The Church Fathers on this verse

Exodus 4:24Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And when he was in his journey, in the inn, the Lord met him, and would have killed him.

Douay-Rheims

וַיְהִ֥י בַדֶּ֖רֶךְ בַּמָּל֑וֹן וַיִּפְגְּשֵׁ֣הוּ יְהוָ֔ה וַיְבַקֵּ֖שׁ הֲמִיתֽוֹ׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

8 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Consequently, the angel comes to him with a warning, not due to the matter of circumcision—if that had been the case, the angel would not have left until after the mother had circumcised the other child—but rather to caution him against taking his wife to Egypt. His mission was not to settle there but to lead the Israelites out, a purpose he himself recognized, thus permitting his wife to remain. This is evidenced by the encounter upon his return from Egypt, where his father-in-law Jethro met him along with his wife (Exodus 18:2).

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

The initial inquiry revolves around the identity of the individual the angel sought to slay: was it Moses, for the Scripture states that "the angel met him and sought to put him to death," or was it the child that the mother preserved through circumcision? The assumption is that the angel intended to kill the infant, as it was uncircumcised, using the harshness of this act to affirm the importance of circumcision. However, it remains unclear if he intended to dispatch the first individual mentioned, as the context does not specify who is being referred to, unless clarified by the subsequent commentary. It begins in somewhat ambiguous terms, "met him, and wished to put him to death," referring to someone not previously named.

Read more (269 words)

The Psalm declares, "His foundation is on the mountains of the saints. The Lord loveth the gates of Zion" (Psalms 86:2). This introduction does not clarify the identity of those associated with the foundations mentioned. Given that it proceeds with "the Lord loveth the gates of Zion," it suggests that these foundations pertain either to the Lord or to Zion. It seems more plausible that the reference pertains to the foundations of Zion, understood here as a city’s foundation. However, the gender of the pronoun *eius* may vary, reflecting masculine, feminine, or neuter forms; in Greek, the feminine is *autus*, while masculine and neuter use *autou*. Thus, based on the Greek interpretation, this speaks to "the foundations of the Lord," meaning the structures the Lord has established, corroborated by the statement, "The Lord buildeth Jerusalem" (Psalms 146:2). Yet, prior to the phrase "the foundations thereof in the holy mountains," neither Zion nor the Lord had been referenced. The text also indicates, even before mentioning the child, that the angel "met him and sought to put him to death," implying further understanding of the identity involved. Should one contend that this reference pertains to Moses, such a viewpoint should not be readily dismissed. The subsequent explanation merits comprehension regarding the assertion that the angel, therefore, declined to slay any of them, as the woman exclaimed, "The blood of my son's circumcision is stopped." The statement does not detail, "Departed from him because she had circumcised the child," but rather, "The blood of my son's circumcision stopped." This phrasing—emphasizing 'stopped' rather than 'shed'—suggests a significant sacrament, if I may say so.

Gregory of Nyssa

4th centuryChurch Father

Moses enters Egypt accompanied by a foreign wife and their children. When, as described, “the Lord met him,” he was overwhelmed by the danger of death, but his wife appeased him through the act of circumcision using their son's blood.

Furthermore, the essence of natural virtue and the elevated aspects of life can sometimes act as a companion, friend, or even a concubine, provided her offspring are free from impurity. Until this contamination is circumcised and removed, thus purging all harmful and unclean aspects, the angel that severs such ties is confronted by the fear of death. However, he is pacified by the concubine's act of removing the distinguishing mark that signifies the foreign, affirming the purity of her children.

Read more (186 words)

It seems clear to those who grasp the historical accounts, based on previous discussions, that a progression of virtues is revealed through the successive words that follow the connection of historical revelations. There's a material and limited understanding in the teachings of any wise generation, but what endures once the veil is lifted possesses Israelite nobility. For instance, outward wisdom may claim that the soul is immortal—this represents holy lineage. Yet, to imply that the soul shifts from one body to another, transforming from verbal to non-verbal essence—this reflects a carnal and foreign state of uncircumcision.

