The Church Fathers on this verse

1 Corinthians 7:18Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Is any man called, being circumcised? Let him not procure uncircumcision. Is any man called in uncircumcision? Let him not be circumcised.

Douay-Rheims

περιτετμημενος τις εκληθη μη επισπασθω εν ακροβυστια τις εκληθη μη περιτεμνεσθω

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

7 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 8 commentaries

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

All this, he says, means nothing for faith. Therefore do not argue or be troubled. Faith is above all these things. “Let each remain in the calling in which he was called.” Were you called in marriage with an unbelieving wife? Remain with her. Do not drive your wife away because of the faith. Were you called as a slave? Do not be anxious. Remain a slave. Were you called uncircumcised? Remain uncircumcised. Did you believe while circumcised? Remain circumcised. This is what the words mean: let each remain “as God has assigned to him.” None of this is an obstacle to piety. You were called in the condition of a slave, another in marriage with an unbeliever, another in circumcision. This is how he regards slavery.

Read more (161 words)

As circumcision brings no profit, and uncircumcision does no harm, so also slavery and freedom are alike. But to show this as clearly as possible, he says: “But if you can also become free, rather make use of it,” that is, serve all the more. Why, then, does he command the one who can become free to remain a slave? So that he may show that slavery not only does no harm, but even brings benefit. I know that some maintain that the words “rather make use of it” are spoken of freedom. They explain them thus: if you can become free, then be freed. But such a thought would be wholly contrary to Paul’s intention. He is consoling the slave and proving that slavery causes him no harm. He would not then command him to seek freedom. Otherwise someone might say: if I cannot become free, then I suffer humiliation and harm. The Greek terms are χρησαι and μαλλον χρησαι.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

"Was anyone called while circumcised? Let him not conceal it." Probably many, ashamed of circumcision, used some remedy to restore the circumcised member to its original form by growing skin over it.

"Was anyone called while uncircumcised? Let him not be circumcised." On the other hand, some, finding something important in circumcision, were circumcised after turning to the faith. Therefore he says that this contributes nothing to faith.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

If anyone was called while circumcised, let him in no way regret that he does not have a foreskin. Likewise, if anyone was called in uncircumcision, let him not be circumcised.

Jerome of Stridon

4th centuryChurch Father

To the preceding discussion, in which he taught that a believing spouse must not separate from an unbelieving one, but remain in the marriage as faith found them, he immediately joins examples concerning the circumcised and the Gentile, the slave and the free. He had also taught that each, whether unmarried or married, must continue living in the condition in which he was when baptized into Christ. Under the metaphor of these examples, he speaks about those who are married and those who are not. Since some, I think, will dispute this understanding, one may first ask what sequence there is in the Apostle’s discourse. While discussing husbands and wives, he suddenly passes to the comparison of Jew and Gentile, slave and free.

Read more (374 words)

After finishing this discussion, he again returns to virgins, saying: “Now concerning virgins I have no commandment of the Lord” (1 Cor 7:25). What meaning has the comparison of Jew and Gentile, slave and free, amid discussions of marriage and virginity? Second, what can be the meaning of the words: “Was anyone called in circumcision? Let him not bring on uncircumcision” (non adducat praeputium). Can one who has once circumcised the foreskin, if he wishes, receive it again? Then in what sense can the words be explained: “For the slave called in the Lord is the Lord’s freedman. Likewise the one called free is Christ’s slave” (1 Cor 7:22)? Fourth, how does the one who commanded slaves to obey their earthly masters now say: “Do not become slaves of men” (1 Cor 7:23)? Finally, how can the words “Let each remain before God in the state in which he was called” apply to slavery or circumcision? This is also contrary to the preceding thought. For if we have heard, “Do not become slaves of men,” on what grounds can we remain in the calling in which we were called? Many believed while having earthly masters, whom they are now forbidden to obey. Further, with regard to circumcision, what does it mean to remain in the same calling in which they were called? Elsewhere the same Apostle cries out: “Behold, I Paul say to you, that if you become circumcised, Christ will profit you nothing” (Gal 5:2). It remains, therefore, to take circumcision and uncircumcision, slave and free, as adapted to the meaning of what was said above and dependent on what precedes. “Was anyone called in circumcision? Let him not bring on uncircumcision.” The Apostle says: if at the time when you were called and believed in Christ, you were called as one circumcised from a woman and were unmarried, then do not marry. That is, do not bring on uncircumcision, so as not to burden the freedom of circumcision and chastity with the weight of marriage. Likewise, if anyone is called in uncircumcision, let him not be circumcised. He says: you had a wife when you believed. Do not regard faith as a cause of discord, because God has called us in peace.

Likewise, in the place where we explained the Apostle’s saying, “Was anyone called in circumcision? Let him not become uncircumcised. Was anyone called in uncircumcision? Let him not be circumcised” (1 Cor 7:18), did we not stand most clearly for the marital union? This remains so, though some very intelligent interpreters of Scripture assert that this is said about circumcision and legal slavery. For we said: “Was anyone called in uncircumcision? Let him not be circumcised. If you had a wife when you received the faith, you are told not to regard the faith of Christ as grounds for divorce, since the Lord has called us in peace.”

