The Church Fathers on this verse

Daniel 10:2Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

In those days I, Daniel, mourned the days of three weeks.

Douay-Rheims

בַּיָּמִ֖ים הָהֵ֑ם אֲנִ֤י דָֽנִיֵּאל֙ הָיִ֣יתִי מִתְאַבֵּ֔ל שְׁלֹשָׁ֥ה שָׁבֻעִ֖ים יָמִֽים׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

3 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Why does he grieve once more? If this is the inaugural year of Cyrus' rule, why the prolonged sorrow, when he could have mourned just a single day? Furthermore, he hears nothing in response to his supplications. It seems he is beseeching for the end of the afflictions; yet, God remains silent on this matter, reiterating what has been communicated previously in a clearer manner. The prophet desires that all Jews might return, despite the impending disasters that await them and God's intent to withhold their homeland from them. Here, God articulates this more explicitly and distinctly. It is noteworthy that Daniel consistently receives visions only after periods of fasting.

Read more (47 words)

Before the interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar's dream, there was fasting; when Gabriel made his appearance, there was again fasting, along with mourning and supplications; and when the angel arrives now, once more fasting and prayer precede it. Consider how he is nearly vindicated in the sight of Daniel.

Jerome of Stridon

4th centuryChurch Father

During that time, I, Daniel, experienced great distress for three weeks. I abstained from the bread I longed for, and neither meat nor wine touched my lips. I also refrained from using any ointments until the completion of the three weeks. This account serves as a reminder for us to refrain from indulgent foods during Lent, which I believe refers to the bread we desire. We should avoid meat, shun wine, and especially forgo the application of ointments. Even today, the Persians and Indians maintain the practice of using masti before bathing. By humbling his spirit over this period, he emphasizes the seriousness of his prayers, ensuring they are not merely fleeting or superficial.

Read more (104 words)

Allegorically, it can be said that those who mourn the absence of the Bridegroom refrain from the heavenly bread, do not partake of the sustenance symbolized by meat, avoid the joyous wine, and neglect to refresh their appearance with oil, as noted in the Psalms: 'to revive the face with oil' (Psalms 108:15). In this manner of fasting, the bride mingles tears with her supplications, striving for what she desires when the Bridegroom is taken from her. It is fitting for Daniel to seek the Lord's favor, especially since some of the exiled Israelites had already returned in the first year of King Cyrus.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

It is essential to explore the reason behind the sorrowful lament; the prophecy does not specify this clearly. Initially, there was no reason for despair; the king was kind and loving, honored the Divine, valued Daniel's presence, and the entire nation thrived due to the king's benevolence. A careful examination of the prophecy of Jeremiah, the accounts in the book of Chronicles, and the writings of Ezra reveals that Cyrus, in his first year of rule, granted all Jews who desired to return to their homeland the opportunity to do so and rebuild the temple of God; thus, for the Prophet, this was a source of great joy. However, upon closer inspection, one might discern that this very situation was the root of Daniel's anguish.

Read more (357 words)

As the king permitted all who wished to embrace their liberty and return to their homeland, many, having established lives in Babylon and feeling tied to it, chose to remain instead of returning. Some devout individuals, faithful to the laws of their homeland, disregarding their possessions in Babylon, preferred the desolation of their homeland over their current situation. This led to profound sorrow for the blessed Daniel. Witnessing not the falsehood of God’s promise, but rather the meekness and kindness of the king alongside the disobedience and waywardness of the people, he was deeply troubled within and continually wept and shed tears.

One might wonder why, during such tears and lamentations, the Prophet himself did not return to his homeland while lamenting others as foolish and indifferent about their own return. The answer lies in understanding the reasons behind the captivity. God permitted Daniel to enter captivity, not because of his personal failings but as a measure of care for the people, sending him into exile alongside the Jews in a role akin to a guardian or teacher. Consequently, during their return, as many preferred their lives in Babylon, the holy Prophet found himself once again compelled to remain among them, so they would not stray into wickedness without his spiritual guidance. Hence, although the reigning king esteemed piety, honored the Prophet, and favored him above all, the blessed Daniel found no solace in this and was deeply troubled by the people's disobedience and their forgetfulness of the holy city. Thus, he spent three weeks without consuming food. He declared, “I have not eaten the bread of the coveted bread, neither has meat or wine entered into my mouth, nor has mastic been anointed with ointment, until the three weeks of days are fulfilled.” During this time, he stated, he took no care of his body, did not anoint himself, nor did he nourish himself. He referred to bread as “coveted” because it is a fundamental sustenance for everyone; while sufficient people partake in meat, the less affluent rely primarily on bread. Therefore, he termed bread “coveted” as it is a more cherished food than any other.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.