The Church Fathers on this verse

Acts 1:4Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And eating together with them, he commanded them, that they should not depart from Jerusalem, but should wait for the promise of the Father, which you have heard (saith he) by my mouth.

Douay-Rheims

και συναλιζομενος παρηγγειλεν αυτοις απο ιεροσολυμων μη χωριζεσθαι αλλα περιμενειν την επαγγελιαν του πατρος ην ηκουσατε μου

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

13 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Since the apostles were grieved and frightened by what had already happened, while they had to go forth to great contests, He encouraged them with words about the future.

"Eating with them, He commanded them not to depart from Jerusalem, but to wait for the promise of the Father, which you have heard from Me."

At first, when they were still afraid and terrified, He led them into Galilee, so that they might hear His words without fear.

Then, when they had heard and had spent forty days with Him, "He commanded them not to depart from Jerusalem." Why was this?

No one allows soldiers who are about to attack the enemy to march out before they are armed. No one lets horses run into the racecourse before they have a charioteer.

Read more (725 words)

So the Lord did not allow them to go out to the struggle before the descent of the Holy Spirit. Otherwise the multitude of enemies might easily overcome and capture them.

He commanded them not to depart from Jerusalem not only for this reason, but also because many there were to believe.

Moreover, lest anyone say that they left their own acquaintances and went boasting among foreigners, they present the proofs of His Resurrection before the very people who killed Christ.

They do this before those very men who crucified and buried Him, in the very city where this lawless deed had been committed with such audacity.

By this the mouths of all foreigners were also stopped. Indeed, if those who crucified Him themselves appear among the believers, this is plainly an evident sign of the Cross.

It is also an evident sign of the lawlessness of the Jews' deed, and a great proof of the Resurrection.

The disciples might have said, "How shall we, being so few and so insignificant, be able to live among such a multitude of impious men breathing murder?"

See how He delivers them from this fear with the words, "but wait for the promise of the Father, which you have heard from Me" (Acts 1:4).

When, you ask, had they heard this? When He said, "It is better for you that I go away; for if I do not go away, the Comforter will not come to you" (Jn 16:7).

And again, "I will pray the Father, and He will give you another Comforter, that He may abide with you forever" (Jn 14:16).

But why did the Holy Spirit not come while Christ was still on earth, nor immediately after His departure?

Christ ascended on the fortieth day, while the Holy Spirit came "when the day of Pentecost had fully come" (Acts 2:1). Why was there this delay?

And how, when the Spirit had not yet come, did Christ say, "Receive the Holy Spirit" (Jn 20:22)?

This was to prepare the disciples and make them capable of receiving Him. For if Daniel grew weak from having to see an angel (Dan 8:17), how much more would they have weakened?

They were to receive such great grace. Either these words must be understood in this sense, or Christ spoke of the future as already accomplished.

In the same way He said, "Tread upon serpents and scorpions, and upon all the power of the enemy" (Lk 10:19).

But why did the Holy Spirit not come immediately then? The apostles had to be kindled with desire for this event, and only then receive grace.

Therefore the Holy Spirit came when Christ had departed. If He had come while Christ was still on earth, there would not have been such expectation in them.

For the same reason He did not come immediately after Christ's Ascension, but eight or nine days later. We too turn to God most earnestly when we are placed in some need.

For this reason John especially sent his disciples to Christ when they were to need Jesus, since he himself was already in prison.

On the other hand, our nature first had to appear in heaven, and reconciliation had to be fully accomplished. Then the Spirit would come, and the disciples would be filled with pure joy.

If Christ had departed after the coming of the Holy Spirit, while the Holy Spirit remained on earth, this would not have been such consolation for them.

They were deeply attached to Christ. Therefore He said to comfort them, "It is better for you that I go away" (Jn 16:7).

For this reason He delays the sending of the Holy Spirit for several days. After tasting a little sorrow and feeling their need, as I have said, they would enjoy full and pure joy.

If the Spirit were less than Him, this consolation would not have been sufficient. How then could He have said, "It is better for you"?

For this reason the greater part of the teaching is entrusted to the Holy Spirit, so that He would not be thought inferior.

Notice into what necessity Christ placed the disciples by promising to give the Spirit in Jerusalem. They had to remain there.

Lest they scatter again after His Ascension, He holds them all there by this expectation, as by certain bonds.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

Now, when they had heard and had spent forty days together, He commanded them not to depart from Jerusalem.

