The Church Fathers on this verse

Luke 12:52Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

For there shall be from henceforth five in one house divided: three against two, and two against three.

Douay-Rheims

εσονται γαρ απο του νυν πεντε εν οικω ενι διαμεμερισμενοι τρεις επι δυσιν και δυο επι τρισιν

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

10 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 12 commentaries

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

How is it that He stated the five individuals in one household would be divided, while mentioning ‘six’ in the accounting? We can clarify this: one individual is counted twice; specifically, the daughter and the daughter-in-law represent the same person. In the context of the mother, she is referred to as daughter, and in relation to the mother-in-law, as daughter-in-law. Consequently, the three—the father, the mother, and the mother-in-law—will find themselves at odds with the two, the son and the daughter. The daughter, as previously noted, exists as a single person but embodies two distinct relationships, that of the mother and the mother-in-law, thus presenting herself as two entities.

Read more (312 words)

The father, mother, and mother-in-law perhaps symbolize all that is established and traditional, whereas the son and daughter reflect the new and transformative. The Lord aims for His new divine commandments and teachings to triumph over all our past sinful behaviors and doctrines.

Additionally, the father represents the mind, while the son embodies intellect. A division exists between these two within a single household, that is, within humanity itself. To illustrate further, consider that the mind of Dionysius the Areopagite was enlightened and embraced the sermon. His mind accepted the faith without evidence, standing in opposition to the pagan intellect, which sought to validate beliefs through reasoning and was constrained by dialectical methods. This exemplifies the division of father and son, who contend for the sake of Christ and the message of the Gospel.

The terms mother and mother-in-law may be likened to thought, while daughter and daughter-in-law correspond to feeling. There is conflict between these two on behalf of Christ. They experience animosity when thought urges us to prioritize the eternal over the temporal, the unseen over the seen, and presents ample evidence for this perspective. Conversely, it is also true that feeling can mount a challenge against thought. Senses, reinforced by faith through miracles and tangible signs, often remain unconvinced by rational arguments, resisting the pagan reasoning that attempts to undermine the belief in God becoming man or the Virgin's childbirth. Such conclusions are indeed folly stemming from those who venerate nature. Ultimately, feeling, driven by visible miracles, can lead to a deeper understanding of God than mere logical proofs. Thus, not all instances of peace and harmony are beneficial; in fact, enmity and division can sometimes reflect divine intention. Therefore, no one should ally themselves with the wicked, and if father and mother oppose the Law of Christ, then enmity with them, as adversaries of the truth, is warranted.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

Are you curious about the consequences of this divine and wise fire? Consider once more His declaration: ‘Or do you think that I came to give peace on earth? I tell you, no, but division.’ Yet Scripture affirms that Christ is our peace, stating, ‘He hath broken down the middle wall: he hath joined two nations into one man, making peace, and hath reconciled both in one body to the Father.’ He united what is earthly with what is heavenly: how could it be said that He did not bring peace to the earth? What conclusion can we draw from this? Peace is indeed a noble and truly marvelous gift when bestowed by God.

Read more (413 words)

The prophets testify, ‘Lord, give us peace, for thou hast given us all things.’ However, not all forms of peace are necessarily without fault: at times, there exists a perilous peace that disconnects individuals from the love of God when they, lacking wisdom and discernment, place too much value on it. For example, the resolve to avoid wicked individuals and to reject concord with them—by which I mean to refuse to share their sentiments—serves to our benefit and advantage. Conversely, it is detrimental for those who have put their faith in Christ and grasped the essence of His mystery to align themselves with those who have strayed from the true path, falling into the traps of pagan misconceptions or the enticements of heretical falsehoods. It is commendable to engage in debate with them, to continually oppose their views, and to be uplifted by those who hold differing opinions. Thus, even if a father disbelieves, his son bears no blame if he challenges and contradicts him. Similarly, a father who possesses faithfulness to God is not guilty if he disregards a disobedient and unholy son who opposes the glory of Christ. This principle applies equally to mothers and daughters, daughters-in-law and mothers-in-law. It is just that the misled should seek counsel from the wise, rather than permit those who are grounded in sound understanding of God’s glory to compromise their beliefs. Christ further teaches us in another passage: ‘Whoever loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; and whoever loves son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.’ Therefore, when you forsake your earthly father for the sake of righteousness towards Christ, you will discover Him who resides in heaven as your true Father. And should you distance yourself from your brother for failing to honor God by refusing His service, Christ will embrace you as His brother; for He has bestowed upon us this gift as well, affirming: ‘I will declare thy name unto my brethren.’ Turn away from your earthly mother and pursue the heavenly Jerusalem, ‘which is our mother’: for in doing so, you will inherit a glorious and distinguished legacy within the family of the saints. Alongside them, you will partake in the divine treasures beyond human understanding. May we also be found worthy of this through the grace and love of Christ, our Savior, to whom be praise and sovereignty with God the Father and the Holy Spirit, forever and ever. Amen.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

