The Church Fathers on this verse

Amos 7:14Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And Amos answered and said to Amasias: I am not a prophet, nor am I the son of a prophet: but I am a herdsman plucking wild figs.

Douay-Rheims

וַיַּ֤עַן עָמוֹס֙ וַיֹּ֣אמֶר אֶל־אֲמַצְיָ֔ה לֹא־נָבִ֣יא אָנֹ֔כִי וְלֹ֥א בֶן־נָבִ֖יא אָנֹ֑כִי כִּֽי־בוֹקֵ֥ר אָנֹ֖כִי וּבוֹלֵ֥ס שִׁקְמִֽים׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

5 Church Fathers comment on this verse

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

When those driven by immoral passions offend honorable individuals, they reveal their own character. In displaying the repugnance of their transgressions, they mistakenly believe they are irritating others, yet unwittingly they portray their true selves. Consider the case of Amaziah, who was of feeble intellect and acted similarly. As a false prophet residing at the altars of idols, he collected remnants of slaughtered animals and relentlessly indulged in disgraceful acts, he scorned Amos. He suggested that the seer should depart from Samaria to Judea, implying there he could freely prophesy deceitfully, leading many astray and finding financial support and means of survival. This misuse of the term "live" (καταβίου) highlights his distorted perspective.

Read more (397 words)

However, it must be demonstrated—accurately—that the prophet had no such intentions and was not driven by greed. Instead, he obeyed the Lord’s directives and faithfully carried out the role of a prophet. Although not formally recognized as a prophet or the son of a prophet—unlike Elisha with Elijah—he was a shepherd and led a simple, humble life, content with the meager fruits of the land that went unsold, namely the sycamore figs.

In their leisure, those who tended the flocks would seek refuge under the trees, seemingly dismissing accusations of idleness as they gathered the fruit to satisfy their hunger. Nevertheless, he asserted that under such circumstances, God chose him to be a prophet, tasked with revealing to the people of Israel the forthcoming events and the near future. In contrast, Amaziah, opposing divine insights with his own, attempted to silence him. Therefore, the Lord declared: Your wife will be reduced to shame in the city, subjected to the harsh realities of urban life and the unrestrained desires of those who possess her. Your children will fall victim to violence, and your land will be subject to oppression, burdened with tributes and taxes. You, who now believe you are secure in the holy land of Bethel and hold the sanctity of the king’s residence, will be led into captivity and die wretchedly before you return. But you must ask how it is that you will lie dead in a foreign, desecrated land under enemy control. Even Israel, who appointed you as a prophet and overseer of the sanctuary, shall be taken captive.

It is, therefore, a grave error to resist God’s call, to act foolishly, and to prevent the righteous from interpreting His will. To such saints, it is said, “He that toucheth you toucheth the apple of his eye” (Zech. 2:8). Notice that the saints maintain a singular and noble objective—serving God’s words incessantly and regarding earthly matters as insignificant, even in the face of strife and hardship. Thus, the blessed Amos, not permitting the wickedness of Amaziah to go unanswered, spoke boldly against him with youthful fervor. Similarly, the disciples, when commanded by the Pharisees and scribes to remain silent, courageously declared, “If it is righteous in the sight of God to listen to you more than to God, judge; for we cannot help but speak of what we have seen and heard” (Acts 4:19-20).

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

Amos responded to Amasiah. After observing that the king had decided against executing Amos, Amasiah, the priest of Bethel, urged the prophet, "Go to Judah; there, they will appreciate your words and offer you sustenance." Amasiah understood that prophets were held in high regard in Judah. In reply, Amos declared, “I am not merely a prophet; I am a herdsman and a caretaker of sycamore trees.” This is the message of the prophet, who honors his God, directed towards the priest who exploits the altars of his deities: “I do not speak from learned knowledge nor do I seek to profit from my calling, as my livelihood is derived from the simple provisions of the land."

Jerome of Stridon

4th centuryChurch Father

Amos responded to Amaziah, declaring that he was not a prophet nor the son of one, but merely a keeper of sheep and a gatherer of sycamores. The Lord called him from tending his flock, instructing him to prophesy to His people Israel. Amos urged Amaziah to listen to the words of the Lord, reminding him that he had been told not to prophesy against Israel or speak out against the house of an idol. Consequently, the Lord proclaimed that Amaziah's wife would be dishonored in the city, while his sons and daughters would perish by the sword. Furthermore, his land would be measured out to invaders, and he would die in a land tainted by sin, as Israel would be led away into exile.

