The Church Fathers on this verse

Philippians 1:24Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

But to abide still in the flesh is needful for you.

Douay-Rheims

το δε επιμενειν εν τη σαρκι αναγκαιοτερον δι υμας

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

13 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

"But I do not know what to choose." What are you saying? You will depart from here to heaven and be with Christ, and you do not know what to choose? No, this is not proper to Paul's soul.

Who would not choose this, if someone told him of it and firmly assured him of it? Certainly no one. But it is not in our power either to depart and be with Christ, or to remain here when the time comes. For Paul and his soul, however, both were possible.

What then are you saying? You know and are sure that you will be with Christ, and yet you are perplexed and say, "I do not know what to choose"? More than this, you even resolve to remain here, that is, to abide in the flesh.

Read more (987 words)

Why would this be? Did you not lead a bitter life? Was it not "in vigils," in shipwrecks, "in hunger and thirst, in nakedness," in cares and anxieties? With the weak you were weak, and over those who stumbled you burned.

"In great patience," he says, "in afflictions, in necessities, in distresses, under blows, in prisons, in banishments, in labors, in vigils, in fastings, in purity, in prudence, in longsuffering, in kindness, in the Holy Spirit, in sincere love." "Five times I received forty lashes less one. Three times I was beaten with rods. Once I was stoned. Three times I suffered shipwreck. A night and a day I spent in the deep. I was often on journeys, in dangers on rivers, in dangers from robbers, in dangers from my own people, in dangers from pagans, in dangers in the city, in dangers in the wilderness, in dangers at sea, in dangers among false brethren" (2 Cor 6:4-6; 11:24-26).

When the whole Galatian people turned to the observance of the law, did you not cry out: "You who are justified by the law have fallen from grace" (Gal 5:4)? How many tears you shed then. And after all this, do you still desire this passing life?

Even if nothing of this had happened to you, but you had accomplished all your works safely and with pleasure, should you not, out of fear of the unknown future, hasten toward some harbor?

Tell me, what merchant, having a ship filled with countless treasures, would still wish to remain at sea when he is near the harbor where he can enter and rest? What athlete would wish to continue the contest when he has already earned the victor's crown?

What fighter would wish to enter battle again and break his head when the crown is being placed upon him? What general would keep wearying himself and fighting when he could be freed from war with honor and trophies, and taste rest with the king in his palace?

How then do you, leading so bitter a life, still wish to remain here? Was it not you who said: "Lest, after preaching to others, I myself should be disqualified" (1 Cor 9:27)? If for no other reason, then for this one reason alone you should have desired release.

Even if the present life were filled with countless blessings, even then one should desire to be loosed from them for the beloved Christ. O soul of Paul! There was none equal to it, nor will there be.

You are surrounded by countless troubles, and you fear the future, and you do not wish to be with Christ? No, he says. This too is for Christ, in order to strengthen still more in good disposition those whom I have made His servants, and to make fruitful the field I planted.

Have you not heard that I seek not my own profit, but that of my neighbors? Have you not heard that I could wish to be cut off from Christ, if only many might be converted to Him? If I resolved on this, then with far greater pleasure I will resolve to sacrifice my delay and my remaining here, if only it may serve in any way for their salvation.

"Who shall tell the mighty acts" of You, O Lord (Ps 105:2), that You did not hide Paul from us, that You revealed such a man to the inhabited world? All the angels praised You with one accord when You created the stars and the sun, yet not so much as when You revealed Paul to us and to the whole inhabited world.

Through this the earth became more radiant than heaven. Being brighter than the light of the sun, he sent forth most brilliant flashes and poured out bright rays. And what great fruit did he produce for us? He did not fatten plants or nourish trees. He both brought forth and ripened the fruit of piety, and he continually raised up what was falling.

Indeed, the sun can in no way restore a fruit-bearing tree once it has rotted. But Paul turned away from sins people covered with countless sores. The sun yields to night, but Paul conquered even the devil.

Nothing crushed him. Nothing overcame him. The sun, remaining on high, stretches its rays downward. But Paul, ascending from below, did not merely fill the space between heaven and earth with light. As soon as he opened his mouth, he filled even the angels with great joy.

How so? If "there is joy among the angels of God over one sinner who repents" (Lk 15:10), then when by his first preaching he caught many, how did he not fill the powers above with joy?

And what am I saying? It was enough for Paul simply to begin speaking, and the heavens leapt and rejoiced because of it. "When Israel went out of Egypt... the mountains skipped like rams" (Ps 113:1, 4). When people were being transferred from earth to heaven, what joy do you think there was?

This is why he says, "to remain in the flesh is more necessary for you." After this, by what shall we justify ourselves? Often a man who owns a small and not wealthy estate does not resolve to move elsewhere, valuing his own comfort.

