Genesis 3:6Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Imagining equality with God, she hastily partook of the fruit, directing her thoughts solely towards it, being blinded by the allure offered by the wicked serpent. And to illustrate her intention, she succumbed to the poisonous counsel of the serpent as Scripture recounts: "And the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes and coveted because it gave knowledge; and she took of its fruit and ate." Indeed, as it is written, "bad company corrupts good morals" (1 Cor. 15:33). Why was it, then, that prior to the serpent's temptation, she had not considered the tree or perceived its allure? It was because she revered God’s command and feared the consequences of disobedience. Yet, once deceived by these vile creatures—who led her to believe they would escape punishment and attain divine status—her misguided hope compelled her to eat the forbidden fruit. Rather than maintaining her proper bounds and trusting in God's word, she chose to engage with the serpent, taking its counsel to heart. Soon enough, she would experience the disastrous results of her choice.

Upon realizing that the tree, in her perception, was not only good for sustenance but also beautiful and desirable for gaining wisdom, she broke down under the serpent’s temptation. She thought: if the tree pleases the palate, captivates the senses, and promises greatness equal to the Creator, why should I not eat from it? Look how the devil ensnared her, leading her thoughts to exceed her rightful place, thus forfeiting what had already been granted to her. "And she took of its fruit and ate; and she gave also to her husband, and he ate. And the eyes of both of them were opened, and they knew that they were naked." What have you done, dear lady? By accepting this ruinous counsel, you have not only disobeyed God's law but also have become so consumed by desire that you forfeited the blessing of paradise. You dared to partake from that one tree which the Lord had forbidden; you trusted the serpent's deceitful words over the Creator’s command and allowed yourself to be misled, deserving of no excuse. Was the one who advised you of the same essence? He was one of your subordinates, under your authority. Why did you choose this dishonor and converse with the serpent, rather than relying on he for whom you were created, who was your equal in dignity, nature, and ability to speak? Why did you not refuse this suggestion, so clearly contrary to God's command? Driven by the allure of what was promised, you willingly ate.

Now that you have cast yourself into such a deep chasm and stripped yourself of your highest honor, why do you also implicate your husband in this tragic fall? You, appointed to be a helper, transformed into a betrayer and, by partaking in this deceit, have stripped him along with yourself of God's favor. What madness could lead you to such a folly? Was not your life in blissful abundance enough, clothed in the flesh without need, enjoying all the fruits of paradise save for one? Was it insufficient that all visible things were under your control? Driven by aspirations, did you wish to reach such heights? You will come to know by experience that not only will you not achieve your desires, but you will lose everything already granted to you. You and your husband will be engulfed in regret, realizing the futility of your actions, while the evil one, who seduced you into this downfall, will rejoice at your plight as you mirror his own fate. Just as he, having aspired to greatness, fell from heavenly heights, so too did he seek to bring you to death through violation of God’s command, fulfilling the wise observation: "By the envy of the devil death entered the world" (Prem. 2:24). "And she gave to her husband, and he ate. And the eyes of both of them were opened." The husband also bears great responsibility. Though tempted by an equal, he, who should have remembered God’s decree, ought to have prioritized it over the fleeting desire presented by his wife, refraining from partaking in the transgression that led to such a loss of goodness in exchange for momentary pleasure, thus offending the One who had shown him love and bestowal of life without pain. Could you not enjoy the abundance of that which was lawful? Why forsake such a simple command? Rather, thou, upon hearing from your wife the wicked promise, were quickly swayed and consumed the fruit. Thus, the consequence extends to both, teaching you through experience not to trust the counsel of a wicked spirit over that of God.

Thus, it is evident that the wife was enticed by desires of divinity; she did not deceive her husband but instead persuaded him. Paul confirms this, stating, "Adam was not deceived" (1 Tim. 2:14). What, then, is his condemnation? Consider the weight of his transgression. The wife, having been tempted, took a taste; once she had tasted, she urged her husband to partake as well, not wanting to be the sole offender. She persuaded him rather than deceiving him, a tendency still seen today. A man may be knowledgeable in faith, loving of the law, zealous for orthodoxy, yet still yield to his wife's urges to temper his zeal, not out of ignorance of the truth, but from obedience to her counsel. Many believe that Adam unwittingly accepted the fruit from his wife, unaware of its origins. However, this is no justification for Adam, for God reproves him saying, "Because you have listened to the voice of your wife" (Gen. 3:17). God did not declare, "since you took from your wife," for Adam could have claimed ignorance regarding the source of the fruit. Adam’s wrongdoing lies not in being deceived but in being overtaken by desire for the fruit.

