The Church Fathers on this verse

Matthew 19:8Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

He saith to them: Because Moses by reason of the hardness of your heart permitted you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so.

Douay-Rheims

λεγει αυτοις οτι μωσης προς την σκληροκαρδιαν υμων επετρεψεν υμιν απολυσαι τας γυναικας υμων απ αρχης δε ου γεγονεν ουτως

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

15 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 41 commentaries

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

For indeed Christ so healed men, as to do good both to themselves, and through them to many other. For these men’s healing was to others the occasion of their knowledge of God; but not to the Pharisees, who were only hardened by the miracles; whence it follows; And the Pharisees came to him, tempting him,, and saying, Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause?

See the wisdom of the Teacher. Being asked, Is it lawful, He said not straight, It is not lawful, lest they should be troubled, but establishes it through a proof. For God made them from the beginning male and female, and not merely joined them together, but bade them quit father and mother; and not bade the husband merely approach his wife, but be joined to her, shewing by this manner of speaking the inseparable bond. He even added a still closer union, saying, And they twain shall be one flesh.

When He had brought forward the words and facts of the old law, He then interprets it with authority, and lays down a law, saying, Therefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. For as those who love one another spiritually are said to be one soul, And all they that believed had one heart and one soul, (Acts 4:32.) so husband and wife who love each other after the flesh, are said to be one flesh. And as it is a wretched thing to cut the flesh, so is it an unjust thing to put away a wife.

He brings in God yet again, saying, What God has joined, let no man put asunder, shewing that it is against both nature and God’s law to put away a wife; against nature, because one flesh is therein divided; against law, because God has joined and forbidden to sunder them.

Had the Lord been opposed to the Old Testament, He would not thus have contended in Moses’ behalf, nor have gone about to shew that what was his was in agreement with the things of old. But the unspeakable wisdom of Christ made answer and excuse for these in this manner, He saith unto them, Moses for the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives. By this He clears Moses from their charge, and retorts it all upon their own head.

At last, because what He had said was severe, He goes back to the old law, saying, From the beginning it was not so.

But not by the law of creation only, but also by the practice of the law, He shews that they ought to be joined one and one, and never put asunder, And he said, For this cause shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave to his wife.

The Lord had before left Judæa because of their jealousy, but now He keeps Himself more to it, because His passion was near at hand. Yet does He not go up to Judæa itself, but into the borders of Judæa; whence it is said, And it came to pass when Jesus had ended all these sayings, he departed from Galilee.

It should be also observed, that the Lord is not either ever delivering doctrine, or ever working miracles, but one while does this, and again turns to that; that by His miracles faith might be given to what He said, and by His teaching might be shewed the profit of those things which He wrought.

Observe their wickedness even in the way of putting their question. The Lord had above disputed concerning thus law, but they now ask Him as though He had spoken nothing thereof, supposing He had forgot what He had before delivered in this matter.

Therefore said He well, Moses suffered, not commanded. For what we command, that we ever wish; but when we suffer, we yield against our will, because we have not the power to put full restraint upon the evil wills of men. He therefore suffered you to do evil that you might not do worse; thus in suffering this he was not enforcing the righteousness of God, but taking away its sinfulness from a sin; that while you did it according to His law, your sin should not appear sin.

e. As the righteous Lord of all, who loves these servants so as not to despise those.

They were conducting Him forth, as the young children of a father going on a far journey. And He setting forth as a father, left them as pledges of His love the healing of their diseases, as it is said, And he healed them.

But, as when you see one much pursuing the acquaintance of physicians, you know that he is sick, so, when you see either man or woman enquiring concerning divorce, know that that man is lustful and that woman unchaste. For chastity has pleasure in wedlock, but desire is tormented as though under a slavish bondage therein. And knowing that they had no sufficient cause to allege for their putting away their wives, save their own lewdness, they feigned many divers causes.

Read more (62 words)

They feared to ask Him for what cause, lest they should be tied down within the limits of fixed and certain causes; and therefore they asked if it were lawful for every cause; for they knew that appetite knows no limits, and cannot hold itself within the bounds of one marriage, but the more it is indulged the more it is kindled.

If then God created the male and female out of one, to this end that they should be one, why then henceforth were not they born man and wife at one birth, as it is with certain insects? Because God created male and female for the continuance of the species, yet is He ever a lover of chastity, and promoter of continence.

