The Church Fathers on this verse

Exodus 12:23Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

For the Lord will pass through striking the Egyptians: and when he shall see the blood on the transom, and on both the posts, he will pass over the door of the house, and not suffer the destroyer to come into your houses and to hurt you.

Douay-Rheims

וְעָבַ֣ר יְהוָה֮ לִנְגֹּ֣ף אֶת־מִצְרַיִם֒ וְרָאָ֤ה אֶת־הַדָּם֙ עַל־הַמַּשְׁק֔וֹף וְעַ֖ל שְׁתֵּ֣י הַמְּזוּזֹ֑ת וּפָסַ֤ח יְהוָה֙ עַל־הַפֶּ֔תַח וְלֹ֤א יִתֵּן֙ הַמַּשְׁחִ֔ית לָבֹ֥א אֶל־בָּתֵּיכֶ֖ם לִנְגֹּֽף׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

9 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

It may appear inappropriate for God to use the symbol of blood to identify the homes of the Jewish people; however, it aligns perfectly with His nature to acknowledge and redeem us through our faith in the blood of Christ.

Jerome of Stridon

4th centuryChurch Father

For your spiritual growth, it is enough to collect these insights, like delicate blossoms from the finest pastures of Scripture. Let your heart find rest in these truths, and protect your thoughts with frequent signs, ensuring that the destroyer of Egypt discovers no entrance within you. Instead, cherish those firstborn realities that were lost among the Egyptians in your memory, and echo the words of the psalmist: My heart is ready, O God, my heart is ready; I will sing and praise (Psalms 56:8).

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

For it was instructed to take a sprig of hyssop and dip it in the blood of the sacrificed lamb to mark the doorposts and thresholds, so that when the Destroyer arrived to strike the firstborn of Egypt, he would see the blood and pass over the houses of the Israelites. This directive was given not because the spiritual realm required such symbols, but so that the Israelites would understand God’s protection through this sign, and for us, who offer the Spotless Lamb, to recognize the established representation.

Read more (67 words)

All of these elements symbolize our sacraments, for with the blood of our Lamb, we mark not just the forehead but also the two lower parts of the face, purifying and sanctifying the speech and mouth in the physical realm, and in the mental aspect as a substitute for the forehead representing reason, and for the two lower parts representing the passions and desires within the soul.

John Damascene

8th centuryChurch Father

We have received it as a mark upon our foreheads, just as salvation was bestowed upon Israel. Through Him, those who believe are set apart from the unbelievers and acknowledged. He serves as our protector, our weapon, and the symbol of triumph over the adversary. He is the seal, ensuring that the one who seeks our downfall cannot harm us, as the Scriptures declare.

Maximus the Confessor

7th centuryChurch Father

What representations do Moses and Pharaoh embody in the Book of Exodus, and how does Egypt fit into this narrative? Why were the plagues specifically directed at one and not the other? Who is referred to as the destroyer, what does the death of the firstborn signify, and why does Scripture instruct to bring forth from Egypt or to lead out? Moses symbolizes the righteous and the destination toward which they strive, while Pharaoh represents the wicked and their natural inclinations. As Moses submits to the fulfillment of God's commands, Pharaoh represents the opposite stance. The term Egypt can be interpreted as obscurity, reflecting the present age.

Read more (209 words)

Geographers note that Egypt is the lowest place on earth. Thus, Scripture speaks not only of leading out but also of elevating; this signifies guiding those who transition from earthly desires to the Spirit and uplifting those who rise from the physical to the spiritual. The Egyptians embody a love of worldly pleasures, despite their outward beauty, while the Israelites embrace devotion to God and reject worldly matters. For the Egyptians, the water turns to blood, whereas for the Israelites, water remains as it is by divine nature. Since water symbolizes nourishment and life, it becomes evident that for individuals who acquire their sustenance through injustice and exploitation, they turn water into blood—signifying their role as oppressors. In contrast, for those who gain their sustenance through honest toil, their experience of water is life-giving. The death of the Egyptian firstborn occurs because their doorposts lack the lamb's blood. The firstfruits symbolize the initial thoughts of the mind, the doorposts reflect the senses, and the destroyer represents the adversary, who ensnares the soul through the senses, stifling every divine impulse within. However, the firstborn of the Israelites are safeguarded by the anointing with blood, signifying that the divine movements of the mind are sustained by the discipline of the senses.