While she didn't lose anything, she realized that her eyes were opened to her own nakedness—not to the godlike status she expected. She then offered the fruit to her husband, persuading him to eat, though Scripture does not indicate that she begged him. Thus, Eve, having eaten, did not experience the death God warned of, nor did she become a deity, as the serpent had claimed. If her nakedness had been evident, Adam would have likely refrained from eating, remaining guiltless for not partaking, yet he would not have triumphed, as he would have faced no temptation. In this scenario, Adam would have been deterred by the sight of his wife’s nakedness rather than by his love for God or the reverence due to His commands. To ensure Adam’s temptation was brief in contrast to Eve’s seduction by the serpent’s allure, Eve approached the tree and tasted its fruit without revealing her nakedness.

The enticement to sin wouldn’t have ensnared the tempted had not their own desires guided the tempter. Even if the tempter had not appeared, the tree’s beauty alone would have incited a conflict, fueled by their yearning for what was forbidden. Although the ancestors may have sought justification for their actions based on the serpent’s counsel, it was ultimately their own desires that brought about their downfall.

The woman revealed herself to be an unwise judge, rendering a verdict without a fair assessment. It is rarely simple for us to make the right decision without thorough examination and deep contemplation. “And she,” as recorded in Scripture, “took of his fruit and ate, and gave also to her husband, and they both ate” (Gen. 3:6). The account of Adam's fall is presented without elaboration, and justly so, as his downfall was not solely his own, but a consequence of his wife's transgression.

Through Eve, humanity was brought under the curse of death; conversely, through Mary, it finds salvation, as the disobedience of the virgin is rectified by the compliance of the Virgin. The wrongdoing of Adam was atoned for by the suffering of the firstborn Son of God, and the cunning of the serpent was vanquished by the innocence of the dove, thus shattering the chains that had held us captive to death.

In contrast to this fragile covering, the Lord provides us with a tougher garment, symbolizing a life of discipline, and instructs us, "By your patience possess your souls" (Luke 21:19). He offers guidance pertinent to this teaching: one who harms their soul through resentment or any sin will ultimately bring about its destruction; however, one who forsakes their soul by rejecting malice and sin will preserve it for eternal life (Matthew 10:39). To our Lord Jesus Christ be all glory, honor, and worship, together with the Father, who exists without beginning, and the life-giving Spirit, forever and ever. Amen.

In response, we are called to continually reflect on our hearts, maintaining an unbroken remembrance of God as we navigate this life, which is often consumed by its pleasures. This requires a spiritual discipline to redirect our innate tendency to fixate on what captivates our sight. The wise Job reminds us of this truth, stating, ‘My heart followed my eyes’ (Job 31:7). Such vigilance is an indication of profound self-control.

Be cautious not to share in your destruction! Why the haste to assume that this tree’s fruit offers eternal life? But once Eve tasted the sweetness of the tree, she perished, finding nothing worthwhile from it, yet in her folly, she promised Adam the fruit, presenting it as the greatest gift she could offer, saying, “We have walked past this treasure, my husband, until now, fearing the glory of blessedness: now I have discovered through experience that our fear was misplaced; I have eaten, and behold, I remain alive, receiving eternal life.” The one who is more confident in themselves than in the words spoken has passed the trial; for having consumed the fruit, I did not die as God warned us, but now I stand alive before you; the command of God is untrue: had it been entirely genuine, you would have mourned me as dead or condemned. Therefore, dear husband, take and enjoy, and you will gain divine honor, becoming like a god, possessing eternal life.

