The Church Fathers on this verse

Luke 22:38Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

But they said: Lord, behold, here are two swords. And he said to them: It is enough.

Douay-Rheims

οι δε ειπον κυριε ιδου μαχαιραι ωδε δυο ο δε ειπεν αυτοις ικανον εστιν

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

15 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 22 commentaries

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Now as one who teaches to swim, at first indeed placing his hands under his pupils, carefully supports them, but afterward frequently withdrawing his hand, bids them help themselves, nay even lets them sink a little; so likewise did Christ deal with His disciples. At the beginning truly He was present to them, giving them most richly abundance of all things; as it follows, And they said unto them, Nothing. But when it was necessary for them to shew their own strength, He withdrew from them for a little His grace, bidding them do something of themselves; as it follows, But now he that hath a purse, that is, wherein to carry money, let him take it, and likewise his scrip, that is, to carry provisions in.

Read more (165 words)

And truly when they had neither shoes, nor girdle, nor staff, nor money, they never suffered the want of any thing. But when He allowed them purse and scrip, they seem to suffer hunger, and thirst, and nakedness. As if He said to them, Hitherto all things have been most richly supplied to you, but now I would have you also experience poverty, therefore I hold you no longer to the former rule, but I command you to get purse and scrip. Now God might even to the end have kept them in plenty, but for many reasons He was unwilling to do so. First that they might impute nothing to themselves, but acknowledge that every thing flowed from God; secondly, that they might learn moderation; thirdly, that they might not think too highly of themselves. For this cause while He permitted them to fall into many unlooked for evils, He relaxed the rigour of the former law, lest it should become grievous and intolerable.

What is, this? He who said, If any one strike you on the right cheek, turn unto him the other also, (Matt. 5:39.) now arms His disciples, and with a sword only. For if it were fitting to be completely armed, not only must a man possess a sword, but shield and helmet. But even though a thousand had arms of this kind, how could the eleven be prepared for all the attacks and lying in wait of people, tyrants, allies, and nations, and how should they not quake at the mere sight of armed men, who had been brought up near lakes and rivers? We must not then suppose that He ordered them to possess swords, but by the swords He points at the secret attack of the Jews. And hence it follows, For I say unto you, that this that is written must be accomplished in me: And he was numbered with the transgressors. (Isa. 53:12.)

And in truth, if He wished them to use human aid, not a hundred swords would have sufficed; but if He willed not the assistance of man, even two are superfluous.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

While they were contending among themselves above concerning priority, He saith, It is not a time of dignities, but rather of danger and slaughter. Behold I even your Master am led to a disgraceful death, to be reckoned with the transgressors. For these things which are prophesied of Me have an end, that is, a fulfilment. Wishing then to hint at a violent attack, He made mention of a sword, not altogether revealing it, lest they should be seized with dismay, nor did He entirely provide that they should not be shaken by these sudden attacks, but that afterwards recovering, they might marvel how He gave Himself up to the Passion, a ransom for the salvation of men.

Or He hereby foretels to them that they would incur hunger and thirst, which He implies by the scrip, and sundry kinds of misery, which he intends by the sword.

Our Lord then was unwilling to blame them as not understanding Him, but saying, It is enough, He dismissed them; as when we are addressing any one, and see that he does not understand what is said, we say, Well, let us leave him, lest we trouble him. But some say, that our Lord said, It is enough, ironically; as if He said, Since there are two swords, they will amply suffice against so large a multitude as is about to attack us.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

Our Lord had foretold to Peter that he should deny Him; namely, at the time of His being taken. But having once made mention of His being taken captive, He next announces the struggle that would ensue against the Jews. Hence it is said, And he said unto them, When I sent you without purse, &c.For the Saviour had sent the holy Apostles to preach in the cities and towns the kingdom of heaven, bidding them to take no thought of the things of the body, but to place their whole hope of salvation in Him.

Or else; When our Lord says, He who hath a purse, let him take it, likewise a scrip, His discourse He addressed to His disciples, but in reality He regards every individual Jew; as if He says, If any Jew is rich in resources, let him collect them together and fly. But if any one oppressed with extreme poverty applies himself to religion, let him also sell his cloak and buy a sword. For the terrible attack of battle shall overtake them, so that nothing shall suffice to resist it. He next lays open the cause of these evils, namely, that He suffered the penalty due to the wicked, being crucified with thieves. And when it shall have come at last to this, the word of dispensation will receive its end. But to the persecutors shall happen all that has been foretold by the Prophets.

