The Church Fathers on this verse

Matthew 26:35Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Peter saith to him: Yea, though I should die with thee, I will not deny thee. And in like manner said all the disciples.

Douay-Rheims

λεγει αυτω ο πετρος καν δεη με συν σοι αποθανειν ου μη σε απαρνησωμαι απαρνησομαι ομοιως δε και παντες οι μαθηται ειπον

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

18 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 33 commentaries

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Let them hear this, who like swine with no thought but of eating rise from the table drunk, when they should have given thanks, and closed with a hymn. Let them hear who will not tarry for the final prayer in the sacred mysteries; for the last prayer of the mysteries represents that hymn. He gave thanks before He delivered the holy mysteries to the disciples, that we also might give thanks; He sung a hymn after He had delivered them, that we also should do the like.

In this we see what the disciples were both before and after the cross. They who could not stand with Christ whilst He was crucified, became after the death of Christ harder than adamant. This flight and fear of the disciples is a demonstration of Christ’s death against those who are infected with the heresy of Marcion. If the had been neither bound nor crucified, whence arose the terror of Peter and the rest?

He produces this prophecy to teach them to attend to the things that are written, and to shew that His crucifixion was according to the counsel of God, and (as He does throughout) that He was not a stranger to the Old Testament, but that it prophesied of Him. But He did not suffer them to continue in sorrow, but announces glad tidings, saying, When I am risen again, I will go before you into Galilee. After His resurrection He does not appear to them immediately from heaven, nor depart into any far country, but in the very same nation in which He was crucified, almost in the very place, giving them thereby assurance, that He who was crucified was the same as He who rose again, thereby to cheer their cast-down countenances. He fixes upon Galilee, that, being delivered from fear of the Jews, they might believe what He spoke to them.

What sayest thou, Peter? The Prophet says, The sheep shall be scattered abroad, and Christ has confirmed it, yet thou sayest, Never. When He said, One of you shall betray me, thou fearedst for thyself, although thou wert not conscious of such a thought; now when He openly affirms, All ye shall be offended, you deny it. But because when he was relieved of the anxiety he had concerning the betrayal, he grew confident concerning the rest, he therefore says thus, I will never be offended.

[I suppose also that Peter fell into these words through ambition and boastfulness. And they had disputed at supper which of them should be greatest, whence we see that the love of empty glory disturbed them much. And so to deliver him from such passions, Christ withdrew His aid from him. Moreover observe how after the resurrection, taught by his fall he speaks to Christ more humbly, and does not any more resist His words. All this his fall wrought for him; for before he had attributed all to himself, when he ought rather to have said, I will not deny Thee if Thou succour me with Thy aid.

Read more (55 words)

But afterwards he shews that every thing is to be ascribed to God; Why look ye so earnestly upon us, as though by our own power and holiness we had made this man to walk?]q (Act 3:12.) Hence then we learn the great doctrine, that man’s wish is not enough, unless he enjoys Divine support.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

Peter, eager to demonstrate his complete commitment to the Savior, found himself in rebellion against Him. Liberated from the apprehension of disloyalty, he began to resist the other disciples, driven by a fervent affection for his Lord as well as personal ambition. The other disciples, too, though untouched by temptation at that moment, made promises that remained unfulfilled due to their lack of understanding. In a desire for communion with the Father, Christ withdrew to a quiet place, recognizing that sincere prayer necessitates solitude and separation.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

Perplexity may be occasioned to some by the great difference, not in words only, but in substance, of the speeches in which Peter is forewarned by Our Lord, and which occasion his presumptuous declaration of dying with or for the Lord. Some would oblige us to understand that he thrice expressed his confidence, and the Lord thrice answered him that he would deny Him thrice before cock-crowing; as after His resurrection He thrice asked him if he loved Him, and as often gave him command to feed His sheep. For what in language or matter has Matthew like the expressions of Peter in either Luke or John?

