The Church Fathers on this verse

Genesis 19:8Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

I have two daughters who, as yet, have not known man; I will bring them out to you, and abuse you them as it shall please you, so that you do no evil to these men, because they are come in under the shadow of my roof.

Douay-Rheims

הִנֵּה־נָ֨א לִ֜י שְׁתֵּ֣י בָנ֗וֹת אֲשֶׁ֤ר לֹֽא־יָדְעוּ֙ אִ֔ישׁ אוֹצִֽיאָה־נָּ֤א אֶתְהֶן֙ אֲלֵיכֶ֔ם וַעֲשׂ֣וּ לָהֶ֔ן כַּטּ֖וֹב בְּעֵינֵיכֶ֑ם רַ֠ק לָֽאֲנָשִׁ֤ים הָאֵל֙ אַל־תַּעֲשׂ֣וּ דָבָ֔ר כִּֽי־עַל־כֵּ֥ן בָּ֖אוּ בְּצֵ֥ל קֹרָתִֽי׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

4 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

If you are determined to indulge the desires of your fierce passions, I will provide a means for you to do so, making your transgression somewhat lighter: “I have two daughters who have yet to know a man. They have not yet experienced marital union; they remain pure, in their prime, radiating beauty. I am willing to offer them to you; do with them as you wish. Once you have taken them, fulfill your wicked intentions and satisfy your unclean desires; but do nothing to these men, for they have come under the roof of my house.” I have compelled them, he says, to seek refuge within my home; therefore, lest their unlawful actions be laid at my feet, and I be the cause of their offense, let them be free from your grasp, and in their place I offer my two daughters.

Read more (629 words)

What remarkable virtue resides in this righteous man! It surpasses any form of strange affection! Who among us can adequately commend such love for his neighbors demonstrated by this righteous man, who even hesitated not to sacrifice his own daughters simply to honor the strangers and safeguard them from the depravity of the Sodomites? And lo, he even surrendered his daughters in order to rescue strangers—who were, after all, not unknown to him—from the brutality of lawless individuals. Meanwhile, we often observe our brethren descending into profound wickedness, as though being ensnared by the very jaws of the devil, yet we remain unwilling to engage, neither offering a word of comfort nor guidance, nor a gentle reminder, thereby neglecting to lead them away from evil and towards righteousness. What justification can we offer, when this righteous man, moved by concern for the wanderers, did not even protect his daughters, while we display such coldness towards our brothers and often utter such unfeeling remarks: “What connection do I have with him? I feel no concern for him.” What do you mean, my friend? Do you truly believe you have no bond with him? He is your brother, made of the same flesh and blood; you share the same Lord and frequently partake in the same spiritual sustenance. Yet you claim, “I have no connection with him,” and you turn away without compassion, refusing to extend a helping hand to one who has stumbled? The Law instructed the Israelites not to abandon even a fallen animal without assistance, even those that belonged to their adversaries. Yet, when you witness your brother, wounded by the devil and having fallen not merely to the ground but into the depths of sin, you do nothing to lift him up with your counsel, refuse to offer any wisdom, and neglect to gather others to aid in restoring your own kin from the clutches of evil and reinstate him to his rightful dignity. So that when you yourself find yourself ensnared by the wicked one—God forbid!—you might have others at your side ready to assist in your deliverance from the grasp of the devil. Paul, eager to inspire the Galatians to be mindful of their brethren, states, “watching each one for himself, lest he be tempted” (Galatians 6:1). It is as if he implies: If you walk by your brother without compassion, you may—should you fall—find others doing the same to you. If you do not wish to be overlooked in your time of need, then do not disregard those who have fallen; rather, extend all your love to them, viewing it as a great privilege to save your brother. There is no virtue more significant than this. For if you believe that the one you neglect is so precious to your Lord that He willingly shed His own blood for him—Paul also teaches, “thy knowledge shall cause the weak brother to perish, for whom Christ died” (1 Cor. 8:11)—how then can you not be ashamed to hide beneath the earth? If Christ laid down His life for him, what extraordinary act might you undertake when you embrace him with kindness, offering encouraging words to restore the fallen and revive a soul that is sinking or perhaps has already sunk into the depths of evil? Thus, I urge you, let us emulate this righteous man, and should we need to endure any hardship for the sake of our neighbor’s salvation, let us not shy away from it. Such perseverance will serve as a promise of salvation for us and will confer upon us great confidence before God. Take heed, beloved, of this righteous man—observe how he stood firm against a multitude that had united in wickedness, and appreciate the remarkable courage he demonstrated with great humility.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

Saint Lot proposed the honor of his daughters, acknowledging that while this act carried shameful wrongdoing, it represents a lesser transgression compared to actions that violate natural law. He prioritized the sacred duty of hospitality over the honor of his own household, a principle that remains unbroken even among uncivilized peoples. When familial bonds may be tenuous, the virtue of hospitality remains steadfast.

Dimitri of Rostov

17th centuryChurch Father

Reflecting on the situation, feeling compassion for the outsiders, showing mercy toward the wrongdoers, and most importantly honoring God's sanctity (for those who transgress and disrupt the divine order established by God bring dishonor to the Creator), the righteous man desired to offer his cherished daughters. Yet, the inhabitants of Sodom, inflamed not by natural wickedness but by depraved desires, were consumed with lust and demanded not Lot's daughters but the men who had arrived to carry out their sinful acts. They began to batter down the entrance to Lot's dwelling, intent not only on humiliating the visitors but also on taking Lot's life.

Read more (97 words)

At that moment, the holy angels, who concealed their divine nature beneath human form, struck the shameless men with blindness, causing them to lose their way to Lot's door and even their own homes (Genesis 19:11). In this way, the angels saved the strangers from peril due to their hospitality. Witnessing such a miraculous act, Lot recognized that these visitors were not mere mortals but rather servants of God and began to regard them with even greater reverence and awe, offering his gratitude for having rescued him and his daughters from the hands of violent, lawless people.

Philaret of Moscow (Drosdow)

19th centuryChurch Father

Behold, I have two daughters, etc. St. Chrysostom remarks that Lot's actions exemplify a peculiar form of hospitality. However, some contemporary interpreters criticize this choice, arguing that in an effort to prevent one evil, it is unjust to endorse another, suggesting instead that one should protect innocence without resorting to further harm. To properly understand Lot’s decision, it is essential to note that he offers a lesser transgression to the Sodomites in lieu of a greater one, akin to recommending to a robber that he should settle for theft rather than murder, in an attempt to mitigate the wrongdoing. This act endangers his daughters to misfortune rather than immorality, as violence cannot violate one's purity.

Read more (100 words)

The principles of hospitality, particularly valued in ancient culture, as well as the commandment to love one’s neighbor, would justify Lot in risking his own life to protect the innocent guests who sought refuge in his home. By this rationale, he willingly sacrificed his family’s honor, believing that his brave and unintended offer could shield his family from all evil, as they were under the protection of civic rights, which, despite their lawlessness, were somewhat upheld. Therefore, Lot's primary error lies in his choice to associate with a people whose moral decay was, at the very least, apparent to him.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.