John Chrysostom
“If I wrote to you, it was not for the sake of the offender, nor for the sake of the one offended” (v. 12).
Lest they say, “Why then do you reprove us, when we are pure in this matter?” the apostle had this objection in mind, forestalled it, and used the words cited: “I do not regret it, though I did regret it.”
“I,” he says, “am very far from regretting now what I wrote to you then. On the contrary, I regretted it more then than now, since you have shown yourselves upright.”
Do you see again his skill in contest and in compelling agreement? Do you see how he gave his discourse an opposite turn?
By the very thing with which they thought to shame him, namely, as if by needless censures in view of their success, he proves that he was right to act so freely with them.
Read more (394 words)
He no longer refuses to speak boldly even what is pleasant to them, now that this has become possible.
Before, he said that “he who is joined to a harlot becomes one body with her” (1 Cor 6:16). And: “Deliver such a one to Satan for the destruction of the flesh” (1 Cor 5:5).
He also said: “Every sin that a man commits is outside the body” (1 Cor 6:18), and other such things.
How, then, does he say here, “not for the sake of the offender, nor for the sake of the one offended”? Here too he does not contradict himself. On the contrary, he is in full agreement with himself.
In what way is he in agreement? He greatly desired to show his love for them.
Thus he does not deny that he was concerned for the fornicator. But at the same time he shows, as I have observed, the love he had for them.
He also shows that he feared still more for the whole Church. He feared lest the evil spread and, going farther, embrace the whole Church.
Therefore he said: “A little leaven leavens the whole lump” (1 Cor 5:6). He said this then. But now that they have corrected themselves, he expresses the same thing differently.
Though he expresses the same thought, he does so with greater pleasantness, saying: “that our care for you might be revealed to you.” That is, “to you, so that you might see how I love you.”
This is the same as the former statement, but expressed differently it appears to have another meaning. To see that it is the same, examine his thought and you will find no difference.
“Because I love you greatly,” he says, “I feared that from this scandalous example you might suffer distress and be forced to grieve over yourselves.”
Similarly, when he said, “Is it for oxen that God is concerned?” (1 Cor 9:9), he did not mean that God does not provide for oxen. No thing can exist without the providence of God.
Rather, he meant that He gave the commandment not chiefly for the sake of oxen.
So also here: “I wrote first for you, and then also for him. I loved you inwardly even before my epistle. But through this epistle I wished to show my love both to you and to everyone generally.”