John Chrysostom
He offers two proofs of the resurrection. One is from the prophets, though he does not cite the prophecy, but rather the Jews’ opinion about it...
And now for the hope of the promise that was made by God to the fathers, do I stand subject to judgment:
και νυν επ ελπιδι της προς τους πατερας επαγγελιας γενομενης υπο του θεου εστηκα κρινομενος
5 Church Fathers comment on this verse
He offers two proofs of the resurrection. One is from the prophets, though he does not cite the prophecy, but rather the Jews’ opinion about it...
The speech of the Apostle Paul at this trial, in the presence of King Agrippa, is likewise a defense, as was his speech before the Jews on the steps of the Jerusalem fortress. But because the Apostle now spoke with greater freedom than he had then before a crowd of fanatics, and because he was not interrupted in his speech and could express himself fully. He defends himself here in such a way that at the same time he gives solemn witness to Christ, dead and risen, according to the prophecy of Moses and the other ancient prophets. He also summons his hearers to repentance and conversion to God.
Therefore he asked to be heard patiently and once more set forth the familiar history of his conversion from a strict and fanatical Pharisee to the faith. He declared that the messianic hope of his people had already truly been fulfilled in the person of that Jesus of Nazareth.
At first Paul had fiercely persecuted His followers. But Jesus personally revealed His glory to him and brought him to the knowledge that He had risen from the dead. Why could this faith seem improbable even to his hearers?
At first it had been such even for him. But how could he resist the personal testimony of Christ Himself? And how could he disobey the heavenly voice, which sent him to open the eyes of Jews and Gentiles?
They were to turn from darkness to light and from the power of Satan to God. Through faith in Jesus they were to receive forgiveness of sins and a portion with the saints. He was not disobedient to this command.
"And now I stand," and so forth: from the remembrance of his life from youth, the Apostle quickly moves in thought and word to his present position as a prisoner under trial. He points to their outward contrast and to their inward unity.
Formerly I was known as a disciple of the strictest Jewish orthodoxy. Now I am known as one under trial. Yet I am not a traitor to my former convictions. I am not being judged for betraying them, nor for heterodoxy.
On the contrary, I am being judged for the hope that I share with all the Jews, the hope in God's promise to the fathers. All the Jews eagerly await its fulfillment, and I with them. "Is it not madness to strive in every way for this hope to be fulfilled, and then to persecute one who believes in it?"; Chrysostom.
By this hope in the fulfillment of God's promise, the Apostle undoubtedly means the hope of the Messiah's coming. This hope was cherished by all the Jews and was founded on God's promises. The unbelieving Jews still await the Messiah. Paul preaches that this Messiah is Jesus of Nazareth, who died for all and rose again. For this hope the Jews accuse him, and he stands before judgment; see the note to Acts 23:6.
"For the hope of the promise," and so forth: see the note to Acts 13:32.
Hope in the Messiah and Savior is the Apostle's chief teaching. In this hope the faith of the forefathers of the Jewish people was centered. In it the Jews of his own day hoped. For it Paul suffered and was judged, proclaiming that the expected Messiah had appeared in Jesus of Nazareth, Who was crucified, died, and rose by the power of the Godhead. Probably, when resurrection was mentioned, some of the hearers showed their unbelief. The members of the Athenian Areopagus expressed this more decisively; see Acts 17:32. Therefore it is understandable that the Apostle interrupted the natural course of his speech and asked what was incredible in the almighty God raising the dead.
According to Saint John Chrysostom, the Apostle spoke as though saying: "Is it not madness to strive in every way for this hope to be fulfilled, and then persecute the one who believes in it?" He offers two proofs of the resurrection: one from the prophets, and the other, stronger proof, from deeds. If the Jews had held no such belief, and had not been brought up in it, but it were only now being introduced, one might reject this teaching. The Apostle has in view specifically the resurrection of Jesus Christ, verse 9. Yet he makes the concept of resurrection general. He uses the word neither in the past tense, concerning the Lord's resurrection, nor in the future, concerning the general resurrection of the dead. He uses the present tense, showing that God is always able to raise the dead. He asks whether they truly do not believe this, and whether they consider such a deed incredible for almighty God.
Passages read together with this verse.
Greek text, 16 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.