The Church Fathers on this verse

John 19:22Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Pilate answered: What I have written, I have written.

Douay-Rheims

απεκριθη ο πιλατος ο γεγραφα γεγραφα

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

11 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Yet Pilate did not change his decision, but remained with his former opinion. Through this, again, no small matter was arranged, but a very important event.

The wood of the cross had been buried in the earth, because no one took care to remove it. This was partly from fear, and partly because the believers were occupied with other, extremely necessary matters.

Since this wood was later to be sought, and since the three crosses naturally lay together, the Lord allowed an inscription to be on His cross so that it would not remain unrecognized. Thus this cross became known to all, first because it lay in the midst of the others, and then because of the inscription upon it. The crosses of the robbers had no inscriptions.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

But Pilate did not agree, and remained with his former opinion. Therefore he says, "What I have written, I have written." Yet here something else, and something important, is also being arranged. Since the three crosses, buried in the earth, would lie in one and the same place, it was arranged that the Lord's Cross alone should have a title and inscription. Thus it would not remain unknown which of them was the Lord's Cross, but could be recognized by this sign. For the crosses of the robbers had no inscriptions.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

But Pilate rejects their desire to change the words of the inscription. He does not allow them endlessly to demean the glory of our Savior. Clearly this happened by divine and ineffable prompting, for the Kingdom of Christ is firm and beyond slander. This remained so even against the will of the Jews, who were trying to change the confession of His glory.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

What Pilate wrote, he wrote. But what did the chief priests, who wished to distort the inscription, say? “Do not write, ‘The King of the Jews,’ but that He said, ‘I am the King of the Jews.’”

What are you saying, madmen? Why do you hinder the fulfillment of what you are in no way able to change? Will it be any less true because Jesus said, “I am the King of the Jews”? If what Pilate wrote cannot be changed, can what the Truth has uttered be spoiled?

The Magi were from the Gentiles, and Pilate himself was also from the Gentiles. They saw a star in heaven, and he made an inscription on the tree. Yet all of them sought and acknowledged a king, not the king of the Gentiles, but the King of the Jews.

Read more (904 words)

But the Jews neither followed the star nor acknowledged the inscription. This was a foreshadowing of what the Lord Himself later said: “Many will come from east and west and recline with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the Kingdom of Heaven. But the sons of the kingdom will be cast into outer darkness” (Mt 8:11-12).

Thus the Magi came from the east, and Pilate from the west. The Magi testified to the rising of the King of the Jews, that is, His Nativity. Pilate testified to the setting of the King of the Jews, that is, His death.

This was so that they might recline in the Kingdom of Heaven with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, from whom the Jews take their origin. Though according to the flesh they do not descend from them, by faith they were grafted into them. Thus was already foreshadowed that wild branch which, according to the Apostle, was to be grafted into the olive tree (cf. Mt 2:1-12; Rom 11:17-21).

The leaders of the Jews urged Pilate not to write that He was King of the Jews, since He Himself claimed to be King of the Jews. Pilate answered: “What I have written, I have written.” Thus Pilate symbolized that very wild olive tree which would be grafted in, while the leaders of the Jews embodied the broken branches.

He was a man from the Gentiles, and for the Gentiles he made the inscription concerning their faith. For the Lord rightly said: “The Kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a nation producing its fruits” (Mt 21:43).

Pilate wrote “The King of the Jews,” not “King of the Greeks or Latins,” although Jesus was to reign over all nations. What he wrote, he wrote, changing nothing at the demand of the unbelieving. This had long ago been foretold in the psalm: “Do not destroy the inscription” (cf. headings of Ps 57 and Ps 58).

All nations believe in the King of the Jews. He reigns over all nations, but He reigns as King of the Jews. So strong was that root that it could change the grafted branch of the wild olive, although that branch could not change its own name.

O inexpressible power of divine activity even in the hearts of the ignorant! Did some hidden voice not sound within Pilate, in a kind of, if one may say so, crying silence? For this had so long before been foretold in the Psalms: “Do not alter what is written in the inscription” (cf. Ps 57:1).

So he did not alter what had been written in the inscription. What he wrote, he wrote. But what did the chief priests, who wanted to alter it, say? “Do not write, ‘The King of the Jews,’ but that He said, ‘I am the King of the Jews’” (Jn 19:21).

