The Church Fathers on this verse

Mark 8:33Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Who turning about and seeing his disciples, threatened Peter, saying: Go behind me, Satan, because thou savourest not the things that are of God but that are of men.

Douay-Rheims

ο δε επιστραφεις και ιδων τους μαθητας αυτου επετιμησεν τω πετρω λεγων υπαγε οπισω μου σατανα οτι ου φρονεις τα του θεου αλλα τα των ανθρωπων

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

10 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 23 commentaries

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

From the manner, however, itself of the question, He leads them to a higher feeling, and to higher thoughts, concerning Him, that they might not agree with the multitude. But the next words shew what the head of the disciples, the mouth of the Apostles, answered; when all were asked, Peter answereth and saith unto him, Thou art the Christ.

Or else, that He might wait to fix the pure faith in their minds, till the Crucifixion, which was an offence to them, was over, for after it was once perfected, about the time of His ascension, He said unto the Apostles, Go ye and teach all nations.

The reason, however, why the Lord told them this, was to shew, that after His cross and resurrection, Christ must be preached by His witnesses. Again, Peter alone, from the fervour of his disposition, had the boldness to dispute about these things. Wherefore it goes on, And Peter took him up, and began to rebuke hime.

But how is this, that Peter, gifted with a revelation from the Father, has so soon fallen, and become unstable? Surely, however, it was not wonderful that one who had received no revelation concerning the Passion should be ignorant of this. For that He was the Christ, the Son of the living God, he had learnt by revelation; but the mystery of His cross and resurrection had not yet been revealed to him. He Himself, however, shewing that He must come to His Passion, rebuked Peter; wherefore there follows, And when he had turned about and looked on his disciples, he rebuked Peter, &c.

He asks the question with a purpose, for it was right that His disciples should praise Him better than the crowd.

But He saith not to the devil, when tempting Him, Get thee behind me, but to Peter He saith, Get thee behind me, that is, follow Me, and resist not the design of My voluntary Passion. There follows, For thou savourest not the things which be of God, but which be of men.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

But after the Lord had accepted the confession of the disciples, who called Him the true God, He then reveals to them the mystery of the Cross. Wherefore it goes on, And he began to teach them that the Son of man must suffer many things, and be rejected of the elders and of the chief priests, and the scribes, and be killed, and after three days rise again; and he spake that saying openly, that is, concerning His future passion. But His disciples did not understand the order of the truth, neither could they comprehend His resurrection, but thought it better that He should not suffer.

For the Lord, wishing to shew that His Passion was to take place on account of the salvation of men, and that Satan alone was unwilling that Christ should suffer, and the race of man be saved, called Peter Satan, because he savoured the things that were of Satan, and, from unwillingness that Christ should suffer, became His adversary; for Satan is interpreted ‘the adversary.’

He says that Peter savours the things which be of men, in that he in some way savoured carnal affections, for Peter wished that Christ should spare Himself and not be crucified.

After taking His disciples afar from the Jews, He then asks them concerning Himself, that they might speak the truth without fear of the Jews; wherefore it is said, And Jesus entered, and his disciples, into the towns of Cæsarea Philippi.

For many thought that John had risen from the dead, as even Herod believed, and that he had performed miracles after his resurrection. After however having enquired into the opinion of others, He asks them what was the belief of their own minds on this point; wherefore it continues, And he saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?

He confesses indeed that He is the Christ announced by the Prophets; but the Evangelist Mark passes over what the Lord answered to his confession, and how He blessed him, lest by this way of relating it, he should seem to be favouring his master Peter; Matthew plainly goes through the whole of it.

For He wished in the mean time to hide His glory, lest many should be offended because of Him, and so earn a worse punishment.

Origen of Alexandria

3rd centuryChurch Father

Or else, Mark and Luke, as they wrote that Peter answered, Thou art the Christ, without adding what is put down in Matthew, the Son of the living God, so they omitted to relate the blessing which was conferred on this confession. It goes on, And he charged them that they should tell no man of him.

