John Chrysostom
"As also some of your own poets have said: 'For we are also His offspring.'" The poet Aratus said this.
"He is not far," he says, "from each one of us" (v. 27). Thus, he says, He is near to all who are everywhere in the universe.
What can be greater than this? See how he overthrows local gods. Why do I say, "not far"?
He is so near that without Him it is impossible even to live. "For in Him we live and move and have our being."
He points, as it were, to a material example of this kind. It is impossible not to know the air that is poured out everywhere and is not far from each one of us.
Or rather, it is even within us. So also it is with the Creator of all.
See how Paul ascribes everything to Him: Providence, preservation, being, activity, and the continuation of all things.
Read more (185 words)
He did not say "through Him," but "in Him," which signifies greater nearness.
The poet who said, "We are also His offspring," said nothing like this. He said it about Jupiter, while Paul refers it to the Creator.
He does not mean the very being whom the poet meant. May it not be!
Rather, he applies to Him what was properly said of another. Likewise he ascribed the altar to Him, and not to the one whom they worshiped.
Something was said and done that related to Him, but the Greeks did not know that it related to Him, and referred it to another.
Tell me, of whom could it properly be said, "To an unknown God," of the Creator or of a demon?
Obviously, of the Creator, though they did not know Him, while they knew the other.
As the words that God created all things must properly be referred to God and not to Jupiter, some vicious, impious man and sorcerer, so also Paul's words, "we are also His offspring," were not said in the same sense as the poet's, but in another.