The Apostle commands Saint Titus to present two kinds of exemplariness in himself: exemplariness in life and exemplariness in teaching. Thus everything said may be expressed briefly: above all, be yourself a pattern in everything, both in life and in teaching.
Exemplariness in life is shown by an abundance of good works: present yourself as a pattern of good works.
“Let the older women,” he says, “teach the younger, and you yourself instruct the young men in chastity. But for all let your bright life, open to all, be a common school and pattern of virtue. Let it be like a first image containing all virtues, easily presenting examples for all who wish to learn something good,” says Chrysostom.
“Let life be the pattern of the teachings you offer, because a word witnessed by deeds becomes worthy of belief,” says blessed Theodoret. “Let the example of life show how one must do what the word teaches,” says Ambrosiaster.
“For the teacher there is no benefit in acquiring skill in instruction and polishing the tongue in speech, if he does not teach more by example than by word. If an unchaste man begins to persuade his hearers to chastity, his word will be weak and ineffective, however eloquent he may be.
“By contrast, if he himself is pure and chaste, then even if he is unskilled in speech and slow of tongue, by his example he will move them to progress in this virtue through imitation of him,” says blessed Jerome.
The Apostle teaches that exemplariness in teaching must be shown both in the dispositions with which teaching is given and in its content. Exemplary dispositions in the work of teaching are defined by the words “integrity, dignity, incorruptibility.”
“Integrity,” adiaphthorian. In some copies it is aphthorian, and in others aphthonian. The last reading gave occasion for the Slavonic rendering “without envy.”
A source without envy, for example, means a source sufficient for all, closed to no one. Anyone may take as much as he wishes. Lack of envy in teaching means teaching everyone everything, not teaching one thing and withholding another, or teaching everything to some and only part to others.
It means teaching everything to all, in imitation of Saint Paul, who told the Ephesians that he had not hesitated to teach them the whole will of God. In this sense, lack of envy will be the same as wholeness, as also appears in the Slavonic note beneath the line.
That is, teach the whole body of doctrine to the whole community. For diaphtherein, applied for example to a garment, means to tear it into pieces.
In every case, the word adiaphthorian must be given a special meaning distinct from aphtharsian, which stands one word later. It is best to suppose that the Apostle is exhorting this: in teaching, teach everyone everything.
Show yourself as a full source of teaching, overflowing, thirsting to share with all that with which the heart is filled, from the abundance of which the mouth speaks. As the Savior also said of teachers: “Every scribe instructed in the Kingdom of Heaven is like a householder who brings out of his treasure things new and old” (Mt 13:52).
And should we not chiefly see here an indication of this thirst for teaching, or an irresistible desire to pour oneself out in word from the fullness of the knowledge of God, held and loved with a full heart?
“Dignity,” semnoteta, is shown in teaching when the teacher presents doctrine reverently, as though speaking before God in Christ, and respectfully toward the hearers. He addresses them not as a superior to subordinates, but as a benevolent father to children (see Oecumenius), with meekness and love.
This requires that in its very form of expression, teaching speech preserve strict seriousness in keeping with the subject. At the same time, it must retain the simplicity required by the need to adapt to the understanding of the hearers.
There should be no bombast, no baseness or vulgarity, no joking turns, and no subtlety characteristic of vain speculations. As blessed Theophylact writes, “there should be nothing youthful that could distract the foolish and move them to laughter. Everything should be pious, serious, and worthy of God.”
“Incorruptibility” in teaching directly gives the thought that not only falsehood but also vainly wise assumptions, which corrupt the word of truth, must not be admitted in it.
But since this thought is contained in the following words, “sound speech that cannot be condemned,” here it is better to understand by incorruptibility an uncorrupted disposition of spirit, undamaged by passions, with which teaching must be presented. There must be neither vainglory, nor shameful pursuit of gain, nor any other earthly motives.