The Church Fathers on this verse

Ezekiel 20:25Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Therefore I also gave them statutes that were not good, and judgments, in which they shall not live.

Douay-Rheims

וְגַם־אֲנִי֙ נָתַ֣תִּי לָהֶ֔ם חֻקִּ֖ים לֹ֣א טוֹבִ֑ים וּמִ֨שְׁפָּטִ֔ים לֹ֥א יִֽחְי֖וּ בָּהֶֽם׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

4 Church Fathers comment on this verse

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

I will provide them with directives that bear no real value. Regarding spiritual insight, the law is sacred, and the commandment is sacred, just, and beneficial (Rom. 7:12). However, concerning the fruitlessness of deeds and merely existing in shadows, these directives lack goodness and do not grant eternal life; for no one is justified by the law, as stated in the scriptures (Gal. 3:11).

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

I will provide them with my commandments, which are not beneficial, and my judgments, in which they shall not find life. These commandments given are not favorable, representing the four severe punishments I sent upon Jerusalem: the sword, exile, wild beasts, and death. Alternatively, the judgments and commandments that God regards as harsh are those of the law, which were delivered to the Hebrews like little children or defiant servants, rather than as mature children and heirs; for God humbled Himself to their frailty and granted them the law and judgments, which in His eyes were deemed unkind.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

Some interpreted it as idolatry, believing the term ‘dah’ signified 'allowed'; however, it is clear that they misunderstood the discourse. No rational individual would deem the sinful reverence of idols as merely unkind; rather, they would assert it is profoundly wrong. Consequently, the Source of wisdom, the Giver of righteousness, the Accuser of evil cannot regard extreme malice as merely not good; He designates it as the epitome of wickedness. Thus, the prophetic declaration conveys a different message, stating that, according to God, He has bestowed upon them His judgments, indicating that anyone who acts according to them will find life; and by judgments, He refers to the Ten Commandments of the Law.

Read more (225 words)

They have violated these commandments and continued to do so without fear; hence, I have constrained them and bound them with additional commandments that cannot grant them life, but adherence to which, along with diligent care, will lead them to refrain from violating these essential laws. He signifies these as the directives concerning leprosy, corpses, unclean meats, seed spillage, and similar matters, as well as the rituals of cleansing and the sacrifices accompanying them. Those who were subject to these regulations could not overlook these vital and beneficial laws. Therefore, God did not assert that He provided them with evil commandments; instead, He expresses that these commandments are not good. They do not instruct in vice, nor do they inherently produce virtue; rather, they aimed to encourage individuals to approach the temple of God and present themselves before Him. The one who perceived himself as impure would seek the temple for purification, and upon arrival, he would reawaken his awareness of God, which would dispel evil thoughts and urge him to adhere to God's commandments. Thus, these commandments are not inherently good, as they did not align with God's divine purpose, but were designed to meet the frailty of those to whom the Law was given. While not inherently good or necessary, they still guided toward what is good and necessary. To this, God adds:

Irenaeus of Lyon

2nd centuryChurch Father

The Law served as both instruction and a prophetic message for the Jewish people. Initially, God guided them through the natural commandments, exemplified by the Ten Commandments, which are essential for salvation. As Moses recorded in Deuteronomy, “These words the Lord spake unto all the congregation of the children of Israel upon the mount, and added nothing, and wrote it upon two boards, and gave it unto me” (Deuteronomy 5:22). This was to ensure that those desiring to follow Him would adhere to His commandments. However, when they chose to create a golden calf and turned their hearts back to Egypt, opting for slavery over freedom, they received a modified experience, not to sever their bond with God but to keep them in a state of bondage.

Read more (556 words)

The prophet Ezekiel clarifies this shift by stating, “after the lust of their heart were their eyes, and I gave them commandments of evil, and excuses in which they shall not live.” Additionally, Luke recounts that Stephen, the first chosen deacon and martyr of Christ, remarked on Moses and the commandments he received, stating they were meant for a people whose ancestors resisted obedience, turning instead to Egypt and demanding of Aaron, “Make us gods to precede us; for with Moses, who brought us out of the land of Egypt, we do not know what happened.” In those days, they created a calf, offered sacrifices to an idol, and reveled in their handiwork. Consequently, God turned away and permitted them to worship the celestial hosts, as documented in the prophets, “O house of Israel, have you offered sacrifices and slain sacrifices to me during forty years in the wilderness? Ye have received the tabernacle of Moloch, and the star of the god Remphan— the images which ye made to worship them” (Acts 7:38-43; Am. 5:25-26). This indicates that the law was given to them by the same God, adapted to their servitude. In Exodus, God tells Moses, “I will send My angel before thee; for I will not go down with thee, because thou art a cruel people” (Ex. 33:2-3). Furthermore, the Lord indicated that some of the commandments were given through Moses as a concession due to their stubbornness and disobedience. When they questioned why Moses allowed divorce, He replied, “it was because of your hard-heartedness that he allowed you to do this; but in the beginning it was not so” (Matthew 19:7-8), acknowledging Moses as a faithful servant yet affirming the singularity of God who created male and female from the beginning, reproaching them for their obstinacy. Hence, the instruction provided by Moses regarding divorce reflected their hardened hearts.

Yet, this pattern is mirrored in the New Testament, where the apostles also issue similar directives for analogous reasons. Paul states, “I speak this, not the Lord” (1 Cor. 7:12), and “I speak this as a permission, not as a commandment” (1 Cor. 7:6), and notes, “I have no commandment from the Lord concerning virgins, but I give counsel, as one who has received from the Lord the grace to be faithful” (1 Cor. 7:25). Paul also warns, “lest Satan tempt you because of your self-control” (1 Cor. 7:5). Thus, when the apostles present certain mandates out of compassion due to the unrepentance of some, it is to prevent hardened hearts from despairing and turning away from God entirely. Consequently, it is not surprising that, in the Old Testament, God permitted similar allowances for the people's benefit, using rituals to draw them towards salvation through adherence to the Ten Commandments, and those who were guided by Him remained steadfast, growing in their love for Him. However, if some deem the Teacher of the Law inadequate due to the rebellious and sinful nature of Israel, they should recognize the truth in the call that “many are called, but few are chosen” (Matt. 20:16), that some appear as sheep outwardly but are wolves inwardly (Matt. 7:15), and that God has always respected human free will and self-control, ensuring that those who disobey may justly face consequences, while those who comply and believe are rewarded with eternal life.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.