The Church Fathers on this verse

Hebrews 8:13Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Now in saying a new, he hath made the former old. And that which decayeth and groweth old is near its end.

Douay-Rheims

εν τω λεγειν καινην πεπαλαιωκεν την πρωτην το δε παλαιουμενον και γηρασκον εγγυς αφανισμου

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

10 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

See how he has disclosed what was hidden, the very thought of the prophet. He honored the law by not directly calling it old. Yet he expressed this, because if that covenant had been new, he would not have called the one established after it new.

Thus he expresses something greater and particular when he says that it had grown old. For this reason it is abolished, destroyed, and no longer exists.

On the basis of the prophet’s words, he speaks about the old covenant with greater boldness. He profitably shows that ours now flourishes, while that one has become old.

After using the term “becoming obsolete,” he adds another word of his own, “growing old.” Then from all this he draws the following conclusion: “near to vanishing away.”

Read more (1226 words)

Therefore the old covenant was not simply replaced by the new, but replaced as aged and useless.

For this reason the Apostle also said: “because of its weakness and uselessness.” Again, “the law made nothing perfect.” Again, “if the first covenant had been faultless, no place would have been sought for another.”

What does “faultless” mean? Useful and strong.

He says this not in order to present the old covenant as worthy of condemnation, but in order to show its insufficiency.

It is as if someone said, “This house is not without fault,” meaning that it has defects and is old. Or, “This garment is not without fault,” meaning that it soon tears.

So here too he does not call the old covenant evil, but only defective and imperfect.

So we also are new, or rather, we were new. But now we have grown old, and for this reason we are near to corruption and destruction.

Yet, if we wish, we can destroy this oldness. It is impossible to do this by the laver of baptism, but here it is possible through repentance.

Therefore, if there is anything old in us, let us destroy it. If there is any rust, any stain, or any impurity, let us wipe it away and be clean.

Then the King will desire our beauty.

Even those who have reached extreme ugliness can recover the beauty of which David speaks: “Hear, O daughter, and see, and incline your ear. Forget your people and your father’s house, and the King will desire your beauty” (Ps 45:10-11).

Forgetfulness does not produce beauty, or rather, beauty of soul. Of what forgetfulness, then, does he speak?

Of the forgetting of sins. He addresses the Church from the nations and exhorts her not to remember her parents, that is, those who sacrifice to idols.

She was formed precisely from such people.

He did not say, “Do not take part in this,” but something much greater: do not even bring it to mind.

He says the same elsewhere: “I will not remember their names with my lips” (Ps 16:4). And again: “That my mouth may not speak of the works of men” (Ps 17:4).

This is not yet a great virtue. Or rather, though it is great, it is not like the other.

What does he say there? He did not say, “Do not speak” of the works of the fathers, but even, “Do not remember.” Do not bring them to mind.

Do you see how far he wishes to drive evil away from us?

He who does not remember does not think. He who does not think does not speak. He who does not speak will not act.

Do you see how many roads to evil he blocks for us, and how far he removes us from the greatest of evils?

Let us also give heed to him and forget our evil deeds, though not the sins we have committed.

“Remember them first,” says the Lord, “and I will not remember them.”

Thus we must not only remember theft, but also restore what was stolen.

This is what it means to bring evil into forgetfulness: to destroy the very thought of theft, never to admit it to ourselves, and to correct what has already been done.

How can we attain the forgetting of evil? By remembering God’s benefits.

If we continually remember God, we will no longer be able to remember evil. “When I remember You upon my bed,” says the Psalmist, “I meditate on You in the night watches” (Ps 63:6).

Although we must remember God always, we must do so especially when the mind is at rest.

Then, through this remembrance, the mind can judge itself and can retain what it remembers.

During the day, even if we remember, other cares and anxieties enter in and erase that remembrance. But at night one can remember continually.

Then the soul is in peace and stillness. Then it is in harbor and safety.

“What you say in your hearts,” says the Psalmist, “meditate on your beds” (Ps 4:4).

We ought to remember this during the day also. But since you are amid constant cares and are distracted by worldly affairs, remember God at least on your bed.

Meditate on Him in the morning.

If we occupy ourselves with this in the morning, we will go out to our affairs without danger.