Read more (288 words)

Mark indeed relates it in nearly the same words as Matthew, only marking more precisely in the Lord’s words the manner in which it should fall in, Verily I say unto thee, that this day, in the night, before the cock crow twice, thou shalt deny me thrice. (Mark 14:30.) Whence some inattentive persons think that there is a discrepancy between Mark and the rest. For the sum of Peter’s denials is three; if the first then had been after the first cock crowing, the other three Evangelists must be wrong when they make the Lord say that Peter should deny Him before the cock crow. But, on the other hand, if he had made all three denials before the cock began to crow, it would be superfluous in Mark to say, Before the cock crow twice. Forasmuch as this threefold denial was begun before the first cockcrow, the three Evangelists have marked, not when it was to be concluded, but how often it was to happen, and when to begin, that is, before cock-crow. Though indeed if we understand it of Peter’s heart we may well say, that the whole denial was complete before the first cock-crow, seeing that “before that his mind was seized with that great fear which wrought upon him to the third denial. Much less therefore ought it to disquiet us, how the three-fold denial in three distinct speeches was begun, but not finished before cockcrow. Just as though one should say, Before cock-crow you will write me a letter, in which you will revile me three times; if the letter were begun before any cock-crow, but not finished till after the first, we should not therefore say that the prediction was false.

Jerome of Stridon

5th centuryChurch Father

After this example of the Saviour, whosoever is filled and is drunken upon the bread and cup of Christ, may praise God and ascend the Mount of Olives, where is refreshment after toil, solace of grief, and knowledge of the true light.

He foretels what they should suffer, that they might not after it had befallen them despair of salvation; but doing penitence might be set free.

And He adds emphatically this night, (1 These. 5:7.) because as they that are drunken are drunken by night, so they that are scandalized are scandalized by night, and in the dark.

This is found in Zacharias in words different; it is said to God in the person of the Prophet, Smite the shepherd, and the sheep will be scattered abroad. (Zech. 13:7.) The good Shepherd is smitten, that He may lay down His life for His sheep, and that of many flocks of divers errors should be made one flock, and one Shepherd.

It is not wilfulness, not falsehood, but the Apostle’s faith, and ardent attachment towards the Lord his Saviour.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

As Jesus Christ increasingly made His presence known, Peter's resistance grew concurrently. His initial confidence led to a significant downfall, leaving him devoid of divine support and exposing his frailty. Observe his subsequent humility; after the Resurrection, when he inquired about John, inquiring ‘Lord, what about this man?’ (John 21:21), the Lord’s response silenced him. Similarly, upon hearing before the Ascension that ‘It is not for you to know the times or seasons’ (Acts 1:7), he remained quiet. Later, when he was told regarding the vision: ‘What God has cleansed, you must not call common’ (Acts 10:15), despite not fully grasping the message, he refrained from disputing it. This transformation within him was a consequence of his denials.

Read more (288 words)

Previously, Peter had confidently professed his faith, asserting, ‘Even if all are made to stumble, I will not be’ (Matthew 26:33) and ‘I will never deny You’ (v. 35). Yet he should have added, ‘If You provide me strength.’ Afterward, he openly declared regarding the healing of the crippled man, ‘Why do you look at us so intently, as though by our own power or godliness we had made him walk?’ (Acts 3:12). This clearly illustrates that while human will is impotent without divine guidance, God’s plans are ineffective without human willingness. Peter and Judas embody these truths.

Thus, we must not carelessly surrender everything to God, nor consider our efforts as the source of all accomplishments. God does not act in a way that promotes complacency, nor does He provide all things to prevent arrogance; rather, He removes what is detrimental and retains what is beneficial. The fall of the chief apostle serves not only the aforementioned reasons but also to cultivate a deeper love within him, for ‘to whom much is given, from him much will be required.’

We should strive to obey God consistently and not resist Him, even when His instructions contradict our personal beliefs or perspectives. His Word must take precedence over our own ideas and interpretations. This approach should extend to the sacred Mysteries; we must not merely focus on what is visible, but we must trust in the Lord’s declarations. Since He affirms, ‘This is My Body, and this is My Blood,’ we should respond with obedience and faith, acknowledging that, as in Baptism, we see the water while the gift of regeneration remains unseen. Just as our soul intertwines with our body, God has imparted the spiritual through the tangible.

Origen of Alexandria

3rd centuryChurch Father

When the disciples had eaten the bread of blessing, and drunk of the cup of thanksgiving, the Lord instructs them in return for these things to sing a hymn to the Father. And they go to the Mount of Olives, that they may pass from height to height, because the believer can do nought in the valley. o[

Whence the other disciples were offended in Jesus, but Peter was not only offended, but what is much more, was suffered to deny Him thrice.

