by the spirit call Him, saying, The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit at my right hand, until I make Thy enemies Thy footstool?" He continues, "If David calls Him Lord, how is He his son?" (vv. 43-45). In this, He does not deny His identity as David’s son—He would not have rebuked Peter for this—but aims to correct the Pharisees' mistaken belief. His inquiry, “What son is He?” indicates that He is indeed the son of David, albeit not in the manner they perceive. They claim that Christ is merely the son of David and not also Lord. Thus, He first presents the prophet’s testimony and then gently corrects their understanding, asking, “If David calls Him Lord, how can He be his son?” When the Pharisees heard this, they had no reply; they were disinterested in accepting the truth. Therefore, He leads them to recognize that He is indeed Lord to David. However, He does not assert this directly for Himself but rather through the prophet’s words, given their lack of belief and poor opinion of Him. Despite their dismissive attitude, we should not be misled by the fact that the Redeemer sometimes speaks of Himself in a humble manner; this approach reflects His effort to engage with their flawed perceptions. Consequently, He continues to present His teachings through questions and answers, subtly revealing His dignity, as being recognized as the Lord of the Jews cannot be equated with being the Lord of David. Observe how appropriately He unfolds this doctrine. After initially stating that there is only one Lord, He also identifies Himself as Lord, supporting this not only through His deeds but also through the prophet’s affirmation. Simultaneously, He declares that the Father will take vengeance upon His enemies, asserting the equality of honor He shares with the Father. With these statements, the Saviour concludes His dialogue with the Pharisees, having conveyed a profound and noble doctrine that left them speechless. From then on, they remained silent—not out of choice, but because they had no counterarguments. Thus, they received such a decisive challenge that they feared to engage Him further; it is recorded, “And no man from that day forth durst ask Him any question” (v. 46). This significantly benefited the people, as the Saviour disbanded the schemes of these adversaries and thereafter directed His message toward the crowd.