The Church Fathers on this verse

Luke 6:16Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And Jude the brother of James, and Judas Iscariot, who was the traitor.

Douay-Rheims

ιουδαν ιακωβου και ιουδαν ισκαριωτην ος και εγενετο προδοτης

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

11 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 17 commentaries

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Rise then thou also at night time. The soul is then purer, the very darkness and great silence are in themselves enough to lead us to sorrow for our sins. But if thou lookest upon the heaven itself studded with stars as with unnumbered eyes, if thou thinkest that they who wanton and do unjustly in day time are then nothing different from the dead, thou wilt loathe all human undertakings. All these things serve to raise the mind. Vain-glory then disquiets not, no tumult of passion has the mastery; fire does not so destroy the rust of iron as nightly prayer the blight of sin. He whom the heat of the sun has fevered by day is refreshed by the dew; nightly tears are better than any dew, and are proof against desire and fear.

Read more (48 words)

But if a man is not cherished by the dew we speak of, he withers in the day. Wherefore although thou prayest not much at night, pray once with watching, and it is enough; shew that the night belongs not only to the body, but to the soul.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

Let us examine then in the actions which Jesus did, how He teaches us to be instant in prayer to God, going apart by ourselves, and in secret, no one seeing us; putting aside also our worldly cares, that the mind may be raised up to the height of divine contemplation; and this we have marked in the fact, that Jesus went in to a mountain apart to pray.

But mark the great carefulness of the Evangelist. He not only says that the holy Apostles were chosen, but he enumerates them by name, that no one should dare to insert any others in the catalogue; Simon, whom he also called Peter, and Andrew his brother.

But if we may learn the interpretation of the Apostles’ names, know that Peter means, “loosening or knowing;” Andrew, “glorious power,” or “answering;” but James, “apostle of grief;” John, “the grace of the Lord;” Matthew, “given;” Philip, “large mouth,” or the “orifice of a torch;” Bartholomew, “the son of him who lets down water;” Thomas, “deep or twin;” James the son of Alphæus, “supplanter of the step of life;” Judas, “confession;” Simon, “obedience.”

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

With respect to the name of Judas the brother of James, Luke seems to differ from Matthew, who calls him Thaddæus. But what prevented a man from being called by two or three names? Judas the traitor is chosen, not unwittingly but knowingly, for Christ had indeed taken to Himself the weakness of man, and therefore refused not even this share of human infirmity. He was willing to be betrayed by His own Apostle, that thou when betrayed by thy friend mayest bear calmly thy mistaken judgment, thy kindness thrown away.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

Let not thy ears be open to deceit, that thou shouldest think that the Son of God prays from want of strength, that He may obtain what He could not perform; for being Himself the Author of power, the Master of obedience, He leads us by His own example to the precepts of virtue.

Every where also He prays alone, for human wishes comprehend not the wisdom of God; and no one can be a partaker of the secrets of Christ. But not every one who prays ascends a mountain, he only who prays advancing from earthly things to higher, who is not anxious for the riches or honours of the world. All whose minds are raised above the world ascend the mountain. In the Gospel therefore you will find, that the disciples alone ascend the mountain with the Lord. But thou, O Christian, hast now the character given, the form prescribed which thou shouldest imitate; as it follows, And he continued all night in prayer to God. For what oughtest thou to do for thy salvation, when Christ continues all night in prayer for thee?

But what does it become thee to do when thou wouldest commence any work of piety, when Christ, about to send out His disciples, first prayed? for it follows, And when it was day, he called his disciples, &c. whom truly He destined to be the means of spreading the salvation of man through the world. Turn thy eyes also to the heavenly council. Not the wise men, not the rich, not the noble, but He chose to send out fishermen and publicans, that they might not seem to turn men to their grace by riches or by the influence of power and rank, and that the force of truth, not the graces of oratory, might prevail.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

In the Gospel of Matthew, chapter nineteen, the sequence of the names of the apostles is presented, stating: 'But the names of the twelve apostles are these.'

Eusebius of Caesarea

4th centuryChurch Father

The two next are James and John, as it follows, James and John, both indeed sons of Zebedee, who were also fishermen. After them he mentions Philip and Bartholomew. John says Philip was of Bethsaida, of the city of Andrew and Peter. Bartholomew was a simple man, devoid of all worldly knowledge and guile. But Matthew was called from those who used to collect taxes; concerning whom he adds Matthew and Thomas.

Beda Venerabilis

8th centuryChurch Father

He not only surnamed Peter first, but long before this, when he was brought by Andrew, it is said, Thou shall be called Cephas, which is by interpretation, a stone (John 1:42.). But Luke, wishing to mention the names of the disciples, since it was necessary to call him Peter, wished shortly to imply that this was not his name before, but the Lord had given it to him.

Matthew places himself after his fellow-disciple Thomas, from humility, whereas by the other Evangelists he is put before him. It follows, James the son of Alphæus, and Simon who is called Zelotes.

But in a mystical sense the mountain on which our Lord chose His disciples represents the loftiness of justice in which they were to be instructed, and which they were to preach to others; so also the law was given on a mountain.