Beda Venerabilis

8th centuryChurch Father

Wherefore He first asks what is the opinion of men, in order to try the faith of the disciples, lest their confession should appear to be founded on the common opinion. It goes on, And they answered, saying, Some say John the Baptist, some Elias, and others, One of the prophets.

Philip was that brother of Herod, of whom we spoke above, who in honour of Tiberius Cæsar called that town, which is now called Paneas, Cæsarea Philippi. It goes on, And by the way he asked his disciples, saying unto them, Whom do men say that I am?

This, however, he speaks with the feelings of a man who loves and desires; as if he said, This cannot be, neither can mine ears receive that the Son of God is to be slain.

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryCommentator

The Lord faced this temptation with the same strength and purpose with which He countered the tempter's words in the wilderness, declaring, “Get behind me, Satan. You are considering things from a human perspective,” He continued, “and not from God's perspective. You fail to recognize that all of this is anticipated and provided for by My Father, and it should be enacted without impeding anyone's freedom.”

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryCommentator

From that time onward, Jesus began to share openly with His disciples about His impending sufferings and death. The Gospel of Mark adds that He spoke candidly about these matters, providing clarity to these statements. Prior to this, Jesus had alluded to His suffering and demise privately, but now, as the disciples grew stronger in their faith and faced the approaching culmination of His earthly mission—during which their faith would be tested—He revealed the nature of His sufferings with greater precision and intensity. This revelation saddened them and diminished their faith, allowing them to better endure the trials ahead. The weight of this upcoming trial was already manifest; the news of His suffering deeply troubled the disciples.

Read more (217 words)

They struggled to accept the notion of hardship for the one they recognized as the Messiah. Despite witnessing their Master's many adversaries seeking His life, they held onto the expectation that soon everything would transform, and He would reveal His Messianic glory to all. Yet, the Lord insisted that He must endure suffering and death. Therefore, Peter, speaking on behalf of the apostles, exclaimed, “God be merciful to You, Lord; may it never be!” This was a statement filled with friendship, love, and loyalty. However, the Lord admonished Peter, revealing that hidden within his words was a satanic influence—a subtle and unconscious attempt to sway Him, reminiscent of the devil's suggestion to Jesus in the wilderness, offering easier and faster paths to fulfill the divine mission. The Lord rebuked him, saying, “Get behind Me, Satan; you are a stumbling block to Me; for you are not setting your mind on God's interests, but on man's.” This stern rebuke underscores the reality that Peter's words posed a temptation to Christ, and the Lord needed to respond with heightened firmness given their misalignment with His sinless will. Mark's Gospel illustrates this moment by noting that Jesus spoke while turning and looking at His disciples, indicating that Peter’s sentiments resonated with the collective thoughts and feelings of all the apostles.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

Peter quietly spoke to Jesus, taking Him aside so that the other disciples would not overhear. However, Jesus turned to address all the disciples and, as noted by Mark the Evangelist, looked at them and said to Peter, clearly audible to everyone: “Get behind Me, Satan; you are an obstacle to Me, for you are not setting your mind on the things of God, but on the things of men. Do you suggest that I should evade suffering and death? Remember, Satan approached Me with the same temptation when he offered Me the kingdoms of this world; your words echo his, and thus you are to Me like Satan, to whom I have already declared and now reiterate: Depart from Me!

Read more (46 words)

If you viewed the suffering and death that I am about to endure as fulfilling the will of God, you would not deem them disgraceful, nor would you try to dissuade Me from them. Understand that this is My Father’s will, and it must be accomplished!”