Read more (99 words)

Therefore did He not follow this pattern in all kinds, to the end that, if any man choose to marry, he may know what is, according to the first disposition of the creation, the condition of man and wife; but if he choose not to marry, he shall not be under necessity to marry by the circumstances of his birth, lest he should by his continence be the destruction of the other who was not willing to be continent; for which same cause God forbids that after being joined in wedlock one should separate if the other be unwilling.

If then because the wife is made of the man, and both one of one flesh, a man shall leave his father and his mother, then there should be yet greater affection between brothers and sisters, for these come of the same parents, but man and wife of different. But this is saying too much, because the ordinance of God is of more force than the law of nature. For God’s precepts are not subject to the law of nature, but nature bends to the precepts of God. Also brethren are born of one, that they should seek out different roads; but the man and the wife are born of different persons, that they should coalesce in one. The order of nature also follows the appointment of God. For as is the sap in trees, so is affection in man.

Read more (68 words)

The sap ascends from the roots into the leaves, and passes forth into the seed. Therefore parents love their children, but are not so loved of them, for the desire of a man is not towards his parents, but towards the sons whom he has begot; and this is what is said, Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife.

This sentence of chastity seemed hard to these adulterers; but they could not make answer to the argument. Howbeit, they will not submit to the truth, but betake themselves for shelter to Moses, as men having a bad cause fly to some powerful personage, that where justice is not, his countenance may prevail; They say unto him, Why did Moses then command to give a writing of divorcement, and to put her away?

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

The Lord, who overturned every charge against Moses, offers His defense, stating that Moses did not act contrary to God in instituting this law. Rather, he established this regulation due to your unyielding hearts, so that in your ethical depravity, with the desire to take additional wives, you would not bring ruin upon your first spouses. In their stubbornness, the people would even go to the extent of putting their wives to death if they were forced to coexist with them. Thus, Moses declared that those wives who were despised by their husbands should be granted a certificate of divorce.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

For how great was that hardness! When not even the intervention of a bill of divorce, which gave room for just and prudent men to endeavour to dissuade, could move them to renew the conjugal affection. And with what wit do the Manichæans blame Moses, as severing wedlock by a bill of divorce, and commend Christ as, on the contrary, confirming its force? Whereas according to their impious science they should have praised Moses for putting asunder what the devil had joined, and found fault with Christ who riveted the bonds of the devil.

Whereas Scripture witnesses that these words were said by the first man, and the Lord here declares that God spake them, hence we should understand that by reason of the ecstasy which had passed upon Adam, he was enabled to speak this as a prophecy.

For they are called one, either from their union, or from the derivation of the woman, who was taken out of the side of the man.

Behold now out of the books of Moses it is proved to the Jews that a wife may not be put away. For they thought that they were doing according to the purport of Moses’ law when they did put them away. This also we learn hence by the testimony of Christ Himself, that it was God who made it thus, and joined them male and female; which when the Manichæans deny, they are condemned, resisting the Gospel of Christ.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

It becomes apparent from this singular commandment that it was essential to invalidate the statutes established by Moses due to the obstinacy of the people, as those who were hard-hearted had been succeeded by a community that embraced the faith of Abraham. This also applies to the prior declarations, such as “thou shalt not kill... Thou shalt not commit adultery” (Matt. 19:18), which were acknowledged even before the Law was enacted. In the Law, all such principles were proclaimed, and they found their fulfillment through the Gospel. The commandments of the Law, which were given to them for specific reasons and were set in place, did not come to an end in a way that obliterated the old; rather, they were fulfilled so that the new could be established.

Jerome of Stridon

5th centuryChurch Father

Here they reveal the cavil which they had prepared; albeit the Lord had not given sentence of Himself, but had recalled to their minds ancient history, and the commands of God.

What He says is to this purpose. Is it possible that God should so contradict Himself, as to command one thing at first, and after defeat His own ordinance by a new statute? Think not so; but, whereas Moses saw that through desire of second wives who should be richer, younger, or fairer, that the first were put to death, or treated ill, he chose rather to suffer separation, than the continuance of hatred and assassination. Observe moreover that He said not God suffered you, but, Moses; shewing that it was, as the Apostle speaks, a counsel of man, not a command of God. (1 Cor. 7:12.)

In like manner He says his wife, and not wives, and adds expressly, and they twain shall be one flesh. For it is the reward of marriage that one flesh, namely in the offspring, is made of two.

That they might have Him as it were between the horns of a syllogism, so that, whatever answer He should make, it would lie open to cavil. Should He allow a wife to be put away for any cause, and the marriage of another, he would seem to contradict Himself as a preacher of chastity. Should He answer that she may not be put away for any cause whatsoever, He will be judged to have spoken impiously, and to make against the teaching of Moses and of God.