Suitably also was the mount of mercy chosen whence to declare the offence of His disciples’ weakness, by One even then prepared not to reject the disciples who forsook Him, but to receive them when they returned to Him.

Also He foretels this to them, that they who now were somewhat dispersed in consequence of the offence, should be after gathered together by Christ rising again, and going before them into Galilee of the Gentiles.

But you will ask, whether it were possible that Peter should not have been offended, when once the Saviour had said, All ye shall be offended in me. To which one will answer, what is foretold by Jesus must of necessity come to pass; and another will say, that He who at the prayer of Ninevites turned away the wrath He had denounced by Jonas, might also have averted Peter’s offence at his entreaty. But his presumptuous confidence, prompted by zeal indeed but not a cautious zeal, became the cause not only of offence but of a thrice repeated denial. And since He confirmed it with the sanction of an oath, some one will say that it was not possible that he should not have denied Him.

Read more (141 words)

For Christ would have spoken falsely when he said, Verily I say unto thee, if Peter’s assertion, I will not deny thee, had been true. It seems to me that the other disciples having in view not that which was first said, All ye shall be offended, but that which was said to Peter, Verily I say unto thee, &c. made a like promise with Peter because they were not comprehended in the prophecy of denial. Peter said unto him, Though I should die with thee, yet will I not deny thee. Likewise also said all the disciples. Here again Peter knows not what he says; he could not die with Him who was to die for all mankind, who were all in sin, and had need of some one to die for them, not that they should die for others.

Hilarius of Poitiers

4th centuryChurch Father

Hereby He shews that men confirmed by the powers of the Divine mysteries, are exalted to heavenly glory in a common joy and gladness.

The credit of this prediction is supported by the authority of old prophecy; It is written, I will smite the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock shall he scattered abroad.

But Peter was carried so far by his zeal and affection for Christ, that he regarded neither the weakness of his flesh nor the truth of the Lord’s words; as if what He spake must not come to pass, Peter answered and said unto him, Though all should be offended because of thee, yet will I never be offended.

Beda Venerabilis

8th centuryChurch Father

Beautifully after the disciples have been filled with the Sacraments of His Body and Blood, and, commended to the Father in a hymn of pious intercession, does He lead them into the mount of Olives; thus by type teaching us how we ought, by the working of His Sacraments, and the aid of His intercession, mount up to the higher gifts of the virtues and the graces of the Holy Spirit, with which we are anointed in our hearts.

Rabanus Maurus

9th centuryChurch Father

This hymn may be that thanksgiving which in John, (c. 17.) Our Lord offers up to the Father, when He lifted up His eyes and prayed for His disciples, and those who should believe through their word. This is that of which the Psalm speaks, The poor shall eat and be filled, they shall praise the Lord.] (Ps. 22:26.)

Peter understood the Lord to have foretold that he should deny Him under terror of death, and therefore he declares that though death were imminent, nothing could shake him from his faith; and the other Apostles in like manner in the warmth of their zeal, valued not the infliction of death, but human presumption is vain without Divine aid.

Nicodemos the Haghiorite

18th centuryChurch Father

Beloved, reflect on the reason behind Peter’s lamentable downfall, which is his denial of Christ. Despite being the foremost and most fervent follower of our Lord, he ultimately swore to turn away from his Master. May his stumbling serve as an illumination for you. The root of Peter’s denial lay in his arrogance. This pride led him to elevate himself above his fellow Apostles when he proclaimed, “if all be offended because of thee, I will never be offended” (Matthew 26:33). Even when the Lord warned him of his impending failure, Peter ignored the warning, affirming with even more conviction, “Though I should die with Thee, yet will I not deny Thee” (Mark 14:31).

Read more (88 words)

His arrogance rendered him insolent, causing him to overlook peril not only as he entered the high priest's courtyard, surrounded by many servants, but also while sitting among them to warm himself by the fire. His boldness stemmed from the illusion that he need not fear the adversary, but rather that the adversary should fear him. How could he muster the strength to stand firm at that moment, when he was so enveloped in pride? “Pride goeth before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall” (Proverbs 16:18).

