The Church Fathers on this verse

John 8:17Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And in your law it is written that the testimony of two men is true.

Douay-Rheims

και εν τω νομω δε τω υμετερω γεγραπται οτι δυο ανθρωπων η μαρτυρια αληθης εστιν

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

11 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Then He veiled this, bringing forward testimony concerning Himself: “And in your law it is written that the testimony of two men is true.” What would the heretics say here? What advantage does He have over men, if we understand these words simply?

In relation to men this is established because no one alone, by himself, is worthy of trust. But in relation to God, can this have any significance? Why, then, is it said, “two”? Is it “two” because They are two, or because they are men?

Read more (66 words)

If it is because They are two, why did He not have recourse to John and say, “I bear witness about Myself, and John bears witness about Me”? Why not to an angel? Why not to the prophets? He could have found many other testimonies. But He wishes to show not only that there are two, but that They are of one and the same essence.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

Let the Arians and Eunomians, who do not acknowledge the Son as consubstantial with the Father, speak here. If He were not consubstantial, how would He have dared to say, “I have testimony and certainty equal to the Father”? When two men testify about something and their testimony is true (Deut 19:15), it is evident that their certainty is also equal. So here He proves that His own testimony is in no way lower than the testimony of the Father.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

Having said that God the Father will judge and condemn together with Him those who act impiously against Him, He also admits in another respect the needed duality of persons.

I do not refuse to say what I am by nature, He says. I am the light of the world, and therefore I must not seem to anyone a lover of boasting. For I glory not in dignities belonging to another, but in those essentially proper to Me.

Yet if these words of Mine seem insufficient for receiving true understanding, since I alone bear witness concerning Myself, then I shall receive God the Father as One Who acts together with My dignities and confirms them.

For, He says, He works miracles together with Me, as you see, and acts with Me. As far as human nature is concerned, I could do nothing if I were not God by nature.

Read more (553 words)

As far as existence from the Father is concerned, I am confessed and witnessed by the nature of Him Who begot Me. I have the Father in Myself and can accomplish all things. Since I have Him in Myself by reason of identity of essence, I am able to accomplish everything without hindrance.

For our Lord Jesus Christ, as God, possesses omnipotence from His divine nature, though He appeared as man. He is also witnessed by the Father as having Him as co-worker in all things, according to what He said: "I do nothing of Myself, but the Father Who dwells in Me Himself does the works," Jn 8:28; 14:10.

We understand the Father's cooperation with the Son not as the supplying of His own and alien power to one who is powerless for the doing of works. If we thought so, we would have to acknowledge the power of the Father, like that of the Son, as imperfect.

For then some miracle would be performed through two, because one alone would seem insufficient for it. Understanding what is said much more piously and reasonably, we again affirm that in the Father and the Son there is one Godhead and the unchanging omnipotence of one and the same nature.

Therefore, without doubt, the works of God the Father will also be the works of the Son. In turn, the works of the Son will also be the works of God the Father.

He says, "I do nothing of Myself," not as a servant and subordinate, nor as one in the position of a disciple waiting for commands from the Father, nor as one taught to perform miracles.

Rather, He indicates with complete precision that He is begotten from the essence of God the Father. Like light, He ineffably and without beginning shone forth from His hidden depths. He eternally coexists with Him, being and being understood as the image and impress of His hypostasis.

He has, so to speak, one and the same purpose with Him, and the same activity in all things. To teach clearly that He wills together with the Begetter in all things, He says: "I do nothing of Myself."

This is as if He said: I in no way incline toward any wish of My own that is not proper to God the Father. Whatever the Father's nature wills and determines is certainly also in Me, since I have shone forth from His depths and am the true fruit of His essence.

This is difficult to explain, not easy to express in speech, and inaccessible even to reason itself. Yet, introducing it as far as possible into pious contemplation, let us gain for ourselves the heavenly reward. Let us preserve our mind unharmed and disinclined to any changes whatever.

It must be noted that the Savior, by adding and saying to the Jews, "And in your Law it is written," thereby already compels the Pharisees, as by necessity, to accept the duality of persons.