Thus, the serpent did not dare approach Adam at that moment, fearing a miscalculation in his expectations; yet, a more fearsome serpent emerged, surpassing him in cunning. She perished through the influence of the one whom the serpent had not touched; through flattery, she offered Adam poison that led them both to destruction, and their deceitful testing resulted in death, severing them from eternal life. And behold, the unfortunate Adam was ensnared by such deception, like a city under siege; with the mere taste, he inflicted harm on all humanity. Consequently, for his disobedience, he was cast down to the earth, for he could not practice moderation in fasting, which is genuinely beneficial for resisting temptation; unlike him, the Christian community strives to embrace fasting, competing with the spiritual beings, hoping to achieve eternal life in fulfillment.

How great is the call to fasting, which was given to Adam from the beginning: only plant-based foods constituted the nourishment for his forebears, yet even so, he became indulgent. Now, numerous delights abound: all kinds of fish, fowl, and animals, along with vegetables and grains, as well as the temptations of gluttony that ignite a dark desire to satiate our appetites, ultimately robbing us of eternal life.

In sharing these words, I do not urge you towards excessive indulgence, dear friends; neither do I wish to encourage your voracity beyond that of our forefather. Rather, I implore you to exhibit fervor, most sincere, for self-restraint: for you, as you fast diligently, aim to render an annual offering to our God, similar to how the Hebrews presented their tithes to the Lord, symbolizing the forthcoming fasting through which we attain eternal life.

I wish, dear friends, to clarify the numbering of our fast as a tenth portion: throughout the year, seven weeks are allocated for fasting; within each of these weeks are five designated days, yielding thirty-five days of fasting for us. Along with the nights and days of the saving Passion, and the Sabbath besides the first, we arrive at thirty-six full days, plus a half-day: this constitutes the tenth of the year through which we receive eternal life.

O Savior of the world, we bow down and present this verbal homage to You: have mercy on all, O Merciful One, O Lover of mankind; both those who fast and those who partake of food, we extol You, O One who has liberated all beings from their waywardness: You alone are God to us, though You became man by the will of Mary, the Immaculate and Most Holy Virgin and Mother of God: to You, we prostrate ourselves; through the intercession of her who bore You, grant eternal life to all Your servants.

You did not gaze with kindness, but instead, with a cruel vulnerability, reached for the tree and boldly partook of the senseless fruit. It is the mental Eve that has emerged in me—a carnal thought fueled by passion, which entices with allure but ultimately delivers only bitterness upon consumption.

He approached the woman, appearing as the weaker vessel, and feigning ignorance of God’s decree, posed the deceptive question: “What is it that God says, ‘May you not eat from every tree of Eden?’” (Gen. 3:1). He presumed that the utterly good God lacked true goodness, branding God's pure and beneficial command as harsh and burdensome.

Noticing that his wife engaged him with a degree of naivety and, in her defense, recited the commandment given by God: “Of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die” (Gen. 3:3), the wicked one directly challenged the righteousness of God's command. It is daunting to recount his audacious and irreverent words: “Ye shall not surely die” he declared. “For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like gods, knowing good and evil” (Gen. 3:4, 5). In spite of the evident poison in the serpent’s words—so identified in Scripture as the fallen angel—the woman lingered on them, setting aside both the command and the warning from God. Instead, she began to scrutinize the tree, her judgment clouded by the devil’s deceit. The fruit appeared appealing for consumption, and the wisdom of good and evil seemed like an enticing pursuit. She partook of the fruit and encouraged her husband to do the same.

It is astonishing how swiftly the downfall of our first parents occurred! Was it not facilitated by their own inner disposition? They had turned away from the contemplation of their Creator in paradise to fixate on the creation and their own abilities. While the focus on oneself and the created world may seem enticing, it becomes disastrous when devoid of God, leading to pride and delusion. Scripture prompts such reflections when it describes how the woman, influenced by the serpent’s words, “saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasing to the eyes, and desirable to make one wise; and she took of its fruit and gave it to her husband, and he ate” (Gen. 3:6).