Innocentius of Kherson

19th centuryChurch Father

Before entering Gethsemane, the Lord deemed it important to once again caution His disciples about the forthcoming trials they would face (Matthew 26:31). He asked them, "When I sent you out without a purse, without provisions, and without sandals, did you lack anything?" They responded, "Nothing at all." The Lord continued, speaking gently so as not to alarm them too greatly, saying, "But now, let those who have a purse take it, and likewise a bag; and whoever lacks them should sell his cloak and buy a sword. For I tell you, this Scripture must be fulfilled in me: ‘And he was numbered with the transgressors’!" The parable the Master shared indicated that the disciples would soon be left to navigate their own way for a time, and thus they needed to ensure their own sustenance and safety.

Read more (185 words)

However, some misunderstood His message, interpreting it as a directive to prepare for conflict. One disciple mentioned they had two swords, yet the Master’s intention lay elsewhere; nonetheless, having two swords seemed reasonable to the disciples as they would soon face uncertainty in the vicinity of Jerusalem. Thus, as if in affirmation, the Lord remarked, “It is enough” (Luke 22:35-38). He added, rather than providing further explanations or analogies, “Tonight, all of you will be led to fear because of Me, for it is written: ‘I will strike the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock will be scattered. But after I have risen, I will go ahead of you into Galilee.’” Peter responded, given his profound affection for the Lord and momentarily disregarding the lesson learned earlier, “Even if all fall away on account of You, I never will!” Jesus replied, “Truly, I tell you, this very night, before the rooster crows, you will disown Me three times.” Peter insisted, “Even if I have to die with You, I will never disown You!” The other disciples voiced similar sentiments, according to Matthew (Matthew 26:31-35).

Philaret (Gumilevski)

19th centuryChurch Father

Peter repeatedly declared his commitment, asserting that he would not deny the Lord even if it meant facing death. Likewise, the other disciples echoed his sentiments. Peter believed in his unwavering resolve, contradicting the Lord's forewarnings, as if he had greater insight into himself than the Savior. What tragic self-deception! As David lamented, "Thou hast turned away Thy face, and art troubled." Why didn’t Peter recall David’s wisdom? Doing so might have tempered his bold promises. How often are our minds clouded by the subtlety of selfishness! The remaining disciples, unwilling to appear weaker than Peter, also proclaimed their willingness to die alongside the Lord. However, the Savior did not respond to either Peter's or the other disciples' declarations.

Read more (44 words)

Instead, He allowed the unfolding events of the night to reveal the truth of His predictions and to clarify the misunderstandings the disciples held about themselves. Rather than dwell on empty reassurances, He redirected their focus to the imminent trials they were to face.

Abbot Panteleimon about the Trinity

19th centuryCommentator

Peter argued with the Lord more vehemently than before, as if he believed he knew better than the Lord: PETER SAID UNTO HIM, THOUGH I SHOULD DIE WITH THEE, I WILL NOT DENY THEE. The other disciples, not wishing to appear weaker than Peter, also declared their resolve to stay loyal to the Lord unto death. The Lord remained silent to these bold assurances, allowing the events of that night to reveal the fallacy of their confidence. Saint Chrysostom remarks, "Christ allowed Peter to stumble to teach him to fully submit to Him and to hold His insights as superior to his own understanding. Others also gained significant lessons from Peter’s denial, grasping both the frailty of humanity and the faithfulness of God. When God Himself foretells something, it should not be challenged.

Read more (287 words)

Our prayer should be, 'Help us not to be separated from You,’ yet this disciple, relying on his own strength, declared, 'Though all may falter, yet I will remain steadfast,’ and this gradually led to his pride. To rectify this, Christ allowed the denial to occur. Since Peter disregarded both the words of Christ and the teaching of the prophet—because Christ had referenced the prophet's words to prevent Peter from contradicting them—he learned through experience. Consider how later, after the Resurrection, he demonstrated humility when questioned, 'And he what?' (John 21:21), and he was silent, no longer daring to dispute as he had before. Later, while atop the house during a vision, he heard a voice saying, 'What God has cleansed, you shall not regard as unclean’ (Acts 10:15). Even though he did not fully grasp the significance of these words, he remained silent and did not argue. All of this resulted from the initial fall. This illustrates the crucial truth that human effort alone is inadequate without divine assistance; likewise, divine assistance does not benefit those who do not strive. Both Judas and Peter exemplify this reality. The former, having received ample support, gained nothing because he failed to engage his will, while the latter stumbled despite his effort, as he lacked divine help. True virtue arises from the combination of these two elements. Therefore, I urge you not to surrender to apathy, and do not presume that your struggles alone suffice to achieve all. God desires diligence and does not act on our behalf in all matters; He takes no pleasure in our arrogance, thus He does not grant us everything but instead allows us to keep what is beneficial while removing what is detrimental.