Why was this? Because no one allows soldiers who are about to attack a great force of opponents to go out against them before they have time to arm themselves.

Nor would anyone agree to let horses go before the charioteer has mounted. So also the Lord did not allow the apostles to enter the contest before the descent of the Holy Spirit.

Otherwise the vast multitude might defeat and capture them.

Yet the Lord did not forbid them to depart from Jerusalem only for this reason. He did so also because many there were to believe.

Third, He did this so that no one could say that, abandoning their own people, they went to seek glory among strangers.

Read more (608 words)

Therefore they spread the undoubted proofs of the Resurrection among the very people who had killed the Lord, crucified Him, and buried Him.

They did so in the very city where those men had dared to commit such lawlessness.

When, then, had they heard such a command? When He said to them, "It is to your advantage that I go away; for if I do not go away, the Comforter will not come to you" (Jn 16:7).

And again, "I will pray the Father, and He will give you another Comforter" (Jn 14:16).

Why, then, did the Comforter not come while He was present, nor immediately after His departure, but eight or nine days later, when the day of Pentecost had come?

Moreover, how could He say, "Receive the Holy Spirit" (Jn 20:22), when the Holy Spirit had not yet descended?

To this one must say that He spoke so in order to prepare in them desire, readiness, and capacity to receive the Holy Spirit.

They received Him when He descended. Or He spoke of what was to be as already existing and present.

He did the same when He spoke of the power to tread upon serpents and scorpions, and upon all the power of the enemy.

It must also be said that the gifts of the Spirit are diverse and manifold. There is a gift of purification and perfection, a gift of sanctification and sanctifying power.

There is a gift of tongues and prophecy, a gift of miracles and interpretation, and many other gifts.

Thus, given the diversity and manifold character of the Spirit's gifts, nothing prevented the apostles from receiving the grace of the Spirit in different ways.

But the full communication of the Spirit, which made the apostles perfect and able to perfect others, took place at Pentecost.

Then He descended upon them in the form of fiery tongues and filled them wholly with His power.

The Lord departed, and then the Holy Spirit came. He came at Pentecost, and not immediately, so that they might be pierced with desire and then receive grace.

If the Holy Spirit had come while the Son was present, and afterward the Son had departed while the Spirit remained, they would not have had such consolation.

For they were very unwilling to be separated from their Teacher. Therefore He ascends, and the Spirit does not come immediately.

After some despondency, desire and awareness of the need for the promise given to them would awaken in the disciples.

Then, at the descent, they would experience pure and full joy.

Yet first our flesh had to appear in heaven, and the fullest reconciliation had to be accomplished. Only then was the Holy Spirit to descend.

Know, then, what necessity to remain in Jerusalem the Lord laid upon them by the promise He gave. Lest after the Ascension they should scatter again, He holds them all there by this expectation, as by bonds.

By the promise of greater hopes, He disposes them to a stronger desire for these hopes, even though they did not know them clearly.

But no one would err in saying that even then they received some power and grace of the Spirit. It was not power to raise the dead, but the power to forgive sins.

Therefore He added, "If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven them," and so on (Jn 20:23), showing what kind of power He was giving them.

At that time He clothed them with this particular power. After forty days had passed, He gives them the power to work miracles. Therefore He says, "You shall receive power," and so on.

Basilios Michailowski

19th centuryChurch Father

Having taught His apostles and His other followers the mysteries of the Kingdom of God, the Lord gathered them on the Mount of Olives on the last day, the fortieth after the Resurrection. He commanded them not to depart from Jerusalem, but to await the Holy Spirit promised by the Father and His gracious gifts, saving and necessary for the work of preaching the Gospel. For the human word is powerless to persuade another to change his faith or alter his life, unless the grace of the Holy Spirit touches the heart of the one who is in error. It is not the Apostle Paul, nor the Apostle Peter, nor Apollos who brings about a man's salvation. Only the Lord God orders it.

Read more (61 words)

All the apostles and other preachers of Christianity are only workers sent by God into His vineyard, that is, into His garden, into God's world (1 Cor 3:9). "Neither he who plants nor he who waters is anything." All salvation, though certainly not without the active participation of the one being converted to Christ, is ordered by God (1 Cor 3:7).

