The Church Fathers on this verse

Joshua 2:5Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And at the time of shutting the gate in the dark, they also went out together. I know not whither they are gone: pursue after them quickly, and you will overtake them.

Douay-Rheims

וַיְהִ֨י הַשַּׁ֜עַר לִסְגּ֗וֹר בַּחֹ֙שֶׁךְ֙ וְהָאֲנָשִׁ֣ים יָצָ֔אוּ לֹ֣א יָדַ֔עְתִּי אָ֥נָה הָלְכ֖וּ הֽ͏ָאֲנָשִׁ֑ים רִדְפ֥וּ מַהֵ֛ר אַחֲרֵיהֶ֖ם כִּ֥י תַשִּׂיגֽוּם׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

3 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

A falsehood, when it seeks acceptance, often appears rooted in truth, and without such a foundation, it is dismissed. To illustrate this point, consider an example not directly related to our current discussion. Rahab the harlot, upon receiving the spies, was questioned, “Have men come to you?” She responded, “Yes,”—this was the truth; then she added, “but they went out,”—this was the falsehood. Had she declared, “They did not leave,” a search of her house would have ensued. She conveyed the truth to build trust, then layered in a falsehood for deception.

Read more (202 words)

By faith, Rahab the harlot, having welcomed the spies and led them through a different path, did not perish with the disbelievers (Hebrews 11:31). Note the remarkable wisdom with which she blends her shrewdness. When the king’s emissaries inquired, “Have men come to see you?” her reply was, “Yes, they have.” She first affirmed the truth and subsequently included a lie. A lie lacks credibility on its own unless it first masks itself with a semblance of truth. Consequently, one wishing to deceive effectively will often begin with an acknowledgment of the truth, combined with the already suspect. “Have the spies visited you?”—“Yes,” she affirms. Had she initially said, “No,” it would have prompted a thorough investigation. Instead, she directed them with, “They went this way; pursue them, and you will catch up.” Such a captivating deceit! Such a beautiful falsehood, not betraying the divine but safeguarding her faithfulness! If Rahab, through repentance, achieved such deliverance and is celebrated by the words of the saints—by Joshua who proclaims, “Let Rahab the harlot live!” and by Paul who declares, “By faith Rahab the harlot ... did not perish with the unfaithful”—certainly, we too can receive salvation all the more readily if we repent.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

The king of Jericho sent a message to Rahab, asking her to surrender the men who had arrived at her home, as they had come to spy on the land. However, the woman had hidden the two men and responded, “Yes, men came to me, but I did not know where they were from... I do not know where they have gone.” Indeed, every falsehood is unjust. Therefore, when Scripture presents instances of deception, they are either misrepresented as lies due to misunderstanding or, if they truly are deceptions, they cannot serve as moral examples since they lack righteousness. In the case of the Hebrew midwives (Ex. 1: 17-20) and Rahab the harlot (Num. 2: 3), the Lord honored them not for their deceit but for their compassion towards His people. Thus, it was not their dishonesty that brought them favor, but rather their kindness, good intentions, and acts of mercy, rather than the sin of lying.

John Cassian

5th centuryChurch Father

The ruler of Jericho sent a message to Rahab, requesting her to hand over the men who had visited her, explaining that they had come to explore the entire region. However, the woman took the two men and concealed them, stating that indeed men had visited her, but she was unaware of their origins and did not know where they had gone. This incident highlights Rahab's situation. Scripture does not commend her character; instead, it acknowledges her immoral past. Yet it was her choice to protect the spies through deception rather than betray them that earned her the honor of sharing in the eternal blessings bestowed upon the people of God.

Read more (70 words)

Had she opted for the truth or prioritized the safety of her own people, there is no doubt that both she and her household would have faced the impending devastation. Furthermore, she would not have been recognized among those instrumental in the lineage of the Lord, nor would she have appeared in the genealogy of the patriarchs, nor been part of the lineage that brought forth the Savior of all.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.