The Church Fathers on this verse

Acts 20:7Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And on the first day of the week, when we were assembled to break bread, Paul discoursed with them, being to depart on the morrow. And he continued his speech until midnight.

Douay-Rheims

εν δε τη μια των σαββατων συνηγμενων των μαθητων κλασαι αρτον ο παυλος διελεγετο αυτοις μελλων εξιεναι τη επαυριον παρετεινεν τε τον λογον μεχρι μεσονυκτιου

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

9 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

See how they all counted everything of little importance compared with preaching. It was then Pentecost and the day of the week, yet he continued teaching until midnight. He cared so much for the salvation of the disciples that he did not fall silent even at night. Rather, he conversed especially then, when there was quiet. See how long he speaks, and this after the time of the evening meal. But the devil disturbed this feast, though without success, by plunging one listener into sleep and throwing him down. How this happened, the writer narrates further. After staying seven days, Paul devoted the night before the next day to instruction. So painful was it for him to part from them, and for them from him.

Read more (233 words)

'They gathered,' he says, 'to break bread.' At the time when food was to be taken, and it was not yet late, he began to speak and continued teaching for a long time. Thus, although they had gathered not specifically for instruction but for the breaking of bread, he began his discourse and continued it. See how all shared in Paul's table. It seems to me that even while sitting at table he engaged in conversation, teaching us to regard everything else as of little importance. Picture that house, where there were lamps and a multitude of people, and Paul was speaking in the midst of them all. Many had taken places even at the windows, so as to hear this trumpet and see that comely face. What must those being instructed have been like, and what delight they received. But why did he speak at night? Because he was about to depart and see them no more. Yet he did not say this to them, since they were weaker, though he said it to others. Besides, the sign that occurred made that evening forever memorable for them. Great was the discourse. It was interrupted and then continued again, so that the incident served to honor the teacher. On the other hand, the young man who died from his desire to hear Paul had to serve as a reproach to all the negligent.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

"On the first day of the week." At that time it was the feast of Pentecost and the day of the Resurrection. "Until midnight." Paul did not rest even at night, but then conversed all the more, because it was a time of leisure. See how long he spoke even after supper.

Beda Venerabilis

7th centuryChurch Father

Here we may speak allegorically. The upper room is the height of spiritual gifts of grace. Night is the obscurity of Scripture. The many lamps are the explanation of hidden words. The Lord's Day is the remembrance of the Lord's Resurrection, or of our own resurrection. This text also serves as a reminder to the spiritual teacher. Encouraged by the sweetness of the Resurrection and the joys of the life to come, he calls his hearers to higher virtues. When, in a long discourse, he touches upon certain mysteries of the Scriptures, he should then enlighten the unwise hearers by the lamp of intelligible exposition. The Apostle also did this when he said: 'Abraham had two sons, one by a slave woman and one by a free woman' (Gal 4:22). Then he explains: 'These are two covenants' (Gal 4:24), and so forth.

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryChurch Father

In the spring, around Pascha of the year 58 or 59, Paul left Corinth. Some of his companions crossed over to Troas before him (Acts 20:4-5). Paul spent Pascha in Philippi and took Luke from there, whom he had previously left there. He spent a week in Troas to make up for the shortness of his previous stay there, which had been caused by his desire to learn quickly the state of the Corinthian Church (2 Cor 2:12). There, on the first day of the week, he was present at the Church's worship and conversed with the brethren in a house. Providence, seeing the need to confirm the faithful in the teaching they had received and to spread it among the Gentiles, opened an occasion for the divine power active in the Apostle to show itself most strikingly.

Read more (163 words)

A young man fell from the third story of the house and was picked up dead, but Paul restored him to life. Yet, hastening to Jerusalem for the feast of Pentecost, Paul did not wish to remain there longer. His companions boarded the ship. He himself, as long as he could, still went on foot with the Troan brethren as far as Assos. In order not to be delayed in Ephesus, he decided to pass it by. He arranged only that the presiding clergy of the Ephesian Church, and probably of several other Churches, should come to him in Miletus. The phrase Ένοίς διήλϑον (Acts 20:25) points not to one place or community, but to many. Irenaeus, the disciple of Polycarp, bishop of those regions, speaks directly of the bishops and presbyters of Ephesus and the other neighboring cities (Contr. Haeres. III, 4, §12). This agrees with the indication that Paul's preaching in Ephesus lasted two years and three months (Acts 19:8, 10).

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

This stay of the Apostle Paul in Troas was marked by one of the greatest works of the grace of God that accompanied Paul in his apostolic activity: the resurrection of a young man named Eutychus, who had fallen from a window of the house. From Troas the Apostle Paul made his journey hurriedly, directing his way toward Jerusalem, where he wished to be on the day of Pentecost. Therefore, though he greatly desired to visit the Christians in Ephesus on the way to Jerusalem, he passed that city by so as not to be delayed there. He arrived instead at Miletus, a coastal city south of Ephesus.

Kochomski S.W.

19th centuryChurch Father

The first day of the week was the day of Christ's Resurrection. Could Christ's disciples forget this, when their whole faith and all their hope were founded on the Lord's rising (1 Cor 15:17)? Certainly not. Therefore they gathered on this day in remembrance of Christ's Resurrection. This Sunday assembly was not unique, but customary, proper to that day continually, and therefore established from the beginning of the Church. 'On the first day of the week,' says the writer of the book, 'when the disciples came together to break bread.' Clearly, they gathered precisely because it was this day and because such was the requirement of this day. How did this Sunday assembly proceed?