Almost every passage in the Gospels conveys a spiritual significance, and the quoted words merit a more profound spiritual understanding to prevent anyone from being harmed by the severity of a literal interpretation. Holy faith approaches moral teachings with humility and, through demonstrations of gentle love, gains the respect of even those who neglect to worship God, guiding errant minds toward belief by soothing them with its affection. When a weak heart struggles to grasp the profound mysteries of faith, the commandments we have been given assist us in recognizing what deserves reverence. Righteousness that emanates from the Righteous One and sanctity from the Holy One bear witness to the goodness of the Creator of all good.

Read more (1869 words)

Can we assume that the Lord, who succinctly called for the honoring of God and the love of one’s neighbor—“Thou shalt love the Lord thy God... and love thy neighbor” (Lk. 10:27)—has now altered or nullified familial bonds and destroyed the affection found within family ties? Should we believe that He commanded the severing of the dearest connections? He Himself embodies our peace, having united both into one (Eph. 2:14)! How can He say, “My peace I give unto you, my peace I leave unto you” (John 14:27), if His purpose was to shatter kinship and separate parents from their children, and children from their parents? And cursed is he who does not honor his father (Deut. 27:16). Is it really righteous to forsake those bonds?

Yet if we keep in mind that honoring God is paramount, followed by love for relatives, we shall find it easier to address this matter. It is essential to prioritize divine matters over human affairs! We must honor our parents, but even more so the Creator of our parents; we owe our gratitude to Him for our parents! If they do not acknowledge the Father, how can we honor them? Thus, the Lord instructs us to prioritize God over all, yet He does not command us to abandon our relatives. In another passage, we find: “Whoever loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me” (Matt. 10:37). We are not prohibited from loving our parents, but we are warned against placing them above God. Our relatives are a gift from the Lord, and we cannot cherish a blessing from God more than God Himself. Even those who understand this statement literally but with good intentions are not devoid of a righteous interpretation.

However, there is cause to seek a deeper understanding, for the Lord has added: “From now on five in one house shall be divided, three against two, and two against three” (Luke 12:52). Who are these five? The passage continues to discuss the relationships of six individuals: father and son, mother and daughter, mother-in-law and daughter-in-law. The mother can also refer to a mother-in-law: a mother to her son is a mother-in-law to his wife, indicating that the number carries significance even in its literal interpretation. It is clear that faith transcends natural ties, as it binds free persons who were once enslaved by familial ties.

It is fitting to explore the hidden meaning of these words. One house symbolizes one individual, for each person is a dwelling place, either of God or of the devil. Thus, a spiritual house is a spiritually renewed individual, as affirmed in Peter’s letter: “And you yourselves, as living stones, are being built up as a spiritual house, a holy priesthood” (1 Pet. 2:5). This house faces division, as indicated by the numbers: two against three and three against two. Notably, we find that “two” often represents soul and body in Scripture. When these two are in harmony on earth, they form one unified entity. In another context, it is stated: “I discipline my body and bring it into subjection” (1 Cor. 9:27); here, one serves while the other obeys.

Once we discern who these two are, we may learn the meaning of “three,” which can be easily deduced from the two. Within the body reside the three faculties of the soul: the rational, the desiring, and the spirited, or λογιστικόν, πιθυμητικόν, θυμικόν. The separation is not merely two against two, but rather two against three and three against two, as, with the coming of Christ, the irrational individual became rational. Previously, we were akin to beasts, devoid of reason, and steeped in mortality. The Son of God came, filled our hearts with His Spirit, and we were reborn as spiritual children.

