The Church Fathers on this verse

Mark 13:3Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And as he sat on the mount of Olivet over against the temple, Peter and James and John and Andrew asked him apart:

Douay-Rheims

και καθημενου αυτου εις το ορος των ελαιων κατεναντι του ιερου επηρωτων αυτον κατ ιδιαν πετρος και ιακωβος και ιωαννης και ανδρεας

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

8 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 9 commentaries

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

While the Lord was seated on the Mount of Olives, His disciples approached Him with the question, "When will this occur?" referring to the fulfillment of the prophecies concerning Jerusalem.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

The Evangelists do not contradict each other when one mentions an event that another leaves out, or when they depict occurrences in varying manners. Instead, they enrich one another's accounts, thereby leading the reader's understanding.

*Cf. the descriptions of the end of time in the Gospels of Matthew (Matt. 24:3-8), Mark (Mark 13:3-8), and Luke (Luke 21:7-11).

Matthew records that while He was seated on the Mount of Olives, His disciples approached Him privately and inquired, “Tell us, when will this take place, and what will be the sign of Your coming and the end of the age?” Jesus responded, “Take heed that no one deceives you. For many will come in My name, saying, ‘I am the Christ,’ and will deceive many,” leading to the declaration, “And these shall go into everlasting torment, but the righteous into everlasting life.”

Read more (130 words)

Let us explore this extensive dialogue of the Lord as presented by the three evangelists—Matthew, Mark, and Luke—since all three recount it in a remarkably similar fashion. Each record offers unique insights, yet we find no contradictions among them. It is crucial to pay particular attention to the passages that are consistent across the texts, as they may seem to conflict without careful consideration.

In our examination, it is unfeasible to propose that a differing discourse, though akin, occurred under varying circumstances, for all three narrate a conversation that transpires in the same setting and at the same moment. The differing arrangements of the Lord’s statements among the evangelists do not hinder our grasp of their meaning, as the fundamental truths conveyed by each saying do not contradict one another.

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryCommentator

The warning in Matthew 23:37-39 weighed heavily on the hearts of the disciples, who embraced its prophetic nature but felt deep compassion for Jerusalem. They struggled to understand how this message could align with their expectations of the Messiah's reign. As they departed from the temple and the Lord overheard His followers admiring its grandeur, particularly visible from the Mount of Olives, He disclosed to them that this magnificence would be completely destroyed in the impending devastation. Curious to gain further insight, the disciples, once alone with Him on the Mount of Olives, inquired about the timing of this catastrophic event.

Read more (57 words)

They were puzzled because those who had yet to witness the inauguration of the Messiah's kingdom, as they had anticipated, saw no indications that the existing order—expected to transform entirely with the Messiah’s arrival—was nearing its end. Therefore, they collectively asked Him what signs would indicate the coming of His kingdom and the conclusion of the age.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryCommentator

The Evangelists Matthew and Mark clearly specify both the setting and timing of the event: it took place on Tuesday as Jesus Christ was departing from the temple alongside His disciples. Conversely, Luke focuses only on the context of Christ's address. This address came in the wake of Christ's strong condemnation of the Pharisees and scribes, where He warned about the temple of Jerusalem losing His presence and care, foretelling its destruction (Matt. 23:38). This proclamation not only caused sorrow among the disciples, who held deep reverence for Jehovah and His sanctuary, but also left them bewildered. They wondered how it was possible that the eternal stones of the temple could be destroyed (Mk.

Read more (198 words)

Lk.), and how its magnificent structures, supported by substantial endowments (Lk.), could face annihilation. Overcome with confusion and sadness, they (Mk. one of the disciples, Lk. some of them) turned to the Lord, urging Him to appreciate the temple's beauty and glory, as if asking: must all this come to an end? In reply, Christ foretold the total obliteration and devastation of the temple. Later, as Jesus, along with the twelve disciples, arrived at the Mount of Olives and was away from the crowd, His disciples (Mk. Peter, James, John, and Andrew) inquired of Him: “Tell us, when will these things be? And what will be the sign of Your coming and the end of the age?” (Mt.) This question illustrates that the disciples still identified strongly with the Old Testament outlook, firmly rooted in the divine order established by God, believing that the destruction of Jerusalem would coincide with the culmination of the world. They also linked this event with the future, glorious return of Christ, possibly drawing from His earlier words (Matt. 23:38-39), where, while predicting the temple's demise, He simultaneously assured His followers of a new and majestic appearance of Himself to those left behind.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

Overwhelmed by their sorrowful reflections, the apostles followed Jesus in quietude. Some trailed behind, while only Peter, James, John, and Andrew remained beside Him. Upon reaching the Mount of Olives, He paused and took a seat, with all of Jerusalem, bathed in moonlight, spread before Him. They inquired, "Tell us, when will these things be, and what will be the sign when all these things are about to be fulfilled?" (Mark 13:4) and "What will be the sign of your coming and the end of the age?" (Matthew 24:3). Having reconciled themselves to the certainty of the temple's destruction, the apostles believed the anticipated Messianic kingdom would emerge following this event.

Read more (41 words)

They understood that Jesus Christ would return, ushering in His glorious reign concurrent with the end of the age; they anticipated these occurrences would transpire soon, during their lifetimes. It was against these hopes that they would need to take heed.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryCommentator

As they traversed the Kidron Valley, they ascended a steep path that led to the Mount of Olives, directing their steps toward Bethany. Upon reaching the summit, Jesus took a moment to rest, likely beneath the lush canopies of the two grand cedars that once graced the mountaintop. The panoramic view from this vantage point could inspire profound contemplation. Below Him lay the sacred city, which had fallen into moral decay, demonstrating on this very day—the final day of His public ministry—that it failed to recognize the significance of its visitation. The landscape included the mountainside and the garden of Gethsemane spread out at His feet. Across the slope, the walls of the city stood tall amidst a spacious square embellished with marble colonnades and golden temple roofs.

