The Church Fathers on this verse

Exodus 33:11Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And the Lord spoke to Moses face to face, as a man is wont to speak to his friend. And when he returned into the camp, his servant Josue, the son of Nun, a young man, departed not from the tabernacle.

Douay-Rheims

וְדִבֶּ֨ר יְהוָ֤ה אֶל־מֹשֶׁה֙ פָּנִ֣ים אֶל־פָּנִ֔ים כַּאֲשֶׁ֛ר יְדַבֵּ֥ר אִ֖ישׁ אֶל־רֵעֵ֑הוּ וְשָׁב֙ אֶל־הַֽמַּחֲנֶ֔ה וּמְשָׁ֨רְת֜וֹ יְהוֹשֻׁ֤עַ בִּן־נוּן֙ נַ֔עַר לֹ֥א יָמִ֖ישׁ מִתּ֥וֹךְ הָאֹֽהֶל׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

7 Church Fathers comment on this verse

Basil the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

“‘Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind’ (Mark 12:30). The phrase ‘with all’ emphasizes that one’s love cannot be shared among multiple pursuits. The affection directed towards worldly matters diminishes the totality of love available. Consequently, only a few individuals are deemed friends of God, as exemplified by Moses, who is noted as a friend of God, and John. It is stated, ‘The friend of the Bridegroom, standing ... rejoiceth with joy’ (John 3:29), meaning that one who possesses unwavering and devoted love for Christ is deserving of His friendship. This is why the Lord tells His disciples who have matured in faith: ‘I say not therefore unto you servants, but friends, for the servant knoweth not what his Lord doeth’ (cf.

Read more (62 words)

John 15:15). Therefore, those who are perfect can truly comprehend the Beloved. Indeed, only the saints can claim to be friends of God and of one another, whereas those characterized by vice and ignorance cannot be friends, as the essence of true friendship is incompatible with a corrupt heart. Evil stands not only against good but is also in opposition to itself.”

Jerome of Stridon

4th centuryChurch Father

Moreover, I have witnessed the Sovereign of the Lord of hosts (Isaiah 6:5). The Jewish elders claim that Isaiah was executed for stating that he beheld the Lord of hosts with his physical eyes, while Moses only glimpsed God’s back. However, God Himself declares, ‘No man shall see My face and live’ (Ex. 33:20). When we inquire how God asserts in the Law that He appeared to other prophets through dreams and visions but spoke directly to Moses, we find it contradictory to the notion that ‘no man shall see my face and live,’ in light of the fact that God engaged with Moses directly. Their response is that, from a perspective of human understanding, God revealed Himself in a manner suited to that experience, not as He truly is, but as He desired to present Himself.

Read more (90 words)

We contend that Isaiah's vision is of the same nature; the critical question is whether Moses truly beheld God. If he did, then Isaiah, too, witnessed Him and was unjustly executed for proclaiming this truth, as it affirms that God can indeed be seen. Conversely, if Moses did not see, then Isaiah’s fate should reflect that of Moses, since both are accused of the same falsehood, claiming to see what is not visible. Regardless of the interpretation they hold regarding Moses, we will extend the same reasoning to Isaiah’s vision.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

It is vital for every individual to connect with those of virtuous character. Young men, in particular, benefit from aligning themselves with honorable and wise mentors, as noted in Cicero’s writings, since those who walk with the wise grow wise, while those who accompany the foolish will become like them (Proverbs 13:20). This principle serves as both guidance and a testament to righteousness. Young individuals naturally tend to emulate those they frequently interact with, and it is widely recognized that they adopt the lifestyles of their chosen companions.

Read more (275 words)

This explains the greatness of Joshua, whose close association with Moses not only imparted to him an understanding of the law but also sanctified and favored him. When the tabernacle of Moses was filled with divine light and God's majesty was revealed, Joshua was the only one present; he was Moses' aide (Exodus 24:13; 33:11; Numbers 11:28; Deuteronomy 1:38). While Moses engaged in dialogue with God, Joshua remained beside him, shrouded in a holy cloud (Exodus 24:13; 33:11; Numbers 11:28; Deuteronomy 1:38). The elders and the people stayed back, as Jesus and Moses ascended the holy mountain to receive the law, with all the people in the camp and Jesus outside, dwelling in the Tabernacle of the Covenant.

When the cloud descended and spoke to Moses, Jesus stood faithfully beside him, never departing from the tabernacle, while the elders trembled at the miraculous events from a distance. He was perpetually present with the revered Moses throughout his extraordinary deeds and concealed commands, and from this close companionship, he inherited Moses' authority (Deuteronomy 1:38; 3:28). By his merit, he held back the waters (Joshua 3:5-17), commanded the sun to stand still (Joshua 10:12), and in doing so, delayed the arrival of night to extend the day for the sake of his victories. Furthermore, he was uniquely tasked with the privilege that was denied to Moses—to guide the people into the Promised Land. A remarkable leader, he excelled in both miraculous faith and military triumphs. While Moses performed more grand acts, Joshua's endeavors were marked by success. With reliance on God’s grace, both achieved feats beyond human ability: one commanded the sea, the other commanded the heavens.

