John Chrysostom
Our Lord Jesus Christ calls His coming in the flesh an exodus. For example, He says, "Behold, the sower went out to sow" (Mt 13:3). And again: "I came forth from the Father and have come into the world" (Jn 16:28).
One may see this in many places. Paul, however, calls His coming an entrance: "when," he says, "He brings the Firstborn into the world," understanding by this bringing-in the Incarnation.
Why do they speak differently about one and the same matter? Why do they speak in this way? This is clear from the meaning of the expressions themselves.
Christ rightly calls His coming an exodus, because we were outside God. Prisoners who have offended the king usually remain outside the royal courts.
Read more (374 words)
The one who wishes to reconcile them to the king does not bring them inside, but goes out himself and speaks with them, until he makes them worthy to appear before the king's gaze.
So also Christ acted. He came out to us, that is, He assumed flesh and taught us what is pleasing to the King. Then He brought us in, after cleansing us from sins and reconciling us to God.
Therefore He calls His coming an exodus. But Paul calls it an entrance, borrowing this metaphor from the example of heirs receiving some possession into ownership.
To say, "when He brings the Firstborn into the world," means that God entrusted the world to Him. He then received it all into His possession, when He was known.
This is said not of God the Word, but of the incarnate Christ. Indeed, if "He was in the world," as John says, "and the world was made through Him" (Jn 1:10), how could He otherwise have been brought into the world except in the flesh?
"And let all the angels of God worship Him," he says. Intending to say something great and exalted, he prepares the hearers for it and disposes them to receive the truth more readily by presenting the Father as bringing in the Son.
Observe this. Above he said that God spoke to us not through prophets, but through the Son. He showed that the Son is more excellent than the angels, proving this both by the very name of Son and by the fact that the Father Himself brought in the Son.
Here he proves the same thing in another way. How? By worship, which shows that He is as much more excellent than the angels as the Master is more excellent than the servant.
It is like someone who brings another into the king's dwelling and commands those standing there at once to worship him. So the Apostle acts, speaking of the coming into the world according to the flesh.
He adds: "And let all the angels of God worship Him." Are only the angels meant, without the other powers? No. Listen further: "Of the angels He says, Thou makest Thine angels spirits, and Thy ministers a flame of fire."