The Church Fathers on this verse

Acts 2:15Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

For these are not drunk, as you suppose, seeing it is but the third hour of the day:

Douay-Rheims

ου γαρ ως υμεις υπολαμβανετε ουτοι μεθυουσιν εστιν γαρ ωρα τριτη της ημερας

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

10 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

"They are not drunk, as you suppose." Do you see how modest his defense is?

Although he had the greater part of the people on his side, he speaks to them very gently. First he refutes their wicked supposition, and only then proceeds to his defense.

For this reason he did not say, "as you say, mocking and laughing at us," but, "as you suppose." He wished to show that they said this unintentionally.

He attributed it rather to their ignorance than to evil intent.

"They are not drunk, as you suppose, for it is the third hour of the day." Why does he say this? Is it impossible to be drunk at the third hour?

Of course it is possible. But he did not wish to dwell on this at length, since the apostles were not at all in the state described by these people in mockery.

From this, then, we learn that one must not speak at length without need. On the other hand, his following words also confirm this.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

He did not say, "These are not drunk, as you slanderously say," but, "as you suppose." He speaks more gently and does not wish to insistently prove that they said this from malice.

Instead, he attributes it to ignorance and does not convict them of impiety, thereby preparing for them a path to conversion.

And what does the objection mean, that it is not customary to become drunk at the third hour? Peter did not dwell on it.

They themselves did not really think this about the apostles, but said it only in slander.

But why does this happen at the third hour? To show the miraculous character of the event: the brightness of fire is visible in broad daylight, when everyone is in the square.

Cyrill of Jerusalem

4th centuryChurch Father

They were drunk, but not with what you suppose. They were drunk with that of which it is written: "They shall be filled with the fatness of Your house, and You shall give them drink from the torrent of Your delight" (Ps 35:9).

They were drunk with a sober drunkenness, which puts sin to death and gives life to the heart. This drunkenness is the opposite of bodily drunkenness.

The latter produces forgetfulness of what was known, but the former imparts knowledge of things unknown.

They were drunk after drinking wine from the spiritual Vine, which says of itself: "I am the vine, you are the branches" (Jn 15:5).

But if you do not believe me, understand the truth of my words from the time itself: "for it is the third hour of the day."

Read more (52 words)

According to Mark, He who was crucified at the third hour (Mk 15:25) has now sent down this grace at the third hour.

For the grace of the Crucified One is not different from the grace of Him who now acts. The One who was crucified and promised now fulfills His promise.

Arator

6th centuryChurch Father

The third hour blossomed with divine words. This number belongs to God alone. The simple nature is allotted to three Persons. Many testimonies reveal this to us, and the times persuade us of it.

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryChurch Father

Then the twelve apostles came forward to the people, and Peter, no longer the former Peter, timid and fearful, but courageous and fearless, spoke to them.

He said that the extraordinary event now accomplished among them was the action of the Holy Spirit, whom God had once promised to send upon His servants.

He also said that Jesus Himself had sent this Spirit upon them, the disciples of Jesus. This was the same Jesus whom the Jews had recently crucified there.

God raised Him from the dead, glorified Him, and seated Him at His right hand. Therefore Jesus is the Christ.

The recent teachings of the Risen One Himself had shown that Christ had to suffer, and only by this path enter into His glory.

Read more (116 words)

The present enlightenment of the Spirit of God opened for Peter's speech a new source of strength and proofs in the prophecies.

Until then they had been obscure and could not exert such force over the minds of the Jews. Now they were intelligible to everyone who wished to know the truth.

The sign from heaven, which the Jews had so often and vainly asked of Jesus, now appeared of itself from Him who had ascended into heaven.

It bore witness to where the Crucified One now abode, whom they had considered powerless.

The ability to speak in new and unknown languages was an extraordinary gift among the miracles known from ancient and more recent times.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

Beginning his speech, the Apostle Peter places himself in the position of an outside witness to what his hearers see and wonder at.

Therefore, while excluding neither himself nor the other apostles of Christ from the defense, he nevertheless speaks in the third person: "They are not drunk."

Thus the apostle first denies this false opinion of some concerning the wondrous gift of tongues. This opinion cast a black shadow upon the participants in the gift.

In confirmation of this testimony on behalf of the believers, he points to the time of day: "They are not drunk, as you suppose, for it is the third hour of the day."