Read more (49 words)

These things then God prophesied concerning what should befall the country of the Jews, but the disciples understood not the depth of His words, thinking they had need of swords against the coming attack of the traitor. Whence it follows; But they said, Lord, behold, here are two swords.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

By no inconsistency then of Him who commands, but by the reason of the dispensation, according to the diversity of times are commandments, counsels, or permissions changed.

Basil the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

Or the Lord does not bid them carry purse and scrip and buy a sword, but predicts that it should come to pass, that in truth the Apostles, forgetful of the time of the Passion, of the gifts and law of their Lord, would dare to take up the sword. For often does the Scripture make use of the imperative form of speech in the place of prophecy. Still in many books we do not find, Let him take, or buy, but, he will take, he will buy.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

“He who does not have a sword must procure one for himself,” He proclaimed this to illustrate the essence of humility. Observe that Simon possessed one of these swords, intending to express his fervor through it, but the Lord aimed to remind him of Scripture, “Whoever strikes you on the cheek” (cf. Matthew 5:39). In his passion, Simon had overlooked these teachings. He emphasized not only the necessity of restraint when one lacks such items but even more so when we possess them, similar to holding a sword in our hand. To clarify that His reference to swords was meant for moral guidance rather than incitement to violence, He added, “two are sufficient.” For if His intent were to advocate fighting, everyone would have been compelled to arm themselves.

Read more (178 words)

His words were directed at those among the Jews who craved warfare and bloodshed, reminiscent of the fervor displayed by James and John (Luke 9:54). Aware of the hidden wrath residing within them, He seized the moment to unveil their suppressed anger and expel it from their hearts. With His ministry in Judea coming to an end, He set His face toward Jerusalem, distancing Himself from those two with fiery spirits, much like the warning He issued to Judas Iscariot, stating, “Woe to that man” (Mark 14:21). Had Judas repented like Simon Peter and embraced the counsel offered, he too would have secured his rightful place and throne upon being liberated from his curse. From the Lord’s mention of swords, may they glean that He is conscious of the moment and hour of His forthcoming betrayal, prompting His disciples to embrace humility and revealing the violent nature of His adversaries. By the example of Christ willingly surrendering to death, His followers should be inspired to reflect His humility, while His foes are brought to light for their aggression.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

But He who forbids to strike, why does He order them to buy a sword? unless perchance that there may be a defence prepared, but no necessary retaliation; a seeming ability to be revenged, without the will. Hence it follows, And he who has not, (that is, a purse,) let him sell his garment, and buy a sword.

Or, because the law does not forbid to return a blow, perhaps He says to Peter, as he is offering the two swords, It is enough, as though it were lawful until the Gospel; in order that there may be in the law, the knowledge of justice; in the Gospel, perfection of goodness. There is also a spiritual sword, that you may sell your patrimony, and buy the word, by which the nakedness of the soul is clothed. There is also a sword of suffering, so that you may strip your body, and with the spoils of your sacrificed flesh purchase for yourself the sacred crown of martyrdom. Again it moves, seeing that the disciples put forward two swords, whether perhaps one is not of the Old Testament, the other of the New, whereby we are armed against the wiles of the devil. Therefore the Lord says, It is enough, because he wanted nothing who is fortified by the teaching of both Testaments.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

They inquired, “Lord, take note, we have two swords here.” Lacking comprehension of His earlier statement, “And whoever has no sword, let him sell his garment and buy one,” they referred to the two swords they used for sacrificing and portioning the lamb, seeking clarity on His intent. He replied, “It is sufficient.” This indicates that while He mentioned the necessity of acquiring swords, His intention was not for them to rely on them for self-defense. If that had been His purpose, why would He declare, “It is sufficient”? After all, even a hundred swords would be inadequate against such a large number of impending foes. Thus, by saying “it is sufficient,” He demonstrated that the use of swords was unwarranted.