We might consider that five additional elements dwell within this house: smell, touch, taste, sight, and hearing. If we were to separate sight from hearing, we would eliminate the excessive pleasures of the body that arise from taste, smell, and touch, leading to the division of two against three. The soul does not usually find itself ensnared by vices but, in its pursuit of virtue, retreats from temptations and indulgences. Therefore, the senses do not reach a harmony that would lead to sin, but rather their divisions keep the desires of the heart distinct from the obligations of virtue. If we take the five as the five bodily senses, then any corporeal vices and iniquities are rendered distinct. Perhaps the rich man depicted in the Gospel, drowning in excess, identifies these five as his brothers when he suffers in the netherworld: he calls upon them to abandon earthly pleasures so that virtuous efforts may be rewarded with peace in the next life.

We can understand the situation in this way: the flesh and soul coexist within one house, separated from the pleasures of smell, touch, and taste—which tempt into indulgence—yet divided against encroaching vices. Both the flesh and soul are subject to God’s law and exist apart from the law of sin. Following the fall of the first man into transgression, the discord between flesh and spirit became ingrained in nature; they began to diverge in the pursuit of virtue. But the Lord’s Cross reconciled them in unity, abolishing hostility and the law of commandments when Christ descended from the heavens. Christ, our peace, who united both, tore down the wall that divided them, nullifying enmity through His flesh and the law through His teachings, so that from the two, He might create one new being in Himself, making peace and reconciling both with God through one body (Eph. 2:14-16). Who, then, are these two but the outer and inner man? The one speaks of the power of the soul, the other the bodily senses. They unite in a combined effort when the flesh, yielding to the superior force, complies with the life-giving commands—not due to a resemblance in nature between flesh and spirit, but because the flesh, having discarded the allure and corruption of vice, embarks on the path of spiritual renewal with a readiness to comply, no longer resisting the spirit’s law. Through the law of the Spirit and the Spirit of life, liberated from the law of sin, the flesh becomes united with the soul, serving virtue rather than being a refuge for vice.

The soul no longer indulges in bodily temptations nor submits to carnal pleasures; rather, the mind—pure and free from worldly service—draws the senses toward heavenly delights. Engaged in reflection or reading, the mind rejoices, recognizing a flourishing of virtues, and, free from hunger, attains satisfaction through spiritual sustenance from within. The mind nourishes the soul with sweet and glorious knowledge, transforming bodily impulses into an ornament of creation rather than allowing them to become a mockery. What was once a playground for desires becomes a temple of God, as seen in 1 Corinthians 6:19, while the domain of vice transforms into a sanctum of virtue. This transformation occurs only when the flesh, returning to its rightful nature, acknowledges the soul as its source of strength, shedding its pride and yielding to the soul’s governance. Such was the flesh before it succumbed to the venom of the malicious serpent, forgetting the holy constitutions embedded in the soul’s consciousness.

The origin of sin stems from this struggle; body and soul birthed it together. When the body was tested, the soul, having lost its reason, shared in its suffering. Had the soul curtailed the flesh's desires, the formative sin could have been extinguished immediately! Yet, the soul, as if accepting the tumor introduced by the flesh, succumbed to its influence and, regrettably, birthed passions that the body and soul once shared.

When the soul returns to self-awareness, reflecting upon its unruly progeny, it rejects its illicit offspring, discarding its debauchery and beginning to loathe sin. In a similar manner, the body, wearied by its heavy burdens and the toll of unrighteousness, as soon as it feels the sting of passion’s thorns, rushes to cast aside its old self, ensuring that the unfit offspring does not lead the negligent progenitor to ruin. The fierce assault of desires drags the flesh toward the allure of pleasures, binding it to vice, compelling it to dwell in indulgence. Pleasure, akin to the daughter-in-law of flesh and spirit, forges an unsanctioned union with the impulse of corrupt passion.