But Paul could depart to Christ, and did not wish to go to Christ. To Christ, whom he loved so much that for Him he was ready even for Gehenna. He remained to struggle further for people. By what, then, shall we justify ourselves?

But is it possible to speak of Paul simply and in general terms? See what he did. First he said that to depart was better for him, persuading them not to grieve. Then he says that if he remains, he remains solely for them, and that this cannot be attributed to the malice of deceitful men.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

But on the other hand, to remain in the flesh is still more necessary for your benefit, because I seek not my own, but yours. Both draw me, that is, I am in difficulty and do not know what to prefer. Yet I recognize that it is more necessary to continue living and to be useful to you. With what can the lofty soul of Paul be compared after this? He preferred the benefit of others to union with Christ. To make himself more fully Christ’s, he postponed union with Him.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

The ambiguity arising from the division of the Apostle's following words cannot be removed by the rule of faith: "I do not know what to choose. I am pressed by both: having a desire to depart and to be with Christ, for this is far better; but to remain in the flesh is more necessary for you."

However these words are divided, their meaning will not contradict the faith. Therefore the ambiguity here must be removed by considering the context of the speech.

At first glance it is not clear whether one should read, "and the other: having a desire," or first, "I am pressed by both," and only then add, "having a desire to depart and to be with Christ."

Read more (381 words)

But since the words that follow are, "this is far better," it is clear that the Apostle desires this better thing. Thus, being drawn by both, or constrained by both, he desires one thing and finds the other only more necessary.

That is, he desires to depart and be with Christ, while he finds remaining in the flesh more necessary. Here the ambiguity is resolved by the single following particle "for," although some interpreters have omitted it.

They thought that the Apostle was not only constrained by both, but apparently also desired both. In light of this observation, the Apostle's words in this place should be divided as follows: "I do not know what to choose. I am pressed by both."

After this one should read, "having a desire to depart and to be with Christ." Since someone here could ask the Apostle why he especially desires this departure, he adds, "for this is far better."

Why then does he find himself constrained on both sides? Because on the other side he finds it more necessary to remain: "but to remain in the flesh is more necessary for you."

In the same way, when someone comes to desire death, if he has already attained the desire to die while possessing firm faith and seeing where he must go, he has already come to depart this life willingly.

For understanding where one must go is not the same as also loving it and desiring to be there. As regards what will happen in his soul, it is necessary that he die willingly.

Therefore some who already possess firm faith speak in vain when they say that they do not wish to die in order to become perfected. Their very perfection consists in their coming to wish to die.

If they wish to speak truthfully, let them not say, "I do not wish to die in order to become perfected." Rather, let them say, "I do not wish to die because I have not been sufficiently perfected."

Thus, for believers, not wishing for death is not counsel by which they may be perfected. It is an indication that they have not been sufficiently perfected. Therefore, as to their not wishing to be perfected, let them wish it, and behold, they are already perfected.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

<...> but I also consider remaining here in the flesh a good thing for your strengthening. The Syriac has: “for your joy and for the increase of your faith.”

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

One is better, the other more necessary. The latter is more necessary because of the fruit that the labors will bring. The former is better because of grace and union with Christ.

Therefore, since the Apostle has shown that the one departed from the body will be with Christ, if he is worthy of this, let us consider what death is and what life is.

Thus we have made clear that, according to Scripture, death is the release of the soul from the body and a kind of separation of the human being.

We are loosed from the bonds that had joined soul and body when we leave the world. Therefore David says, "Thou hast broken my bonds; to Thee I will offer the sacrifice of praise" (Ps 115:7-8).

Read more (359 words)

The bonds of this life, that is, the union of soul and body, are explained in the preceding verse of the same psalm: "Precious in the sight of the Lord is the death of His saints" (Ps 115:6).

Therefore David rejoices, prophetically foreseeing that he would abide with the saints and with those who gave their souls for Christ according to the promise. For he too faithfully sacrificed himself for the people of God.

He did this when he fought Goliath in single combat (1 Kgs 17:40) and alone turned away the danger threatening all. He did it when he was ready for death, in order to wipe away his sin before the Lord (2 Kgs 12:13).

He did it when he resolved to bear the punishment himself for the salvation of the people struck by the Lord's chastisement (2 Kgs 24:17). For he knew that to die for Christ is a greater honor than to reign in earthly life.

What could be higher than to become a sacrifice for Christ? And although one may read of many sacrifices that David offered to the Lord, here he nevertheless adds, "To Thee I will offer the sacrifice of praise."

He does not say, "I offer," but "I will offer," thinking of that perfect sacrifice when each one, loosed from bodily bonds, stands before the Lord and makes himself a sacrifice of praise to Him.

For there is no perfect praise before death. It is impossible to give faithful praise to anyone on earth, when his future life is still unknown (Sir 11:28).