But He so frames His answer as to evade their snare. He brings in the testimony of Holy Writ, and the law of nature, and opposing God’s first sentence to this second, He answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female? This is written in the beginning of Genesis. This teaches that second marriages are to be avoided, for He said not male and females, which was what was sought by the putting away of the first, but, male and female, implying only one tie of wedlock.

God has joined by making man and woman one flesh; this then man may not put asunder, but God only. Man puts asunder, when from desire of a second wife the first is put away; God puts asunder, who also had joined, when by consent for the service of God we so have our wives as though we had them not. (1 Cor. 7:29.)

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

But perhaps someone may ask how it is that Moses instructed the issuance of a certificate of divorce for a wife. He who poses this question is a Jew, while he who accepts the truth is a Christian. This objection echoes what was presented to the Lord, to which He replied that Moses permitted the giving of a divorce decree due to the hardness of your hearts, but from the beginning it was not intended to be so (Matt. 19:8). It is clear that Moses allowed this, not God mandated it; God’s command has always been clear. What does the divine law state? A man shall leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh (Gen. 2:24; Matt. 19:5; Mk. 10:7-8; Eph. 5:31). Therefore, when a man divorces his wife, he is tearing apart his own body.

Read more (142 words)

This passage illustrates that what was permitted due to human frailty was not ordained by God. Hence, the apostle states, I do not issue a command, but the Lord commands that the wife is not to separate from her husband (1 Cor. 7:10), but he later adds, To the rest I say, not the Lord: if any brother has an unbelieving wife (1 Cor. 7:12) and she departs... As for a case of unequal yoke, he further states: If an unbeliever chooses to leave, let him leave her (1 Cor. 7:15). At the same time, the Apostle Paul made it clear that no marriage can be unraveled by divine decree, and he did not offer guidance or sanction for the one who initiates the divorce, but he sought to alleviate the burden from the one who remains. This presents a moral understanding.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

He reverses their accusation, a tactic He frequently employs. He points out, due to your obstinacy, I permitted you to issue a certificate of divorce—this stems from various reasons cited by those who despised their wives and refused to seek reconciliation. He allowed this to protect them from potential harm. The rationale behind the issuance of divorce decrees is clearly articulated in the previously mentioned fifth chapter. He states that from the very beginning it was not intended to be this way; had God meant it to be so, He would not have created just one man and one woman nor commanded that they become one flesh.

Origen of Alexandria

3rd centuryChurch Father

Seeing the Lord thus tempted, let none of His disciples who is set to teach think it hard if he also be by some tempted. Howbeit, He replies to His tempters with the doctrines of piety.

Hilarius of Poitiers

4th centuryChurch Father

Also He cures the Galileans on the borders of Judæa, that He might admit the sins of the Gentiles to that pardon which was prepared for the Jews.

Rabanus Maurus

9th centuryChurch Father

Here then He begins to relate what He did, taught, or suffered in Judæa. At first beyond Jordan eastward, afterwards on this side Jordan when He came to Jericho, Bethphage, and Jerusalem; whence it follows, And He came into the coasts of Judæa beyond Jordan.

It should be known, that the whole territory of the Israelites was called Judæa, to distinguish it from other nations. But its southern portion, inhabited by the tribes of Judah and Benjamin, was called Judæa proper, to distinguish it from other districts in the same province as Samaria, Galilee, Decapolis, and the rest. It follows, And great multitudes followed him.

For by the wholesome design of God it was ordained that a man should have in the woman a part of his own body, and should not look upon as separate from himself that which he knew was formed out of himself.

Remigius of Auxerre

9th centuryChurch Father

The Apostle says that this is a mystery in Christ and the Church (Eph. 5:32.); for the Lord Jesus Christ left His Father when He came down from heaven to earth; and He left His mother, that is, the synagogue, because of its unbelief, and clave unto His wife, that is, the Holy Church, and they two are one flesh, that is, Christ and the Church are one body.

Abbot Panteleimon about the Trinity

19th centuryCommentator

HE SPEAKS TO THEM: Moses did not issue a command regarding divorce, as you claim, but merely allowed it. He did so not out of a desire to contradict God, but as a wise legislator. During his time, the best legal framework was not feasible; he recognized your harsh and unyielding nature, thus permitting you to divorce your wives to prevent you from causing destruction to those you wished to leave. These statements from the Lord were highly offensive and shameful to the Pharisees. To mitigate their impact, the Lord quickly refers back to the original, ancient law: It was not this way from the beginning. At the creation of the first humans, a union between one man and one woman established the prohibition against divorce.

