The Church Fathers on this verse

Exodus 14:22Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And the children of Israel went in through the midst of the sea dried up; for the water was as a wall on their right hand and on their left.

Douay-Rheims

וַיָּבֹ֧אוּ בְנֵֽי־יִשְׂרָאֵ֛ל בְּת֥וֹךְ הַיָּ֖ם בַּיַּבָּשָׁ֑ה וְהַמַּ֤יִם לָהֶם֙ חֹמָ֔ה מִֽימִינָ֖ם וּמִשְּׂמֹאלָֽם׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

7 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

"He has divided the Red Sea into sections, for His mercy endures forever" (Psalms 135:13). Another translation (Simmachus) refers to it as divisions (είς τομάς). A third (unknown translator, see Orig. Ex.) describes it as parts (είς τμήματα). Some suggest there was not a single pathway but that the waters parted in such a way that each tribe had its own passage, creating multiple routes. This miraculous act, which undeniably showcased His immense power and instilled a sense of awe, was simultaneously an expression of great compassion, not only towards those who benefited from it but also towards His adversaries, should they choose to reflect on it. "And led His people Israel through the midst of it, for His mercy endures forever" (Psalms 135:14).

Read more (96 words)

It is fitting that it states, "led Israel in the midst of it," as this too demonstrates God's might. Simply parting the sea was not sufficient; He facilitated their passage not only to amaze and terrify them but also to inspire them with fear at its extraordinary nature. Nonetheless, God's power, even once the waters had receded, instilled courage within them, enabling them to confidently traverse this remarkable path. With the waters towering on either side, it required great bravery to confront the reality that the encroaching sea could engulf them and overwhelm the entire camp.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

The people of God, rescued from the great and mighty Egypt, are guided through the Red Sea to vanquish their foes through baptism. This sacrament of the Red Sea symbolizes immersion in the sacred blood of Christ, annihilating the sins represented by the pursuing Egyptians. Upon emerging from this experience, no oppressor remains to trouble you.

Gregory of Nyssa

4th centuryChurch Father

As Moses traversed the parted sea, he descended into the depths along with his people, emerging unharmed as if the sun had dried his body. He walked confidently along the seabed, moving through the depths of the ocean, undeterred by the sudden retreat of the waves. On both sides, the waters had solidified into towering walls.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

Some believe that the sea was separated into twelve sections, allowing each tribe to cross uniquely; they refer to the cherished words of David, who stated, “To him who divided the Red Sea into divisions” (Psalm 135:13). However, I hold the view that the sea was parted into two distinct halves. This is also supported by Sacred Scripture, which describes, "And the water was a wall at their right hand, and a wall at their left" illustrating that the passageway was vast enough for the countless people who traversed it. It is written, "I am set in the depths as in the wilderness" (Psalms 105:9), which further indicates the wide breadth of the path. Nonetheless, the initial interpretation does not contradict the truth of piety; both understandings arise from God's miraculous power. Yet, it is essential to adhere to the truth revealed in Sacred Scripture.

Roshdestwenski W.G.

Teacher of the Church

The author of ancient sacred texts recalls how the Israelites ventured into the heart of the Red Sea. As stated, "And the children of Israel went in through the midst of the sea on dry ground, and the water was a wall unto them at their right hand, and a wall beside them." They traversed this dry expanse amidst the sea, which created formidable barriers of water on either side (Exodus 14:22). Consequently, it is a common understanding among church leaders that the Israelites journeyed directly from the shores of Egypt to those of Arabia.

Read more (417 words)

However, Moses offers a differing view within the same narrative, noting that in the subsequent verse, the Israelites observed the Egyptians lying at the water’s edge—not by Arabian waters, but by the sea connected to Egypt, from which their bodies emerged as the sea frequently expelled them into the nearby lands. The book of Numbers cites that after crossing the Red Sea, the Israelites continued for three days through the wilderness of Elim, which was adjacent to the eastern sea, associated with Egypt.

The evidence supporting this prevailing interpretation is compelling. The Scriptures affirm repeatedly that the Israelites walked through the very depths of the sea: “And by the spirit of Thy fury the waters were parted: the waters were thickened like a wall of water, and the waves were thickened in the midst of the sea” (Exodus 15:8). The Psalmist echoes this in Psalm 105:9, “And thou shalt forbid the Red Sea, and thou shalt pour out, and thou shalt set me in the abyss as in a wilderness.” Likewise, Isaiah proclaims, “He shall lead them through the abyss, as a horse through the wilderness, and they shall not be troubled” (Isaiah 63:13). This truth is further substantiated by the demise of their pursuers within the sea: "When Pharaoh's horse and chariots and horsemen entered into the sea, and the Lord brought the water of the sea upon them: and the children of Israel passed through dry land in the midst of the sea" (Exodus 15:12). Nehemiah, a scribe from Judah, affirms this in his account, combining elements of the Exodus narrative in prayer, "And the sea hast thou parted before them, and they passed through the midst of the sea on dry ground, and their persecutors thou hast cast into the deep, as a stone in the green water" (Nehemiah 9:11).

Had the Israelites not followed this course, they could not have crossed unless they opted for a significantly longer route. This is evident when one examines the geography, which makes it clear that anyone traveling from Egypt towards Mount Sinai, with the Red Sea positioned between them, would inevitably pass through its waters. Despite the existence of a direct route from the city of Ramesses to Mount Sinai along the shoreline, the terrain is so rugged that it would prove arduous for a large gathering of people. This challenge was precisely why the Hebrew people, guided by divine providence, traversed the Red Sea, a necessary passage for the purpose of overwhelming the Egyptians therein.

Vissarion (Nechaev)

19th centuryCommentator

The waters stood as a barrier to their right and left. Considering the configuration of the waters that resembled solid walls on both sides, it is difficult to align with the views of those enamored with miraculous tales, who propose that the Israelites benefited from a sea tide. Tides do not separate waters; they merely reveal, and only briefly, the area of the sea closest to the land. Were it not for divine intervention during the Israelites' crossing of the Red Sea, and if the tide had in fact aided them, it remains unclear why surrounding nations were alarmed upon hearing of this miraculous occurrence (Ex. 15:14). The Canaanites were well aware of this wonder and were filled with fear of the Israelites (Num. 2:11).

Read more (42 words)

The book of Wisdom refers to the Israelites' journey on the sea floor as a passage through a field of wickedness (Prem. 19:7), suggesting that the seabed was adorned with vegetation, making their crossing akin to a stroll through an opulent garden.

Wlastow G.K.

19th centuryCommentator

They served as their shield on both the right and left, rendering any assault from those directions impossible.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.