The Church Fathers on this verse

Isaiah 7:2Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And they told the house of David, saying: Syria hath rested upon Ephraim, and his heart was moved, and the heart of his people, as the trees of the woods are moved with the wind.

Douay-Rheims

וַיֻּגַּ֗ד לְבֵ֤ית דָּוִד֙ לֵאמֹ֔ר נָ֥חָֽה אֲרָ֖ם עַל־אֶפְרָ֑יִם וַיָּ֤נַע לְבָבוֹ֙ וּלְבַ֣ב עַמּ֔וֹ כְּנ֥וֹעַ עֲצֵי־יַ֖עַר מִפְּנֵי־רֽוּחַ׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

6 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

The proclamation was made in the house of David, stating that Aram had allied with Ephraim (Isaiah 7:1-2). This account is more than mere history; it offers profound insights for those with discerning hearts and clear vision, revealing the immense wisdom of God and His unwavering care for His people. Though He did not prevent the conflict from initiating, nor did He let the invading forces seize the city, He intervened by staying the execution of their threats after allowing them to speak. This act stirred the hearts of the Jews, awakening them from complacency, demonstrating His sovereign power to preserve those in peril as if they had not faced affliction at all.

Read more (313 words)

Such interventions are not uncommon, as seen in the instances of the fiery furnace in Babylon, the lion's den, and countless other examples.

The enemies besieged the city, pressed against its walls, and instilled fear in the hearts of its inhabitants, yet they accomplished nothing beyond that. This reveals the wickedness of the ten tribes, who not only engaged in civil strife and turned against their brethren, but also aligned themselves with foreigners and strangers. They were compelled to reach out to these outsiders for assistance in rebellion against their own city, enlisting the foreign power of Racine to attack their capital. The dynamics of this conflict were lopsided, with the adversaries boasting numerous armies and allies, while the defenders had no such support—only the city itself—making the might of God evident.

In this scenario, no one took up arms or stepped forth to counter the malicious intents of the foe, and their wicked plans were thwarted. The prophet states, “it was not possible” to bring destruction upon it. What averted this fate? Only the hand of God, which invisibly turned them away. However, while God dispelled the war, He did not immediately free His people from fear. It was declared in the house of David that Aram had conferred with Ephraim, leaving both him and his men in terror. When God purposes to perform a remarkable act, He often does not bring about the miracle instantly; rather, He allows those affected to experience the distress first so they may acknowledge His mercy when they are delivered. Many can, out of arrogance or neglect, forget hardships once relief comes, or attribute their triumphs to their own efforts. Therefore, God first allows them to feel the weight of their trials, followed by His gracious act of rescue. He permitted their hearts to tremble, allowed them to face significant tribulation, and afterward sent them deliverance.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

Having presented the context of the narrative and outlined the endeavors of the two monarchs, as well as the reality that their ambitions did not come to pass, he then proceeds to analyze each detail individually through his words. It was announced, as he states, within the house of David, referring to those who were in power, and it was declared that Aram had allied with Ephraim. In this context, Aram signifies Syria, while Ephraim similarly represents the ten tribes located in Samaria. Upon witnessing this development, the house of David, specifically Ahaz, understood and acknowledged the situation. His spirit was filled with dread, just as a mighty oak trembles in the storm.

Read more (126 words)

He employs the term "terrified" to describe this feeling rather than "smitten," implying a near-total loss of reason. Intense fear can disturb the mind and soul, akin to how a tree is shaken by fierce winds. The root of this terror for him was primarily due to the events that had unfolded; for, as mentioned earlier, during his reign, Phakaeus waged war against Judea, resulting in the tragic loss of one hundred and twenty thousand lives in a single day. Thus, considering that Phakaeus was formidable enough to overwhelm the inhabitants of Jerusalem alone, it is reasonable to assume that fear would have been amplified in both Ahaz and his people upon realizing that the king of Syria had also joined forces with Ephraim against Jerusalem.

Basil the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

The essence of this saying can be understood as follows: two monarchs, one from Syria and one from Israel, arrived in Jerusalem with intentions to wage war but found themselves unable to conquer the city. The Syrian king was named Rezin, while the Israelite king was Pekah. News reached the royal household about the alliance formed between these two kings. In the Hebrew language, the term for the Syrian is Aram, and the Israelite is referred to as Ephraim, since this was the tribe from which Jeroboam originated, the one who initially caused the split. The king and his people were filled with dread at this report; they were so shaken that their fear could be compared to a tree in a forest swaying in the strongest winds. This provides a straightforward account of the situation.

Read more (597 words)

Yet, those who delve deeper may uncover themes relevant to our own lives and to the growth of the Church. Thus, let us explore who these kings might represent in a broader context. I propose that the prophetic name Aram symbolizes the intellect which, influenced by earthly wisdom, seeks to comprehend the mind of God. This interpretation highlights the understanding of the leaders of this age, who obsess over celestial patterns and star movements, asserting that human affairs are dictated by such factors. This perspective, however, is tainted by arrogance, a quality that can only be dispelled by the words of truth spoken by the faithful, who, empowered by the Spirit, dismantle every prideful thought raised against the understanding of God.