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryCommentator

During this time, it became increasingly essential for the Lord to distinguish a select group from His multitude of followers. This was necessary to amplify His mission through them and to adequately prepare them for future ministry. While on one hand, He enjoyed growing popularity among the people, on the other, the animosity of His adversaries also intensified. This hostility, permitted by Divine foresight, remained within the bounds set for them and never intruded upon the Divine liberty of our Savior to sacrifice Himself out of pure love for humanity, independent of any external compulsion. Yet, in accordance with the Divine plan, their actions were destined to bear fruit in a relatively short time.

Read more (207 words)

To avoid escalating tensions with the Pharisees, the Lord sought to forge a deeper bond with a few of His disciples. Accordingly, He chose to withdraw to a quiet mountain for prayer one evening. We can only speculate about the content of His prayer at that moment. It is conceivable that as the Divine Intercessor was laying the groundwork for the establishment of the New Testament Church, He sought His Father's blessing upon this endeavor, requesting fortitude against the forces of darkness (and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it; I saw Satan fall from heaven; this Satan implores that I may sift you like wheat, and I pray for you, Simon). The Son of Man perhaps asked His heavenly Father to strengthen Him for the final trial that awaited Him, as He was to bring near Judas Iscariot, through the Father's will and pleasure, and from then on, be confronted with the tool of His impending death. The following morning, He summoned His disciples to the mountain and selected twelve to remain with Him, enabling them to bear witness to all they experienced firsthand (Mk. 3:14). These chosen few effectively represented the leaders of the anticipated twelve tribes of the new Israel (Rev. 21:14).

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryCommentator

After recounting the incidents of the second-first Sabbath and the one that followed, Luke does not suggest a marked shift in the locale of Christ's ministry. Nonetheless, according to the Gospel of Mark, the first occurrence thereafter is the selection of the twelve apostles. The Gospel of Matthew does not mention this event but merely provides a list of the apostles' names when they were commissioned to spread the message, implying that their selection had already been noted. Neither Mark nor Luke establishes a chronological link between this event and the previous one. Luke informs us that prior to this event, the Lord dedicated the entire night to prayer.

Read more (202 words)

These twelve disciples were chosen to be Christ's closest associates during His earthly ministry and to carry on His mission after His ascension. As a result, from this moment, He drew them near, forming a single community and family of which He was the head. The names of the apostles align with those provided by the evangelists, differing only slightly in the sequence. Mark, when naming James and John, notes that Christ called them "Boanerges," meaning sons of Thunder. It is possible that this designation for the sons of Zebedee as "sons of Thunder" did not occur at this time but rather during an incident that showcased the passionate nature of these apostles, perhaps in reference to Luke 9:54. Similarly, Mark mentions that Christ named Simon as Peter, though this occurred earlier, as noted in John 1:42. Some of the apostles listed by the evangelists were already known from their early encounters with Jesus (John 1:37 ff.) and their calls to discipleship (Matthew 4:18 ff., 9:9 ff., and parallel passages), such as Peter and Andrew, James and John, Philip and Nathanael (or Bartholomew), as well as Matthew the tax collector. The accounts related to the calling of the other apostles remain unknown.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryCommentator

Judas, the brother of James, was a man of determination, as evident in his inquiry to the Savior: "Lord, what is this, that Thou wilt manifest Thyself to us, and not to the world?" This question conveyed a confusion that was shared by the other apostles regarding the true nature of Christ’s kingdom. He seemed to believe that the Messiah, as a temporal leader, ought to reveal Himself to the world through some remarkable display of His power and dominion, indicating that he, like Salome, the mother of Zebedee's sons, viewed the kingdom in a more worldly manner. In contrast to the other Judas (John 14:22), he was called Levi or Thaddeus, which translates to a brave and earnest man; both names reflect this meaning—Levi from the Hebrew word for heart, and Thaddeus from a word meaning breast.

Read more (920 words)

This apostle was primarily known by his nickname to prevent any association with the infamous Judas who betrayed Christ.

The final apostle in the list was Judas Iscariot, whose name casts a shadow over the narrative of the Gospel. Identified as "a man from Kerioth," a town in the tribe of Judah (Joshua 15:25), his name has been interpreted in various ways. Commonly, it is thought to comprise the words "ish" meaning man and "Kerioth," but some scholars suggest that it might also denote something like "man with a leather belt," signifying his role in handling the treasury. Should this title have been ascribed to him posthumously, other interpretations may apply, referencing attributes such as "man of blows" or "man of lies." Everything points to him as a figure overwhelmingly consumed by self-interest. Often, such selfishness is accompanied by a deceptive openness towards those perceived as offering potential gain. It is likely that Judas was drawn to Christ due to the fervor with which others welcomed Him, anticipating the establishment of the Messiah’s kingdom and all the marvelous benefits it would bestow upon the Jews. His fervor for the Messianic cause could have contributed to his selection among the twelve. It is even plausible that he initially harbored genuine belief in Christ as the Messiah, albeit in a materially driven sense common among the Jewish leaders. However, when his expectations were unmet, his self-serving nature overpowered his better inclinations, leading him to betrayal.