This means the ninth hour according to our reckoning: the first hour of prayer and the time of the morning sacrifice.

Before this hour, especially on a feast day, an Israelite did not permit himself to take any food.

Ignatij (Semenov)

19th centuryChurch Father

The word is directed first of all against the prejudice which, through the frivolity of some, was turning the whole present matter into shame.

The teacher speaks of people to whom he himself belongs as though speaking of others, since he speaks not from himself but from the Spirit of God. In a similar way the Evangelist John also spoke about himself.

Besides, everyone saw the present preacher. It would have been unnecessary for him to speak about himself.

In removing the accusation, he does not set forth either himself personally or his fellow apostles. He presents the refutation in another form.

It is simple, brief, and natural, yet also respectful toward the hearers: he appeals to the time common to all.

Read more (128 words)

The third hour of the day is counted, according to Palestinian reckoning, from sunrise.

"That these men are not drunk," the apostle now seems to say, "is guaranteed by your own common custom, Jews, our hearers." Peter stood with all the apostles.

"The feast of Pentecost is ordinarily spent by all with special reverence and attention. We appeal to you, and to our people's known strictness in observing the Law."

"Who among us becomes drunk so early, even on an ordinary day?" In the East, because of the heat, this would have meant extreme absurdity.

"Those who get drunk are drunk at night," wrote Saint Paul.

Next follows the positive part of the word, the proposition, which here is the word of Scripture, the sure foundation for everything.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

But an extraordinary phenomenon does not always evoke wonder alone. In a large crowd there will always be people for whose frivolity nothing is extraordinary or miraculous.

Whether to justify their deep ignorance, or to achieve base selfish aims, they will strive to reduce even the most extraordinary thing to the level of the vulgarity that alone is intelligible to them.

Such people were also found among the mass of the people surrounding the God-inspired Apostles. These senseless men were alien to holy wonder at the extraordinary phenomenon.

Mocking and nodding toward the Apostles, they said, “They are filled with sweet wine,” which in antiquity was a favorite morning drink. Thus blasphemous frivolity always laughs at holy inspiration.

Read more (554 words)

The sensual and stiff-necked people could not understand what was taking place before them. It was a miracle, great and mysterious.

It was that wondrous gift which the heavenly Teacher had promised before His Ascension, when He said that those who believe in Him “will speak with new tongues” (Mk 16:17).

Now this promise was fulfilled. His disciples began to speak in other, new languages, and they spoke what the Comforter, the Holy Spirit sent down upon them, had taught them.

Every miracle directed toward lofty religious and moral aims first has in view the removal of natural obstacles to that aim. So it was now.

The teaching of Christ had to be preached to all the nations of the earth. Yet a barrier separated them in the form of different languages and dialects.

The gift of tongues removed this barrier, and the word of Christ could freely spread throughout the whole world.

As a miraculous gift, it was incomprehensible not only to the ignorant crowd of that time. It will remain such even for the highest scientific knowledge, and all scientific attempts to explain it are nothing but vague conjecture.

Some interpreters, among others, have thought to explain this miracle by attributing it chiefly to the hearers.

They suppose that the Apostles spoke in their usual language, but that the hearers, under the impression of the extraordinary phenomena and enthusiasm, imagined that each heard his native tongue.

Or they suppose that, by the action of the Holy Spirit, the Apostles received back the pure, primordial, universally intelligible language lost at the building of the tower of Babel.

This language, they say, was now understood by all nationalities. But under such an explanation, the phenomenon remains perhaps even more miraculous and mysterious.

As for other free-thinking interpreters, who do not acknowledge the gift of tongues as a miracle, they try to explain it naturally.

They point to certain cases of somnambulism, when those subject to it suddenly began, in ecstasy, to speak words and speeches previously unknown to them.

Since this explanation attributes the miracle to an abnormal condition, it is obviously not new. It is only a modified repetition of the explanation given by interpreters contemporary with the phenomenon.

They blasphemously mocked and said, “They are filled with sweet wine.” No, neither sweet wine nor somnambulism was at work in the Apostles.

The wisdom of God was at work in them, clothing them with superhuman power.

Meanwhile the rumble of exclamations spread more and more through the masses of the people, who did not know how to explain the miraculous phenomenon.