Nilus of Sinai

5th centuryChurch Father

Peter promptly responds, indicating that they possessed two swords, which the Lord deemed adequate for their mission. However, as the Apostle points out, these swords serve as both a correction to the contrary and a source of encouragement for the believers. In his letter to Titus, he provides guidelines for teachers, stating, “That he may be able both to comfort in sound doctrine, and to reprove them that oppose” (Titus 1:9). Thus, he distinguishes between two types of the word: one intended for the faithful and the other for the adversaries; one delivers correction for falsehood, while the other affirms the truth. The depiction of the word as a sword is familiar to many, as Scripture reminds us, “The word of God is living and active, and sharper than any two-edged sword” (Hebrews 4:12).

Read more (1247 words)

This reveals the dual function of the word. Others might refer to the two swords as clarity and truth; when these are united in the word, they are adequate to conquer those who resist them. The high priest symbolically laid on the word upon his garments: the manifestation and the truth (Ex. 28:30) - the manifestation for the clarification of the assertion, and the truth for the denouncement of untruth. Therefore, when Peter used the sword to sever the ear of the high priest's servant, it appears to have been done both in mystery and in name. In the early days of their ministry, the Apostles adhered to what the Law prescribed, bringing forth those who professed love for the Law to the Door, that is, to Him who proclaimed, “I am the door” (John 10:7), and employed the teaching needle to convert the slave's ear into the freedom of obedience (Deuteronomy 15:17). However, when the Jews acknowledged their unworthiness of eternal life and it became essential to turn to the Gentiles, the Apostles effectively severed their ears through the Spirit’s proclamation, deeming them unworthy of the word of freedom due to their disobedience. Declaring, “It was necessary that the word of God should first have been spoken to you” (Acts 13:46), was akin to converting the slave's ear to freedom, while the assertion, “Seeing ye put it from you, and judge yourselves unworthy of everlasting life, lo, we turn to the Gentiles,” was as if to completely sever their hearing. Paul echoes this sentiment, saying to the Jews, “If ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing” (Galatians 5:2). To fall from grace parallels being cut off from the word of liberation. Likewise, the Lord invites, “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations” (Matthew 28:19), signifying the severing of the Jews’ ears and the opening of the Gentiles’ ears to obedience. The Old Testament Scriptures foretold this long before, clearly prophesying that the ears of the Jews would be cut off, while the Gentiles would receive them. Even Ezekiel proclaimed to the Jewish people, “Thy nostrils and thy ears shall be cut off” (Ezekiel 23:25) because they had not accepted the fragrance of Christ’s peace, analogous to the saying, “The fragrance of your good ointment is pleasant” (Song of Songs 1:3). Once the main sensors have been removed from them, they will fail to hear the voice of the Shepherd. Isaiah also speaks of the Church of the Gentiles, declaring, “The Lord God hath given me the tongue of the learned, that I should know how to speak a word in season to him that is weary” (Isaiah 50:4), thus the Lord bestowed an ear to the Gentile Church, while cutting off the ear of the Jewish Church. This is reflected in the actions of those who sold the robe and wielded the sword. Let us then examine ourselves, to see if we wear our robe righteously. Scripture notes that some are clothed by flattery, and others bind their garments with fear. Therefore, are we not, using flattery, allowing those in heresy, who ensnare the simple-minded, to don the garments of moral virtues, though they wear them insincerely, appearing as strangers, rather for the sake of maintaining favor, and transforming themselves under a guise of modesty which traps those unsuspecting souls in perdition? They may relinquish such garments under compulsion in the age to come; for they will not earn rewards for their toil but face punishment from God, who exacts vengeance upon those garbed in strange attire, as declared by the Prophet. Actions performed not for the good itself, but for ulterior motives, not only go unrewarded but also invite penalties, especially when they are crafted as a snare for the unwise. As vanity renders virtuous deeds worthless, stripping the laborer of eternal rewards, the transient accolades for burdensome tasks serve as a meager return for significant toil, being soon diminished. Similarly, manifesting a facade of piety for deception not only renders labor futile but also dangerous, deserving not just the loss of rewards but enduring and painful retribution. The Apostle admonishes some who have endured hardship in their labor, “Have you suffered so many things in vain?” (Galatians 3:4), where “in vain” signifies the loss of rewards, and “suffered” points to the expectation of torment. Yet, some ministers of the Church, who hypocritically emulate the faithful priests operating with integrity in the sanctuary, might themselves mirror this behavior. For while a veil (καταπέτασμα) differs from a covering (καταπέτασμα), the likeness in names disguises the distinction in meaning. The veil is displayed only for a time and necessity, preventing exposure to all, secured from right to left with no maintenance from above; conversely, the cover hangs down over the bindings fastened above. The latter symbolizes our undertaking virtues for the Lord, who perceives our secret actions, unveiling our deeds to Him who sees from above. Our Offering bears the cause of grief and is influenced by God’s approval, much like the veil that hangs downward. When performing acts of goodness, we act solemnly beneath this cover. But when we exhibit a façade of virtue while secretly engaging in vice, we risk projecting one image while harboring another, crafting a false appearance of honor obscuring our hidden shame, thereby misleading others into believing in our piety and virtue. Such deeds of virtue concealed in secrecy garner God’s praise, whereas those exposed await condemnation. Even if such corrupt attempts remain obscured here under a guise of piety, they will inevitably be unmasked in the age to come when their illusory glory fades and truth shines forth. Isaiah has declared, “The Lord will discover their secret parts” (Isaiah 3:18). Yet not all who practice goodness fall into the same category; some may pursue human acclaim while retaining true godliness. Therefore, let not the righteous be vilified due to the deceitful actions of others. For those who truly commit to virtue, whose deeds align with their vows, manifest the hidden truth in their visible actions, existing genuinely rather than merely appearing virtuous, deriving their worth from the One who scrutinizes the heart’s depths, rewarding based on one’s actions rather than the opinions of others. Yet, some misappropriate the genuine purpose, boasting as if their grasp of virtue stems solely from personal strength. It is indeed rare and incredibly challenging to uphold the weight of virtue without succumbing to pride, remaining humble, as one might say, leavenless; for the leavenless, even before fire, neither inflates nor loses its humble shape. The humble self-perception keeps one grounded, protecting against arrogance even while engaging in virtuous acts. Thus, the lawgiver advises them to maintain the fear of God, acting as a safeguard against unreasonable pride, serving as a holy guide in chastity. Such reminders reinforce the divine commandments, symbolizing this very principle: as the robe ignites the garment's journey, so the fear of the Lord initiates wisdom. Therefore, it must be sought at every height of virtue—since elevations often lead to deception—always reminding the soul to avoid pride, and teaching the brave that, while they may weave their own robe, it is God who bestows the wisdom to accomplish it, affirming that the true source of knowledge lies not in human effort but in divine grace. Thus, virtue becomes resplendent, being recognized as God’s handiwork, and its acquisition secured through a proper fear of the Lord, perpetually guarded by reverence toward Him. To Him be glory and dominion forever and ever. Amen!