Read more (82 words)

Had the law allowing divorce been the primary and beneficial statute, it would have been instituted from the outset. Hence, the original divine law of marriage does not permit divorce; this law, as ordained by God the Creator, stands as an eternal decree meant for all time and for all humanity, serving as the ultimate law applicable to everyone. After silencing the Pharisees with this response, the Lord, as the lawgiver of the New Covenant, powerfully reaffirms the foundational law of marriage:

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

Jesus’ discourse regarding marriage, divorce, and celibacy, particularly the theme of virginity, emerged from queries posed by the Pharisees and later by His disciples. This led to Jesus' clarifications concerning the permanence of marriage, emphasizing its unbreakable nature, as well as addressing the conditions surrounding divorce, particularly in cases of infidelity. This teaching is elaborated in the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5:31-32).

Kochomski S.W.

19th centuryCommentator

Moses permitted you to divorce your wives due to your hardened hearts, but this was not the divine intention from the beginning. Initially, the Creator, who established marriage, intended that what He had united would remain unbroken; the husband and wife, as one flesh, were to be together for life. However, as men became hard-hearted, they began to mistreat their wives, pushing them towards separation out of disdain and creating an atmosphere of fear and oppression. Recognizing that he could neither heal their obstinacy nor eliminate the wrongdoing, Moses chose instead to introduce a provision for divorce through a legal framework. This allowed a husband who bore animosity towards his wife to send her away, granting her the freedom to choose her own path and the right to remarry.

Read more (80 words)

While the sacred law of God remains constant, the challenge of wickedness has become pervasive, leading civil authorities to impose regulations to mitigate its effects. They seek to manage the situation by permitting some forms of lesser evils, tolerating the situation as long as it is visible and does not lead to greater destruction. Thus, there exists a noticeable distinction, yet not a contradiction, between divine law and civil law, with the root cause being the hardness of human hearts.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryCommentator

The Lord acknowledges that while the law of Moses does permit divorce, “it was not so at first.” This regulation was later introduced to address a specific and temporary issue, namely the “hard-heartedness” of the people (Deut. 10:16, Sir. 16:10, Acts 7:51, Rom. 2:5), marked by a lack of meekness, patience, and selflessness; “it is lawful to let wives go, lest they be killed” (Eph. Sig.). During the era of Moses, the practice of divorce was already deeply rooted among the Israelites, a people often described by God as hard-hearted and cruel through the prophets.

Read more (129 words)

Through Moses, God instituted this law to safeguard the rights of women, mandating that divorce could not be enacted in a moment of rage, but required a formal letter of divorce after one had regained composure and reflected on the situation. Nonetheless, this law did not prohibit divorce entirely due to the people's stubbornness. However, “it was not so at first”: the creation of one man and one woman, along with the original intention for marriage, stands in direct opposition to this practice. Christ does not castigate Moses for this decree, as it was divinely ordained; instead, He clarifies the intent of the ancient law, reiterating that “in the beginning it was not so,” meaning that initially, a law divergent from this one was established by divine act (Chrysostom).

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 20 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Λέγει
    legei
    I say
    G3004 · λέγω
  2. αὐτοῖς
    autois
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  3. Ὅτι
    hoti
    that
    G3754 · ὅτι
  4. Μωϋσῆς
    mōysēs
    Moses
    G3475 · Μωϋσῆς, Μωσῆς
  5. πρὸς
    pros
    to
    G4314 · πρός
  6. τὴν
    tēn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  7. σκληροκαρδίαν
    sklērokardian
    hardness of heart
    G4641 · σκληροκαρδία
  8. ὑμῶν
    hymōn
    you
    G4771 · σύ
  9. ἐπέτρεψεν
    epetrepsen
    I allow
    G2010 · ἐπιτρέπω
  10. ὑμῖν
    hymin
    you
    G4771 · σύ
  11. ἀπολῦσαι
    apolysai
    I release
    G630 · ἀπολύω
  12. τὰς
    tas
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  13. γυναῖκας
    gynaikas
    a woman
    G1135 · γυνή
  14. ὑμῶν
    hymōn
    you
    G4771 · σύ
  15. ἀπ᾽
    ap
    from
    G575 · ἀπό
  16. ἀρχῆς
    archēs
    ruler
    G746 · ἀρχή
  17. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  18. οὐ
    ou
    no
    G3756 · οὐ
  19. γέγονεν
    gegonen
    I come into being
    G1096 · γίνομαι
  20. οὕτως
    houtōs
    thus
    G3779 · οὕτω, οὕτως