Thus death is the separation of soul and body. So too we have read in the Apostle: "To depart and to be with Christ is far better."

What does this separation bring with it, except that it frees the body and gives it rest, while bringing peace and freedom to the soul? And further, if the soul is pious, it is destined to be with Christ.

Saint Ambrose again turns to the definition of death as the separation of soul from body, stressing that this understanding is based on Holy Scripture and not on the judgments of philosophers.

Ambrosiaster

4th centuryChurch Father

Paul admits that it is much better for him to depart and be with Christ. Nevertheless, he knows that it is necessary for him to remain in the flesh for the benefit of believers. Thus their glory may abound in the Lord and increase the Apostle’s glory when they see him again. They will grow in knowledge and be more firmly rooted in faith. So great was his love for believers that he does not choose what he himself says is better for him. He desires what benefits many, being certain that what leads to the salvation of many is pleasing to God.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

I desire life for myself in order to benefit you, and death in order to be with Christ. Therefore the choice is difficult for me, because I know both the benefit of life and the ineffable delight of release from this present life. Worthy of wonder in the divine Apostle is this: for the salvation of men he preferred this life with its labors and dangers.

Maximus the Confessor

7th centuryChurch Father

It should be noted that none of the saints descends voluntarily into Babylonia. For it is not the custom of those who love God, and indeed it contradicts sound reason, to prefer what is worse to what is better.

If some of them are forcibly led away by the people there, by this we understand those who, not by their own choice but under compelled circumstances, leave the most exalted word of knowledge for the sake of guiding those in need of salvation.

They turn instead to instruction concerning the passions. In accordance with this, the great Apostle also judged it more profitable to be in the flesh. That is, for the sake of the disciples he turned to moral edification.

Yet he was filled with desire to depart from it and be with Christ through simple, noetic, and supramundane contemplation.

Marcus the Ascetic

4th centuryChurch Father

The land of the Chaldeans (Acts 7:4) is life in the passions, where the idols of sins are constructed and worshiped. Mesopotamia (Acts 7:2), which means the land between the rivers, is a life that partakes of both contrary dispositions.

The promised land (Heb 11:9) is the state filled with every good. Therefore everyone who, like Israel of old, returns to his former habit is again dragged down into slavery to the passions, deprived of the freedom that had been given.

It is worthy of note that, as we see, none of the saints went down into the land of Babylon. For it is unfitting and contrary to rational understanding that those who love God should choose what is worse instead of the good.

Read more (115 words)

If some of them were led there unwillingly together with the people, by these we understand those who leave the higher word of knowledge and pass through teaching about the passions.

They do this not by choosing what is preferable, but because the salvation of others requires it, for the guidance of those who need it.

Therefore the great Apostle also decided that his remaining in the flesh was more profitable (Phil 1:24). That is, it was for the sake of the disciples and their moral instruction.

Yet he also had a perfect desire to depart (Phil 1:23) from the moral instruction of others and to be with Christ in supramundane and simple noetic contemplation.

Ivanov A.V.

19th centuryChurch Father

“But to remain in the flesh,” he says, “is more necessary for your sake.” Therefore the Apostle’s thought is far from the view that the present life is the exile of the spirit into the prison of the flesh because of some pre-earthly transgressions. It is equally far from the idea that one must strive to free oneself from this prison, even by violent means.

Michail Cheraskov

19th centuryChurch Father

Often, when the Apostle touches on his desires and hopes concerning his future lot, he is animated by one hope and one desire alone: "that Christ may be magnified in his body. Whether by life or by death." "For," says the Apostle, "to me, to live is Christ, and to die is gain." The Apostle even finds it hard to choose which is better, life or death. Both draw me: I have a desire to depart from the body and be with Christ, for this is far better. Yet to remain in the flesh is more necessary for you. What called forth these self-denying and pious words of the Apostle? The unreasonable, bold men mentioned above, who were proclaiming the word of God. Acting without the Apostle's will, and even against him, they could overstep the bounds of prudence. They could stir up a commotion, draw the authorities' attention to what was happening, and the Apostle would have to answer for it. The Apostle could expect the storm to break over him at any hour (Chrysostom).

Nikanor (Kamenski)

19th centuryChurch Father

Turning personally to himself, the Apostle says that he views all the circumstances of his life through his relation to Christ; cf. Rom 14:8. Therefore, although he is confident in the success of his work, death could unite him completely with Christ.

For that reason he would have considered it better to die. This would have been gain for him. Yet, on the other hand, he cannot lose sight of the benefit of the work of evangelization entrusted to him.

Therefore the continuation of his earthly struggle is more desirable to him. He is also disposed to this by his desire to serve the further perfection of the Philippians, which is a special joy for him.