Similar issues arise in many areas; mentality may assert the existence of God while perceiving Him materially. It may acknowledge Him as Creator yet believe He requires matter for His creations; it agrees He is omnipotent and benevolent but frequently succumbs to the constraints of fate. If we were to recount in detail how the essential truths of common sense become tainted with ludicrous additions, we’d find that if these distortions are eliminated, the Angel of God will show mercy to us, rejoicing in the authentic generation of such truths.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

As Moses journeyed back to the camp, he encountered opposition. The Lord sought to remove his life for his failure to perform circumcision, as he had left one of his sons born in Midian uncircumcised. Since that moment when God spoke to Moses at Horeb, he had not reunited with his wife. Zipporah was distressed by the realization that her lack of complete faith in her husband's words had led to her own culpability. Moses too felt burdened by guilt for not having circumcised his son. Amid these troubling thoughts, an angel appeared to both of them. He proclaimed the necessity of circumcision, warning that Moses could be ridiculed by the Hebrews for his oversight, especially since they maintained this covenant even in their sorrow over the loss of their sons. The angel appeared to Moses with sternness, reminding him of whom he ought to fear—God, who ordained the ritual of circumcision, or the flesh that prevented him from adhering to it.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

The inquiry arises as to why the angel sought to take Moses' life. Moses' spouse believed it stemmed from the fact that one of their sons had not been circumcised in accordance with Jewish law, leading her to act swiftly to perform the circumcision. Others suggest it was due to the circumstance of Moses taking his wife along when chosen to lead the Israelites to freedom. It should be noted that Moses, in his commitment to his father-in-law, married to show that he valued her and would not elevate her above another, and this action did not convey neglect of God's directive. Consequently, to address the angel's threat, he instructed his wife to return to her own people.

Read more (165 words)

Historical accounts support this assertion, as after their departure from Egypt, once they had crossed the Red Sea and approached Mount Sinai, Moses' father-in-law came to meet him, accompanied by his wife and their two sons. The narrative reveals that Jethro, Moses' father-in-law, approached Zipporah, Moses’ spouse, after her release, and then journeyed to Moses in the wilderness (Exodus 18:2-5). Furthermore, the angel presented an additional warning, revealing a drawn sword. In light of Moses' fear of Pharaoh, which he expressed on several occasions, asking, "Who am I, that I should go to Pharaoh king of Egypt?" (Ex. 3:11), and requesting God to select another leader (Ex. 4:13), he also lamented, "I am slow of speech and slow of tongue" (Ex. 4:10). The angel countered, admonishing him with the intention of instilling greater fear by invoking the authority of the sword, as if to convey, "If you fear Pharaoh, you should be even more fearful of me, the one who can strike you without warning."

Maximus the Confessor

7th centuryChurch Father

If God commissioned Moses to journey to Egypt, what could explain the angel of God’s intention to slay him? This intention was halted only because his wife quickly circumcised their son (Ex. 4:24-25). If circumcision was necessary, why did God not direct Moses to perform this act with humility prior to sending him? Moreover, if there was any wrongdoing on Moses' part, why did not the good angel counsel him regarding his divine mission?

Read more (561 words)

In response, one who approaches the intricate verses of the Holy Scriptures with reverence and seeks to unveil the spiritual meaning hidden within the text is likely to gain all understanding (Proverbs 8:9). For such a seeker will find no hindrance in pursuing divine truth. We will set aside the historical context of Moses’ journey and instead delve into the spiritual implications of this account, as its essence continues to resonate throughout our lives.

The wilderness, from which Moses is dispatched to lead the children of Israel, symbolizes human nature, the material world, or a state free from desire. In this state, the mind, enlightened through contemplation, receives from God the sacred mandate to liberate from Egypt, which signifies the flesh and sensory experiences, the divine insights struggling against the passions of the body.

