John Chrysostom
"If I have repaid evil for evil," he states. Pay attention to these words; their significance is considerable. While it is commendable to be unoffended, it is far superior and more fitting for a discerning spirit to refrain from seeking vengeance. Although the law permitted retaliation, prescribing that one should respond to an eye with an eye and a tooth with a tooth (Deuteronomy 19:21), true wisdom leads one to rise above such limitations. Not only did he observe the law, but he also excelled it in many ways, understanding that mere adherence to commandments is not the essence of virtue. Just as the Apostle Paul, embracing the gospel, did not simply abide by it but boldly proclaimed it (1 Cor.
Read more (474 words)
9:14), so too did the revered David, who, despite the allowance for retribution within the law, transcended its boundaries. We are called not merely to abstain from avenging our adversaries, but also to show them kindness: "Pray for those who wrong you" and "do good to those who hate you," as the Lord instructed (Matthew 5:44). It is indeed a significant act for David to refrain from revenge, demonstrating a commitment far beyond the demands of the law; thus he inquires, "If I have done wrong, if there is injustice in my hands, if I have avenged myself against those who repay me with malice." Regarding his son, nature itself intervened; but he questions whether he has offended anyone or retaliated against others. What claim for forgiveness or justification can we present, when, after the arrival of Christ, we fail to reach the standard of those who lived in the earlier covenant, all while we are called to an even higher expectation? "For I say unto you," the Lord proclaimed, "except your righteousness exceed that of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall not enter the kingdom of heaven" (Matt. 5:20). Just as a person who lived under the law and did good cannot be equated with one who lived before the law yet did the same, so too is the individual living under grace not equivalent to one under the law; there exists a profound distinction between the two eras.
St. Paul, elaborating on this concerning vice and virtue, expressed amazement at some individuals, deeming others deserving of sterner judgment: "When the Gentiles," he says, "who do not have the law, by nature perform the things contained in the law, these, having no law, are a law unto themselves" (Rom. 2:14). Observe how he commends those who do good without the law. He regards those who sin under grace as more deserving of penalty compared to those who sin while under the law: "He who disregards the law of Moses," he asserts, "in the presence of two or three witnesses, is without mercy put to death; how much worse punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?" (Hebrews 10:28, 29). Those who transgressed prior to the law, he considers less liable than those who break the law: "For as many as have sinned without the law shall also perish without the law,” meaning they will face a lighter penalty, lacking the law as their accuser, only nature serving that role; “but those who have sinned under the law shall be judged by the law," indicating a stricter punishment due to the law as their accuser in addition to nature (Rom. 2:12).