What are you saying, madmen? Why do you oppose what you cannot in any way change? Does it cease to be true because Jesus said, “I am the King of the Jews”? If what Pilate wrote cannot be changed, can what the Truth said be changed?

But is Christ only King of the Jews, or also of the Gentiles? Certainly He is also King of the Gentiles. For when He said in prophecy, “I have been established by Him as King over Zion, His holy mountain, proclaiming the commandment of the Lord,” He immediately added something so that no one, because of Mount Zion, would say that He was established as King only for the Jews.

“The Lord said to Me: Thou art My Son. Today I have begotten Thee. Ask of Me, and I will give Thee the nations for Thine inheritance, and the ends of the earth for Thy possession” (Ps 2:6-8). Therefore He Himself said with His own mouth among the Jews: “I have other sheep that are not of this fold. Them also I must bring. They will hear My voice, and there will be one flock and one Shepherd” (Jn 10:16).

Why, then, do we wish a great mystery to be understood in this inscription, where “The King of the Jews” was written, if Christ is also King of the Gentiles? Because the wild olive was grafted into the richness of the olive tree, and the olive tree was not grafted into the bitterness of the wild olive (cf. Rom 11:17).

Since “The King of the Jews” was truthfully written about Christ in the inscription, what Jews should be understood except the seed of Abraham, the children of the promise, who are also children of God? For the Apostle said: “It is not the children of the flesh who are children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as seed” (Rom 9:8).

Those to whom he said this were Gentiles: “If you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise” (Gal 3:29). Therefore Christ is King of the Jews, but of Jews by circumcision of the heart, in the Spirit and not in the letter. Their praise is not from men but from God (cf. Rom 2:29).

They are Jews belonging to the free Jerusalem, our eternal mother in the heavens, the spiritual Sarah, who cast the bondwoman and her children out of the house of freedom (cf. Gal 4:22-31). Therefore Pilate wrote what he wrote (Jn 19:22), because the Lord said what He said.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

All this has been properly explained in the interpretation of the same chapter, namely of the words: "And they put over His head His written accusation: This is Jesus, the King of the Jews" (Mt 27:37).

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryChurch Father

Pilate could not forgive the chief priests for having driven him into servile submission to their stubbornness. Therefore he now answered them sharply: "It is not your business to interfere in my orders. What I have written will remain written as it is."

Innocentius of Kherson

19th centuryChurch Father

"What I have written, I have written," was the procurator's answer. The chief priests returned to Golgotha in shame and vexation, to satisfy their feeling of revenge.

It is clear that Pilate, by composing the inscription, and still more by refusing to change it, wished to annoy the chief priests. Meanwhile, according to the Fathers of the Church, the Roman judge, without knowing it, was also here serving as the executor of higher decrees.

"Pilate," blessed Augustine reasons, "wrote what he wrote, because the Lord said what He said. He said, 'I am the King set over Zion, My holy mountain' (Ps 2:6). He said that He had to suffer in order to enter into His glory. And behold, those who nailed Him to the cross thereby, so to speak, raised Him to the throne.

Read more (120 words)

It remained to proclaim the new King. Pilate the Gentile, by means of a trilingual inscription, solemnly proclaims Him before all nations, contrary to the Jewish authorities. It is a prophetic symbol of coming events. The Jewish people, continuing to reject the yoke of Christ's kingdom, saw, and to this day sees to its shame, how the Gentile nations, one after another, recognize the crucified Jesus as their King, Savior, and Lord."

The special inscription made on the cross of Jesus Christ, as Chrysostom notes, later served to distinguish it from the other crosses with which it had been buried in the earth. This occurred when the mother of Constantine the Great, Saint Helena, resolved to find the life-giving wood.

Ivanov A.V.

19th centuryChurch Father

But Pilate answered, "What I have written, I have written." Thus Jesus Christ, both in fact and therefore legally, by the recognition of authority, appeared in His very humiliation as King of the people who demanded His death.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

When the cross had already been raised, the leaders of the Jews for the first time clearly noticed the mortal insult to themselves from Pilate. In their blind frenzy they imagined that crucifixion was an outrage directed against Jesus. But now, seeing Him hanging between two robbers, yet on a higher cross, they immediately understood that this execution was a public outrage against themselves.

