The Church Fathers on this verse

Mark 12:44Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

For all they did cast in of their abundance; but she of her want cast in all she had, even her whole living.

Douay-Rheims

παντες γαρ εκ του περισσευοντος αυτοις εβαλον αυτη δε εκ της υστερησεως αυτης παντα οσα ειχεν εβαλεν ολον τον βιον αυτης

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

11 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 14 commentaries

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

The Lord did not regard the widow’s offering of two coins simply as the monetary value of two obols (cf. Luke 21:1-4). Why was this? It is because He values the richness of the spirit over material wealth. In terms of money, her situation seems dire; yet when we consider her heartfelt generosity, the treasures of her noble spirit are beyond description.

Read more (427 words)

Yet, why should I express this to those who are unwilling to relinquish their attachment to riches, who treat it as if it were eternal? They give a trifling portion of their abundance and believe they have accomplished all that is required. This is not true charity; genuine charity is exemplified by that widow who gave “all she had, her entire living.” If you cannot match her sacrifice, then at least offer what is excessive in your possession; ensure that all you have is adequate, but without excess. Sadly, few give even a fraction more; and when one possesses a multitude of servants and luxurious garments, all this is superfluous. We have no need or use for what we can do without; it is excess and unnecessary. Let us discern what we truly cannot live without. With just two servants, we could manage; after all, there are those who live without any. If it is possible for some to thrive without servants altogether, what justification do we have for not being satisfied with just two? A home with three rooms would suffice for us; consider that some, with their families, manage comfortably in a single room. You may keep two servants if you choose, but is it really disgraceful, they would say, for a free woman to be accompanied by so few? In truth, it is not shameful for a free woman to travel with two; rather, it becomes shameful to be surrounded by many. You may chuckle at this, but understand that it is truly ignoble to parade with a throng. Like merchants of livestock or slaves, one may think it impressive to be in the company of numerous attendants. This is mere pride and vanity; it lacks prudence and modesty. A free woman should not be validated by the multitude of followers; what virtue is there in possessing many servants? Such things do not define the soul, and that which is not essential to the soul does not grant true freedom. True freedom arises when we are satisfied with little; when we desire much, we become enslaved—worse than the enslaved. Consider this: do not the angels traverse the cosmos alone, without anyone to accompany them? Are they, who lack this need, inferior to us who do? If it is distinctive of angels to be free from dependence, which life is nearer to the angelic: one that requires many servants, or one that needs but few? Is it disgraceful to possess only a limited number of attendants? It is only disgraceful to engage in unholy actions.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

Now there was a praiseworthy custom amongst the Jews, that those who were able and willing should put something into the treasury, for the maintenance of the priests, the poor, and the widows; wherefore there is added, And many that were rich cast in much. But whilst many people were so engaged, a poor widow came up, and shewed her love by offering money according to her ability; wherefore it is said, And there came a certain poor widow, and she threw in two mites, which make a farthing.

Or else; That widow is the soul of man, which leaving Satan to which it had been joined, casts into the temple two mites, that is, the flesh and the mind, the flesh by abstinence, the mind by humility, that so it may be able to hear that it has cast away all its living, and has consecrated it, leaving nothing for the world of all that it possessed.

Jerome of Stridon

5th centuryChurch Father

But in a mystical sense, they are rich, who bring forth from the treasure of their heart things new and old, which are the obscure and hidden things of Divine wisdom in both testaments; but who is the poor woman, if it be not I and those like me, who cast in what I can, and have the will to explain to you, where I have not the power. For God does not consider how much ye hear, but what is the store from which it comes; but each at all events can bring his farthing, that is, a ready will, which is called a farthing, because it is accompanied by three things, that is, thought, word, and deed. And in that it is said that she cast in all her living, it is implied that all that the body wants is that by which it lives1; wherefore it is said, All the labour of man is for his mouth. (Eccl. 6:7)

Hegemonius

4th centuryChurch Father

Truly, the small offering of the impoverished widow is received with grace, indicating a deeper truth beyond the monetary regulations set forth by Moses. For while Moses welcomed the gifts from the wealthy, Jesus extends His acceptance to those who have little.

Paulinus of Nola

5th centuryChurch Father

We have been given the responsibility to manage and share temporary resources, rather than to hold onto them as our own forever. If you acknowledge that your earthly possessions are temporary, you can secure eternal treasures in heaven. Let us also recall the widow who, selflessly caring for the needy and prioritizing their needs over her own, contributed all she had, relying solely on her future rewards, as the Judge Himself affirms. For while many others cast from their excess, she, in dire need and owning only two small coins, overflowed with spiritual wealth and sought only divine favor, yearning for heavenly riches and relinquishing all earthly gains.

Read more (65 words)

Therefore, let us offer to the Lord what He has graciously bestowed upon us, for without His grace, we would own nothing, and without His will, we would not exist at all. Let us present our gifts to the Lord; let us offer Him what He graciously accepts from even the humblest. Give with joy, I implore you, and take delight in His rewarding gift!

Beda Venerabilis

8th centuryChurch Father

The Lord, who had warned them to avoid the desire of high place and vain glory, now distinguishes by a sure test those who brought in gifts. Wherefore it is said, And Jesus sat over against the treasury, and beheld how the people cast money into the treasury. In the Greek language, phylassein means to keep, and gaza is a Persian word for treasure; wherefore the word gazophylacium. which is here used means a place where riches are kept, which name also was applied to the chest in which the offerings of the people were collected, for the necessary uses of the temple, and to the porch in which they were kept.