Although Christ knew of Judas’s malevolent heart, His choice to include him among the twelve was meant to bring him near to the very Source of goodness and to afford him opportunities for renewal and transformation. Yet, despite this supreme gift of mercy, Judas failed to embrace it. Ironically, his treachery inadvertently served the divine purpose of Christ. In his moments of despair following his betrayal, he bore reluctant witness to his Master. In stark contrast to the denials of even the chief apostles at a crucial juncture, when one declared, "I know not this man," Judas confessed to the authorities, "I have sinned by betraying innocent blood." Thus was formed the new assembly of Christ's closest followers and disciples, bestowed with the grave honor of being the heralds of the Gospel.

It is noteworthy that these individuals, chosen for such a monumental mission, were not remarkable figures by worldly standards, and historical accounts about them remain sparse. By the second century, the particulars of their lives and deeds were already clouded in legend. They were not renowned for grand achievements but faithfully fulfilled their divine vocation, achieving results that eclipsed even the most celebrated victories of worldly conquerors, for these ordinary fishermen and tax collectors conquered the world with an enduring triumph. However, to become effective fishers of men, these newly appointed disciples needed to undergo a journey of spiritual formation under the guidance of their Divine Teacher. This process was fraught with difficulty. Emerging from the commonplace circumstances of daily life, where earthly concerns overshadowed spiritual understanding, the apostles struggled to fully comprehend the exalted calling to which they had been elevated, often failing to grasp the true nature of their Master’s mission.

The great effort required from their Lord to lift their minds from material misconceptions to reveal the pure truth brought Him considerable anguish. He lamented, "O faithless generation, how long shall I be with you? How long shall I bear with you?" (Mark 9:19). Time and again, in various situations, the apostles found themselves perplexed, as the Gospels attest to their lack of understanding, their feeble faith, and their focus on earthly concerns rather than spiritual priorities (Mark 4:13, 40; Mark 6:52; Mark 8:17-18, 21, 33; Mark 9:6, 19, 32, 34; Mark 10:24, 32, 35; Mark 14:40). These shortcomings were not rooted in their character, as their hearts were genuinely good, but rather in the prejudices shaped by their upbringing. Thus, despite their struggles to grasp higher truths, they remained devoted to their Master, who, knowing their weaknesses, graciously overlooked their failings, aware that though their flesh was frail, their spirits remained capable of great things. Consequently, He lovingly referred to them as brothers, children, and friends (Matthew 25:40; John 13:33; John 15:14-15).

As His disciples observed the depth of His love, they became increasingly eager to understand the essence and spirit of His teachings and example. Gradually, they experienced spiritual elevation and growth. However, His instruction differed significantly from the typical teachings imparted by the rabbis. They did not receive formal, systematic lessons from Him, but rather gleaned insights through His public preaching and private discussions when they sought clarification on topics they found confusing (Mark 7:17-18; Mark 8:5-37; Mark 9:19; Mark 10:36). Yet most importantly, His life itself served as the most profound lesson; it stood as an exemplary model for them. So captivated were they by His life and teachings that they often lost sight of their own identities, leading the Gospel writers to omit personal mentions of the apostles. Christ alone filled their thoughts and hearts, resulting in a remarkable transformation. In the short time they shared with Him—especially in the intimate setting of their beloved mountains and the shores of the familiar lake, breathing the same air, hearing His voice, witnessing His life, and marveling at His miraculous works—they were profoundly renewed. Their faith transcended even that of the prophets and kings from the Old Testament, many of whom longed to witness the Messiah and hear His divine teachings, yet were not granted such opportunities (Luke 10:24).

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryCommentator

The calling of the Twelve Apostles is recounted in the Gospel of Luke based on the account found in the Gospel of Mark. Mark provides a detailed narrative (Mark 3:13-19), while Matthew offers only a brief reference. In Mark's enumeration of the apostles (Mk. 3:13-19), he aligns with Matthew (Mt. 10:2-4), who also succinctly lists them. Mark supplements this with several details, notably mentioning that the Lord ascended the mountain to pray, spending the entire night in communion with the Father before calling forth the disciples and selecting twelve of them the following day. This was a pivotal moment in the life of the Lord as He embarked on the preparation of these twelve for the monumental task of spreading the message of His kingdom throughout the world. It underscores the significance of His fervent prayer on the mountain the night before this critical decision.

For additional insights, refer to the annotations on Matthew 10:2 and Mark 3:16-19.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 9 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  2. Ἰούδαν
    ioudan
    Judah
    G2455 · Ἰούδας
  3. Ἰακώβου
    iakōbou
    James
    G2385 · Ἰάκωβος
  4. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  5. Ἰούδαν
    ioudan
    Judah
    G2455 · Ἰούδας
  6. Ἰσκαριὼθ
    iskariōth
    Iscariot
    G2469 · Ἰσκαριώτης, Ἰσκαριώθ
  7. ὃς
    hos
    who
    G3739 · ὅς, ἥ
  8. ἐγένετο
    egeneto
    I come into being
    G1096 · γίνομαι
  9. προδότης
    prodotēs
    a betrayer
    G4273 · προδότης