On a white wooden board, covered with gypsum and standing out so clearly above Jesus' head, a black inscription was visible on the cross in the three civilized languages of the ancient world. At least one of these languages was certainly known to everyone in the crowd gathered there: official Latin, common Greek, and native Aramaic.

Read more (199 words)

The inscription declared that this man, who was enduring such a shameful slave's death, this man crucified before the eyes of the whole world between two criminals. Was "the King of the Jews." The inscription read: "Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews." This threefold inscription probably read thus: ישוע הנצרי מלך היהודים οὗτος ἐστίν Ἰησοῦς Βασιλεύς τῶν Ἰουδαίων Rex Judaeorum.

When the Jews understood what malicious mockery Pilate had subjected them to, it completely poisoned the pleasure of their spiteful triumph. They sent a delegation to Pilate, asking him to change the inscription that outraged them. "Do not write," they said, "the King of the Jews, but that He said, I am King of the Jews."

But Pilate's courage, which had so quickly evaporated at the name of Caesar, now revived again. He was glad by any means to annoy and thwart the men whose rebellious cries had forced him that morning to act against his wish and conscience. Few could express their haughty contempt with such force as the Romans.

Without even deigning to justify his action, Pilate at once dismissed the proud hierarchs with a brief and arrogant answer: "What I have written, I have written."

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

John supplements the brief accounts of the first Evangelists with several particular details concerning the inscription on the cross.

Pilate wrote, that is, ordered an inscription to be written, and placed it on the cross. According to Roman custom, a man condemned to crucifixion carried, on the way to the place of execution, a board inscribed with the charge for which he was condemned. After the crucifixion, this board was nailed to the upper horn or end of the cross.

Pilate used this custom to wound the members of the Sanhedrin once more. Since they accused the Lord of claiming royal dignity for Himself, Pilate ordered this charge to be written, to the Sanhedrin's shame: the King of the Jews was crucified at the demand of the representatives of the Jewish people.

Read more (175 words)

Contrary to custom, the inscription was made in three languages: Hebrew, the national and local tongue; Greek, the widely used tongue; and Roman, the language of the victors. Pilate's purpose may have been that every foreigner also could read this inscription, since Hebrew was little known to outsiders.

Yet in this, without doubt, a higher purpose was fulfilled. In the moments of His uttermost humiliation, the Lord was proclaimed to the whole world as King in three languages, two of which were the most widespread in the world.

"Pilate placed on the cross, as upon a monument of victory, an inscription that sends forth a bright voice, proclaims His victory, and announces the Kingdom" (Chrysostom).

The Lord's accusers took this inscription as a malicious mockery of them by Pilate. They came to him asking that it be changed in a sense more favorable to them. But from the proud and offended Roman they received a decisive refusal, sharply expressed. By it the Sanhedrin was again made to feel its dependence on a foreign pagan power.

Philaret (Gumilevski)

19th centuryChurch Father

But Pilate, who had yielded so much to the Sanhedrin in the offense against conscience, did not wish to yield any further, even from pride alone. With the pride of a Roman he answered the Sanhedrin: "What has been written will remain written." There would be no change.

Thus Pilate wished to take revenge on the Sanhedrin. Yet at the same time, unintentionally and unconsciously, he became a preacher of great truths.

Let us say in the words of blessed Augustine: "Pilate wrote what he wrote, because the Lord said what He said. He said, 'I am the King set over Zion' (Ps 2:6). He said that He had to suffer in order to enter into His glory.

Read more (60 words)

It remained to proclaim the new King. And Pilate the Gentile solemnly proclaims Him, contrary to the Jewish authorities. Here there is also a prophetic symbol of events that were soon to follow. The Jewish people saw, and to their shame still sees, how the Gentile nations, one after another, recognize the crucified Jesus as their King, Savior, and Lord."

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 6 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Ἀπεκρίθη
    apekrithē
    I answer
    G611 · ἀποκρίνω
  2. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  3. Πιλᾶτος
    pilatos
    Pilate
    G4091 · Πιλᾶτος
  4. Ὃ
    ho
    who
    G3739 · ὅς, ἥ
  5. γέγραφα
    gegrapha
    I write
    G1125 · γράφω
  6. γέγραφα
    gegrapha
    I write
    G1125 · γράφω