The Church Fathers on this verse

1 Corinthians 15:30Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Why also are we in danger every hour?

Douay-Rheims

τι και ημεις κινδυνευομεν πασαν ωραν

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

7 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Verses 30-31. "Why do we stand in danger every hour? I die daily, by the boasting in you, brethren, which I have in Christ Jesus our Lord" (1 Cor 15:30-31).

See by what else he seeks to confirm the dogma: by his own resolve, or rather, not by his own only, but by that of the other Apostles.

And this is no small proof: to point to teachers who are fully assured of the truth and confirm it not only by words, but also by deeds.

Therefore he does not simply say, "We also are persuaded of this." That alone would not have been sufficient for persuasion. Rather, he presents proof from deeds and speaks as though saying this:

Read more (389 words)

To confess this in words perhaps seems to you nothing remarkable. But if we present proof from deeds, what will you say against this? Hear, then, how we preach this every day by our sufferings.

He did not say, "I," but "we," having in mind all the Apostles together. In this way, on the one hand, he shows his humility, and on the other, he makes his words credible.

What can you say? That we deceive you by preaching this, and that we teach this from vainglory? But our sufferings do not allow such an opinion. Who would constantly subject himself to sufferings vainly and to no purpose?

Therefore he says, "Why do we stand in danger every hour?" From vainglory, perhaps someone might resolve to do this once or twice, but not for his whole life, as we do. We have dedicated our whole life to this.

"I die daily, by the boasting in you, brethren, which I have in Christ Jesus our Lord." By boasting here he means the Corinthians' progress.

Having pointed to many sufferings, and wishing to show that he does not speak of this with regret, he adds: I not only do not grieve, but I even boast in what I suffer for you.

He boasts in two things: that he suffers for them, and that he sees progress in them. Then, since he has spoken of great deeds, according to his custom he ascribes both to Christ.

How then does he die "daily"? By zeal and readiness for it.

And why does he say this? Again, in order thereby to confirm the truth of the resurrection. Who, he says, would resolve to undergo so many kinds of death if there is no resurrection and future life?

If even for those who believe in the resurrection great courage is needed to undergo dangers for it, much more would an unbeliever not resolve to undergo so many and such grievous kinds of death.

And see how he gradually intensifies the discourse. Having said, "we stand in danger," he adds, "every hour." Then he says, "daily." Further, he says not only, "I am in danger," but, "I die."

Finally he shows what kinds of death these are: "If, according to man, I fought with beasts at Ephesus, what profit is it to me?" (1 Cor 15:32).

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

If you do not accept as proof of the resurrection the verbal confession made by those being baptized, then you have testimony in deeds also. For all we apostles are continually in distress. But if there were no resurrection, why would we endure distress? For what pleasure? If someone decides to suffer distress out of vainglory, he may decide to do so once. But the hourly endurance of distresses, as we endure them, is the greatest proof of confidence in the resurrection.

Ambrosiaster

4th centuryChurch Father

He mentions the dangers and labors of the preachers, saying: why are we also in danger? It is understood that this is for the coming resurrection, which he mentioned above. For they are certain that true life will follow death here. They do not fear dangers from unbelievers, and they suffer from the zeal of persecutors only because they believe that these men have destroyed themselves. Paul shows his anxiety, which he nourishes through concern for the salvation of men for the sake of the glory promised by the Lord. For this reason the Apostle hastened and always took care that his glory before God might increase through the multiplied salvation of many people.

Ivanov A.V.

19th centuryChurch Father

“Every hour.” “Perhaps someone might decide, out of vainglory, to suffer once or twice, but not for an entire life, as we do,” says the Apostle. “We apostles have devoted our whole life to the work of preaching,” as Chrysostom says.

Michail Cheraskov

19th centuryChurch Father

Second, denial of the truth of the resurrection of the dead would declare vain all the labors and struggles of the Apostles for the planting of Christianity. Speaking of his hourly afflictions and daily dying for the preaching of Christ’s name, the holy Apostle Paul adds: “according to human reasoning, when I fought with beasts at Ephesus. What benefit is it to me if the dead do not rise?” That is, judging in human terms, was it worth it for me, for the success of my preaching, to undergo so many persecutions and troubles, even the danger of being eaten by beasts at Ephesus? Would it be worth it if all my struggles had to end in an unwaking dead sleep and disappearance in the grave?

Nikanor (Kamenski)

19th centuryChurch Father

The thought of baptism with faith in the glorious future life closely touches the thought of Christ's suffering life on earth. Therefore the Apostle now turns to it as to a new argument for the necessity of faith in the universal resurrection.

The Apostle speaks of his own labors and sufferings, since they were especially great. He especially should have avoided them if he were not striving for the heavenly crown.

Yet everything he says about himself clearly applies to all Christians, as is evident from what was said earlier, in verse 19 and then in verse 30.

To prove the complete untenability and absurdity of the false teaching of those who deny the future resurrection of the dead, the holy Apostle points to the destructive abyss to which this false teaching would lead.

Read more (122 words)

Unbelief in the resurrection would lead to the denial of the good that does not attain its goal in the present life. It would lead to the destructive riot of sensual life.

It would lower man to the wild passions of animals and prompt him to speak as the idlers spoke in the time of the prophet Isaiah: "They made joy and gladness, slaughtering calves and killing sheep, eating meat and drinking wine, saying, Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die" (Is 22:13).

If the consequences to which the denial of the future resurrection leads are mad and absurd, then without doubt this false teaching itself is mad and absurd. For from it these destructive consequences for man naturally flow.

Theophan the Recluse

19th centuryChurch Father

St. Paul takes his second persuasion from the self-denying apostolic labors in preaching the Gospel, to whose subjects the dogma of the resurrection of the dead also belongs.

He speaks as though saying: how could we have resolved to endure calamities, deprivations, and deaths, if the Gospel were not tangibly certain, and in it the truth of the resurrection, after which a radiant recompense awaits those who labor in the Gospel?

This is unthinkable.

"See by what else he seeks to confirm the dogma: by his own resolve, that is, by his readiness for every calamity and death. Or rather, not by his own only, but by that of the other Apostles.

And this is no small proof: to point to teachers who are fully assured of the truth and confirm it not only by words, but also by deeds.

Read more (183 words)

Therefore he does not simply say, 'We also are persuaded of this.' That alone would not have been sufficient for persuasion. Rather, he presents proof from deeds and speaks as though saying this:

'To confess this in words perhaps seems to you nothing remarkable. But if we present proof from deeds, what will you say against this? Hear, then, how we preach this every day by our sufferings.'

He did not say, 'I,' but 'we,' having in mind all the Apostles together. Thus, on the one hand, he shows his humility, and on the other, he makes his words credible.

What can you say? Are we deceiving you by preaching this, and do we teach this from vainglory? Our sufferings do not permit such an opinion. For who would constantly subject himself to sufferings vainly and to no purpose?

Therefore he says, 'Why then do we also stand in danger every hour?' Perhaps someone might resolve to do this once or twice from vainglory, but not for his whole life, as we do. We have dedicated our whole life to this" (St. Chrysostom).

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 6 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. τί
    ti
    who
    G5101 · τίς
  2. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  3. ἡμεῖς
    hēmeis
    I
    G1473 · ἐγώ
  4. κινδυνεύομεν
    kindyneuomen
    I am in danger
    G2793 · κινδυνεύω
  5. πᾶσαν
    pasan
    all
    G3956 · πᾶς
  6. ὥραν
    hōran
    an hour
    G5610 · ὥρα