Read more (85 words)

The faithful were instructed in the Word of God, which was either orally handed down by the Apostles, as now, or read from the Bible. Then they 'broke bread.' That is, after the blessing of the bread and its change into the Body of Christ, they divided it among themselves and partook. Therefore they received Communion. At this, many lamps were lit. In this last circumstance one sees a likeness to the present churches of the Orthodox Church, which shine with lights on feast days.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

In this city an event occurred which shows that Christians at that time already had regular liturgical assemblies on Sundays. On the eve of the apostle's departure there was an evening gathering. The whole Church of Troas was present, assembled for the last time to hear the sweet discourse of the great preacher.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

On the first day of the week: according to the Jewish reckoning of weeks, the week ended with the Sabbath. The first day of the week was the first after the Sabbath, that is, in our reckoning, Sunday. It was the day in whose deep morning the Savior of the world, the Lord Jesus Christ, rose from the dead; compare Mt 28:1 and parallels. When the disciples, that is, the Christians of Troas, gathered to break bread, it seems necessary to recognize this as a liturgical assembly. St. Chrysostom, however, does not recognize this and considers the breaking of bread mentioned here a simple meal. In this assembly the Mystery of the Eucharist, instituted by the Lord in remembrance of Him, was celebrated. After this there were the so-called love feasts.

Read more (257 words)

On the breaking of bread in fellowship and from house to house, see the note on Acts 2:42 and Acts 2:46. That this liturgical action was performed in the apostolic Church precisely on the first day of the week, that is, Sunday, is seen partly from this passage in Acts. It is seen partly from one of Paul's epistles (1 Cor 16:2), and chiefly from the constant tradition of the Church. It is very natural that from the beginning of the Christian Church this day began to be celebrated by this action, as the greatest day of the week, the Lord's Day (Rev 1:10). Paul continued his discourse until midnight. There are no firm grounds for supposing that, for the celebration of the Lord's Day or Sunday solemnity by the celebration of the Mystery of the Eucharist, the faithful gathered in the evening. If on this occasion the assembly lasted so long, this happened for the special reason indicated by the writer of Acts, and may have been an exceptional case. Paul intended to depart from Troas on the next day. His discourse, which preceded the celebration of the Mystery (verse 11), was prolonged (verse 9), perhaps very prolonged. It was the conversation of a loving and beloved father and teacher with loving and beloved children and disciples, as they parted forever; compare verse 25. Perhaps it lasted from early morning until midnight and then until dawn, in fasting, vigil, and prayerful disposition. Neither teacher nor disciples likely wished to interrupt this conversation, however long it was.

Nikanor (Kamenski)

19th centuryChurch Father

The nocturnal preaching of the Apostle Paul in Troas is remarkable in many respects. First, it is remarkable for its length, which is explained by his leaving Troas the next day. Second, it is remarkable for the day on which it was delivered, since it was the eve of Sunday. It was also during the time of preparation for the breaking of bread, that is, for the celebration of the Eucharist. 'It seems to me,' says St. John Chrysostom, 'that Paul tried to spend the feasts in great cities. And see how they counted everything of little importance compared with preaching. It was then Pentecost, the period after Pascha, and the day of the week, yet he continued teaching until midnight. So much did he care for the salvation of the disciples that he did not fall silent even at night.

Read more (153 words)

Rather, he conversed especially then, when there was quiet.' From the passage under consideration, as also from 1 Cor 16:2, it clearly follows that the first day of the week, Sunday, this Lord's Day, was already then sanctified by the Eucharistic sacrifice and was a feast day. Ancient Church tradition confirms this. Evidently they did not gather for the sacred table in the evening. But the occasion was special, a farewell to the Apostle. Therefore his discourse, which began before the meal, delayed the celebration of the Mystery itself. A wondrous sight! Outside the walls of the upper-room temple, midnight darkness already reigned. But here, where the discourse concerned the Eternal Light, there was no night. Here they kept watch in the light. On the origin of the Christian celebration of Sunday, one may read in more detail the article by D. Smirnov in the Proceedings of the Kiev Theological Academy, February 1892.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 24 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Ἐν
    en
    in
    G1722 · ἐν
  2. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  3. τῇ
    tē
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  4. μιᾷ
    mia
    one
    G1520 · εἷς
  5. τῶν
    tōn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  6. σαββάτων
    sabbatōn
    the Sabbath
    G4521 · σάββατον
  7. συνηγμένων
    synēgmenōn
    I gather together
    G4863 · συνάγω
  8. ἡμῶν
    hēmōn
    I
    G1473 · ἐγώ
  9. κλάσαι
    klasai
    I break
    G2806 · κλάω
  10. ἄρτον
    arton
    bread
    G740 · ἄρτος
  11. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  12. Παῦλος
    paulos
    Paul
    G3972 · Παῦλος
  13. διελέγετο
    dielegeto
    I converse
    G1256 · διαλέγω
  14. αὐτοῖς
    autois
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  15. μέλλων
    mellōn
    I am about to
    G3195 · μέλλω
  16. ἐξιέναι
    exienai
    I go out
    G1826 · ἔξειμι
  17. τῇ
    tē
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  18. ἐπαύριον
    epaurion
    tomorrow
    G1887 · ἐπαύριον
  19. παρέτεινέν
    pareteinen
    I extend
    G3905 · παρατείνω
  20. τε
    te
    and
    G5037 · τε
  21. τὸν
    ton
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  22. λόγον
    logon
    a word
    G3056 · λόγος
  23. μέχρι
    mechri
    as far as
    G3360 · μέχρι
  24. μεσονυκτίου
    mesonyktiou
    midnight
    G3317 · μεσονύκτιος