The Church Fathers on this verse

2 Kingdoms (2 Samuel) 16:12Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Perhaps the Lord may look upon my affliction, and the Lord may render me good for the cursing of this day.

Douay-Rheims

אוּלַ֛י יִרְאֶ֥ה יְהוָ֖ה בעוני בְּעֵינִ֑י וְהֵשִׁ֨יב יְהוָ֥ה לִי֙ טוֹבָ֔ה תַּ֥חַת קִלְלָת֖וֹ הַיּ֥וֹם הַזֶּֽה׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

3 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 6 commentaries

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

David lived as an exile and a fugitive, enduring significant hardships throughout his life. As he approached the end of his days, where were those who lamented his misfortunes? What suffering could be greater than his, what ailment or sorrow could weigh more heavily? Yet this just man did not dwell on his plight, nor did he fall into despair or complain, saying, "I receive this reward for my faithful adherence to His law, day and night, yet I have been brought low, delivered into the hands of an unrelenting son!" He neither expressed nor entertained such thoughts but faced his trials with wisdom, finding solace in the belief that they occurred under God’s sovereign will.

Read more (520 words)

Just as the three young men declared in the furnace, "But if it be not so, let it be known to you, O king, that we will not serve your gods, nor will we worship the golden image which you have set up" (Dan. 3:18), they would have responded to inquiries about their hopes for life after death with the conviction that dying for God is the highest reward. For them, as for David, it was a profound comfort that God, knowing their plight, permitted it to occur. If a lover would endure countless trials for the sake of their beloved without expectation of reward, how much more should we persevere—not for the promise of a kingdom or other favors, but for God Himself, to whom all glory is due eternally. Amen.

Absalom returned David to the life of wandering and evasion from which he had once been liberated under Saul, making his situation even harsher than it had been before. David had previously borne his afflictions like a commander; however, he now found himself in flight after having reigned for many years and seemingly vanquished all his adversaries. This ordeal was not brought upon him by an enemy, but rather by "he who came from his own loins," as he lamented. While you consider David in the vigor of youth, able to withstand trials, now, at an age where he sought comfort from this unworthy son, he encountered a rebel instead. Hearing and enduring this situation, David was indeed crushed, as his poignant lament reveals; yet he refrained from any retaliatory action and allowed Shimei to live, saying, "Let him curse me, for the Lord has commanded him. If the Lord sees my humiliation and repays me with good instead of his cursing today," and thus he awaited, filled with trepidation, to observe the outcome of Hushai's counsel.

Upon achieving such extraordinary feats, witnessing his rightful kingdom in the hands of a tormentor, a murderer of kin, and a cruel tyrant, David was not swayed; rather, he proclaimed, "If it pleases God for me to be persecuted and to wander while my adversary is exalted, I accept this with love and give thanks for the multitude of trials." Unlike many brazen individuals who, having accomplished little, bemoan their fate and curse at the prosperity of others, David remained humble in all circumstances. Hence, God declared, "I have found David, son of Jesse, a man after My own heart" (Psalm 88:21).

When we endure wrongs from others, we significantly alleviate our debts by bearing them with grace. Thus, no harm truly befalls us. God attributes our patience in the face of evil as repayment of our debts, not through our own righteousness, but through His mercy. Even in ancient times, He refrained from exacting revenge on those who suffered injustices. When Shimei defamed David, he endured it, saying, "Let him be; the Lord may see my humility and repay me for this day." When the Lord does not seek retribution on our behalf, we gain, for He counts it as merit to us when we accept such trials with gratitude.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

Was it not by his own volition that the wicked son of Hera insulted King David? What then does the righteous David, filled with genuine divine wisdom, proclaim in response? How did he reply to the one who intended to harm him for his words? The king responded, "What do I have to do with you, O sons of Saruina? Let him utter curses, for the Lord has instructed him to speak against David. Who can question why you act in this manner?" (2 Sam. 16:10). Subsequently, the inspired text echoes the profound contemplation of the king’s words, restating them with slight variations: "David said to Abishai and all his attendants, 'Look, if my own son, who sprang from me, seeks my life, how much more might this son of a Benjaminite!

Read more (167 words)

Leave him be; let him curse, for the Lord has instructed him to do so; perhaps the Lord will observe my affliction and will reward me with goodness for his current slanders.' It should be clear to the discerning reader how the Lord directed this wicked individual to speak ill of David. It was not by a commendable command that the Lord directed him; rather, the Lord influenced the will of this wretched soul, which, marred by its own filthiness, led him to this sin, according to the just and hidden decree of God. This is why it is stated, 'The Lord commanded him.' There is no doubt as to why the Lord allowed the evil man to defame David in this manner. The humbled king suggested, 'Perhaps the Lord will take note of my degradation and reward me with goodness in return for his present insults.' We now have evidence that the Lord utilizes the hearts of even the wicked to glorify and assist the righteous.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

Even St. David exemplified virtues comparable to those of Paul. When he faced slander and harsh insults from the Semites, he initially responded with silence and humility, refraining even from speaking of his own good deeds, which he was aware of. In fact, he welcomed the malignment, believing that in his suffering, he might receive God’s mercy. Observe how he combined humility, righteousness, and wisdom to win God’s favor. He said, "Let him speak evil, for the Lord has commanded him to speak evil against David." Here, we see his humility; he accepted what was divinely permitted with a tranquil heart, like a true servant. He proclaimed, "My son, who came out of my loins, seeks my soul," revealing his sense of righteousness.