If with reverence and prayer we first propitiate God, then afterwards we will meet no enemy. If you do meet one, you will laugh at him, having God as your defense.

The marketplace is war. Daily affairs are battle, turmoil, and storm.

Therefore we need weapons, and prayer is a great weapon. We need favorable winds, and we need skill in everything.

Then we may pass the time of the day without shipwrecks and wounds. For many reefs appear each day, and often our ship is broken and sunk.

Therefore we need to pray, especially in the morning and at night.

Many of you have often seen the Olympic games. You have not only seen them, but also encouraged and applauded the combatants, one supporting this man and another that man.

You therefore know how, on the days of contest, and even during the nights themselves, the herald is anxious about nothing else.

He cares only that the combatant, when he comes out, should not disgrace himself.

Those who sit beside the trumpeter urge him not even to converse with anyone, lest by exhausting his breath he provoke laughter.

If one who is about to contend before men takes so much care, much more should we take constant care and concern, since our whole life is a contest.

Therefore let each night be for us an all-night vigil. Let us take care that, when we go out by day, we are not mocked.

And would that it were only mockery. But now the Judge of the contest Himself sits at the right hand of the Father.

He listens attentively, lest we say anything improper or useless. For He is judge not only of deeds, but also of words.

Beloved, then, let us keep watch through the whole night. If we wish, we too will have healers, for an angel stands beside each of us.

Yet we sleep deeply through the whole night. And would that this were all.

Many do much that is shameful even then. Some go to houses of fornication. Others turn their own homes into houses of fornication by bringing harlots to themselves.

So little do they care for the good contest.

Some get drunk and use filthy speech. Some make noise. Some spend the whole night in wicked deeds, doing more evil than those who sleep.

Some count up their profits. Some are tormented by other cares. They are more willing to do anything than what is needed for the contest.

Therefore I exhort you: let us leave everything and care for one thing only, how we may receive the prize and be crowned.

Let us do everything by which we may obtain the promised good things.

May we all be deemed worthy of them by the grace and love for mankind of our Lord Jesus Christ.

To Him, with the Father and the Holy Spirit, be glory, dominion, and honor, now and ever, and unto the ages of ages. Amen.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

He explains the prophetic expression and says that the very fact that he called this covenant wholly new indicates that the first is now shown to be old.

"Now what is becoming old and growing aged is near to vanishing away." Having gained assurance from the prophet, he finally touches the law itself, showing that our covenant now flourishes.

Thus, from the prophetic expression he took the name old. On his own he added the name of obsolescence. Then, by necessity, he concluded that vanishing away is inevitable for the law.

It is as though he were saying: the New Covenant did not abolish the Old by chance. It did so because of its age and obsolescence, that is, because it is Old, "weak and unprofitable."

As he also says elsewhere: "The law, weakened by the flesh, was powerless" (Rom 8:3).

Gregory of Nyssa

4th centuryChurch Father

The great Paul knew that the only-begotten God, who has primacy in all things, is the leader and cause of every good thing. He testifies of Him not only that through Him the creation of beings was accomplished. He also testifies that, since the ancient creation in man had grown old and come to corruption, as he calls it, and another, new creation in Christ had arisen, no one else led even in this. In the whole creation accomplished among men by the Gospel, He is the firstborn.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

In the name "new," used by Jeremiah, He showed the oldness of the first. And what is becoming old and aging is near to disappearance.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

The law was adapted to mortal men, but the New Testament promises us eternal life. Therefore that law has rightly grown old, while this covenant always remains new, since it is joined to the ages that do not grow old. This is what the prophecy signified: "No one shall teach his neighbor, and no one his brother, saying, Know the Lord, for all shall know Me, from the least of them to the greatest." This is not fulfilled in the present life, but will be fulfilled in that life. For those still covered here by the darkness of unbelief will there behold the truth, "and they will weep," according to the word of God (Jn 16:20). Since the Apostle, in what he had explained before, called the ministry under the law "a shadow of the heavenly things," he continues this discourse.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

"In saying, New, He has made the first old." Up to this point he cites the sayings of Jeremiah. Since they say, "I will make a new covenant," he uses the word "new" to show from this that the former covenant has already been abolished.

For when He said "new," he says, He thereby showed that the first had already grown old. The word new is ordinarily used in contrast to old.