So long as the unbroken harmony of vices persisted within one dwelling, there appeared no division. However, when Christ ignited a blaze upon the earth, cleansing the offenses of the flesh, and the sword—symbolizing potent action—penetrated into the innermost depths of spirit and intellect, renewing both flesh and soul through regeneration’s ordinances, they shifted from their former state into something entirely new. They severed ties with their once-loved vices, separating from the perverse progeny: parents turned against children as the body surrenders its excesses and the soul renounces sin, leaving no space for foreign enticements.

Children become alienated from their parents due to the stale vices that reject the wise judgment of the renewed individual, as pleasure, like a rebellious offspring, evades the discipline of virtuous obedience often enforced in a respectable household. This can also be interpreted such that children distance themselves from their parents, seeking to surpass them, in line with the Lord’s assertion: “If anyone comes to Me and does not hate his father, mother, children, brothers, sisters, and even his own life, he cannot be My disciple” (Luke 14:26). Let us understand this as an admonition: a son devoted to Christ takes precedence over his non-believing parents because honoring God surpasses familial ties.

On a deeper level, sin emerges from the flesh and operates as if conceived in its very womb, as the apostle reveals: “If I do what I do not want, it is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells within me” (Rom. 7:20). Since the blood of the Lord was shed for the well-being of the world, extinguishing sin's power, it has become feasible for us to shift from transgression to grace, as “where sin increased, grace abounded all the more” (Rom. 5:20). It is evident that repentance born of sin prompts a change in purpose and an awakening of the desire for spiritual grace. What once led to my demise shall now guide me to salvation (Rom. 7:10). Sin, cleansed by pure water from the source of grace, is severed from the flesh that originally birthed it, and since everyone seeks to make amends for sin, a longing for proper instruction arises from the burden of transgressions.

The Word of God transmutes the appetite for evil actions and the fierce onslaught of passions into a craving for divine affection. This same nature reflects an altered disposition, whereby both soul and body absorb a more splendid teaching—the teaching of heavenly mysteries. The spirit feeds on understanding and, uplifted by the promise of what lies ahead, turns away from the past behaviors of the soul. The spiritual individual does not grasp that which pertains to the Spirit of God, for he considers it folly; but the spiritual one comprehends all things, and no one is able to pass judgment upon him (1 Cor. 2:14-15).

Love for God and love for humanity Despite the expectation to apply spiritual discernment throughout the Gospel, it is here—so that the simplicity of the explanation does not cause offense—that the strict ensemble of conclusions should be enveloped in spiritual profundity.

Read the full text in the app

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

This situation lacks a historical rationale and must be approached from a spiritual perspective. The term "house" refers to the believer’s soul, while the "five" signify its five faculties: mind, intellect, reason, imagination, and sensation. Before the advent of faith, these faculties were unified, aligning with the pursuit of pleasure. However, following Christ's arrival, they became fragmented; specifically, the three rational faculties—mind, intellect, and reason—are in opposition to the two irrational faculties of imagination and sensation, creating conflict in matters of desire. Conversely, the two irrational faculties contend with the three rational ones regarding the state of being free from passion until the word of God liberates from this initial irrationality.

Read more (260 words)

Additionally, considering that humankind possesses both the five faculties of the soul and the five senses of the body—sight, hearing, smell, taste, and touch—we can liken this "house" to humanity. Within it, a division emerges: the three rational faculties of the soul stand against the two irrational ones, while the two most significant senses of the body, sight and hearing, oppose the other three, striving to conquer them.

It raises a question: Why mention five yet imply six? Although there are three pairs, the mention of five suggests something profound, and the six serve as an illustrative tool. This portrayal signifies the irreconcilable nature of those united by familial bonds. Essentially, reconciliation is unattainable among any five individuals—two people and three objects, or three individuals and two objects—when conflicts arise over the matters at hand, as one would have to divide either an object between three individuals or objects between two, which none may permit.

Similarly, individuals connected by blood ties or kinship will find division if they cannot agree on matters of faith. As the Scripture states, “There will be,” He says, “two against three,” indicating a scenario where two dispute over three issues, or vice versa, three contend about two. The examples provided include the closest relationships which faith can sever, illustrated by pairs linked through blood and those bound by marital ties.