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryCommentator

This action highlighted how the foremost of the apostles was influenced by worldly perspectives, prompting Christ to express His displeasure toward him. He turned to Peter and said, “Get thee behind Me, Satan, thou art a temptation to Me, because thou thinkest not of the things of God, but of the things of men.” This echoed the same temptation that the adversary had presented to Christ in the wilderness, where Peter, perhaps unknowingly, mirrored Satan by discouraging the Savior from pursuing His redemptive mission through the fear of forthcoming suffering. Peter still envisioned Christ as a temporal ruler, believing that resisting His foes with human strength was the appropriate response. Clearly, Peter had much to learn to understand that his Lord’s kingdom would be founded upon suffering and self-denial.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryCommentator

Turning and gazing at the disciples, He was not silently chiding Peter in front of the others but summoning them as witnesses through His gaze. This was so they could recognize, through Peter's example, the peril of admonishing the Lord—even if done out of love and a desire to protect, without fully grasping His words and God's plan for the Messiah and His kingdom. The teaching of self-denial is presented in nearly identical terms as found in Eu. Matthew (cf. Matt. 16:24-27).

Paul Matwejewski

19th centuryCommentator

The Lord Jesus Christ, whom the apostles acknowledged as the Son of God, equipped them for the trials ahead by revealing the glory of the Resurrection that awaited Him at the conclusion of His earthly existence, as well as the sufferings and death He would endure. He did not promise His followers the earthly rewards and accolades they anticipated in the kingdom of the Messiah; instead, He indicated the sole path to salvation through self-denial and the cross. No longer using parables or indirect messages, He spoke plainly and forthrightly about the necessity for the Son of Man to undergo considerable suffering, to be rejected by the elders, the high priests, and the scribes, to be killed, and to rise on the third day.

Read more (189 words)

Though the concept of the cross was not mentioned at that moment, the prediction of the beloved Master's sufferings and death deeply impacted Peter, startling him more than anyone else. Relying on human reasoning, he thought that it was unnecessary and incongruous for Christ—whom he had just declared to be the Son of God—to suffer. While he was correct in what was revealed to him, he struggled to grasp the redemptive significance of the God-Man's suffering and death. However, the Lord discerned the true source of Peter's thoughts, noting that ‘the adversary wished that Christ did not suffer’ (St. John Chrysostom). Thus, addressing His disciples with firm admonition, He turned to Peter and said, ‘Get behind Me, Satan; you are an offense to Me, for you are not mindful of the things of God, but the things of men.’ St. John Chrysostom elucidates that Jesus referred to him as Satan not to disgrace the Apostle, but to illustrate that Peter’s words did not originate from his true self; rather, they were so contrary to his nature that even he, though Peter, could be referred to as Satan without reproach.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 26 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  2. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  3. ἐπιστραφεὶς
    epistrapheis
    I turn back to
    G1994 · ἐπιστρέφω
  4. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  5. ἰδὼν
    idōn
    I know
    G1492 · εἴδω
  6. τοὺς
    tous
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  7. μαθητὰς
    mathētas
    a learner
    G3101 · μαθητής
  8. αὐτοῦ
    autou
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  9. ἐπετίμησεν
    epetimēsen
    I rebuke
    G2008 · ἐπιτιμάω
  10. Πέτρῳ
    petrō
    Peter
    G4074 · Πέτρος
  11. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  12. λέγει
    legei
    I say
    G3004 · λέγω
  13. Ὕπαγε
    hypage
    I go away
    G5217 · ὑπάγω
  14. ὀπίσω
    opisō
    behind
    G3694 · ὀπίσω
  15. μου
    mou
    I
    G1473 · ἐγώ
  16. Σατανᾶ
    satana
    an adversary
    G4567 · Σατανᾶς
  17. ὅτι
    hoti
    that
    G3754 · ὅτι
  18. οὐ
    ou
    no
    G3756 · οὐ
  19. φρονεῖς
    phroneis
    I think
    G5426 · φρονέω
  20. τὰ
    ta
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  21. τοῦ
    tou
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  22. Θεοῦ
    theou
    God
    G2316 · θεός
  23. ἀλλὰ
    alla
    but
    G235 · ἀλλά
  24. τὰ
    ta
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  25. τῶν
    tōn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  26. ἀνθρώπων
    anthrōpōn
    a man
    G444 · ἄνθρωπος