Clearly, our foreparents, by choosing disobedience and yielding to the devil, distanced themselves from God and fell into servitude to their adversary. The promised result of their trespass, death, swiftly followed: the Holy Spirit, who had resided within them, departed, leaving them to confront their own fallen nature, now tainted by the poison of sin—this poison imbued in humanity by the devil, who himself was saturated with sin and death. The initial sinful awareness encountered by our ancestors was a profound sense of shame, which brought with it an involuntary and painful recognition of the sin that had taken the place of the Holy Spirit's former presence. They became aware of their nakedness and swiftly fashioned coverings from fig leaves to conceal the shame of their bodies, which they had not perceived as shameful prior to the fall, akin to infants who remain unaware of sinful desires.

“The soul of Adam died,” states St. Gregory Palamas, “through disobedience, becoming separated from God; for he lived in body (after his fall) for nine hundred and thirty years. Yet the death that struck the soul due to his disobedience not only made the soul wretched, bringing a curse upon humanity but also rendered the body vulnerable to various illnesses, afflictions, and ultimately decay, which leads to its demise.” “Adam,” comments Blessed Theophylact of Bulgaria, “while physically alive, was also spiritually dead: he died from the moment he partook of the forbidden fruit.”

She sees it as pleasant for nourishment, representing the lust of the flesh; appealing to the eyes, reflecting the lust of the senses; and desirable for knowledge, embodying the pride of worldly pursuits. Thus, the inception of sin arises from sensuality, an excessive craving, rooted in the heart's desire for indulgence without thought—invading the entirety of human nature. The act of eating epitomizes the external manifestation of the fall into sin. To ascribe this action a consequence of death necessitates an understanding of its inseparable ties to the internal disposition of sin, manifested in disbelief, disobedience, ingratitude, pride against God, and a corrupt use of all human faculties. The sinful act by the woman does not yield immediate repercussions; it could be that the corrupting influence of the forbidden fruit takes time to inflict harm on the body or that the conscience initially remains suppressed within the pleasures of sin. Eventually, the husband chooses to follow his wife. The sacred writer bypasses detailing his specific temptations and sinful influences. However, it is clear from the flow and structure of the account that he did not observe the dialogue between his wife and the serpent. What was even more perilous was his encounter with his wife, who had been influenced by the serpent's cunning counsel, and her apparent success in persuading him. The desire of Adam to partake of the forbidden fruit highlights the reproach of God (Genesis 3:22). The sinful inclination in the soul is marked by a disordered pursuit of knowledge. Seduced by curiosity and skepticism, the wife views the forbidden tree as if it were a novel sight. She neglects to consider it in light of God’s command and instead regards it solely from her self-interest, centered on her desires and reasoning. This marks the beginning of sin, as noted by Solomon, “This is what I found: God made mankind upright, but they have gone in search of many schemes” (Ecclesiastes 7:29). The distinction between the husband's and wife's sins lies here: the wife welcomes the unknown tempter while the husband acts directly against God's command. Thus, the apostle assigns seduction to the woman (1 Tim. 2:14) and attributes sin, transgression, and disobedience solely to the man (Rom. 5:12, 14, 19).

*****

The notion of original sin stands as the obstacle that shatters the pride of godlessness, yet no truth is more evident to the mind's eye or firmer to faith than the tragic downfall of our ancestors. Every aspect of our being and environment serves as a reminder of this reality, particularly clear in the fluctuations of human life, shifting from joy to sorrow, from health to ailment, from laughter to grief, in essence, from life to demise. We sense our soul's frailty, especially when grappling with a fierce inner battle between responsibility and desire, virtue and vice, affection and animosity. This struggle has led to countless transgressions since the death of Abel (Gen. 4:8), which have shocked, burdened, and tainted humanity.