Marcus the Ascetic

4th centuryChurch Father

In the realm of multiplicity, there exists diversity, variation, and distinction, yet to transcend this multiplicity and encounter the Divine, who is truly the One, is to elevate oneself to a vision of God. This truth is exemplified by Moses, who established the inward tabernacle (Ex. 33:7, 11-23) and engaged in dialogue with the Lord. It is perilous to attempt to articulate the inexpressible through verbal means, for spoken language inherently implies duality and more. A more accurate perception emerges when one observes without sound, unified in spirit, allowing one to dwell in an indivisible oneness rather than in a state of division.

Roshdestwenski W.G.

Teacher of the Church

The Lord spoke to Moses directly, as friends converse with one another. Such expressions, which imply physical action, do not truly apply to God, who is a spiritual being. Many statements about God found in Holy Scriptures may seem misleading if taken literally according to the surface text; however, if interpreted through the lens of sound reasoning, their true significance becomes evident. It is important to remember that these writings serve as coverings for deeper truths. Just as the person wearing clothing is distinct from the garments themselves, so too do the scriptures about God and His attributes possess varied meanings when viewed through the reasoning of faith.

Read more (368 words)

In the Old Testament, it is often recorded that God spoke repeatedly. For instance, the first chapter of Genesis reveals numerous instances where 'God speaks,' which continues into subsequent chapters and throughout the text. The Lord talking to Moses face to face is akin to how one would communicate with a friend. However, it should not be thought that God speaks in the same manner as humans. Human speech is an expression of thoughts meant for sharing or for eliciting praise, communicated through material means such as air and instruments. Yet, God, being immaterial, does not require such means; He can convey His desires and intentions with a mere thought.

It is indeed accurate to say that God has spoken; yet He does so indirectly through angels and in various ways that align with His boundless wisdom. He does not engage in communication using intermediary forms in a way that would imply He lacks expression. Consequently, one might argue that if God does not speak, He must be without words. Such a notion must be dismissed as blasphemous. God possesses His own Word, but this divine expression is not communicated to us in human terms. His essence is beyond our comprehension, and similarly, His Word remains unfathomable to us.

Both His nature and His Word are fully known only to Himself. When God speaks, it occurs internally — within His own being. The Holy Trinity consists of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit; these three are unified as one God, recognized in their distinct Hypostases. The Father communicates with the Son, begetting Him, which is why He is referred to as the Word (John 1:1). The Father also communicates with the Spirit, thus begetting Him, and the term 'Spirit' applies here as well. The Son speaks to the Father, being begotten of Him, while the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father in the same manner.

Their communication is so profound and divine that even the Seraphim in His presence cannot grasp it unless God reveals such truths to them. These interactions among the three divine persons remain mysterious and are known to no creature, whether verbal, visible, or invisible, unless God Himself chooses to disclose them.

Vissarion (Nechaev)

19th centuryCommentator

The Lord communicated with Moses directly, as recounted in Numbers (Num. 12:8), conveying His intentions through clear and understandable speech rather than from a distance, from the heavens, or through any intermediary like an angel. In a manner akin to a friend conversing with another, the Lord spoke to Moses candidly, allowing Moses the same openness, akin to the liberty one possesses with a close companion, resembling a familiar relationship between a host and guest. This unique privilege was granted solely to Moses among all the prophets throughout the history of the Old Testament. The Lord stated, "If there is a prophet among you, I, the Lord, make Myself known to him in a vision; I speak with him in a dream. Not so with My servant Moses; he is faithful in all My house.

Read more (272 words)

I speak with him face to face, even plainly, and not in dark sayings" (Num. 12:6-8). However, it is also recorded that "the Lord spoke to you face to face from the midst of the fire on the mountain" (Deut. 5:4). This encounter occurred only once, and the Israelites expressed their wish for the Lord not to address them directly in the future but to let Moses serve as an intermediary. When the Lord addressed them from Mount Sinai, the Israelites stood at a distance, trembling at the sound of His voice, as subservients before a fearsome master. In contrast, Moses engaged with God as if in his own home, with the boldness and familiarity of a true friend. This close relationship with the Lord was purposefully bestowed upon Moses so that the people would revere him as God's chosen servant and be encouraged to obey him, and also to bolster Moses in his remarkable duties. Additionally, Joshua, son of Nun, a young man, did not depart from the tabernacle. Moses entered the holy tent exclusively to receive divine revelations and was then directed by the Lord back to the camp of Israel, where he served as the principal leader of the people. Joshua, however, remained in the tent, presumably devoting his time to contemplation and prayer. At this point, he was at least forty years old, yet he is referred to as a youth due to his position as Moses’ aide. It is common in Scripture for servants to be called youths, such as Eliezer, the servant of Abraham (Gen. 18:8), illustrating their perspective of their master as a fatherly figure.

Wlastow G.K.

19th centuryCommentator

The Lord declares that His face cannot be observed, for no one can behold Him and live. This suggests, as noted in verse 11, the exceptional moral integrity of Moses, allowing him to draw near in thought and spirit to the Source of all wisdom and truth. From this profound connection, he was able to obtain insights that transcended human understanding. Moses’ closeness to the divine prepares Joshua, who frequently remained at the tabernacle—even during the night when Moses returned to his family—for the role he would later assume as Moses’ successor.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.