Melito of Sardes

2nd centuryChurch Father

O wondrous and inexpressible mystery! The sacrifice of the lamb became the deliverance of Israel, and the death of the lamb became the life of the people, while the blood served to turn back the angel. Tell me, O angel, what caused your fear? Was it the sacrifice of the lamb or the life of the Lord, the death of the lamb or the image of the Lord, the blood of the lamb or the Spirit of the Lord? Clearly, you were alarmed when you witnessed the Lord’s command unfolding in the lamb, the Lord's life in its sacrifice, and the Lord's image in its death. As a result, you did not strike Israel, but left Egypt bereft of its children. What is this new decree, where Egypt is struck down in ruin but Israel is upheld in salvation? Behold the might of the ordinance!

Read more (559 words)

Beloved, what has been declared and what has transpired holds no meaning unless understood as a parable or a sign. Everything that occurs and is spoken about serves as a parable: that which is recounted is a parable, and what takes place serves as a prototype, such that events are revealed through prototypes, while narrations are illuminated through parables. If this is not a foreshadowing, the matter itself is without purpose. Is the future not perceived through symbolic imagery? Thus, an image of what is to come is fashioned—like wax, clay, or wood—so that the future may be glimpsed in greater glory and greater strength, beautiful in form and abundant in richness through a small and transient representation.

For when that which is but a representation of what is occurring happens, then that which held an image of the future becomes obsolete and unnecessary, and the genuine truth gives way to what truly exists. The dishonorable turns to honor, as true value becomes evident. All things have their designated time: the image has its time, and reality has its time. You create a representation of truth, longing for it because in it you perceive an icon of what is to come. You present reality instead of the image, for you recognize in it the future. You fulfill the act and desire solely this, loving this alone, seeing within it both the image and the reality and the truth.

Thus, as all things occur in corruptible examples, so do they also manifest in incorruptible ones: both earthly and heavenly. And just as the salvation and truth of the Lord are foreshadowed in the people of Israel, so the doctrines of the Gospel are prefigured by the law. Consequently, the people represented the predestined, and the law served as the record of a parable; however, the Gospel is the unfolding and realization of the law, and the church embodies the receptacle of truth.

The image thus held significance prior to the truth, and the parable was admirable before the exposition arose. In other words, the people held worth before the Church was established, and the law was commendable before the Gospel illuminated the world. But once the Church emerged and the Gospel was revealed, the prototype was completed, transferring power to the truth, and the law was fulfilled, bestowing strength to the Gospel. Just as the prototype was finished, conveying the image to that which is intrinsically true, the parable faded as the exposition emerged.

In a similar manner, the law reached its fullness when the Gospel shone forth, and the people were rendered complete upon the founding of the Church. The image was dismantled when the Lord was manifested, and in this present time, what once had significance has become unnecessary, as what is truly valuable has been disclosed. The sacrifice of the lamb held value once, but now it is insignificant due to the Lord's life; the death of the lamb was once precious, but now it is without worth because of the Lord's salvation; the blood of the lamb was valuable, but now it is devoid of significance because of the Lord's Spirit; the silent lamb held importance, but now it is inconsequential because of the spotless Son; the earthly temple was valuable once, but now it is meaningless in the presence of Christ who is from above.

Cyrill of Jerusalem

4th centuryChurch Father

If the lamb from Moses' time stopped the angel of destruction, how much more will the Lamb of God, who bears the sins of the world, free us from our transgressions? (John 1:29) The blood of the silent lamb provided redemption; surely, the blood of the one and only Son offers a greater salvation.

Maximus of Turin

5th centuryChurch Father

The Son of God required neither birth nor baptism, as He was without sin that would necessitate forgiveness through baptism. However, His humility provides us with greatness; His crucifixion grants us victory, and His chains symbolize our triumph. Therefore, let us willingly carry this emblem on our shoulders, let us hoist the banners of triumph, and let us display this royal standard upon our foreheads! The adversary quakes at the sight of this mark on our doorsteps. He who is unafraid of ornate temples trembles at the cross; he who disregards scepters, royal garments, and the banquets of rulers shudders before the humility and fasts of believers.

Wlastow G.K.

19th centuryCommentator

The term ‘destroyer’ is universally recognized among scholars as referring to the enigmatic figure who executes the commands of the Lord: the angel mentioned in the Epistle to the Hebrews as ‘the destroyer’ (Hebrews 11:28). This is echoed in 2 Samuel 24:16, where it is stated, “And the angel (of God) stretched forth his hand against Jerusalem to devastate it, but the Lord pitied the calamity, and said unto the angel that smote the people, Enough, now put down thine hand.”

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.