Entrusted with this noble service, the mind, in conjunction with wisdom—like a devoted spouse—and guided by pious aspirations, will naturally pursue the path of virtue. This journey demands constant progress; stagnation in virtue begets vice. When the mind becomes entangled by material distractions emerging on either side of the path, even the most righteous thoughts and practices can become tarnished and debased. Consequently, the inner voice of conscience, acting like an angel, admonishes and threatens with spiritual death, accentuating that such threats arise when one falters on the path of virtue, rendering thoughts ineffective.

When faced with this inner turmoil, the mind’s partner, wisdom, engages in a kind of circumcision, analogous to Zipporah using a stone—an emblem of faith—to purify the thoughts tainted by sensuality. The Scripture observes: "The blood of the circumcision of the son has become old,” stating that the passionate life, characterized by futile dreams and movements, ceases once the impure thoughts have been cleansed by faith and wisdom. Following this purification, the conscience's rebuke calms, akin to an angel chastising the errant mind for its misdirected thoughts.

Indeed, the journey of virtue is accompanied by numerous holy angels—embodying divine wisdom and paths that yield various forms of virtue, alongside invisible angels prompting us towards goodness and igniting similar inner admonitions. The majesty of Holy Scripture remains wonderfully robust, offering those with clear spiritual vision an understanding beyond mere narrative, without implying any wrongdoing on God's part or that of His angels.

For Moses, as God’s envoy, did not possess, according to a deeper interpretation of the Scripture, an uncircumcised son or flawed thoughts. If this were the case, God would have required circumcision first before sending him. The divine messenger was not harsh in revealing to Moses the impending death due to his failure on the virtuous path; rather, such death resulted from his neglect along that journey.

Upon closer reflection, you, too, will likely observe that the angel did not encounter Moses at the onset, midpoint, or conclusion of his journey to impose a death sentence over any concealed passions. Had he not stalled or interrupted his path, he would have evaded rebuke and the dire warning for the neglect of his responsibilities.

Thus, let us implore God that, while we genuinely walk the path of His commandments, He may mercifully send us, like an angel, an inner voice of conscience that announces our transgressions, ensuring that through discernment we are enabled to sever, like the act of circumcision, the impurities of our desires that subtly emerge along the journey of life.

Isidore of Pelusium

5th centuryChurch Father

I feel a sense of discomfort that my letter has reached such distances, yet your inquiry does not lead me to prideful reflections. Just as parents derive joy from observing the physical activities of their children, even if they are only playful endeavors, I will share my thoughts concisely. The angel who encountered Moses as he returned to Egypt, intending to end his life, raised his sword against him not to exact punishment for the slaying he had previously committed out of fervent zeal, but rather to admonish him for violating the law which he was destined to uphold. Chosen by God to be a lawgiver, Moses failed to observe the law from the outset by bringing his uncircumcised sons into Egypt, neglecting the commandment that set the Hebrews apart from others.

Read more (112 words)

However, upon realizing the gravity of this wrong, Zipporah took a stone, circumcised her son, and humbled herself before the angel. This act of obedience led to the angel departing, indicating that the source of God's righteous anger was precisely what Zipporah's faith discerned. In times of urgent need, women often employ more effective measures than men and demonstrate a deeper fervor in seeking refuge in God. Thus, Zipporah engaged in an act that echoes what we sometimes hear in desperate circumstances today: “We are beset by difficulties; let us hurry to baptize the children. Maybe an angel will bless the Sacrament.” In Jewish tradition, circumcision served as a counterpart to Baptism.

Wlastow G.K.

19th centuryCommentator

It is likely that they were very close to home, perhaps at the initial resting place, which may explain why Jethro brings his wife Zipporah, who had been sent back, along with his two sons to meet Moses in the wilderness. The phrase, “the Lord met him,” is synonymous with “the Lord visited him.” Undoubtedly, Moses experienced a severe illness, and as the following narrative suggests, he likely understood that this was a disciplinary action from the Lord. Unable to carry it out himself, he instructed Zipporah to circumcise their son. Additionally, there is another interpretation of a rather obscure passage that should not be ignored. Dom. Calmet suggests that the Lord's intention was to take the life of the uncircumcised Eliezer.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.