The relational dynamics explored include two entities across three pairs—such as father and son, mother and daughter, and mother-in-law and daughter-in-law—each representing potential discord among three and two pairs of individuals, signaling dissolution and alienation.

Tichon of Zadonsk

18th centuryChurch Father

What connection exists between light and darkness, sweetness and bitterness, purity and impurity, or straightness and crookedness? Do not pursue an illusion of peace and harmony between a wicked wife and a righteous husband, or between a virtuous wife and a sinful husband; between a malevolent mother-in-law and a good-natured daughter-in-law, or vice versa; between an evil brother and a righteous brother, or between an unvirtuous sister and a good sister; between a wicked neighbor and a righteous neighbor, or between any person of evil and any person of good. There has never been, nor will there ever be, true peace and harmony among them. The Lord proclaims: ‘Do you think that I have come to give peace to the earth?

Read more (79 words)

No, I say to you, but division; for henceforth five in one house shall be divided, three against two, and two against three: father against son, and son against father; mother against daughter, and daughter against mother; mother-in-law against her daughter-in-law, and daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law’ (Luke 12:51-53). They shall undoubtedly find themselves in conflict, as some will follow Christ—the Light—while others cling to darkness; some will aspire to heavenly pursuits, while others will be preoccupied with worldly matters.

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryCommentator

To heighten His disciples' awareness of their unique mission, He focuses their minds on the reason for His arrival and the fervor with which He dedicates Himself to it. He emphasizes the essential nature of the struggle, a severe and passionate conflict that He had only subtly alluded to in the past.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryCommentator

All commentators interpret the figurative expression concerning baptism as referring to the sufferings that Jesus Christ endured for the salvation of humanity. Christ's passion is understood in light of His purpose for redeeming the world. However, interpretations of the saying about fire diverge: some scholars perceive fire as a symbol of purification and interpret it as a foreshadowing of Christ’s bestowal of the Holy Spirit upon the faithful. This leads to a connection with the subsequent declaration: I have come to bring fire to the earth, and how I wish it were already kindled! Yet, I must undergo a baptism first. In a similar vein, those who place their faith in Me will face challenges in this life, including hostility even from their nearest family members. Other scholars view fire as a representation of enmity and conflict among people, with verses 51-53 serving as a direct elaboration of this theme. The significance of these latter verses aligns with the message found in Matthew 10:34-36.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

Anticipating the hostility that would emerge from steadfast Gentiles toward those who embraced the new faith, and understanding that within the same households, some would accept the Apostolic message while others might revert to pagan beliefs, Christ foresaw a profound animosity so intense that familial bonds would be unable to withstand it. He foretold that a brother, a witness to the new faith, would be betrayed to oppressors by his Gentile sibling, and a son would turn against his father; that Gentile offspring would even resort to killing their parents.

Read more (309 words)

In this context, Christ declared: ‘Think not that I am come to bring peace on earth; I am not come to bring peace, but a sword; for I am come to divide a man from his father, and a daughter from her mother, and a daughter-in-law from her mother-in-law. And a man's enemies are his household’ (Matthew 10:34-36); and ‘a brother will betray his brother to death, and a father his son; and the children will rise up against their parents and kill them. And you will be hated by all for My name's sake; but do not be afraid of this, and do not stop your preaching activity because of it; know that only he who endures all things to the end of his life will be saved.’

To confess Christ requires a love for Him that surpasses all other attachments, even those to one’s father and mother, always placing His will—revealed in His commandments—above all others. ‘Honor and love your parents, provide for them in their old age, obey them; yet if they pressure you to violate My commandments, resist their directives! If your affection for your father leads you to abandon My commandments in order to demonstrate your love for him over Me, you are not worthy of Me. Likewise, if you find yourself unable to withstand the trials and afflictions that God permits, and do not take up your cross to follow Me, you are not worthy of Me.' Moreover, truth, akin to light, creates division among people: some are drawn toward the light, while others choose to remain in darkness. Hence, the term sword should not be understood literally. Just as the might of the sword can sever the closest relationships, so too can disagreements lead to division, strife, and bitterness. The Apostles' proclamation of the risen Christ instigated significant discord within numerous families.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryCommentator

They are dispatched to a realm filled with conflict and hostility, which will intensify due to the world's disdain for them. Even those whom they hold closest may oppose them in alignment with worldly values. However, individuals who aspire to genuinely follow Christ must relinquish all for His sake, embrace their cross, and walk in His footsteps.