Ephraim, in contrast, can be seen as the knowledge derived from the traditions of Divine Scriptures that strays from the true path and is ultimately misleading. Jeroboam, hailing from Ephraim, was the first to sever ten tribes from David's lineage. Once a fugitive from King Solomon, he took refuge in Egypt and married the sister of Pharaoh's wife. He combined pagan practices with golden idols and instituted festivals according to his desires. Thus, when a worldly intellect, enamored with logical arguments, allies with misguided and heretical thought, we witness the consultation between Aram and Ephraim, intent on dismantling the structure of David and plundering the true place of worship. However, they could not achieve their aims, for they could not conquer a city protected by the Lord. Moreover, it is possible they would not have joined forces if our transgressions had not grown more pronounced. Historically, those who conspired during Ahaz's reign found common ground due to his wrongdoings, as Ahaz acted unjustly in God’s eyes, even sacrificing his own son and practicing idolatry. While the schemes of wicked rulers may disrupt the House of David and instill fear in the hearts of the people, rendering them as barren trees shaken by turmoil, the merciful God intervenes to quell the chaos by sending prophetic guidance that banishes fear, uttering the words: “Fear not, and do not let your heart be faint because of the two smoldering stumps of these burning fires.”

If we explore the meanings of the names mentioned, we may find further clarity. Ahaz signifies possession, Joatham represents the fullness of God’s promise, and Hosea, the strength provided by God. Conversely, Aram, as previously stated, is impure; Pekah suggests partial revelation, while Romelius connotes falsehood in circumcision. Therefore, this conveys that the minds captivated by eloquency and those claiming to decipher Divine Scriptures are in consultation. Pekah indicates a promise of partial understanding, implying an offer of insight into the enigmas of Scripture that remain beyond grasp. The alliance of these two kings against Jerusalem—one elevating worldly wisdom and the other claiming to unravel the sacred mysteries—illustrates the discordant doctrines and contradictory assertions by those seeking to dominate those invested in the Church's affairs. This becomes evident as we see Aram and Romelius's offspring joining to create a malicious scheme, declaring, “Let us go up against Judah, and let us terrorize it!” The prophetic words expose their intentions to sway the House of David through persuasive rhetoric, as they propose to install the son of Tabeel as ruler, and Tabeel means good God. Those attacking the Church often promise to betray the teachings of the Son of God, employing flattering words to entice the unsuspecting. All these factors can be viewed as omens, as the prophetic words further clarify, stating: “If you do not stand firm in faith, you will not stand at all.”

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

The Lord instructed Isaiah to approach Ahaz along with his son Jasub. He commanded Isaiah to convey a message of reassurance, urging Ahaz not to be disheartened by the fiery threats surrounding him. During a time when the house of David, representing the kingdom of Judah, was filled with fear due to the alliance formed by the Syrians and Ephraimites against Jerusalem, the Lord spoke to Isaiah. He told him to bring his son, Jasub, who remained with him. In this context, the words spoken by Isaiah are unique compared to those of other prophets.

Read more (49 words)

He refers to the kings of Syria and Samaria as the ends of the head, illustrating their intention to wage war against the ultimate authority, and he describes them as smoldering heads, indicating their futile efforts against the One who is a consuming fire, as mentioned in Deuteronomy 4:24.

Jerome of Stridon

4th centuryChurch Father

They reported to the house of David that Syria had formed an alliance with Ephraim, and this news caused both the king and his people to tremble, similar to how trees in a forest shake when the wind blows. Upon hearing that Syria and Ephraim, represented by their leaders Racine and Phakeus, had united their forces and were approaching, the house of David was filled with fear. Both the king and the people shook with trepidation, evocative of leaves rustling in the wind. The significance of this event is not obscure; it reflects the conflict during the reign of the unrighteous king Ahaz. Aram, the name bearing the meaning of high and lofty, symbolizes the pride of worldly wisdom.

Read more (156 words)

Takei, the son of Romelin, also associated with the tribe of Ephraim according to the prophet Hosea, is tied to the idolatry initiated by Jeroboam, who established golden calves in Bethel and Dan and effectively severed the people from the house of David.

These factions reveal themselves as heretics conspiring against the Church. When the house of David, foretold in Ezekiel to emerge as a benevolent shepherd, and its innocent believers hear this disturbing news, their hearts will undoubtedly be troubled. Their dismay arises not because they are likened to fruitful trees but rather to a desolate forest. There is no doubt that heretics and pagans take up arms against the house of David, wielding the same weapons of deception and argumentative tactics. While they may contend amongst themselves in their assaults on the Church, they ultimately unite in opposition, much like Herod and Pilate, who despite their prior enmity, come together to condemn the Lord.

Vissarion (Nechaev)

19th centuryCommentator

The alarming report of the invasion sent shockwaves through the house of David, specifically referring to David's lineage ruling in Judah, with Ahaz as its leader at that moment, along with his warriors, representing all the people of Judah under David's authority. Fear overwhelmed everyone, including the king, leading to a state of panic where they were uncertain of their next steps. A cacophony of chaos filled the air. Those seized by fear swayed like the branches of a tree caught in the violent winds of a fierce storm. The cause of this dread was evident: a kingdom already weakened by recent conflicts with the Syrians and Israelites found itself facing the same adversaries once more, who had now united against them. Aram, associated with the Syrians and descended from Shem’s youngest son (Genesis 10:22, 1 Chronicles 1:10), formed an alliance with Ephraim, the prominent tribe within the kingdom of Israel.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.