For He says: "I bear witness concerning Myself," but for this the "Father" is also joined to Me. Will this pair of witnesses, confirmed by the letter of the Law, not be accepted among you? Or again, carried away solely by envy against Me, will you pay no heed even to the Law you honor?

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

Is truth established by two witnesses? Certainly, such is the custom of mankind. Yet it is possible that even two may lie. Chaste Susanna was accused by two false witnesses. Were they not false witnesses because there were two of them? Are we speaking of two or of three? A whole people lied against Christ. Therefore, if a people made up of a great multitude proved to be a false witness, how are we to understand, “By the mouth of two or three every word shall be established” (Mt 18:16), except that the mystery of the Trinity is revealed here? In the Trinity the constancy of truth abides forever. Do you wish to be convincing in judgment? Take two or three witnesses: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.

Read more (883 words)

Therefore, since it is written in your law that the testimony of two men is true, receive our testimony, and do not think only of judgment. He was speaking of judgment. Now He wishes to speak of testimony. “And in your law,” He says, “it is written that the testimony of two men is true. I bear witness of Myself, and the Father who sent Me bears witness of Me.” He would have explained the Law to them, had they not been deaf. Indeed, my brethren, this is a difficult question. I certainly see a great mystery in what God said: “By the mouth of two or three witnesses every word shall be established” (Mt 18:16; cf. Deut 19:15). Is truth established through two witnesses? Yes indeed. Such is the rule among mankind. Yet it may still happen that two lie. Chaste Susanna suffered from two false witnesses (cf. Dan 13:36-62). Were they not false witnesses because there were two of them? Are we speaking of two or of three? The whole people lied against Christ (cf. Lk 23:1). If a people made up of an immense multitude proved to be a false witness, how should we understand, “By the mouth of two or three witnesses every word shall be established”? Only in this way: through the mystery, the Trinity is entrusted to us, in whom the immutable constancy of truth is contained. Do you wish your case to be secure? Keep within yourself two or three witnesses: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Finally, when Susanna, a chaste woman and faithful wife, was accused by two false witnesses, the Trinity sustained her in conscience and in secret. This Trinity brought forth one witness, Daniel, and convicted the two. Therefore, since it is written in your Law that the testimony of two men is true, receive our testimony, lest you experience the Judgment. For He says, “I judge no one, but I bear witness of Myself. I defer judgment, but I do not defer testimony.” Let us, brethren, choose God for ourselves as Judge, and God as witness against the tongues of men and the powerless suspicions of mankind. He who is Judge did not think it unworthy of Himself to appear as Witness. Nor did He exalt Himself as Judge, since He who now appears as witness will also be Judge. Why is He Himself witness? Because He seeks no other, by whom it may be known what you are. Why is He Himself Judge? Because He Himself has authority to assign to death or to life, to condemn or justify. He has authority to cast down into Hades or lift up to heaven, to join to the devil or crown with the Angels. Since He has such authority, He is Judge. Since He seeks no other witness in order to know you, He who will later judge you sees you now. It is impossible for you to deceive Him when He judges. For you will not be able to summon any false witnesses who could deceive that Judge when He judges you. God says to you, “When you despised Me, I saw it. When you did not believe, I did not hide My sentence. I deferred it, but I did not abolish it. You did not hear what I prescribed, but you will feel what I have already appointed. But if you hear what I prescribed, you will not feel the evils I appointed. Instead, you will obtain the good things I promised.” Certainly no one should wonder that He says, “My judgment is true, because I am not alone, but I and the Father who sent Me.” Elsewhere He says, “The Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son” (Jn 5:22). We have already discussed these words of the Gospel. Now we remind you that this was said because the Father will not appear together with the Son when He renders Judgment. Only the Son will manifest Himself at the Judgment of the good and the evil, in the very form in which He suffered, rose, and ascended into heaven. For when the disciples beheld His ascension, the angelic voice sounded: “He will come in the same manner as you saw Him going into heaven” (Acts 1:11). That is, He will judge in the form of man, in which He was judged, so that this prophecy may be fulfilled: “They shall look on Him whom they pierced” (Zech 12:10; cf. Jn 19:37). And when the righteous enter into eternal life, we shall see Him as He is. Then there will be no judgment over the living and the dead, but only the reward of the living. Let no one wonder that He says, “And in your law it is written that the testimony of two men is true” (Jn 8:17). Let no one suppose that this did not belong to the law of God because He did not say, “in the law of God.” Such a person should know that when He said “in your law,” it was as if He said, “in the Law given to you.” By whom was it given, if not by God? So also we say, “our daily bread,” and yet we add, “give us this day” (Mt 6:11).