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

"But remain in Jerusalem until you receive the promise of My Father" (cf. Lk 24:49). That is, what Joel had spoken of: "Your sons and your daughters shall prophesy" (Joel 2:28; Acts 2:17). Thus the Lord saw His disciples fallen into sorrow after His death, amid the crowd gathered for this feast. He sent His builders to establish the faith of those who wavered. He sent His firm pillars (Gal 2:9) to raise up and support the minds of the weak.

Hilarius of Poitiers

4th centuryChurch Father

He commands them to await what was promised by the Father, which had been heard from His mouth. This, without doubt, even now is an expression of His Father's promise. Through this activity of powers the Spirit is manifested. The gift of the Spirit is not hidden where words of wisdom and life are heard. Nor is it hidden where there is knowledge of divine recognition, lest we, like cattle with no knowledge of God, be unacquainted with the Creator of our life. Nor is it hidden through faith in God, lest by not believing the Gospel of God we find ourselves outside the Gospel of God. Nor is it hidden through the gift of healing, so that by curing diseases we may bear witness to the mercy of Him who bestowed it.

Read more (174 words)

Nor is it hidden through the working of powers, so that it may be clear that what we do is the power of God. Nor is it hidden through prophecy, so that by understanding doctrine it may be clear that we have been taught by God. Nor is it hidden through discernment of spirits, so that we may distinguish who speaks by the Holy Spirit and who speaks by an evil spirit. Nor is it hidden through various tongues, so that knowledge of languages may be given as a sign of the Holy Spirit bestowed. Nor is it hidden in the interpretation of tongues, so that the faith of the hearers may not be endangered through ignorance, when the interpreter explains the meaning of what was said to those who do not know the language. In all these things, distributed for the profit of each, there is a manifestation of the Holy Spirit. For the gift of the Spirit is certainly not hidden in these wondrous capacities given to each person. See Acts 1:8.

Isaac the Syrian

6th centuryChurch Father

Do not doubt, then, that the power of the mysteries received by a man accomplishes this in him, in every virtue, without his labors. This is the power that the blessed apostles received in fiery form. For its sake the Savior commanded them not to depart from Jerusalem until they had received power from on high (Acts 1:4). This Jerusalem is virtue; the power is humility; and the power from on high is the Comforter, otherwise interpreted as the Spirit of consolation. This is what is meant by what is said of Him in divine Scripture, that mysteries are revealed to the humble-minded. The humble-minded are counted worthy to receive within themselves this Spirit of revelations, who discloses the mysteries. Therefore some of the saints have said that humility perfects the soul with divine contemplations.

Nicephoros (Theotokis)

18th centuryChurch Father

Briefly, in a single word, the apostle had said before this that Jesus Christ ascended. Now he describes at greater length everything He did from the time of His Resurrection from the dead until the day on which He ascended into heaven.

This Jesus Christ, who after His mortal Passion rose from the dead, presented Himself alive before the apostles, he says, "appearing to them during forty days by many infallible proofs."

What, then, are these proofs? They are the manifestations and demonstrations which Jesus Christ gave to confirm His Resurrection.

Thus, "when He had risen early on the first day of the week, He appeared first to Mary Magdalene" (Mk 16:9). On the same day He appeared also to two disciples who were going to Emmaus (Lk 24:13).

Read more (598 words)

Toward evening of the same day He came "when the doors were shut, where His disciples were gathered, and stood in the midst" (Jn 20:19). In the same way, after eight days had passed, He again stood before His apostles.

He appeared to His eleven disciples on the mountain in Galilee (Mt 28:16-17). Afterward He appeared to them at the Sea of Tiberias (Jn 21:1).

During all that time Christ appeared to His disciples, conversed with them, interpreted the Scriptures to them, and among other things commanded them not to depart from Jerusalem (Lk 24:49).

To assure them still more of the truth of His Resurrection, "He showed them His hands and feet and His side." He also breathed on them and gave them the grace of the most Holy Spirit (Jn 20:20, 22), to loose and bind sins.

Moreover, He allowed the unbelieving Thomas to touch His side (Jn 20:27). Beyond this, He also ate with them: "They gave Him a piece of broiled fish and some honeycomb; and He took it and ate before them" (Lk 24:42).

He also ate bread and fish with them at the Sea of Tiberias (Jn 21:13). These are the infallible proofs which Jesus Christ showed His disciples while appearing over forty days, to assure them of His Resurrection from the dead.

Here one must note that after His Resurrection He appeared not only to the apostles and Mary Magdalene, but also to other brethren, more than five hundred in number, as the divine Paul testifies (1 Cor 15:6).