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryCommentator

What profoundly affected the disciples, leaving a lasting impression on them, were His statements regarding His impending departure. In a state of bewilderment, Peter inquired, "Where are You going, Lord?" Jesus responded with clarity, explaining, "Where I am going, you cannot follow now, but later you will." This indicated that Peter would eventually possess the strength to endure trials like His, a strength he had not yet attained. Driven by courage and a willingness to lay down his life, Peter felt uneasy about this promise of future assurance.

Read more (87 words)

Unaware of his own limitations, he insisted he could accompany Him immediately, declaring, "I will lay down my life for You, Lord." In response, the Lord prophesied that Peter would deny Him three times before the rooster crows, meaning before midnight. The Heart understood Peter's frailty and foresaw what would occur in just a few hours despite his passionate dedication: "Will you lay down your life for Me now? The time is short until midnight, and during this brief period, you will indeed deny Me three times."

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

With even more determination, he declared, "Even if I have to die alongside you, I will not betray you" (cf. John 13:37). The other apostles rallied behind Peter, each expressing their willingness to die for Him. Bolstered by such pledges, Jesus proceeded into the Garden of Gethsemane.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryCommentator

His time with them was drawing to a close, and just as He had previously informed the Jews, He now conveyed to His followers that they could not accompany Him to where He was going. In this moment, He imparted a new commandment that would set them apart from the rest of the world: they were to love one another. Nevertheless, Peter was dissatisfied and expressed his desire to follow the Master. When Peter, with unwavering self-assurance, claimed that nothing could hinder him from accompanying his Lord and proclaimed that he would 'lay down his life for Him,' the Savior gently corrected his overconfidence by foretelling that before the rooster crowed, he would deny Him three times. After revealing to His disciples the grave trials that awaited Him, the Savior warned that they would all abandon Him that very night and scatter, but assured them that He would reunite with them in Galilee after His resurrection.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryCommentator

"I will not deny You": Peter opposes the Savior, aiming to demonstrate his unwavering commitment to Him. Once liberated from the anxiety of betrayal, driven by deep love and a strong sense of honor, he begins to oppose others and defy Christ. However, the other disciples, not yet having faced temptation, in their naivety vowed what they were unable to accomplish.

Paul Matwejewski

19th centuryCommentator

But Peter, blinded by his pride, persisted in proclaiming with even greater fervor: “But if I should die with You, I will not deny You.” The other disciples, lacking the experience of temptation, similarly vowed, as Blessed Theophylact noted, demonstrating empty zeal, to uphold promises beyond their strength, asserting that, like Peter, they would not forsake their Lord in the face of the impending danger surrounding Him.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 20 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Λέγει
    legei
    I say
    G3004 · λέγω
  2. αὐτῷ
    autō
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  3. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  4. Πέτρος
    petros
    Peter
    G4074 · Πέτρος
  5. Κἂν
    kan
    and if
    G2579 · κἄν
  6. δέῃ
    deē
    I bind
    G1210 · δέω
  7. με
    me
    I
    G1473 · ἐγώ
  8. σὺν
    syn
    with
    G4862 · σύν
  9. σοὶ
    soi
    you
    G4771 · σύ
  10. ἀποθανεῖν
    apothanein
    I am dying
    G599 · ἀποθνήσκω
  11. οὐ
    ou
    no
    G3756 · οὐ
  12. μή
    mē
    not
    G3361 · μή
  13. σε
    se
    you
    G4771 · σύ
  14. ἀπαρνήσομαι
    aparnēsomai
    I deny
    G533 · ἀπαρνέομαι
  15. ὁμοίως
    homoiōs
    in like manner
    G3668 · ὁμοίως
  16. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  17. πάντες
    pantes
    all
    G3956 · πᾶς
  18. οἱ
    hoi
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  19. μαθηταὶ
    mathētai
    a learner
    G3101 · μαθητής
  20. εἶπαν
    eipan
    to say
    G2036 · ἔπω, ἐρῶ, εἶπον