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

“And in your law also it is written that the testimony of two men is true.” He says “your,” as you boast, because you call Me a transgressor of the law. If the testimony of two men is true, you yourselves could conclude from this how much truer is the judgment of two judges, and judges such as these. Jesus Christ says this everywhere in a veiled way because of the weakness of His hearers. It was not to be clear to them, but only to the more steadfast Christians. In all such cases, understand this as the reason.

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryChurch Father

The Pharisees dared to object to Him that His testimony about Himself was not true, precisely because He bore witness to Himself.

That is false, the Lord answered. My testimony can be true even in this case, for who on earth, besides Me, truly knows whence I came and whither I go? You do not know this. You judge Me only according to the flesh, by outward appearance, by what you see. It would be better for you not to judge Me, or concerning Me, just as I do not judge you.

Read more (93 words)

Yet this does not mean that I fear My judgment might be as mistaken as yours. No, My judgment is true, for I do not judge alone. The Father judges with Me. If you wish to judge Me, then it would be fitting for you to hear My witnesses. Your law requires two or three witnesses. I present two to you. The first witness is Myself. Here the divine nature of Jesus is clearly distinguished, bearing witness to what is accomplished through the mediation of His human nature. The second is My Father.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

From the fact that Jesus Christ bears witness about Himself, the Pharisees, looking at the matter formally, conclude that His testimony has no significance for others and is even untrue. Perhaps in this case they recall the Lord Christ’s own words (5:31).

But then Jesus Christ intended to unfold the truth of His testimony on the basis of the testimonies of others concerning Him: John, His works, and God the Father (5:32 and following). Now He wished to unfold the truth of His self-testimony in itself, without reference to anything else.

Therefore He first answers that, even if He bears witness about Himself, His testimony is true (14-15). Then He says that in bearing witness about Himself He has not remained alone, but that the Father also bears witness to Him (17-18).

Read more (203 words)

“If I bear witness about Myself, My testimony is true, because I have the most perfect knowledge of Myself, of My origin, My purpose, and the aim of My coming into the world. I alone know this, and you do not know it and cannot know it of yourselves. Therefore you must receive testimony concerning Me from Me Myself. What you say about testimony does not apply to My self-testimony. It has force only in earthly relations.

You judge according to the flesh, according to carnal impulses. Hence your judgment is false in its very foundation, whether it is judgment about yourselves or about others. Thus you judge Me to be an untrue witness about Myself, because you judge according to the flesh and desire to condemn.

But I judge no one, that is, not with the aim of condemning, and not according to the flesh. Yet if I do judge, whether concerning Myself or others, My judgment is just. It is also the judgment of God the Father Himself. Thus, in each of My judgments and testimonies, two witnesses appear: I and the Father. And your law, on which you rest, also recognizes the testimony of two as true” (Deut 17:6; 19:15).

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryChurch Father

Jesus’ words concerning Himself and His consubstantiality with the Father.

“Even if I bear witness about Myself, My testimony,” or, in another sense, “My judgment, is true,” said Jesus, “because I know whence I came and whither I go. You judge according to My humanity, according to My flesh, and consider Me only a man. For this reason you err and demand another testimony from Me.

Yet My works should bring you to understanding. Through them My Father, who sent Me into the world, bears witness to Me. Thus two bear witness to Me: I Myself and the Father. Even according to your law, the testimony of two is considered true.