But when and where He appeared to these five hundred brethren, and who they were, Paul passed over in silence. He said only that in his own time many of them were still alive, while some had fallen asleep.

"Of whom the greater part remain until now, but some have fallen asleep." Perhaps this occurred on the mountain in Galilee, where, as the Evangelist Matthew affirms, the Lord commanded His disciples to gather (Mt 28:16).

He appeared to all these mentioned persons because they alone were worthy to behold His incorrupt and divine body, and were able to receive the wondrous mystery of His Resurrection from the dead.

To this one must add that the Evangelist Mark also assures us of the Ascension of the Lord Jesus into heaven: "So then, after the Lord had spoken to them, He was taken up into heaven and sat at the right hand of God" (Mk 16:19).

Likewise, the same God-inspired Luke writes in his Gospel: "And it came to pass, while He blessed them, that He parted from them and was carried up into heaven" (Lk 24:51).

Why the Savior ascended on the fortieth day after His Resurrection, that He gave the apostles teaching concerning the Kingdom of God, and that He commanded them not to depart from Jerusalem. But to await there the fulfillment of the promise of the Father, which they had previously heard from Him, is mentioned only in this book of the apostolic Acts.

When, then, had the apostles heard of this promise? When the Lord said to them, "And I will pray the Father, and He will give you another Comforter, that He may abide with you forever" (Jn 14:16).

Since Luke, by saying, "the promise of the Father, which you have heard from Me," presents Christ as speaking to the apostles, he also gives the following words as spoken by Christ to them at that time.

Verse 5: "For John truly baptized with water, but you shall be baptized with the Holy Spirit not many days from now."

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryChurch Father

Thus, when the forty days were fulfilled and the disciples were all in Jerusalem, He took them with Him from Jerusalem and led them to the Mount of Olives. There, in the presence of the same chosen disciples who had seen Him on the Mount of Transfiguration, He had struggled earnestly in His contest and had tasted beforehand the cup of suffering.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

The whole life of the apostles, whose deeds the Evangelist Luke describes in his second book, was the fulfillment of the will of Jesus Christ, which He expressed to them in His final appearance after the Resurrection.

Therefore the Ascension of Jesus Christ into heaven, while concluding the Gospel history, is also the beginning of apostolic history.

For this reason the Evangelist Luke begins the history of Christ's apostles with the account of the Lord's Ascension into heaven.

Verses 4-5. Intending to depart to the Father, Jesus Christ gathers to Himself all the apostles and certain other, more perfect disciples of His.

Συναλιζόμενος, "having gathered them," in itself has the sense of a middle verb, "having gathered together," and naturally implies αὐτοῖς, "with them."

Read more (526 words)

The translation "having gathered them," with αὐτούς already implied, is required by the substance of the matter and by the true meaning of the history of the Lord's Ascension.

The Slavonic translation, "eating with them," is supported by the reading συναλιζόμενος, found in many codices, meaning simul commoror. The Vulgate has convescens.

It is also supported by patristic interpretations, according to which the Lord's appearance described here is the same as that narrated by the Evangelist Luke at the end of his Gospel (Lk 24:36-51).

In the passage under consideration, συναλιζόμενος stands in an inseparable connection with Acts 1:3, not only grammatically but also logically.

It designates the most decisive of the "many infallible proofs" by which the Lord presented Himself alive after His Passion.

See Theophylact's interpretation of the indicated section of the Evangelist Luke, and Chrysostom on Acts.

This gathering was required not only by the importance of the Lord's Ascension itself, of which they were to be witnesses, but also by the importance of the command and promise which the Lord gave His disciples.

The command was this: do not depart from Jerusalem. Without this command of the Lord, the apostles would have dispersed to their native settlements.

For most of them, these were the cities and villages of Galilee. And could they themselves have wished to remain in Jerusalem?

So many painful memories were bound up with it. There was the chief seat of Jesus' enemies. There, as His followers, they could expect only mockery and insult.

Nevertheless: do not depart from Jerusalem, but wait for the Holy Spirit promised by the Father.

Such is the will of God: that in Jerusalem, the center of true Old Testament worship, the foundation of the New Testament kingdom should be laid.

There first of all the saving grace of God in Christ through the Holy Spirit was to be manifested. It was precisely there that cruel malice and injustice had recently been expressed by the human race against the Savior of the world.