*****

Let us contemplate the moment when the original adversary, consumed by envy towards the joy of innocence, enticed the first humans to sin. This is not an error of Wisdom but part of Her divine plan: it was decreed in the heavenly council that humanity should inherit a kingdom prepared since the world's foundation. To attain, possess, and relish in God Himself, mere innocence was insufficient; merit was essential. Not just truth but also the very love of God demanded it. By this means, God wished to magnify the delight of heavenly blessings, for those gifts lose their appeal when acquired without effort. These merits, if reliant on human strength alone, how could they be fulfilled? In a state of innocence? What achievement could define him when even such a simple task—abstaining from the forbidden fruit—was unmanageable, when this being, crafted from dust, enamored by its own beauty, deemed itself worthy of divine glory? Would he willingly have traded Eden for Golgotha? Surely he would have rejected the prospect of purchasing eternal bliss at such a high cost while dwelling in paradise. After the fall? But whose act, whose sacrifice, whose life or death could satisfy the demands of aggrieved truth? What offering could extinguish even a fraction of the flames of hell, much less procure the peace of the Lamb of God? The radiant glory of the Father’s presence, the eternal Son, chose to give of Himself to grant us the right to heavenly joy. “In these last days” (Heb. 1:2) He fulfilled this magnificent undertaking, showing “to them that are in heaven, and to them that are on earth, and to them that are under the earth, behold how loved the world” (Phil. 2:10; Jn. 3:16). At last, divine justice is satisfied, Adam’s transgression is cleansed, and our iniquities are forgotten. The cherub who expelled our forebears from paradise opens wide the gates of the kingdom of heaven. In place of a fiery sword, he receives a branch of peace. The altar of the cross bears the eternal inscription: “It is finished” (John 19:30). Thus, having accomplished this, what does our Advocate require from us? Merely our acceptance of the new, greatest gift; this heartfelt embrace of His merits, with complete faith, constitutes our belief.

The Scriptures do not elaborate on this; however, God's admonition to fallen Adam, "Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it" (Gen. 3:17), suggests that Adam fell due to his wife's entreaties and his attachment to her—indicating that he, too, chose to disobey of his own volition. Regardless of his wife's persuasion and Adam's affection for her, he should have recalled the command of God and decided whom to obey: his wife or his Creator. Thus, he bore guilt for yielding to his wife's voice.

It follows that the responsibility for the fall of our ancestors also, in part, lies with God. Having created humanity with free will, God issued a command, the simplest of all, articulated with clarity, coupled with grave warnings, and provided ample means for its observance. Besides the inherent perfection of the primordial man's nature, God's grace was ever-present; yet man chose not to follow the will of his Creator and Sustainer but instead heeded the voice of temptation. But why, one might wonder, did God give Adam this command knowing he would transgress? Because such a command, or another, was essential for primordially man to exercise and fortify his will in goodness, enabling him to earn glory and achieve the utmost bliss. "Why did God not prevent Adam from falling, and the devil from tempting him, when He foresaw both?" To do so would require restricting their freedom or even removing it altogether. The infinitely wise and unchangeable God, once having granted freedom to His creatures, cannot coerce or revoke it. "Why did God not instill in man the very design of his innocence, ensuring he could not fall in the face of all temptations?" Basil the Great might respond: Why do you not consider servants virtuous when they are bound, but only when they act willingly? Therefore, God prefers that actions stem from virtue rather than compulsion. Virtue springs from choice, not necessity, and choice is a matter of what lies within us—that is, it must be freely made.

Anyone who critiques the Creator for not designing humanity to be inherently sinless merely favors a rational nature over an irrational one, a being endowed with free will over a static entity devoid of ambition. But why would God create us knowing we would fall and perish? Would it not have been better to withhold existence and freedom altogether? Who has the right to decipher the intentions of the all-wise? Who will clarify that the creation of mankind as a sensually-spiritual being was not essential to the universe’s structure? Moreover, if God foresaw our downfall, He also anticipated our salvation. Just as He intended to create a fallen humanity, He resolved to restore lost humanity through His only begotten Son. "Not only did God foresee that Adam would sin," says John Chrysostom, "but He also foresaw His plans to restore fallen man through God's household."

God, having known about the fall even before it occurred, prepared a remedy for rebellion and allowed man to experience death so he could comprehend his limitations and recognize the blessings of his Creator. He understood that Adam would stumble; however, He also foresaw the emergence of Abel, Enos, Enoch, Noah, Elijah, the prophets, the wonderful Apostles—those who embody the divine nature and serve as the God-bearing witnesses of martyrs, radiating holiness.