Paul Matwejewski

19th centuryCommentator

After emphasizing the serious nature of their mission, the Lord illustrated the profound lesson of self-giving love that He was about to impart. He forewarned His disciples of the inevitable transformations between the old ways and the new that would arise as the Gospel was proclaimed. The apostles, who were the most devoted companions of Jesus, the Author and Finisher of faith, must prepare themselves for the harsh reality that their journey would not initially be marked by glory and victory but rather by arduous toil, intense struggle, and deep suffering. The Lord proclaimed, "I came to bring fire to the earth, and what do I want, if it has already burst into flames?" According to St.

Read more (451 words)

Philaret of Moscow, this fire symbolizes not destruction but rejuvenation—a celestial fire igniting the inner hearts of mankind. In the words of St. Ephrem the Syrian, it is “an immaterial and Divine fire, enlightening and testing souls like pure gold in a furnace, and consuming vice as easily as it does thorns and straw.” This divine fire that Christ aimed to kindle in human hearts later manifested powerfully in the apostles as they spoke in tongues of flames to those gathered (Acts 2:3). It burned brightly within the God-Man Himself, as He expressed deep longing for His forthcoming trials: “But I have a baptism to be baptized with; and how am I straitened till it be accomplished?” This baptism of suffering was necessary for the fulfillment of God's justice and the redemption of humanity (Matt. 20:22), as He anticipated it with the yearning of His human heart (John 12:27; Matt. 26:38-39).

Lifting the veil on the future, the Lord asked the disciples, “Do you think that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division”—which He elsewhere referred to as a sword (Mt 10:34). St. John Chrysostom pointed out that the Lord wished to prepare them for hard truths so that they would not falter under pressure. He stated that within a single household, tensions would arise—where five will be divided: three against two and two against three; a father will be against his son and a son against his father, a mother against her daughter and a daughter against her mother, a mother-in-law against her daughter-in-law and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law. This is how familial bonds may turn adversarial.

Turning to the crowd, the Lord reminded them that His visitation would possess distinct signs that many overlooked, despite their ability to read the weather: “When you see a cloud rising in the west, say, ‘There comes a shower’; and when the south wind blows, say, ‘There will be heat’; for it will be so.” He rebuked the hypocrites for their keen ability to interpret the signs of nature while neglecting the spiritual signs around them. The present moment is crucial for those who ignore it, as they will face a more stringent judgment than any earthly court. The Lord then posed a profound question: “Why do you not judge for yourselves what is right? When you go with your adversary to the magistrate, make an effort to settle with him on the way, lest he drag you to the judge, and the judge hand you over to the officer, and the officer throw you into prison; I tell you, you will not depart from there until you have paid the very last mite.”

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 17 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. ἔσονται
    esontai
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί
  2. γὰρ
    gar
    for
    G1063 · γάρ
  3. ἀπὸ
    apo
    from
    G575 · ἀπό
  4. τοῦ
    tou
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  5. νῦν
    nyn
    now
    G3568 · νῦν
  6. πέντε
    pente
    five
    G4002 · πέντε
  7. ἐν
    en
    in
    G1722 · ἐν
  8. ἑνὶ
    heni
    one
    G1520 · εἷς
  9. οἴκῳ
    oikō
    a house
    G3624 · οἶκος
  10. διαμεμερισμένοι
    diamemerismenoi
    I divide up into parts
    G1266 · διαμερίζω
  11. τρεῖς
    treis
    three
    G5140 · τρεῖς, τρία
  12. ἐπὶ
    epi
    on
    G1909 · ἐπί
  13. δυσὶν
    dysin
    two
    G1417 · δύο
  14. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  15. δύο
    dyo
    two
    G1417 · δύο
  16. ἐπὶ
    epi
    on
    G1909 · ἐπί
  17. τρισίν
    trisin
    three
    G5140 · τρεῖς, τρία