Meanwhile darkness and malice, raised up by "the father of lies and father of the embittered, that is, the devil" (Jn 8:44), wage war against light, mercy, and love.
From the fifth chapter onward, the holy Evangelist John sketches the picture and narrative of this struggle of darkness against light, of the Jews against the Lord.
From the earthly point of view, this struggle ends in the temporary triumph of darkness and malice through the killing of the Lord Jesus. In essence, however, it is the triumph of light.
It is the fulfillment of God’s preordained plan in the suffering, death, and glorious Resurrection of the God-man.
In depicting the Jews’ struggle against the Lord, John the Theologian naturally narrates chiefly the events that took place in Jerusalem. There was the nest of scribes and Pharisees that refused to admit the thought that Jesus is the Christ.
There the hardened assaults of the Jews, gnashing their teeth against the Lord, take place. They end in an outright conspiracy against the Lord’s life, with a resolve to achieve His killing by every lawful and unlawful means.
If the sixth chapter of John carries our thought to Galilee, to the shore of the Lake of Tiberias, this is because the miracle of feeding the people is joined to the Lord’s teaching about the bread of life that comes down from heaven.
Moreover, in verse 41 there is an indication that even in Galilee, on account of the Lord’s words, embittered Jews rise up and dispute against Him.
They were probably following Him, or were even sent from Jerusalem as spies, in order to find a pretext for accusing the Lord.
All the other events in the Gospel according to John take place in Jerusalem and its environs. Only the concluding twenty-first chapter of John the Theologian again transfers the reader to Galilee.
For here, on the Lake of Tiberias, events occurred that had to be revealed to Christians, since they had not been mentioned by the preceding Evangelists.
The first narrated outburst of the Pharisees’ malice takes place in Jerusalem, on account of the healing of the sick man who had lain thirty-eight years by the pool of Bethesda.
It immediately assumes the form of a conspiracy to kill the Lord Jesus.
The feast on which this healing of the paralytic was accomplished has given occasion for doubts. Saint Irenaeus and Eusebius of Caesarea thought it was Passover. Saint John Chrysostom considers this feast to be Pentecost.
Many more recent learned theologians think it was the feast of Purim, the feast of deliverance from danger in Persia; see Esther, especially Esth 9:26.
It is very difficult to pronounce one’s own opinion on a question on which the most ancient and greatest Fathers of the Church differed. We nevertheless permit ourselves to say the following.
The event occurs after the first Passover and before the mention of the second (Jn 6:4). It seems most natural to suppose that it was the feast of Pentecost.
As for the feast of Tabernacles, it is named explicitly in chapter 7:1-2, between the second and third Passover.
The feast of Purim was celebrated in March. If the event is assigned to this feast, then it must have taken place several days before the second Passover.
Recent investigators have sought the pool of Bethesda in the valley of the Kidron brook, supposing that it is the intermittent spring now known as the "Fountain of the Virgin."
Others point out that, according to very ancient tradition based on Nehemiah 3, the "sheep gate" should be sought on the northeastern side of the ancient city, near the present gate of the holy protomartyr Stephen.
According to the same ancient tradition, the sheep pool was located near that place, beside the Temple.
The name Bethesda, or Bethsaida, is interpreted as "house of mercy." The porticoes of Bethesda were in all probability open galleries built by pious people.
In them the sick lay at least somewhat sheltered from the heat of the sun and from rain. The traveler Tristram saw a scene like the Gospel scene, with sick persons lying under shelters near the hot sulfur springs of ancient Tiberias.
Concerning the Slavonic expression "every year," it must be observed that one cannot understand here "once a year." The Greek kata kairon means "at an appointed time" or "at a suitable time for this."
Biblia Sacra translates it praestituto tempore. That is, it means "from time to time," as our Russian Synodal translation also renders it.
In other words, at times appointed by God, an angel troubled the water.
We cannot pass over in silence the fact that in some very ancient manuscripts of the Gospel according to John, verse 3 from the word "waiting" and all of verse 4 are omitted.
For this reason, verse 4 together with the end of verse 3 is considered by some an explanatory gloss, though one of very great antiquity.
Among the manuscripts lacking verse 4 are named the Sinaitic Codex, Aleph, the Vatican Codex, B, the Parisian Codex, L, and some others.
There are many intermittent springs whose healing effect is experienced only in the first moments when the spring appears from the earth.
Concerning verse 5 of this chapter, Schmieder well observes that the action of the angel indicated by the Gospel explains many phenomena of nature.
It also shows us that the unearthly, higher world often enters in a life-giving way into the ordinary course of nature’s life: Da die Geisterwelt lebendig eingreift in die Natur.
Psalm 103 points directly to this, saying, "You make Your angels spirits, and Your ministers a flaming fire."
That is, according to Schmieder’s thought, all extraordinary phenomena of nature occur by special commands of God, through the action of rational angelic powers upon the irrational powers of nature.
This view of Schmieder certainly finds its justification in the account of the Egyptian plagues, and in the angel of the final plague passing by the doors marked with the blood of the paschal lamb.
It is also justified in the punishment of David by pestilence, which begins when the angel standing by the threshing floor of Araunah stretches out his hand over Jerusalem (see 2 Sam 24:16).
Let us add that we believe the Lord God is not an indifferent spectator of human life. Those who truly study the course of events in mankind’s life cannot fail to see the hand of God.
They see it both in the great physical upheavals of nature and in the great moral upheavals of societies.