Read more (74 words)

But let it be as though I alone were bearing witness about Myself. Even in that case My testimony is true, because I know that I came from God and go to Him. Can such testimony be false? I judge no one, since I came to save sinners, not to judge. And if I judge concerning Myself, My judgment is true, because I am not alone, but I and the Father who sent Me.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

“It is written in your law,” and so forth. The Lord’s self-testimony is trustworthy also in another, so to speak, formal and juridical respect. This was what the Pharisees chiefly had in mind (Jn 8:13).

The Mosaic law required two or three witnesses for a fact to have the force of credibility (Deut 17:6; 19:15). The Lord’s self-testimony fully satisfies this law, because to His self-testimony there is added the testimony of His Father.

This testimony of the Father was expressed partly directly, for example at the Baptism (Mt 3:17 and parallels). It was expressed partly in the Lord’s extraordinary miraculous works (Jn 10:25, 38; 5:36). Finally, it was expressed in the Lord’s own consciousness, in the consciousness of His unity with God.

Read more (47 words)

“Do you see the equality of authority, and how He presents Himself as being as trustworthy as the Father? He would not have dared to say this if He were lower in dignity than the Father, and were not equal and consubstantial with Him” (Theophylact; cf. Chrysostom).

Philaret (Gumilevski)

19th centuryChurch Father

A new refutation of the Jews’ remark: He bears witness about Himself. His testimony is not His alone. The envoy of the heavenly Father remains in constant communion with Him who sent Him. Therefore the envoy’s words about Himself are not His words alone, but also the voice of Him who sent Him.

The communion of the Father with the Son takes place in the unseen realm of the spirit. It is therefore all the more fearful to touch the testimony of the Son with audacious judgments. “And in your law it is written that the testimony of two men is true,” says the Savior.

Read more (112 words)

The Son of God stands above the measure of human truth. Moreover, the law concerning witnesses was introduced only for sinful mankind. Otherwise, the testimony of a pure conscience is trustworthy testimony. Such is the meaning of the expressions “in your law” and “men.”

Yet, contending with the stubbornness of the wretched Jews, the Lord summons against them even the response of the law they honored. They measure everything by the letter of the law. So be it. But are not He and the Father, man and God, two witnesses? The Son bears witness to Himself by words. The heavenly Father bears witness by miracles performed to the glory of the Son.

Wlastow G.K.

19th centuryChurch Father

Continuing His answer to the Pharisees, the Lord indicates to them that, even by their narrow understanding of the law, they ought to have discerned a twofold testimony in what was taking place before their eyes. There was the testimony of a man, as they supposed, who worked miracles and spoke the words of God. There was also the testimony of God, by whose power this man acted and spoke.

Thus it should have been evident even to them that two bear witness to the truth: the Father and Him who reveals the Father. If in Him they did not recognize the God of the Covenant, the Reconciler, and the Messiah, they should at least have recognized the one sent by God.

Read more (89 words)

For us Christians, however, our Lord Jesus Christ revealed a still greater meaning of the mystery of the knowledge of the Godhead. For “there are three who bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one” (1 Jn 5:7).

For a time, that is, until His final discourse with His disciples, the Lord speaks only of two manifested testimonies: “for the Holy Spirit was not yet given, because Jesus was not yet glorified” (Jn 7; cf. the study of that verse).

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 15 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  2. ἐν
    en
    in
    G1722 · ἐν
  3. τῷ
    tō
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  4. νόμῳ
    nomō
    a law
    G3551 · νόμος
  5. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  6. τῷ
    tō
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  7. ὑμετέρῳ
    hymeterō
    your
    G5212 · ὑμέτερος
  8. γέγραπται
    gegraptai
    I write
    G1125 · γράφω
  9. ὅτι
    hoti
    that
    G3754 · ὅτι
  10. δύο
    dyo
    two
    G1417 · δύο
  11. ἀνθρώπων
    anthrōpōn
    a man
    G444 · ἄνθρωπος
  12. ἡ
    hē
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  13. μαρτυρία
    martyria
    witness
    G3141 · μαρτυρία
  14. ἀληθής
    alēthēs
    unconcealed
    G227 · ἀληθής
  15. ἐστιν
    estin
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί