John Chrysostom
It is known, he says, that God made being from nonbeing, the visible from the invisible, the existing from the nonexistent. But how is it known that He did this "by the word"? Reason suggests nothing of the sort. On the contrary, it says that what is visible comes from what is visible. Philosophers especially assert that nothing comes from nothing, since they are natural men and concede nothing to faith. Yet they expose themselves when, speaking of something great and exalted, they leave it to faith. For example, they say that God is without beginning and unborn, though reason does not suggest this either, but the contrary. And look at their great folly. They say that God is without beginning, yet this is far more wondrous than the origin of being from nonbeing.
Read more (175 words)
To say that He is without beginning, that He is unborn, that He exists from Himself and was not begotten by another, is far more incomprehensible than saying that God made being from nonbeing. Here there is much plausibility, namely, that He made something, that what was made has a beginning, and that it was wholly made. But there, tell me, do not the words "self-existent," "unborn," and "having neither beginning nor time" require faith? Yet the Apostle does not point to what is greater, but to what is lesser. "By faith," he says, "we understand that the ages were framed by the word of God." How, he says, is it known that God made all things "by the word"? Reason does not suggest this, and no one was present when it happened. It is known by faith. This knowledge is the work of faith. Therefore he said, "By faith we understand." Tell me, what do we understand by faith? That what is seen came from what is unseen. This is an object of faith.