"Now what is becoming old and growing aged is near to corruption." Indeed, what is old is already weak. What is weak is unprofitable.

By the words "near to corruption" he indicates that what belonged to the old law would not cease all at once, because of the fleshly and sensory condition of the believers.

For those who believed from the circumcision still retained something from the law, as this is also mentioned and explained in other epistles.

Beda Venerabilis

7th centuryChurch Father

Was John born of parents already old because this signified the later birth of the spiritual New Covenant? Did it foretell the mystery of the necessary ending of the carnal law and the cessation of the old priestly observance?

For it grows old and aged, and what is becoming old and growing aged is near to vanishing away.

As for his birth from a father first rendered mute, here the Forerunner of the Lord's priests is born. This is because, through the Lord's manifestation, the tongue of the old priesthood had already been taken away by spiritual teaching.

Read more (175 words)

This was especially so among those who cared only for the letter, among scribes and experts in the law. They taught the letter and distorted it by their traditions. The Lord reproves them for this, as is clearly shown many times and in many places in the Gospel.

As for his being born from a barren mother, is this not because she is the law? The law was appointed by commandment to aid the priestly service and to bring forth spiritual offspring for God. Yet it brought no one to perfection, cf. Heb 7:19.

By all the powers of its devotees, it certainly could not open the doors of the Kingdom of Heaven.

But the Father of the law, having Himself become the fulfiller of the law, cf. Gal 4:4, removed the barrenness improper to the law. For He taught the necessary spiritual understanding and the descent of the grace of heavenly blessedness.

This grace now openly illumines in the Gospel what had once been prefigured and laid within the law, as though conceived there.

Michail Cheraskov

19th centuryChurch Father

What, then, is the Apostle's final word concerning the fate of that covenant, in comparison with which Christ's covenant proved better throughout the preceding arguments? First comes Jeremiah's prophecy (Jer 31:31-34). To soften for the feeling and hearing of the Hebrews the severe judgment concerning the old covenant, the holy Apostle first cites in deliberate detail the words of the prophet Jeremiah about the coming of the desired times of the New Testament. Then he concludes delicately and gently: "By the prophetic words about the new covenant, the Lord showed the oldness of the first. And what is becoming old and aging is near to vanishing away."

Rosanow N.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

From the fact that Jeremiah's prophecy speaks of establishing a new covenant, the Apostle concludes that God declared the first covenant old. Because of its age and decrepitude, it was no longer capable of action.

More than this, everything decrepit is close to complete disappearance from the face of the earth. By this the Apostle means that, from the moment Christ's blood was shed, the Old Covenant with all its institutions retained only the appearance of life.

In reality, it became a house abandoned forever, or a body from which the soul had flown. It would soon be buried in the earth for corruption.

Lactantius

4th centuryTeacher of the Church

Truly Scripture is divided into two Covenants. What precedes the coming and sufferings of the Lord, that is, the law and the prophets, is called the Old Covenant. What was written after the resurrection of Christ is called the New Covenant.

The Jews use the Old, and we use the New. Yet they do not contradict one another, for the New is the fulfillment of the Old. In both of the two there is one testator, Christ.

He accepted death for us and made us heirs of the eternal kingdom. We were blind, shut up in the prison of folly, and living in the darkness of ignorance of God and the Truth.

By Him we have been enlightened. He adopted us by His covenant, freed us from cruel bonds, and brought us out to the light.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 14 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Ἐν
    en
    in
    G1722 · ἐν
  2. τῷ
    tō
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  3. λέγειν
    legein
    I say
    G3004 · λέγω
  4. Καινὴν
    kainēn
    fresh
    G2537 · καινός
  5. πεπαλαίωκεν
    pepalaiōken
    I make old
    G3822 · παλαιόω
  6. τὴν
    tēn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  7. πρώτην
    prōtēn
    first
    G4413 · πρῶτος
  8. τὸ
    to
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  9. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  10. παλαιούμενον
    palaioumenon
    I make old
    G3822 · παλαιόω
  11. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  12. γηράσκον
    gēraskon
    I become old
    G1095 · γηράσκω
  13. ἐγγὺς
    engys
    near
    G1451 · ἐγγύς
  14. ἀφανισμοῦ
    aphanismou
    disappearing
    G854 · ἀφανισμός