John Moschus

6th centuryChurch Father

The elder shared with me his reflections on the significance of the Lord's instructions to His disciples: ‘He who has clothes, let him sell them and buy a knife.’ The disciples responded, ‘Here are two knives.’ I reflected deeply and found myself unable to grasp the essence of these words. Despite the blaring heat of the midday sun, I ventured from my cell to the Lavra of the Towers to seek counsel from Abba Theophilus. As I traversed the desert close to Calamon, a gigantic serpent caught my eye as it descended the mountain toward Calamon. Its size was so immense that it appeared to form a sort of archway in its movement, and I passed safely beneath this arch. I realized that the adversary sought to diminish my fervor, yet I was fortified by the elder's prayers. Upon reaching Abba Theophilus, I inquired about the meaning behind the Scriptural passage. He responded, ‘The two knives represent two virtues: contemplation and good deeds. He who possesses both achieves perfection.’

Beda Venerabilis

8th centuryChurch Father

For He does not train His disciples in the same rule of life, in time of persecution, as in the time of peace. When He sent them to preach, He ordered them to take nothing in the way, ordaining in truth, that He who preaches the Gospel should live by the Gospel. But when the crisis of death was at hand, and the whole nation persecuted both the shepherd and the flock, He proposes a law adapted to the time, allowing them to take the necessaries of life, until the rage of the persecutors was abated, and the time of preaching the Gospel had returned. Herein He leaves us also an example, that at times when a just reason urges, we may intermit without blame somewhat of the strictness of our determination.