In the very city where Christ had been so dishonored, the Holy Spirit, through the apostles, was to bear witness to Him and glorify Him.

This great promise could not have been incomprehensible to the Lord's disciples. As the promise of the Father, it had to be known to them already from the Old Testament prophecies.

Those prophecies concerned the outpouring of the Spirit of God upon all flesh in the messianic time (Joel 2:28 and following; Is 44:3).

Moreover, Jesus Christ Himself had explained to them very clearly the teaching and promise concerning the Holy Spirit, especially shortly before His sufferings (Jn chs. 14-17).

He now reminds them of this. Finally, the baptism of John and his testimony concerning the baptism of men with the Holy Spirit, which the Messiah would perform, had to lead them to understand the true meaning of Christ's promise (Mt 3:11 and parallels).

Consequently the Lord also reminds them here of John's baptism. By comparison with it, He clarifies for the disciples the action of the baptism with the Holy Spirit, which was soon to follow.

This baptism would cleanse, renew, and strengthen human nature.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

The disciples listened to the divine speech, and the sorrow of parting was covered by joy over the enlightenment of the mind. Before it, the mysterious realm of God's divine economy opened ever more widely. They also rejoiced over the promise their Teacher gave them.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

"Having gathered them together," or, according to another interpretation of the Greek word followed by the Slavonic translation, "eating food with them." The writer of Acts defines neither the time nor the place of this gathering precisely.

He does the same in the Gospel concerning the Lord's appearance after the first day until the Ascension; compare Lk 24:36-37.

If we suppose that this gathering of the disciples around the Lord is the same as that mentioned later in verse 6, and that the Lord ascended immediately after this, then of course this was on the very day of the Lord's Ascension and on the Mount of Olives.

Acts 1:8-9 and 1:12 correspond to this. The special character and certain solemnity of the expression "having gathered them together" also seem to support it.

Read more (722 words)

The evangelists do not use such an expression when speaking of the Lord's appearances to the disciples after the Resurrection.

On the other hand, as we have often noted, the evangelists do not narrate events in strict chronology.

Their expressions "after this," "after these words," "having said this," and similar phrases do not always mean that what follows happened immediately after what preceded.

Yet, as we have also noted more than once, there is no need always to strive to determine exactly when the Lord said or did something, or when an event occurred, unless there is a definite indication.

The meaning of the Lord's sayings does not always depend on this. That meaning is what should matter most to us. In any case, the meaning remains one and the same, and in this lies the whole force.

"He commanded them not to depart from Jerusalem." This is one of the Lord's commands, or testamentary instructions, expressing His last will (Acts 1:2).

The disciples had to fulfill it without fail, and its fulfillment demanded no small self-denial from them.

According to natural feeling, the Lord's disciples undoubtedly would not have wished to remain in this city. There their Lord and Teacher had been brought to death on the cross.

There were so many enemies of Him and of them that they had to gather behind locked doors for fear of the Jews (Jn 20:19; Jn 20:26).

There everything reminded them of their own unfaithfulness and of their flight from the Teacher in the hardest moments of His life (Mt 26:56 and parallels).

There, in general, were so many memories that were heavy for them. But such was the will of God: that the law should go forth from Zion and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem (Is 2:2 and following).

On this holy mountain the foundation of the Church of Christ was to be laid. There, precisely where enmity against God and His Christ (Ps 2:2) had reached its extreme measure, His grace would abound all the more.

With the outpouring of the Holy Spirit upon the apostles, the spread of the Gospel throughout the whole world would begin from there (Acts 1:8).

"Wait for the promise of the Father." To this command, difficult for human feeling, namely to remain in a city hostile to them, a consoling promise is immediately joined.

It is the greatest promise: that the all-powerful Protector and Guide would be sent to them from the almighty Father.

The reference is evidently to the full outpouring of the gifts of the Holy Spirit upon the apostles on the day of Pentecost (Acts 1:5; compare Acts 2:2 and following).

They had already received in part the gifts of the Holy Spirit from the Lord (Jn 20:21-22). But they still had to await the full outpouring of these gifts upon them in Jerusalem.

This took place on the day of Pentecost. Here the Lord calls this descent of the Holy Spirit the promise of the Father; compare Lk 24:49, "the promise of the Father."

He says this because God the Father, already in the Old Testament, gave through the prophets the promise of the outpouring of the Holy Spirit in the times of Christ.

