The Church Fathers on this verse

Hebrews 7:11Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

If then perfection was by the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law), what further need was there that another priest should rise according to the order of Melchisedech: and not be called according to the order of Aaron?

Douay-Rheims

ει μεν ουν τελειωσις δια της λευιτικης ιερωσυνης ην ο λαος γαρ επ αυτη νενομοθετητο τις ετι χρεια κατα την ταξιν μελχισεδεκ ετερον ανιστασθαι ιερεα και ου κατα την ταξιν ααρων λεγεσθαι

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

9 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

If, he says, perfection had been through the Levitical priesthood. Having spoken of Melchizedek, shown how much higher he was than Abraham, and explained the great difference between them, he now begins to show the difference between the covenants themselves.

One is imperfect, the other perfect. Yet even now he does not approach the matter directly, but first reasons about the priesthood and the covenant. For unbelievers, proofs from things already accepted and formerly known were more persuasive.

He proved that Melchizedek was far higher than Levi and Abraham, since he appeared as priest in relation to them. Now he proves the same from another side.

Read more (417 words)

From what side? From the present priesthood and the Jewish one. Look at his great wisdom. The very point by which Christ seemed to be separated from the priesthood, since He was not according to the order of Aaron, he brings forward as proof of His priesthood and excludes the others.

He does this by presenting himself as though perplexed, asking why Christ is called priest not according to the order of Aaron, and then resolving the difficulty.

I too, he says, am perplexed why He was not according to the order of Aaron. He expresses this in the words: If perfection had been through the Levitical priesthood. The words, what further need was there, intensify the thought.

If Christ according to the flesh had been priest according to the order of Melchizedek first, and only afterward the law and the priesthood according to Aaron had appeared, then one could rightly say that the latter was more perfect. Introduced later, it would abolish the first.

But if Christ appears afterward and receives another form of priesthood, then the imperfection of all that came before is evident.

Let us suppose, he says, that all former things were fulfilled and there was nothing imperfect in the former priesthood. Why, then, was there still need for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not be named according to the order of Aaron?

Why does God leave Aaron and introduce another priesthood, that of Melchizedek? If perfection had been through the Levitical priesthood means this: if through the Levitical priesthood perfection had been attained in works, teaching, and life.

Notice how gradually he advances. After saying that Christ is according to the order of Melchizedek, he proved that the priesthood according to the order of Melchizedek is higher, because Melchizedek himself is higher.

Then he proves the same with respect to time, namely, that Christ comes after Aaron and is therefore higher. What do the following words mean: for with it the people received the law? What does with it mean?

They are guided by it, accomplish everything through it, and one cannot say that it was given for others. With it the people received the law, that is, they used it and had used it.

One cannot say that, being perfect in itself, it did not guide the people. The people received the law with it means they were guided by it. What need, then, would there be for another priesthood, if this one were perfect?

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

He has shown that Melchizedek, in priestly order, was far higher than both Abraham and Levi. Now he again brings another proof, showing that the priesthood in Christ is far more excellent than the Levitical priesthood.

Christ's priesthood is perfect priesthood, while that one is imperfect. If the priesthood according to the law had been perfect, then the priest should have arisen according to the order of Aaron, for Aaron was from the tribe of Levi.

But it is said that a priest arises not according to the order of Aaron, but according to the order of Melchizedek. Then, because that priesthood was imperfect, another is introduced in its place.

Read more (163 words)

The expression still has great significance. It is as though saying this: if Christ according to the order of Melchizedek had come first, and the law were then given afterward, one could rightly say that the priesthood according to the law, namely Aaron's, was given because Melchizedek's priesthood was somehow imperfect.

In reality, however, Christ received another form of priesthood afterward. From this it is clear that, since Aaron's priesthood was imperfect, another is introduced in its place.

What does the expression mean: for with it the people received the law? On this basis one cannot say that Aaron's priesthood was perfect, or that it was given for others and not for the Hebrews.

On the contrary, it was given entirely to one people. With it the law of the people was joined. That is, it was appointed that the people should use it, be guided by it, and accomplish everything through it.

Why, then, was it abolished? Clearly, because it is powerless.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

Thus it has been proved in Melchizedek that the rank of priesthood would one day be taken from the tribe that ministered according to the law, and that another form and law of sacred service would shine forth. For it was necessary that, together with the change and removal of the sacred service, the law itself should also be changed and abolished. Therefore the divine Paul philosophizes about this and speaks.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

So, he says, if the perfection of the priesthood, that is, the complete fulfillment of the priesthood's purpose, had been from the tribe of Levi, for the people received the law with it, then the fulfillment of the Mosaic law would have required the Old Testament priesthood to exist. What further need would there have been for another priest to arise, not according to the likeness of Abraham, who was the progenitor of those priests, but according to the likeness of the uncircumcised Melchizedek?

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

If the priesthood under the law, says the Apostle, had perfection, because everything prescribed by the law was fulfilled through it, what would be the meaning of granting another priesthood? Why would there be God's promise that a priesthood would be given not according to the order of Aaron, but according to the order of Melchizedek? Through that priesthood everything prescribed by the law was fulfilled. It offered sacrifices, cleansed from defilement, and fulfilled the commandments concerning the feasts. This is what the Apostle expressed: for the people were given the law upon it. Thus, having shown the change of the priesthood, he also shows the cessation of the law.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

Now from another side he takes up the same subject and shows that the Levitical priesthood has been rejected. Indeed, why is it not said, You are a priest forever according to the order of Aaron, but rather, according to the order of Melchizedek?