Read more (432 words)

In a similar situation, when the religious leaders insisted that the apostles refrain from teaching in the name of Jesus, the apostles boldly replied, “We ought to obey God rather than men” (Acts 5:29). Amos exemplified this boldness when the high priest of Bethel commanded him to cease his prophecy. Instead of succumbing to fear, Amos freely articulated the judgments awaiting those who attempted to hinder the dissemination of God's message. He humbly acknowledged that he was not of the prophetic lineage; he was simply a shepherd who the Lord had chosen to proclaim His word.

The translation of "shepherd" varies in interpretations, with Aquila and others rendering it in ways that highlight his care for the flock. Yet, the reference to "sheep" implies a focus more on these animals than on goats, despite the broader category that Leviticus attributes to both sheep and goats. The term used for "picked mulberries" suggests a particular kind of tree native to the land, which bears fruit that the shepherd would eat when other food was scarce.

Regardless of the particularity of the terms, it is clear that the Lord empowered this humble shepherd with a mission to deliver divine messages to Israel, even directing him to Samaria for this purpose. Amos asserted that although Amaziah commanded him not to prophesy, he must convey the Lord's warnings concerning the impending disasters. The expression “the house of the idol” refers to the temple where God was mocked, with the underlying Hebrew meaning suggesting a different interpretation related to laughter, indicating the futility of their false worship.

The urgent pronouncement, “do not pour out words,” denotes the gradual revelation of God’s judgment, akin to the steady dripping of water. Amos further clarified the implications of Amaziah's commands, assisting in understanding the deeper meanings behind prophetic revelations. This included a stark declaration that Amaziah's wife would face dishonor, symbolizing the shame of unfaithfulness inflicted on him in plain sight, while the tragedy of his children perishing would bring him profound grief.

Amaziah’s authority as a priest would not shield him from the fate of losing his land to invaders, becoming subject to new rulers. Ultimately, he was foretold to die outside his homeland in a place plagued by impurity, witnessing the captivity of his people as a result of the deceit he perpetuated. Amaziah serves as a representation of the obstinacy against divine revelation, his false church destined for disgrace, while those he misled would experience divine judgment—they would be taken captive, not in service to the true God, but under the yoke of falsehood and demonic forces.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

What I encountered was as follows: I took on the role of a shepherd, gathering the fruit of the mulberry tree, and it seems that the prophet indicated that he, a sinner, turned away from the multitude of transgressors. Yet, it was fitting for the forthcoming prophet of languages to seek nourishment among the thorns, drawing sustenance from them, as he needed to lead the withered and foul flocks of the Gentiles, the people from other regions, into the lush pastures of his teachings. This way, they would become enriched by spiritual sustenance, allowing him to draw forth spiritual nourishment from the converted sinner.

Gregory the Great

6th centuryChurch Father

He who once trembled at the inquiry of the servant girl now, empowered by the descent of the Holy Spirit, boldly confronts earthly authorities. It is indeed beneficial to elevate our gaze of faith towards the might of this Divine Creator and to examine the lives of the patriarchs found throughout the New and Old Testaments. Here I stand, having opened this eye of faith, observing David, Amos, Daniel, Peter, Paul, Matthew, and I wish to explore the nature of this remarkable Spirit. Yet, in my desire, I find myself weakened. For He imbues the youth skilled in music, transforming him into a psalmist. He empowers the shepherd tending sycamores and turns him into a prophet. He fills the virtuous young man and makes him a judge of the elders.

Read more (97 words)

He fills the tax collector, reshaping him into a preacher. He transforms the persecutor into a teacher of the nations. He calls the tax collector to be an evangelist. Oh, what a magnificent Creator this Spirit is! There is no hesitation on His part to instruct as He desires. At the moment He engages the mind, He educates, for to engage is to enlighten. By shining His light, He swiftly perceives the spirit of humanity: in an instant, He alters it from what it was before, suddenly guiding it to become what it had not yet been.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.