But amid the cries of wonder, the mocking voices of blasphemers began to be heard more loudly. They tried to give dominance to their frivolity.

The moment was terrible. The work of God was threatened with general ridicule. But it is never mocked.

At that moment the Apostle Peter stepped forth from among the Apostles and addressed the agitated crowd with a loud voice. “Men of Judea and all who dwell in Jerusalem!” he cried out.

The crowd, struck by the Apostle's courage, fell silent and held its breath. The Apostle Peter continued: “Let this be known to you, and give heed to my words.

For these are not drunk, as you suppose, since it is the third hour of the day.”

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

"They are not drunk, as you suppose": remarkable is the softness and meekness with which this crude suspicion is removed.

It recalls the words of the Lord Himself, by which He once removed the reproach voiced by His enemies, that He had a demon: "I do not have a demon, but I honor My Father" (Jn 8:48-49).

"They" means all the disciples of Christ who were speaking in different languages. Peter and the Eleven, having been filled with the Holy Spirit, also undoubtedly spoke in different languages.

But now, beginning the first preaching to the people in explanation of the event, they stopped. The others probably continued speaking.

Read more (149 words)

Peter, of course, delivered this speech in Hebrew. It was understandable, if not to all visitors from other countries, then at least to most of those gathered.

It was also understood by all the inhabitants of Jerusalem, Judea, Galilee, and the surrounding regions.

Peter, with the Eleven, as impartial witnesses, as it were separates himself from the other disciples of Christ by speaking of them in the third person: "they," not "we."

As proof that they are not drunk, the apostle indicates that it is now the third hour of the day.

This hour, nine o'clock in the morning by our reckoning, was the first of the three daily hours of prayer, the third, sixth, and ninth.

It coincided with the offering of the daily morning sacrifice in the temple. Before this hour, according to Jewish custom, no one ate food, especially on so great a feast as Pentecost.

Nikanor (Kamenski)

19th centuryChurch Father

Refuting the slander by one natural argument, the apostle says that the third hour, counted from sunrise, is an utterly unsuitable time for drunkenness on the morning of a great feast.

He immediately gives the true explanation of the apostles' condition. He shows that what happened to them was what the prophet of God Joel had foretold.

The book of Joel's prophecies was written almost eight hundred years before that time, and the Jews honored it as inspired by God.

Blessed Theophylact greatly approves this appeal of the Apostle Peter to prophetic prediction.

"He does not appeal specifically to Christ, saying that after He had been crucified and risen, He promised the apostles this gift.

Read more (150 words)

If Peter had said this, he would have ruined everything. Although it could have proved Christ's divinity, it would have seemed incredible to the Jews.

The question was that they should believe what was said. What seemed incredible would have made them waver.

Nothing can resolve such perplexities except prophetic testimony. Therefore, when some doubtful question arises, do not resort to reasonings.

Reasoned arguments are refuted just as they are composed. But who will overthrow the voice of God? Reasoning is overthrown; Scripture is not overthrown."

Some interpreters note that the Apostle Peter speaks about those who were speaking in different languages, separating them from himself. They suppose that they continued speaking during Peter's speech.

But such disorder cannot be admitted, since the writer of Acts presents the apostle's solemn delivery of the speech, while the other apostles stood by.

He is separated from the others because he represents them.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 13 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. οὐ
    ou
    no
    G3756 · οὐ
  2. γὰρ
    gar
    for
    G1063 · γάρ
  3. ὡς
    hōs
    as
    G5613 · ὡς
  4. ὑμεῖς
    hymeis
    you
    G4771 · σύ
  5. ὑπολαμβάνετε
    hypolambanete
    I take up
    G5274 · ὑπολαμβάνω
  6. οὗτοι
    houtoi
    this
    G3778 · οὗτος
  7. μεθύουσιν
    methyousin
    I am drunk
    G3184 · μεθύω
  8. ἔστιν
    estin
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί
  9. γὰρ
    gar
    for
    G1063 · γάρ
  10. ὥρα
    hōra
    an hour
    G5610 · ὥρα
  11. τρίτη
    tritē
    third
    G5154 · τρίτος
  12. τῆς
    tēs
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  13. ἡμέρας
    hēmeras
    a day
    G2250 · ἡμέρα