John Chrysostom
Thus, having taught by what was said above that even those who do not have the law will enjoy the same blessings, the Apostle also presents the ground for this, saying: "For there is no partiality with God."
When he said that both Jew and Gentile are punished for sins, this needed no proof. But when he wishes to show that the Gentile also is counted worthy of honor, this does require a foundation.
For it seemed astonishing and strange that one who had not heard the law and the prophets should be counted worthy of reward for good deeds.
Therefore, as I noted above, by speaking of the times before grace, he accustomed their hearing to this. In this way it would be easier to bring them to acknowledge it when the discourse reached the times of faith.
Read more (226 words)
Here he remains entirely beyond suspicion, since he sets forth something not directly related to his aim. Therefore, after saying, "Glory and honor and peace to everyone who does good, first to the Jew, and also to the Greek," he added: "For there is no partiality with God."
See with what success the Apostle gained the victory. Having brought the discourse to an absurd conclusion, he concludes that it is not proper for God to act otherwise.
For this would be partiality, and in God there is no partiality. He did not say, "If this were not so, God would be partial."
Rather, he expressed himself more majestically: "For there is no partiality with God." That is, God examines not the qualities of persons, but the difference of deeds.
By saying this, he revealed that the difference between Jew and Gentile lies not in deeds, but only in persons.
After this he ought to have said: nevertheless, because one is a Jew and the other a Greek, one receives honor and the other dishonor. Yet both are repaid according to their works.
But the Apostle did not say this, because he might have stirred the Jew to anger. He offers something else and greater, casting the Jewish mind even lower and weakening it so that they might accept his teaching.
What is this? What follows next.