Compare Is 44:3; Joel 3:1 and others.

"Of which you have heard from Me." This does not point to a similar discourse of the Lord recorded by the Evangelist Luke (Lk 24:49), for that discourse and the one considered here seem to be one and the same.

The Lord points to His own discourses about this promise of the Father, spoken before His sufferings.

Such are His words about help from the Spirit of God in their preaching and during persecutions (Lk 12:11 and following; Mt 10:20 and parallels).

Such, in particular, are His words about the other Comforter in His last farewell discourse with the disciples, as Chrysostom and Theophylact note.

There He revealed to them with special fullness the teaching about the Comforter who was to come to them, the Holy Spirit.

See Jn 14:15-17; Jn 14:26; Jn 15:26; Jn 16:7; Jn 16:12-16.

"Know, then, what necessity to remain in Jerusalem the Lord laid upon them by the promise He gave: lest after the Ascension they should scatter again, by this expectation, as by bonds, He holds them all there" (Theophylact; compare Chrysostom).

Nikanor (Kamenski)

19th centuryChurch Father

The Lord's command not to leave Jerusalem was given to the apostles, according to Luke's Gospel, after He had taken a piece of broiled fish and honeycomb as proof concerning Himself. He ate before all of them, when they were gathered together (see Lk 24:41-43, 49). Saint John Chrysostom explains why the Lord commanded the apostles not to depart from Jerusalem: "No one would allow soldiers intending to attack a crowd to set out before they had been armed. So the Lord does not allow them to go out to the struggle before the descent of the Holy Spirit, lest the multitude of enemies easily overcome and capture them. He commands them not to depart from Jerusalem not only for this reason, but also because many there could come to believe.

Read more (229 words)

If the very Jerusalemites who crucified Him appear among the believers, this will plainly be a manifest sign both of the Cross and of the Jews' lawlessness, and a great proof of the Resurrection." Eating with others presupposes their gathering. Therefore in Greek both gathering and eating together are expressed by one word: συναλιξόμενος. Thus some translators rendered this word as "eating," and others as "having gathered." It is clear that the first word is more substantial and more definite. The command to await the Holy Spirit points to the necessity of spiritual preparation for this great mystery of man's union with God. Even for receiving eminent people there are many preparatory periods of waiting. How then should one not prepare to receive the Spirit of God? Jesus Christ had often told the apostles that He would comfort them, guide them into all truth, and remind them of all that had been said to them through Jesus Christ Himself (see Jn 14:16-26; Jn 15:26; Jn 16:7-13; Lk 24:49). In the words of John Chrysostom, "the apostles had to be kindled with desire for this event, and then receive grace." So also we, preparing to receive the Holy Mysteries. Must prepare for this by fasting, abstinence, and especially by the spiritual burning of a heart turned toward God with faith and love, that we may become partakers of eternal life.

Philaret of Moscow (Drosdow)

19th centuryChurch Father

Let us remember here that before His Ascension the Lord did not give them a special commandment concerning prayer. He only commanded them "not to depart from Jerusalem, but to wait for the promise of the Father" (Acts 1:4), that is, the promised Holy Spirit.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 17 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  2. συναλιζόμενος
    synalizomenos
    I am assembled together with
    G4871 · συναλίζω
  3. παρήγγειλεν
    parēngeilen
    I notify
    G3853 · παραγγέλλω
  4. αὐτοῖς
    autois
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  5. ἀπὸ
    apo
    from
    G575 · ἀπό
  6. Ἱεροσολύμων
    hierosolymōn
    Jerusalem
    G2414 · Ἱεροσόλυμα
  7. μὴ
    mē
    not
    G3361 · μή
  8. χωρίζεσθαι
    chōrizesthai
    I separate
    G5563 · χωρίζω
  9. ἀλλὰ
    alla
    but
    G235 · ἀλλά
  10. περιμένειν
    perimenein
    I wait for
    G4037 · περιμένω
  11. τὴν
    tēn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  12. ἐπαγγελίαν
    epangelian
    a promise
    G1860 · ἐπαγγελία
  13. τοῦ
    tou
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  14. Πατρὸς
    patros
    father
    G3962 · πατήρ
  15. Ἣν
    hēn
    who
    G3739 · ὅς, ἥ
  16. ἠκούσατέ
    ēkousate
    I hear
    G191 · ἀκούω
  17. μου
    mou
    I
    G1473 · ἐγώ