Read more (181 words)

To the east, beyond the barren, rocky hills of the Judean wilderness, the Moabite mountains rose purple, shimmering at sunset like a necklace of precious gems. In a deep, sun-scorched basin, the murky waters of the Dead Sea stirred gently. Gazing down from the mountain's peak, the Savior beheld the pervasive signs of divine wrath alongside human transgression. To one side, the Dead Sea glistened darkly, its toxic and numbing waves serving as an enduring testament to God's judgment upon moral depravity, while beneath Him lay the infamous city, responsible for the bloodshed of every prophet and destined to face a more horrific consequence for its greater crimes. Christ experienced a profound sorrow as He reflected. The closest and most cherished disciples—Peter, James, John, and Andrew—approached Him, and noticing His gaze directed toward the temple, they inquired privately, “Tell us, when will this be, and what will be the sign of Your coming and of the end of the age?” Their question implied an understanding that the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple would align with the culmination of the world.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryCommentator

The occasion for this profound prophetic dialogue of the Lord is recounted more frequently in Mark than in Matthew. In the Gospel of Matthew, it is noted that the disciples drew attention to the splendor of the temple edifices. When the Lord predicted their downfall, they inquired on the Mount of Olives regarding the timing of His prophecy’s fulfillment. Mark clarifies that not all disciples were involved in this exchange; initially, one disciple pointed out the temple’s grandeur, followed by inquiries from four of the Lord’s closest followers, which stimulated this exalted and magnificent discussion with Him. There is no contradiction between the evangelists, as one provides more specifics while the other speaks more generally.

Read more (183 words)

One might conjecture that the Apostle Andrew, who was present with three of the most trusted disciples, could have been the one who first highlighted the temple’s beauty.

The phrase “What stones” draws attention to the remarkable stones used in the temple's construction. According to Flavius, these stones were immense, measuring approximately 25 cubits in length, 12 in width, and 8 in thickness. Such a formidable structure appeared destined to stand the test of time, making the notion of its destruction difficult to fathom. The term “And what buildings” references the same idea as noted in Matthew 23:1.

The inquiry “When shall these things be—when shall all these things be accomplished” indicates a distinction in focus. In Matthew, these questions are articulated more explicitly, allowing a clearer understanding in reference to Mark’s account. Specifically, the phrase “when these things shall be” pertains to the devastation of Jerusalem, while “when all these things shall be accomplished” refers to the Second Coming of Christ and the culmination of the age, with the question inquiring about the signs that would signal the approach of these events.

Paul Matwejewski

19th centuryCommentator

The disciples were troubled after receiving from their Lord the disheartening news about the complete devastation of the pillars they had long associated with Israel’s honor and greatness. They grasped from Christ's brief yet profound remarks that the grand temple faced a grim destiny. This led them to ponder whether the end of the world was imminent and if it would coincide with the glorious arrival of the Messiah. Jesus Christ positioned Himself atop the Mount of Olives, providing a panoramic view of the landscape below. At the base of the mountain lay the Garden of Gethsemane, with the deep valley of Jehoshaphat running alongside it, fed by the stream of Cedar. Opposite the valley rose the city's walls and the temple’s structures, which embodied the rich history of God’s chosen people.

Read more (137 words)

Peter, James, John, Andrew, and the rest of the disciples seized a moment to seek a deeper understanding of God's future plans. They approached the Lord with inquiries, saying, “Teacher, tell us, when will these things be? What will be the sign of Your coming and the end of the age?” In response, the God-Man delivered a prophetic teaching that spanned from imminent events to the distant culmination of the world and His glorious return for final judgement, elucidating the future so thoroughly that it addressed all their queries. While they received a remarkably clear response regarding the temple’s destruction, His answers about the end of time and His return at the Last Judgement served not to satisfy mere curiosity, but to inspire watchfulness, prayerfulness, and a commitment to the divine will of the Father in heaven.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 22 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  2. καθημένου
    kathēmenou
    I sit
    G2521 · κάθημαι
  3. αὐτοῦ
    autou
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  4. εἰς
    eis
    into
    G1519 · εἰς
  5. τὸ
    to
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  6. ὄρος
    oros
    a mountain
    G3735 · ὄρος
  7. τῶν
    tōn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  8. Ἐλαιῶν
    elaiōn
    Olive-grove
    G1638 · ἐλαιών
  9. κατέναντι
    katenanti
    opposite
    G2713 · κατέναντι
  10. τοῦ
    tou
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  11. ἱεροῦ
    hierou
    a temple
    G2411 · ἱερός
  12. ἐπηρώτα
    epērōta
    I interrogate
    G1905 · ἐπερωτάω
  13. αὐτὸν
    auton
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  14. κατ᾽
    kat
    down from
    G2596 · κατά
  15. ἰδίαν
    idian
    one's own
    G2398 · ἴδιος
  16. Πέτρος
    petros
    Peter
    G4074 · Πέτρος
  17. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  18. Ἰάκωβος
    iakōbos
    James
    G2385 · Ἰάκωβος
  19. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  20. Ἰωάννης
    iōannēs
    John
    G2491 · Ἰωάννης
  21. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  22. Ἀνδρέας
    andreas
    Andrew
    G406 · Ἀνδρέας