Is it not clear that in the Levitical service there was no perfection either in teaching or in life, and therefore there was need of another and more perfect service?

After using the word perfection, he further added: for the people received the law upon it. This means that they received the law on the basis of the Levites' priesthood, for the Levites were also teachers of the law.

Thus through the Levitical priesthood they were both instructed and established in what the law contains. The expression upon it means: so as to attend to it, or be guided by it.

Leo the Great

5th centuryChurch Father

As I enter upon the fulfillment of this duty, I recognize all my weakness and smallness beside the greatness of the gift of priesthood received by me with all the priests. I find it my duty to repeat the words of the prophet.

O Lord, I have heard Thy report and was afraid. O Lord, accomplish Thy work in the midst of the years. In the midst of the years make it known. In wrath remember mercy (Hab 3:2).

But what caused such anxiety, such fear, such trembling of the reed, such exaltation of the humble, such dignity of the unworthy? Yet we do not despair or grow faint, because we do not rely on ourselves, but on Him Who is one and the same, working all things in all (1 Cor 12:6).

Read more (224 words)

Therefore, my beloved, we also sang David's psalm together in one voice, not for our own exaltation, but for the glory of the Lord Christ. For the prophetic words are precisely about Him: You are a priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek (Heb 5:6).

In other words, He was not named according to the order of Aaron. Aaron's priesthood was transmitted in the seed of Aaron's family, was a temporary ministry, and ceased when the time of the Old Testament expired.

He was named according to the order of Melchizedek, in whose person the type of the High Priest forever was shown (Heb 6:20). Since the parents from whom Melchizedek came are not mentioned, he is received as a type of Him Who has no genealogy.

For Who shall declare His generation? (Isa 53:8). Consequently, the mystery of Christ's divine priesthood was extended also to the ministries of men. It is not transmitted through generations in the seed of a family.

The priest is not chosen according to created flesh and blood. With the former prerogatives of patriarchs and their families having ceased, the Church receives those pilots whom the Holy Spirit has deemed worthy.

For among the people of the children of God, who as one people possess priesthood and kingdom, the privilege of earthly origin does not receive the anointing.

Michail Cheraskov

19th centuryChurch Father

Having unfolded the typological features of Melchizedek, the Apostle proceeds to set forth the superior characteristics of Melchizedek's priesthood, which were realized in the person of Jesus Christ. He reveals the superiority of Christ's priesthood, according to the order of Melchizedek, over the imperfect Levitical priesthood.

First he sets forth a general consideration (Heb 7:11-12). The very foretelling of a new priesthood according to the order of Melchizedek, while the former Levitical priesthood according to the order of Aaron still existed, already indicated that the latter, as imperfect, would one day be replaced by the former as more perfect.

Even the Old Testament law, which strove to bring those under the law to moral perfection, had to expect its own change because of its close connection with the priesthood, when the priesthood itself was changed.

Rosanow N.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

Having thus proved Melchizedek's superiority over Abraham and Levi, the Apostle draws this conclusion. The appointment of a priest according to the order of Melchizedek shows the inability of the Levitical priesthood to bring men to perfect nearness to God.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 32 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Εἰ
    ei
    if
    G1487 · εἰ
  2. μὲν
    men
    truly
    G3303 · μέν
  3. οὖν
    oun
    therefore
    G3767 · οὖν
  4. τελείωσις
    teleiōsis
    completion
    G5050 · τελείωσις
  5. διὰ
    dia
    through
    G1223 · διά
  6. τῆς
    tēs
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  7. Λευιτικῆς
    leuitikēs
    Levitical
    G3020 · Λευϊτικός
  8. ἱερωσύνης
    hierōsynēs
    the priestly office
    G2420 · ἱερωσύνη
  9. ἦν
    ēn
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί
  10. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  11. λαὸς
    laos
    a people
    G2992 · λαός
  12. γὰρ
    gar
    for
    G1063 · γάρ
  13. ἐπ᾽
    ep
    on
    G1909 · ἐπί
  14. αὐτῆς
    autēs
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  15. νενομοθέτηται
    nenomothetētai
    I ordain
    G3549 · νομοθετέω
  16. τίς
    tis
    who
    G5101 · τίς
  17. ἔτι
    eti
    still
    G2089 · ἔτι
  18. χρεία
    chreia
    need
    G5532 · χρεία
  19. κατὰ
    kata
    down from
    G2596 · κατά
  20. τὴν
    tēn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  21. τάξιν
    taxin
    order
    G5010 · τάξις
  22. Μελχισέδεκ
    melchisedek
    Melchizedek
    G3198 · Μελχισεδέκ
  23. ἕτερον
    heteron
    another
    G2087 · ἕτερος
  24. ἀνίστασθαι
    anistasthai
    I raise up
    G450 · ἀνίστημι
  25. ἱερέα
    hierea
    a priest
    G2409 · ἱερεύς
  26. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  27. οὐ
    ou
    no
    G3756 · οὐ
  28. κατὰ
    kata
    down from
    G2596 · κατά
  29. τὴν
    tēn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  30. τάξιν
    taxin
    order
    G5010 · τάξις
  31. Ἀαρὼν
    aarōn
    Aaron
    G2 · Ἀαρών
  32. λέγεσθαι
    legesthai
    I say
    G3004 · λέγω