The Church Fathers on this verse

2 Kingdoms (2 Samuel) 12:16Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And David besought the Lord for the child: and David kept a fast, and going in by himself lay upon the ground.

Douay-Rheims

וַיְבַקֵּ֥שׁ דָּוִ֛ד אֶת־הָאֱלֹהִ֖ים בְּעַ֣ד הַנָּ֑עַר וַיָּ֤צָם דָּוִד֙ צ֔וֹם וּבָ֥א וְלָ֖ן וְשָׁכַ֥ב אָֽרְצָה׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

2 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

The esteemed King David felt profound sorrow when his beloved son, whom he cherished deeply, fell gravely ill. As earthly solutions proved ineffective, he sought the Lord's help. He set aside his royal attire, sat upon the ground, donned a linen cloth, and refrained from food and drink, pouring out his heart in prayer for seven days, yearning for the restoration of his child.

David, filled with love for his son, humbled himself in grief, sitting in sackcloth and ashes during this time of illness. He did not resort to fortune-tellers or sorcerers as was customary in those days, as illustrated in the account of Saul, but instead turned his pleas to God.

Read more (188 words)

David also sinned, yet let us reflect on his repentance. For three days, he remained in dust, not seeking forgiveness for his transgressions but praying for his unwell child, still consumed by pain. He atoned for his sin through self-abasement, a contrite spirit, deep sorrow, and by renouncing similar transgressions. He kept his sins in memory, embraced all the tribulations that came his way with acceptance, showed mercy to those who insulted him, and ultimately refrained from taking vengeance on those who wronged him, even preventing others from retaliating on his behalf.

This is not to dismiss the significance of fasting, for it holds value, but rather to encourage you towards something greater than fasting: the commitment to renounce all evil. David's repentance demonstrates this, as he sat in dust for three days not for his own sin but out of love for his child, who was still in anguish. His cleansing came through humility, heartfelt sorrow, abstaining from sin, constant reflection on his misdeeds, gracious acceptance of his sufferings, kindness towards his offenders, and a refusal to seek revenge himself or permit others to act in vengeance.

Salvianus of Marseille

5th centuryCommentator

How incredibly challenging it is to atone for transgressions when the adversaries of the Lord have the opportunity to speak ill of Him is illustrated by the example of the revered King David. Through his righteous deeds, David earned the possibility of escaping eternal damnation solely by confessing his sins. Yet even he, who found refuge in repentance, could not attain complete absolution for his wrongdoings. When the prophet Nathan, to whom David had acknowledged his failures, proclaimed, "The Lord hath taken away thy sin," he immediately added, "But because thou hast by this deed given occasion to the enemies of the Lord to blaspheme Him, the son that was born to thee shall die."

Read more (217 words)

What transpired next? David cast aside his crown and jewels, renouncing his royal attire and all signs of nobility. He isolated himself, mourning for his sins; he wept bitterly, donned rough sackcloth, drenched himself in tears, and covered himself with ashes. In his cries for the child’s life, he raised anguished laments and sought to reach the Holy One through fervent prayers. Through such supplication and earnestness, he believed that he could obtain from God what he yearned for. However, he was unable to receive what he sought through the most potent means available for those who petition.

It is clear from these events that no sin is more grievous than that which prompts the Lord's enemies to utter blasphemies against Him. A person who falls into serious error, without leading others to speak against God, bears condemnation solely for themselves. However, one who leads others to blaspheme draws many into destruction and is thus culpable for the transgressions of those he influences. Furthermore, when a person sins in such a manner that does not provoke others to insult God, the offense only impacts the sinner. In contrast, the one whose sin incites others to speak ill of God commits a transgression that transcends human fault, as the denunciations of others inflict profound harm upon the Lord.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.