Read more (44 words)

You have a notice of the porch in the Gospel, These words spake Jesus in the treasury as He taught in the temple; and of the chest in the book of Kings, But Jehoiada the priest took a chest. (John 8:20. 2 Kings 12:9)

Reckoners use the word ‘quadrans’ for the fourth part of any thing, be it place, money, or time. Perhaps then in this place is meant the fourth part of a shekel, that is, five pence. It goes on, And he called unto him his disciples, and saith unto them, Verily I say unto you, That this poor widow hath cast more in, than all they which have cast into the treasury: for God does not weigh the property but the conscience of those who offer; nor did He consider the smallness of the sum in her offering, but what was the store from which it came. Wherefore He adds, For all they did cast in of their abundance, but she of her want did cast in all that she had, even all her living.

Again, in an allegorical way, the rich men, who cast gifts into the treasury, point out the Jews puffed up with the righteousness of the law; the poor widow is the simplicity of the Church: poor indeed, because she has cast away the spirit of pride and of the desires of worldly things; and a widow, because Jesus her husband has suffered death for her. She casts two mites into the treasury, because she brings the love of God and of her neighbour, or the gifts of faith and prayer; which are looked upon as mites in their own insignificance, but measured by the merit of a devout intention are superior to all the proud works of the Jews.

Read more (44 words)

The Jew sends of his abundance into the treasury, because he presumes on his own righteousness; but the Church sends her whole living into God’s treasury, because she understands that even her very living is not of her own desert, but of Divine grace.

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryCommentator

As the Lord distanced Himself from the superficiality of the Pharisees, He consistently demonstrated to His disciples that a genuine heart is the true measure of the value of righteous deeds; it bestows great honor upon all individuals. Without such sincerity, true greatness cannot exist. He made this clear by observing the contributions of the wealthy compared to those of the impoverished widow in the temple's treasury.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryCommentator

Following His rebuke of the Pharisees and scribes, Christ paused momentarily in the area known as the court of the women. There, positioned near the treasury, He observed the worshippers as they each contributed their gifts to the temple. He noticed many wealthy individuals placing large amounts in the treasury, as well as seeing poorer individuals donating smaller sums.

Read more (98 words)

When a destitute widow approached and placed only two small coins into the treasury, He summoned His disciples and proclaimed, “Truly, I say to you, this poor widow has put more than all those who put into the treasury; for all put in from their abundance, but she, from her poverty, put in all that she had, all her sustenance.” Through this, the Lord illustrated to His disciples that every act of sacrifice is esteemed by God—not based on quantity or outward riches, but rather on the heartfelt dedication and sincerity with which it is given to Him.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

Jesus summoned the apostles and explained that while the wealthy contributed generously, their donations came from their surplus; they offered what they could afford to spare without hardship. In contrast, the widow entrusted her entirety, giving everything she possessed, including her final means of support. Even considering her dire situation, her offering was more significant than those of all the affluent individuals. However, the Lord assesses gifts not by their monetary value but by the depth of love imbued in the giving. With a sincere heart and profound devotion to God, this widow approached the treasury and selflessly donated all she had.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryCommentator

Filled with righteous indignation and deep compassion, Christ departed from the temple for the final time. With a heavy heart, He took a moment to rest in the women’s courtyard. This area featured numerous receptacles where worshippers placed their offerings. Among the wealthy donors contributing gold and silver, a humble widow nervously set down her meager gift. The expressions of the affluent givers revealed their disdain for her small offering, which was deemed the least acceptable contribution to the temple. She placed two lepta, the smallest currency in circulation, which was not even legally permitted as an offering for those in poverty. A lepton was one-eighth of a cent and worth slightly more than half a penny, so her entire gift amounted to barely a penny.

Read more (105 words)

Despite the temptation to feel ashamed of her modest contribution in the presence of those generously giving gold, Christ was delighted by her faith and willingness to sacrifice. Her offering represented a ‘cup of cold water,’ which, when given with love, is assured of reward in His kingdom. As a lesson for all time, He emphasized that acts of kindness are measured by the extent of self-denial involved; the widow's sacrifice in her poverty far surpassed that of the wealthiest Pharisee who contributed gold. "For they all contributed out of their abundance; she out of her poverty put in all she had, her whole livelihood."

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryCommentator

Some contributed from their surplus, feeling little strain and not depleting their resources, but she offered the very last of her possessions, dedicating everything she had to God.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 21 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. πάντες
    pantes
    all
    G3956 · πᾶς
  2. γὰρ
    gar
    for
    G1063 · γάρ
  3. ἐκ
    ek
    from out
    G1537 · ἐκ
  4. τοῦ
    tou
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  5. περισσεύοντος
    perisseuontos
    I exceed
    G4052 · περισσεύω
  6. αὐτοῖς
    autois
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  7. ἔβαλον
    ebalon
    I cast
    G906 · βάλλω
  8. αὕτη
    hautē
    this
    G3778 · οὗτος
  9. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  10. ἐκ
    ek
    from out
    G1537 · ἐκ
  11. τῆς
    tēs
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  12. ὑστερήσεως
    hysterēseōs
    poverty
    G5304 · ὑστέρησις
  13. αὐτῆς
    autēs
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  14. πάντα
    panta
    all
    G3956 · πᾶς
  15. ὅσα
    hosa
    how much
    G3745 · ὅσος
  16. εἶχεν
    eichen
    I have
    G2192 · ἔχω
  17. ἔβαλεν
    ebalen
    I cast
    G906 · βάλλω
  18. ὅλον
    holon
    all
    G3650 · ὅλος
  19. τὸν
    ton
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  20. βίον
    bion
    life
    G979 · βίος
  21. αὐτῆς
    autēs
    he
    G846 · αὐτός