Read more (345 words)

"What philosophy! By the words, 'to die is gain,' he rejected love for this life. By the words, 'to live in the flesh is fruitful labor for me,' he showed that the present life is also necessary.

How is it necessary? If we use it as we ought, if we bear fruit. Therefore one must not hate life, for one can live well. But if we misuse life, even then we must not blame it.

Why? Because life is not the cause, but the will of those who misuse it. God gave you life so that you might live for Him. But you, by your inclination to evil, live sinfully and subject yourself to every blame" (Chrysostom).

"In itself, death is neither loss nor gain, and it occurs according to God's order. Therefore Saint Paul calls martyrdom itself gain, death for Christ and the Gospel. Such death is truly gain, for of itself it crowns the sufferer with a most glorious crown" (Bishop Theophan).

To this our more recent interpreter adds: "As Christ partook of divine glory and sat at the right hand of God the Father only after the Resurrection and Ascension into heaven, so the believer will partake of Christ's glory and behold God face to face only after his own resurrection.

Therefore, although the Apostle, even while living in the flesh, has Christ as his true life, death will be gain for him. It is gain not in itself, but as a necessary link in the passage from this earthly life, filled with deprivation and sufferings, to the life of glory with Christ.

It is the passage to full communion with Him and the contemplation of Him."

"There could be no comparison between being with Christ in the other life and life here. It is not this latter life that appears in the Apostle as the counterweight to the former. Rather, it is what he can still do in this life for the good of his neighbors, and for the spread of the Kingdom of Christ on earth" (Nazarevsky; cf. Rom 9:1-3).

Theophan the Recluse

19th centuryChurch Father

The other counterweight to his desire is this: "it is more necessary for your sake." Consciousness of apostolic duty compels him to desire to live still longer in the flesh, so as to strengthen believers, convert unbelievers, and lead all to Christ.

Between being with Christ in the other life and life here, no comparison could arise. This latter life does not appear in the Apostle as a counterweight to the former. Rather, the counterweight is what he can still do in this life.

The goal of the present life lies in the future life. The future is radiant. Yet if in the present there appears the possibility of doing much more, by which the future will be still more radiant, one cannot but desire its prolongation.

Read more (496 words)

He desires it not for its own sake, but for the sake of what can be attained through it. When the Apostle saw that remaining in the flesh was more necessary, and that he still had strength to accomplish this most necessary work, then the better future entered into struggle with the best future.

The prolongation of the present life serves as the means to that best future. Then the resolution of the dispute took place of itself: "I shall remain and continue with you." However difficult the present life is, I must desire its prolongation, and I do desire it.

Saint Chrysostom marvels both at this wavering of desires in Saint Paul and at this decision: "What are you saying? You will depart from here to heaven and be with Christ, and you do not know what to choose?

No, this is not characteristic of Paul's soul. For who would not choose this, that is, to be with Christ, if someone told him of it and firmly assured him of it? Certainly no one.

But it is not in our power either to depart and be with Christ, or to remain here when the time for departure comes. Yet for Paul and his soul, both were possible.

What then are you saying? You know and are certain that you will be with Christ, and yet you are perplexed, saying, 'I do not know what I shall choose'? More than this, you even decide to remain here, that is, to remain in the flesh.

Why is this? Are you not leading a bitter life? Are you not in calamities, hunger, thirst, and nakedness? And yet you still desire this passing life?

Even if none of this had happened to you, and you accomplished all your works in safety and pleasure, should you not, fearing the uncertainty of the future, hasten to the safe harbor?

Even if the present life were filled with countless blessings, even then one ought to desire release from them for Christ, Whom you love. No, he says, even this, remaining in the flesh, is for Christ.

It is so that I may establish still more firmly in good disposition those whom I have made His servants. It is so that I may make fruitful the field I have planted.

Have you not heard that I could wish to be cut off from Christ, if only many might be converted to Him? If I resolved on this, would I not with still greater joy resolve to sacrifice my delay and remaining here, if only this might serve somewhat for their salvation?

This is why he says, 'to remain in the flesh is more necessary for your sake.' Paul could have gone to Christ and did not wish to go to Christ, to Christ Whom he loved so much that he was ready even for Gehenna for His sake.

Instead, he remained to struggle here for people. With what, then, shall we justify ourselves?"

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 9 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. τὸ
    to
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  2. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  3. ἐπιμένειν
    epimenein
    I remain
    G1961 · ἐπιμένω
  4. ἐν
    en
    in
    G1722 · ἐν
  5. τῇ
    tē
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  6. σαρκὶ
    sarki
    flesh
    G4561 · σάρξ
  7. ἀναγκαιότερον
    anankaioteron
    necessary
    G316 · ἀναγκαῖος
  8. δι᾽
    di
    through
    G1223 · διά
  9. ὑμᾶς
    hymas
    you
    G4771 · σύ