Read more (167 words)

If we endure distress from our neighbors, should we not bear with equanimity what is done by outsiders? Ultimately, he stated, "Leave him alone, let him speak evil, for the Lord has commanded him; perhaps the Lord will look upon my humiliation, and the Lord will reward me with kindness for his current vile speech." Not only did he endure the insults, but he also allowed the man to go unpunished as he hurled stones at him. Furthermore, after achieving victory, David willingly offered forgiveness to Shimei when he sought it. This illustrates that Saint David, embodying the true spirit of the Gospel, felt no offense but was instead grateful to his accuser and rejoiced rather than expressed anger at the evil intended toward him, which he hoped would be answered with goodness. Behold, in his perfection, he pursued an even greater perfection. He experienced indignation at the injustice as a human, yet he mastered his feelings like a valiant warrior and persevered like a courageous fighter.

The subsequent lines of the psalm clarify the intent, for David states, “I was dumb and did not open my mouth, for You made me” (Psalm 38:10). This reflects his understanding that, having been subjected to the scorn of the foolish, he chose silence to avoid further grievous sins. He realized that it was God's desire for him to experience shame at the appropriate moment, leading eventually to salvation through repentance. In the interim, experiencing reproach can be advantageous, as even the suffering of the body serves a purpose, as articulated by the apostle: “I delivered him to the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit might be saved in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ” (1 Cor. 5:5).

Read more (160 words)

David acknowledged the beneficial nature of being reviled, telling Absalom, “Leave it, let Shimei revile me, for the Lord has commanded him; perhaps the Lord will consider my affliction and grant me kindness in return for this abuse” (2 Sam. 16:11-12). Indeed, the Lord observed his disgrace; he fled in sorrow, barefoot and with his head covered, and ultimately had his shame removed (see 2 Sam. 15:30). Thus, when David, facing dishonor, fled in humility, he sought God’s forgiveness and refrained from retaliating against his accuser, refraining from any contentiousness. Afterward, he regained his kingdom, as the reproach comes from the Lord, and oftentimes it is more beneficial to endure it rather than resist it. This led to his triumph. Hence, reproach can be profitable! Yet, why did he add, “For Thou hast made me”? Did he not acknowledge his silence as recognizing God's will? Therefore, he endured patiently what transpired, seeking divine forgiveness for his sin through his dishonor.

We must be cautious of those who provoke us, who incite frustration, those who harden hearts, and those who promote immoral desires. When faced with scolding or provoking remarks, remaining silent is often the wisest approach. It is not a sign of weakness to hold one's tongue, but it is sinful for others to incite and insult us, trying to draw us into their behavior. Proverbs 26:4 advises us on this matter.

Read more (539 words)

If we choose to remain silent, the instigator may question our silence, pushing, "Why do you not speak? Are you afraid?" They might believe that they have rendered us incapable of response. As we continue to stay quiet, their frustration may grow, leading them to feel humiliated and ignored. Responding to them, however, allows them to feel victorious, as if they have found someone to engage in their folly. If we remain silent in the face of insults, they may remark that we were harmed but disregarded the offense. If we counter with reproach, it will only lead to mutual condemnation, with no one justified in the exchange. My accuser aims to provoke my anger, wishing for me to react in kind. A righteous person, aware of their virtue, will not entertain such provocations, placing greater value on the discernment of upright individuals over the disdain of the accuser. Such steadfastness is highlighted in Cicero. This embodies the idea of being silent even regarding commendable matters, as expressed in Psalm 38:3. A person at peace with their integrity should not be disturbed by slander, nor assign undue weight to another’s accusations when balanced against their own righteousness. This is how one nurtures a spirit of humility.

If one wishes to avoid humiliation, they may think: “My accuser belittles and mocks me directly, as though I have no voice. Why should I refrain from retorting? They treat me like I am not a man, incapable of defending myself. They accuse me, as if I'm unable to deliver a fitting response!" Such thoughts reflect a lack of meekness and humility, illustrating a heart susceptible to temptation. The tempter may incite these feelings, often utilizing another's words to stoke discord and fill one’s spirit with negativity. Yet, we are called to stand firm upon the solid rock, as mentioned in Matthew 16:18. When a servant scolds a righteous individual, or when the weak hurl insults, the righteous person remains silent. Even when reproached by a beggar, they do not retaliate. The true strength of the righteous lies in their ability to withdraw and succeed, much like skilled archers who, by retreating, inflict greater harm upon their attackers, as outlined in Epist. 57:12.

Why do we feel indignant when confronted with slander? Why do we not strive to emulate the one who stated, "I am numbed and humbled, and keep silent even about good things" (Psalm 38:3)? Did David merely articulate this principle without acting upon it? On the contrary, he exemplified it. In facing dishonor from Shimei, as recounted in 2 Samuel 16:5, David opted for silence, even amid his armed companions. He did not respond to the jibes, nor did he seek revenge; when one of his men offered to retaliate, David declined. He chose humility and maintained his silence, undaunted by the insult of being called a "bloodsucker." His inward virtue afforded him peace, knowing full well the good deeds he had performed.

Responding quickly to wrongdoing generally affirms one's deservedness of the reproach, regardless of the pretense otherwise. Thus, the one who disregards an offense is indeed greater than the one who suffers from it, as the former appears unaffected by the insult, while the latter visibly endures it.

He endured not only the slander but also chose to overlook it when the son of Semei followed and hurled stones at him. Furthermore, after emerging victorious, David graciously forgave the one who sought his pardon. This account illustrates the spirit of the Gospel embodied by St. David, who not only remained unoffended but also expressed gratitude towards his accuser. Rather than responding with indignation, he embraced the situation, trusting that he would be rewarded for his tribulations. In his pursuit of perfection, he aimed to achieve an even greater level of excellence. Though he felt human anger at the insult, he triumphed over it like a valiant warrior, enduring the challenge like a steadfast athlete. His patience was evident as he awaited the fulfillment of the promises made to him.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.