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

Let the one called in uncircumcision not receive circumcision, and let the circumcised not strive to show himself uncircumcised. For uncircumcision is natural, and circumcision is performed according to the old law. Yet it is not the act itself that is praised, but the keeping of the divine commandment.

Nikanor (Kamenski)

19th centuryChurch Father

The thought of remaining in the condition in which one was called to the faith serves as the foundation for the teaching on the indissolubility of marriage bonds. It also applies to every other bond not contrary to the spirit of Christian life. St. John Chrysostom says of this: “Let each remain in the calling in which he was called. Were you called in marriage with an unbelieving wife? Remain with her, and do not drive your wife away because of the faith. Were you called as a slave? Do not grieve, but remain a slave. Were you called uncircumcised? Remain uncircumcised. Did you believe while circumcised? Remain circumcised.

Read more (365 words)

None of this is an obstacle to piety.” Concerning slavery in particular, he says: “As circumcision brings no profit, and uncircumcision does no harm, so also slavery and freedom are alike. But to show this as clearly as possible, the Apostle says: ‘But if you can also become free, rather make use of it’ (χρησαι), that is, serve all the more. I know that some maintain that the words ‘rather make use of it’ are spoken of freedom. They explain them thus: if you can become free, then be freed. But such a thought would be wholly contrary to Paul’s intention. He is consoling the slave and proving that slavery causes no harm. He would not then command him to seek freedom. In relation to Christ, he says, both are equal: you are a slave, and so is your master. When is a slave free while remaining a slave? When he is freed from passions and diseases of the soul, and does not surrender to greed, anger, and other such passions.” Conversely, when is a free man a slave? When he serves men in some evil thing, in gluttony, greed, or vainglory. Such a man, though free, is worse than any slave. Here is an example of both. Joseph was a slave, but he did not serve men slavishly, for he did not submit to his mistress. She, on the contrary, though free, proved lower than any slave. Today we have no slaves, but we have servants and masters, superiors and subordinates. These lessons apply to all Christians who occupy different positions in society. To persuade Christians all the more to preserve their outward condition, the Apostle says that he teaches this to Christians everywhere. This statement has great significance both historically and for the practice of the Church. It concerns the establishment of common orders of life for all Christians, not in conflict with other prevailing orders, insofar as those are not contrary to the spirit of the Christian faith. According to blessed Theophylact, “The Apostle said this so that Christians, knowing that they have other Christians sharing the same order of life, might be more zealously disposed to obedience to the Apostle’s decree.”

Theophan the Recluse

19th centuryChurch Father

He sets forth examples of what exactly he commands everywhere. At the same time, he explains what it means to remain in the condition in which one was called. He gives only two cases: circumcision and uncircumcision, and slavery and freedom. Evidently it was instructive for the Corinthians to touch upon these. “Let him not become uncircumcised,” μη επισπασθω. This word suggests the artificial restoration of the circumcised part, after which circumcision is no longer visible, and the circumcised man appears as if he had not been circumcised. Our Slavonic translation even adds the note: let him not make himself uncircumcised. Photius, in Oecumenius, cites St. Epiphanius’s remark that by certain medical means a circumcised man can be made uncircumcised.

Read more (171 words)

Others report that during the persecution of Antiochus many Jews used these means to conceal their Jewishness. Some suppose that certain Jews who had believed did the same. Some did so out of zeal, so that no trace of Judaism might remain. Others did so for some other reason. It is thought that with them in mind St. Paul wrote: do not do this. It is useless labor. Circumcision and uncircumcision are nothing in the work of salvation. Perhaps it was so. Why does he say: let the uncircumcised not be circumcised? Were there really some who, having been called uncircumcised, were circumcised? Evidently there were. They were brought to this by the arguments of the Judaizers. Theophylact writes: “Some, on the contrary, were carried away by the apparent great glory of circumcision and were circumcised after receiving the faith. To them St. Paul says that this adds nothing to the work of faith and salvation.” The Apostle mentions both cases either to prevent them, or to rebuke and correct them.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 11 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. περιτετμημένος
    peritetmēmenos
    I circumcise
    G4059 · περιτέμνω
  2. τις
    tis
    any one
    G5100 · τις
  3. ἐκλήθη
    eklēthē
    I call
    G2564 · καλέω
  4. μὴ
    mē
    not
    G3361 · μή
  5. ἐπισπάσθω
    epispasthō
    I become uncircumcised
    G1986 · ἐπισπάω
  6. ἐν
    en
    in
    G1722 · ἐν
  7. ἀκροβυστίᾳ
    akrobystia
    foreskin
    G203 · ἀκροβυστία
  8. κέκληταί
    keklētai
    I call
    G2564 · καλέω
  9. τις
    tis
    any one
    G5100 · τις
  10. μὴ
    mē
    not
    G3361 · μή
  11. περιτεμνέσθω
    peritemnesthō
    I circumcise
    G4059 · περιτέμνω