The severity of our ancestors’ sin may seem minor because it involved eating fruit from a forbidden tree. Yet its true magnitude becomes apparent when we consider several factors: First, it was not merely the act but the very essence of the commandment they transgressed. This commandment required unconditional obedience to God, serving as a test of their allegiance. By breaching this command, they embraced disobedience, as the Apostle notes (Rom. 5:19), thereby violating the moral law, which fundamentally is the will of God and demands human obedience. Therefore, Blessed Augustine stated, "Let no one think lightly of the first couple's sin just because it revolved around eating fruit; the command demanded obedience, a virtue foundational to all other virtues in rational beings."

Secondly, the simplicity of the command is noteworthy. St. John Chrysostom asks, “What could be simpler?” Although God placed man in paradise surrounded by countless bountiful blessings, He forbade them only from one tree, yet man could not fulfill even this simple requirement... As the Scriptures declare, "the Lord God made to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight and good for food" (Gen. 2:9), revealing that man violated this command through great obstinacy and carelessness. Thirdly, the favors extended to fulfill this command were profound; man was crafted uniquely, adorned in God's image, made sovereign over creation, granted a paradise of delight, invited into communion with the divine, endowed with immortality, and destined for eternal joy—all requiring just one act of obedience in return. Yet, fearsome repercussions awaited any violation of this command: "for in the day that thou eatest of it, thou shalt surely die" (Gen. 2:17). Can stronger incentives be imagined for obeying such an easy command?

Fourthly, we must acknowledge that Adam and Eve were pure and innocent, endowed with immense strength and unfettered by sin, with God's omnipotent grace continually supporting them. They simply needed the will to resist the deceiver, and they could have prevailed; success depended solely on their free choice, and their capacities were more than adequate.

The sins associated with Adam and Eve's transgression include: 1. Pride, as they were lured by the serpent's promise that they would become like gods; 2. Unbelief, demonstrated in their failure to trust God's warning of death; 3. Rebellion against God, as they chose to obey the deceiver instead of their Creator, believing the outlandish slander that God had forbidden them out of envy; 4. Grave ingratitude for the numerous blessings bestowed by God. In Blessed Augustine's words, "Here lies pride, as humanity sought to rule itself rather than submit to God; desecration of the sacred space, for they disbelieved God; self-destruction, as they exposed themselves to death; spiritual infidelity, since the purity of their souls was compromised by the serpent's lure; theft, for they seized what was forbidden; and greed, as they desired what was beyond their rightful measure."

In summary, Tertullian observed that the transgression of the initial command effectively dismantled the entirety of the moral law. Lastly, it is crucial to reflect on the grave repercussions of our ancestors’ sin. If this sin were trivial, it would not have incurred such terrifying outcomes, and the righteous Judge would not have subjected them to severe punishment. Blessed Augustine affirms that while God merely prohibited eating from a single tree, revealing the sin as seemingly minor, the profound gravity of the consequence underscores how seriously God views the act. The result was indeed a distortion of God's image. If humanity is made in God's image, primarily reflected in their mind and free will, then when these faculties lost their inherent perfection due to Adam's sin, the divine image became marred. This assertion finds support in the words of Basil the Great: "Man was created in God's image and likeness; yet sin has distorted the beauty of this image, leading the soul into passionate desires." Macarius the Great adds, "If a coin bearing a king's image becomes tarnished, the gold loses its value, just as Adam suffered comparable loss." Theodoret states succinctly, "Adam, in aspiring to be divine, tarnished what was made to reflect the image of God."

She perceived that the fruit was pleasing for nourishment, arousing a desire within her that had hitherto been constrained by fear. The tree’s beauty enticed her gaze; she found it so captivating that she wanted to behold it perpetually. This distracted longing made it difficult for her to focus on God. The allure was intensified by the promise of divine understanding of good and evil that the fruit represented. The yearning for this knowledge, fueled by her sensual desires and vanity, became overwhelming as she decided to take the fruit and offered it to her husband. She convinced him by echoing the serpent’s words and through her actions. Eve committed a grave sin, not only by disobeying God but also by leading her husband into the same disobedience. Her husband, in turn, sinned just as grievously by prioritizing his wife’s wishes over the commands he had received directly from God. Instead of rebuking her for her wrongdoing and urging her toward repentance, he hastily chose to heed her suggestion, likely fearing that adherence to God's command would jeopardize his authority over her, especially as she sought the knowledge that would transform their dynamic.