Or the two swords suffice for a testimony that Jesus suffered voluntarily. The one indeed was to teach the Apostles the presumption of their contending for their Lord, and His inherent virtue of healing; the other never taken out of its sheath, to shew that they were not even permitted to do all that they could for His defence.

Philaret (Gumilevski)

19th centuryChurch Father

The phrase "enough to eat" is often used in Eastern cultures to indicate dissatisfaction with another's words (Deuteronomy 3:26). The disciples of Jesus did not grasp His message with sufficient clarity. While He spoke of trials and endurance, of affliction and prayer, they believed that physical weapons were necessary for protection. "Enough is enough," declares He who comprehended not only the plight of His feeble fishermen but also the historical impact of Peter's sword in Rome. Lord, help us recognize our vulnerabilities and our sins so that we may humbly seek and receive Your mighty grace. Amen.

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryCommentator

Indeed, this is a significant moment. When I sent you forth without provisions—a bag, money, or shoes—did you find yourselves in need of anything? Now, however, any of you who has a bag should take it, and likewise, a purse for your supplies, which were previously abundant. Those who lack should sell their garments to acquire a sword. The Lord wasn’t indicating a shift in their methods but rather illustrating a change in societal attitudes towards the disciples. Previously, they received generous support from those they preached to, but now they would need to secure their own clothing and sustenance, even concern for their livelihoods. This shift stemmed from the fact that many no longer recognized Him as the Messiah, but instead viewed Him as a transgressor.

Read more (65 words)

The Lord remarked, I tell you, this Scripture must be fulfilled in Me: I am counted among the transgressors. The prophecies concerning Me are reaching their culmination. The disciples struggled to comprehend this profound message, prompting the Savior to pause. He chose a different approach to ready His disciples for the forthcoming trials and to ensure they were adequately positioned to withstand the impending tests.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

The apostles were perplexed by His words, believing that Jesus was instructing them to take up swords. They innocently replied, "Lord, here are two swords." Recognizing their lack of understanding, Jesus, wishing to clarify His message in their next discussion, paused and gently told them, "That is sufficient."

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryCommentator

The phrase "Here are two swords" indicates that the Galileans often traveled with weapons for their protection against dangers such as wild animals and thieves, as their journeys frequently led them through perilous regions, particularly the wilderness near Jericho (cf. Lk. 10:30ff.). On this occasion, the Apostles possessed two swords; Peter held one of them (Luke 22:40-42). The disciples were still grappling with their understanding, confused enough to misconstrue the Lord's message about their preparedness for future challenges and struggles, interpreting his words literally as a reference to actual swords.

Read more (151 words)

Alarmed by the looming threat to their Master’s life, they mistakenly believed He was instructing them to defend Him with those swords, proudly claiming they had them for His protection. These “two swords” stood against the hostility of Jerusalem's adversaries who slandered Him, as well as the forces of Satan and hell itself.

If one were to envision the expression on the divine face of the Savior during these solemn moments, it might resemble a gentle and loving smile in response to the disciples’ declaration about their intention to protect Him with mere knives. The Lord’s reply, "Enough," resonates with a sense of understanding that he is not being comprehended, prompting him to deem further discussion unnecessary. Without revealing their lack of understanding, He concludes the conversation with a simple assertion: "enough," signaling that the matter at hand is not what they presume; the topic is beyond their grasp (cf. Theophilus).

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 14 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Οἱ
    hoi
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  2. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  3. εἶπαν
    eipan
    to say
    G2036 · ἔπω, ἐρῶ, εἶπον
  4. Κύριε
    kyrie
    lord
    G2962 · κύριος
  5. ἰδοὺ
    idou
    See! Lo! Behold! Look!
    G2400 · ἰδού
  6. μάχαιραι
    machairai
    a sword
    G3162 · μάχαιρα
  7. ὧδε
    hōde
    here
    G5602 · ὧδε
  8. δύο
    dyo
    two
    G1417 · δύο
  9. Ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  10. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  11. εἶπεν
    eipen
    to say
    G2036 · ἔπω, ἐρῶ, εἶπον
  12. αὐτοῖς
    autois
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  13. Ἱκανόν
    hikanon
    sufficient
    G2425 · ἱκανός
  14. ἐστιν
    estin
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί