Observing that the Lord's prophecy about His future return is closely tied to the prophecy concerning Jerusalem's downfall, and that the vivid expressions used by ancient prophets to describe the world's end—like the darkened sun and moon and fallen stars—often metaphorically represent the collapse of kingdoms and cities, leads some to speculate if all of Christ's current prophecies refer to the same matters: the destruction of Jerusalem, while the anticipated second coming of Christ may serve as a prophetic-ideal illustration of the accompanying calamities, the suffering and scattering of the Jewish people, and the triumph of Christianity.
To dispel this seemingly reasonable but fundamentally erroneous notion, it is essential to distinguish between the language of ancient prophetic revelation and the direct words of Jesus Christ. An unclear, allegorical method was least appropriate for Him, especially when He sought to caution His followers against misconceptions regarding forthcoming events. Furthermore, upon examining the previously mentioned expressions of the ancient prophets, it becomes evident that they indeed spoke allegorically; whereas the declarations of Jesus evoke a profound sense of clarity and urgency.
Additionally, in every other instance where Jesus comments on His return, it is interpreted as a concrete occurrence. It would be particularly peculiar for this instance to shift towards metaphor, especially since the historical context of His statements is so evident. It would require imposing an unnatural interpretation on subsequent parables, and particularly, the allegory connected with Jerusalem's destruction does not align with the vision of the world's judgment that concluded His discourse. Moreover, it is crucial to remember that in the letters of the Apostles, the ultimate culmination of the world and the glorious return of the Lord are depicted unequivocally and literally; thus, it would be inconsistent to dismiss this prophecy found in the Gospel, which will undoubtedly resonate in the teachings of the Apostles.
Another concern arises when reading in St. Matthew that the end of the world and the coming of the Lord will occur suddenly following the tribulation of those days; that is, after the calamities linked to Jerusalem’s fall. This has led some to believe that the God-Man implies His return will happen sooner than anticipated, and therefore, there exists some uncertainty in His prediction. However, this misleading thought is dispelled when we consider St. Luke’s account. He indicates that between Jerusalem's destruction and the Lord's coming lies the entire period of the Gentiles, during which Jerusalem will be trampled by the uncircumcised and the Jews will be in subjugation to all nations.
The extended duration of the times of the Gentiles is clear from the term “times” itself, as well as from the events expected to unfold within this period. The Apostle Paul reinforces the length of these times in his letter to the Romans, discussing the blinding and subsequent dispersal of Israel, which must continue until the full number of the Gentiles enters (Rom. 11:25). Such a scenario cannot occur in less than many centuries. Thus, neither Jesus nor His disciples had cause to expect the realization of future events sooner than is fitting.
What, then, should we make of the term "suddenly" in the Gospel of St. Matthew? It serves as a prophetic abbreviation, capturing extensive epochs within its context. It could be inferred that, as we compare accounts from the Evangelists, we do not possess a complete record of Jesus’ utterances, as prolonged discussions would naturally have been punctuated by the inquiries, opinions, and movements of His disciples. The discourse itself contains indications that the conversation was shaped by the disciples' questions. Therefore, the discourse would have been clear and precise for those present. Now, as this dialogue has been distilled into a written narrative, inevitable gaps arise; disparate subjects are brought together, and the future is depicted in a cohesive, illustrative manner. However, for anyone who can grasp the true perspective, the narrative becomes distinctly clear, presenting its subjects in separation and detail.